Molecular spectroscopy
Guest
|
W@DIS
Energy levels
Data Search, Comparison and Export
Energy levels Multiset
States and Energy levels Plots
Transitions
Data search and comparison
Graphical representation of transitions
Line Profiles
Data Search and Comparison
3-atomic molecules ontologies
Molecular states and transitions ontologies
Molecular vibrational states and band ontologies
Information resources of 3-atomic molecules ontologies
Metadata
Applications
Transitions
Transition Multiset
Binary relation of sources
Tables for taking into account the Hartmann-Tran profiles in the H2O spectra calculations
References
Monographs
Proceedings or books of selected articles (abstracts)
Articles
Links
Info
Monographs
Microwave spectroscopy
1. ВОЗНИКНОВЕНИЕ
2. НЕМНОГО ОПРЕДЕЛЕНИЙ
3. КАК ЭТО ДЕЛАЕТСЯ
4. МОЛЕКУЛА И АТОМ ГЛАЗАМИ МИКРОВОЛНОВОЙ СПЕКТРОСКОПИИ
5. НЕСКОЛЬКО НОВЫХ НАПРАВЛЕНИЙ
6. СПЕКТРОСКОПИИ НЕТ КОНЦА
ЛИТЕРАТУРА
High resolution spectroscopy methods, Tomsk, 2003 (in Russian)
1.ИЗМЕРЯЕМЫЕ ВЕЛИЧИНЫ
1.1. Энергетические состояния молекул
1.2. Тепловое распределение заселенности квантовых состояний
1.3. Интенсивность линии и коэффициент поглощения
1.4. Контур спектральной линии
1.5. Характеристики спектральной аппаратуры
2. КЛАССИЧЕСКИЕ СПЕКТРОМЕТРЫ
2.1. Дифракционные спектрометры
2.2. Схемы дифракционных спектрометров
2.3. Акустооптические спектрометры
2.4. Интерферометр Фабри-Перо
3. ФУРЬЕ-СПЕКТРОСКОПИЯ
3.1. Основы Фурье-спектроскопии
3.2. Ошибки в Фурье-спектроскопии
4. ЛАЗЕРНЫЕ СПЕКТРОМЕТРЫ
4.1. Лазерные спектрофотометры
4.2. Лазерные спектрометры с воздушным промежутком в резонаторе
4.3. Лазерный спектрофотометр с диодным лазером
4.4. Многоходовые лазерные кюветы
4.5. Внутрирезонаторная лазерная спектроскопия
4.6. Метод затухания излучения в резонаторе (ЗИР-спектроскопия)
4.7. Оптико-акустическая спектроскопия
5. МЕТОДЫ ОБРАБОТКИ ДАННЫХ
5.1. Синхронное детектирование
5.2. Корреляционная спектроскопия
5.3. Метод производной
6. АНАЛИТИЧЕСКИЕ ВОЗМОЖНОСТИ СПЕКТРАЛЬНОЙ АППАРАТУРЫ
6.1. Метод протяженной трассы с высоким спектральным разрешением
6.2. Затменное зондирование с борта космического аппарата
6.3. Затменное зондирование с поверхности Земли
6.4. Метод протяженной трассы с низким спектральным разрешением
ЗАКЛЮЧЕНИЕ
Литература
Introduction in the theory of vibration-rotational spectroscopy (in Russian)
ГЛАВА 1. Нормальные координаты, ...
1.1 Приближение Борна – Оппенгеймера
1.2 Система координат и нормальные колебательные координаты
1.3. Гамильтониан трехатомной молекулы в естественных координатах
ГЛАВА 2. Операторная теория возмущений
2.1. Эффективный вращательный гамильтониан
Молекулярные столкновения и спектры атмосферных газов
Аннотация
ОГЛАВЛЕНИЕ
Введение
Уширение линий
Радиационное уширение
Допплеровское уширение
Совместное действие двух механизмов
Уширение линий столкновениями
Механизмы возмущения
Возможные приближения
Корреляционные функции
Общие соотношения в теории контура
Соотношения симметрии
Форма линий в адиабатическом приближении
Теория Андерсона
Метод Робера–Бонами
Интерференция линий
Пространство Лиувилля
Релаксационный оператор
Модель сильных столкновений
Модель варьируемого взаимодействия ветвей
Эффекты в центральной части полосы
Крылья полос
Квазистатическое приближение
Учет неадиабатичности
Эффект Дике
Индуцированные спектры
Механизмы индукции дипольного момента
Характерные черты индуцированных полос
Бинарные и многочастичные эффекты
Спектральные моменты полос
Бинарное приближение
Трансляционные спектры
Вращательные спектры
Колебательно-вращательные спектры
Одновременные переходы
Атмосферные наблюдения
Spectroscopy of intermolecular interaction. Nonlinear effects (in Russian)
Molecular Spectroscopy
Water Structure and Behavior
Links
Organisations, people, groups, ...
Conferences
Journals
Projects
WICS
Databases
Software
HITRAN
Molecules
Isotopologues
Rus
|
Eng
|
..
Up
List of composite figures
Graphical Resources Statistics
Functions and arguments
Цитируемые графики
Статистика качества цитируемых графиков
Detailed CO2 statistics
Scrolling of collection of published spectral plots
Molecular Spectroscopy (W@DIS)
»
Graphical resources
»
Plots and figures representing spectral data on the continuous absorption of water and the properties of the complexes
» List of composite and primitive plots
Primitive or composite plot search using article list
Select primitive plot
-------------------
Figure 1. a
Figure 1. Optical thickness of water vapour (220K)
Figure 1. Optical thickness of water vapour (300K)
Figure 2. Elsasser W.M. (1938)
Figure 2. Experimental data
Figure 2. Fitting
Figure 1. a
Figure 4. Experiment (10 g/m³)
Figure 4. Experiment (50 g/m³)
Figure 4. Fitting (10 g/m³)
Figure 4. Fitting (50 g/m³)
Figure 1. a
Figure 1. b
Figure 1. c
Figure 1. d
Figure 1. a
Figure 1. b
Figure 1. c
Figure 1. d
Figure 1. e
Figure 1. f
Figure 1. g
Figure 1. h
Figure 1. i
Figure 1. The Absorption Spectra of Water Vapor
Figure 3. Water vapor atmospheric absorption coefficient. Experiment
Figure 3. Water vapor atmospheric absorption coefficient. Theory
Figure 1. Contour of the induced infrared absorption of hydrogen (T=80K)
Figure 1. Contour of the induced infrared absorption of hydrogen (T=300K)
Figure 7. Range 1-5.5 mkm
Figure 7. Range 7.5-14 mkm
Figure 1. a
Figure 1. a
Figure 1. b
Figure 1. c
Figure 1. d
Figure 1. e
Figure 1. f
Figure 1. g
Figure 1. h
Figure 1. i
Figure 2. Adel A. (1939) (700-1200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Elsasser W.M. (1952) (300K, 500-1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Present measurements (800-1100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. a
Figure 1a
Figure 1. Absorption coefficients of water vapor (1250-1850 A)
Figure 1. a
Figure 2
Figure 1a
Figure 1. a
Figure 1. b
Figure 1a
Figure 1. a
Figure 1. b
Figure 11
Figure 1a
Figure 1a
Figure 4a. Absorption (%). Path length 1320 m
Figure 4a. Absorption (%). Path length 176 m
Figure 4a. Absorption (%). Path length 352 m
Figure 4a. Absorption (%). Path length 704 m
Figure 4a. Absorption (%). Path length 88 m
Figure 4b. Absorption (%). Total pressure 125 mm Hg
Figure 4b. Absorption (%). Total pressure 2 mm Hg
Figure 4b. Absorption (%). Total pressure 25 mm Hg
Figure 4b. Absorption (%). Total pressure 302 mm Hg
Figure 4b. Absorption (%). Total pressure 60 mm Hg
Figure 4b. Absorption (%). Total pressure 740 mm Hg
Figure 4c. Absorption (%). Partial pressure H₂O 16.3 mm Hg
Figure 4c. Absorption (%). Partial pressure H₂O 2 mm Hg
Figure 4c. Absorption (%). Partial pressure H₂O 5 mm Hg
Figure 4c. Absorption (%). Partial pressure H
2
O 10 mm Hg
Figure 4d. Absorption (%). Path length 704 m
Figure 4d. Absorption (%). Path length 352 m
Figure 1a
Figure 3. 4.3 mkm band. Calculation
Figure 3. 4.3 mkm band. Experiment
Figure 1. Elsasser W.M. et al. (1953). Absorption coefficient for the 15 mkm band of CO₂
Figure 1. Kaplan L.D. (1952). Absorption coefficient for the 15 mkm band of CO₂
Figure 4. Calc. (50 pr. cm)
Figure 4. Calc. (10 pr. cm)
Figure 4. Calc. (3 pr. cm)
Figure 4. Exp. (1.68 pr. cm)
Figure 4. Exp. ( 1.29 pr. cm)
Figure 4. Exp. (0.04 pr. cm)
Figure 4. Exp. (0.09 pr. cm)
Figure 4. Exp. (0.17 pr. cm)
Figure 4. Exp. (0.34 pr. cm)
Figure 4. Exp. (0.60 pr. cm)
Figure 4. Exp. (1.03 pr. cm)
Figure 4. Exp. (1.12 pr. cm)
Figure 1. Bottom curve
Figure 1. Center curve
Figure 1. Top curve
Figure 1a
Figure 1a
Figure 1. a
Figure 1. b
Figure 2. a
Figure 2. b
Figure 8. k₁. Vigroux, F. (1959)
Figure 5. Interpolation between 5 frequences
Figure 5. Present experiment
Figure 1. Low-resolution spectra of the 15-, 10.4-, and 9.4-mkm bands of CO₂. T=530R
Figure 1. low-resolution spectra of the 15-, 10.4-, and 9.4-mkm bands of CO₂, T=1500R
Figure 2. Low-resolution spectra of the 5.2-, 4.8-, and 4.3-mkm bands of CO₂. T=1500 R
Figure 2. Low-resolution spectra of the 5.2-, 4.8-, and 4.3-mkm bands of CO₂. T=530 R
Figure 3. Low-resolution spectra of the 2.7- and 2.0-mkm bands of CO₂ T=1500R
Figure 3. Low-resolution spectra of the 2.7- and 2.04-mkm bands of CO₂ T=530R
Figure 1a
Figure 4. Absorption coefficients of hot CO₂. Experiment
Figure 4. Absorption coefficients of hot CO₂
Figure 5. Absorption coefficients of CO₂. T=1220K. Experiment
Figure 5. Absorption coefficients of CO₂. T=1220K
Figure 1a
Figure 2a. Curve
Figure 2a. Line
Figure 2a.The frequency dependence of the absorption coefficient α for nitrogen (curve B)
Figure 2a.The frequency dependence of the absorption coefficient α for oxygen (curve A)
Figure 6. Absorption coefficients of the v₃ CO₂ band at 1200K
Figure 6. Absorption coefficients of the v₃ CO₂ band at 1600K
Figure 6. Absorption coefficients of the v₃ CO₂ band at 2000K
Figure 6. Absorption coefficients of the v₃ CO₂ band at 2400K
Figure 7. Absorption coefficients of the v₃ CO₂ band at 1400K
Figure 7. Absorption coefficients of the v₃ CO₂ band at 1800K
Figure 7. Absorption coefficients of the v₃ CO₂ band at 2200K
Figure 1. O₂+N₂ mixture
Figure 1. Pure O₂
Figure 1a
Figure 4. Watanabe, et al. (1953). Absorption coefficient of H2O
Figure 4a
Figure 1. Calculation using J.H. Van Vleck profile
Figure 1. Our calculation
Figure 11. Calculation using J.H. Van Vleck profile
Figure 11. Our calculation
Figure 15. Calculation using J.H. Van Vleck profile
Figure 15. Our calculation
Figure 8. Calculation using J.H. Van Vleck profile
Figure 8. Our calculation
Figure 1a
Figure 1a
Figure 1a
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1. Burch Darrell E., et al. (1962). Experiment P=15.6 mmHg
Figure 1. The theoretical calculations of the transmittance. P=15.6 mm Hg
Figure 2. Burch Darrell E., et al. (1962). Experiment P=137 mmHg
Figure 2. The theoretical calculations of the transmittance. P=137 mm Hg
Figure 3. Burch Darrell E., et al. (1962). Experiment P=542 mmHg
Figure 3. The theoretical calculations of the transmittance. P=542 mm Hg
Figure 2. Calculated Lorentz absorption
Figure 2. Calculated modified Lorentz absorption
Table 2. Experimental absorption CO₂+CO₂
Figure 2. Experimental absorption CO₂
Table 3. Experimental absorption CO₂+N₂ ( p=1.25 atm)
Table 3. Experimental absorption CO₂+N₂ (p=0.25 atm)
Table 3. Experimental absorption CO₂+N₂ (p=0.5 atm)
Figure 3. P=0.25 atm. CO₂+N₂.
Figure 3. P=0.5 atm. CO₂+N₂
Figure 3. P=1.25 atm. CO₂+N₂
Figure 3. Self broadened curve
Table 4. p=0.25 atm. CO₂+O₂
Figure 4. P=0.25 atm. CO₂+O₂
Figure 4. P=0.5 atm. CO₂+O₂
Figure 4. P=1.25 atm. CO₂+O₂
Figure 4. Self broadened curve
Table 4. p=0.5 atm. CO₂+O₂
Table 4. p=1.25 atm. CO₂+O₂
Figure 2. J.H. Van Vleck
Figure 2. Our results
Figure 3. Becker, G.E., et al. (1946)
Figure 3. Bell Telephone Lab.
Figure 3. D.J.H.Wort (1962)
Figure 3. J.H. Van Vleck calculation
Figure 3. Our calculation
Figure 3. R.H.Dicke, et al. (1946)
Figure 3. Salomonovich A.E., et al. (1960)
Figure 3. The University of Texas
Figure 3. Zhevakin S.A., et al. (1958)
Figure 4. Our calculation
Figure 4. A.E.Salomonovich, et al. (1960)
Figure 4. Bell Telephone
Figure 4. D.J.H.Wort (1962)
Figure 4. E.Wolf, et al. (1962)
Figure 4. S.A.Zhevakin, et al. (1958)
Figure 4. Texas University
Figure 7. Spectral absorption coefficient
Figure 1a
Figure 1a
Figure 14-Presenr results
Figure 14. Heasty, R., et al. (1962)
Figure 14. N₂ spectrum
Figure 14. Theoretical
Figure 15. Heastie, R., et al. (1962)
Figure 15. Present results
Figure 12. Golay Detector
Figure 12. In-Ge Detector
Figure 16. (Thick gas) calculation (a=0.0281)
Figure 16. (Thick gas) calculation (a=0.0351)
Figure 16. (Thin gas) calculation
Figure 16. K.E. Nelson (1959). Experimental data
Figure 17. (Thick gas) calculation (a = 0.0482)
Figure 17. (Thick gas) calculation (a = 0.241)
Figure 17. (Thin gas) calculation
Figure 17. Nelson. Experimental data
Figure 18. (Thick gas) calculation (0.295)
Figure 18. (Thick gas) calculation (a=0.059)
Figure 18. (Thin gas) calculation
Figure 18. Nelson (1959). Experimental data
Figure 2. The fundamental absorption band of O₂
Figure 2. The oxygen-argon mixture, p[Ar] = 56.9 Amagats
Figure 2. The oxygen-nitrogen mixture. p[N₂]=56 Amagats
Figure 2. d
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 1a
Figure 1a
Figure 1. a
Figure 1. b
Figure 1. c
Figure 6. 7.5 mm of H₂O, 750 mm of a hypothetical broadener similar to H₂O
Figure 6. AC (H₂O + CO₂). (7.5 mm (H₂O), 750 mm (CO₂), 100-300 GHz)
Figure 6. AC (H₂O + N₂) (7.5 mm (H₂O), 750 mm (N₂), 100-300 GHz)
Figure 6. AC (H₂O). (7.5 mm (H₂O), 750 mm (N₂), 100-300 GHz) (Van Fleck, calculated)
Figure 6. C.W. Tolbert, et al. (1958) (144.38 GHz)
Figure 6. This work (120-300 Gc, 750 mm)
Figure 6. This work (150-300 Gc, 750 mm)
Figure 4. Measurements by the varying humidity
Figure 4. S.A. Zhevakin et al. (1963)
Figure 4. Varying distance method
Figure 1. Experimental values of the absorption coefficient
Figure 1. Theoretical values of the absorption coefficient
Figure 3. Absorption coefficient of atmospheric water vapor dimers
Figure 3. Absorption coefficient of water dimers. Experiment
Figure 4. Absorption coefficient of atmospheric water vapor monomers (Calculation)
Figure 4. Absorption coefficient of atmospheric water vapor monomers. (Experiment)
Figure 1. Calculation
Figure 1. Experiment (Texas University) (1959, 1960, 1961)
Figure 1. Experiment. D.J.H.Wort (1962)
Figure 1. Experiment. M.Cohn, et al (1963)
Figure 1. a. Experiment, distance variation, NIRFI (1963)
Figure 1. a. Experiment, humidity variation, NIRFI (1964)
Figure 1. b. Experiment, distance variation, NIRFI (1964)
Figure 1. b. Experiment, humidity variation, NIRFI (1964)
Figure 1. c. Experiment, humidity variation, NIRFI (1964)
Figure 5. G. Birnbaum, et al. (1962)
Figure 5. H. A. Gebbie, et al. (1963)
Figure 5. L. Frenkel, et al. (1966)
Figure 5. Rotational Line Shape
Figure 5. This work (Theory)
Figure 5. This work
Figure 5. Translational Line Shape
Figure 1a
Figure 1a
Figure 2. Absorption coefficient of water dimers in Earth's atmosphere
Figure 2. Absorption coefficient of water monomer in Earth's atmosphere
Figure 1. Calculations using method of C. B. Ludwig et al.
Figure 1. K.E.Nelson (1959)
Figure 1. Our calculations
Figure 1. Our measurement (2 atm)
Figure 1. Our measurement (20 atm)
Figure 1. Our measurement (25 atm)
Figure 1a
Figure 1a
Figure 1a
Figure 1a
Figure 8. M. Schurgers et al. (1968)
Figure 4. Atmospheric water wapour. (Experiment)
Figure 4. Fitting
Figure 4. Absorption coefficient (CO₂+CO₂, 3770-4100 cm⁻¹). Approximation
Figure 4. Absorption coefficient (CO₂+CO₂, 3770-4100 cm⁻¹). Experiment
Figure 4. Absorption coefficient (CO₂+N₂, 3770-4100 cm⁻¹). Approximation
Figure 4. Absorption coefficient (CO₂+N₂, 3770-4100 cm⁻¹). Experiment
Figure 4. Calculated absorption coefficient (W. S. Benedict line parameters) (300K, 0-35 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Calculated absorption coefficient. (W. S. Benedict line parameters) (300K, 0-35 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Calculated absorption coefficient. (W. S. Benedict line parameters) (300K, 0-35 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Frenkel, R.L. et al. (1966) (0.8-10 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. G.E. Becker, et al. (1946) (0.6-1.15 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Hall J.T. (1967) (300K, 0-35 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Present work (300K, 13-35 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Straiton, A.W. et al. (1960) (0.5-5 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Absorption coefficient (296K, 0-35 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Absorption coefficient (296K, 0.1 atm, 0-35 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Continuum. (296K, 0-35 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Sample1-Experiment (18-36 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Sample1-Th-A (18-36 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Sample1-Th-B (18-36 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6a. Sample2-Experiment
Figure 6a. Sample2-Th-C
Figure 6a. Sample2-Th-D
Figure 6a. Sample2-Th-E
Figure 6b. Sample3-Exp (18-36 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6b. Sample3-Th-F (18-36 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6b. Sample3-Th-G (18-36 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6c. Sample4-Exp (18-36 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6c. Sample4-Th-H (18-36 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6c. Sample4-Th-J (18-36 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. T'(v)
Figure 7. T
calc
(v)
Figure 7. The observed data
Figure 2. Water absorption coefficient (400K, 600-1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Water absorption coefficient (450K, 600-1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Water absorption coefficient (500K, 600-1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Water absorption coefficient (460K, 600-1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Water absorption coefficient (480K, 600-1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Water absorption coefficient (500K, 600-1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1a
Figure 6. The empirical profile
Figure 6. The fitted curve
Figure 6a. The empirical profile
Figure 6a. The fitted curve
Figure 7. The experimental data
Figure 7. The fitted curve
Figure 7. The individual component of the left peak
Figure 7. The individual component of the right peak
Figure 7. The sum of dashed curves
Figure 7a. The experimental data (300K, 9200-9800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7a. The individual component (1)
Figure 7a. The individual component (2)
Figure 7a. The sum the individual components
Figure 1. Absorbance of O₂. (300K, 15600-16200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Absorbance of O₂. (87K, 15600-16200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. The lower spectrum
Figure 2. The upper spectrum
Figure 1. 7.5 cm⁻¹ new feature
Figure 1. 14.9 cm⁻¹ monomeric absorption
Figure 1. A dimeric origin for the quadratic absorption
Figure 1. Least-squares fits to the data
Figure 2. Experiment
Figure 2. Theory
Figure 1a
Figure 1. Spectral curve. Sample A. (7000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Spectral curve. Sample B. (7000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Spectral curve. Sample C. (7000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10. Mixture CO₂+Ar. Exp. (2400-2570 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10. Mixture CO₂+Ar. Theor. (2400-2570 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10. Mixture CO₂+N₂. Exp. (2400-2570 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10. Mixture CO₂+N₂. Theor. (2400-2570 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10. Mixture CO₂. Exp. (2400-2570 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10. Mixture CO₂. Theor. (2400-2570 cm⁻¹)
Figure 11. Pure CO₂. (T=296K, 7000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 11. Pure CO₂. (T=431K, 7000 cm⁻¹) Case 1
Figure 11. Pure CO₂. (T=431K, 7000 cm⁻¹) Case 2
Figure 12. Mixture CO₂+He. (T=296K, 7000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 12. Mixture CO₂+N₂. (T=296K, 7000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 12. Mixture CO₂+N₂. (T=431K, 7000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 12.Pure CO₂. (T=296K, 7000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 13. Mixture CO₂+Ar. (3800 cm⁻¹, T=296K)
Figure 13. Mixture CO₂+H₂. (3800 cm⁻¹, T=296K)
Figure 13. Mixture CO₂+He. (3800 cm⁻¹, T=296K)
Figure 13. Mixture CO₂+N₂. (3800 cm⁻¹, T=296K)
Figure 13. Mixture CO₂+O₂. (3800 cm⁻¹, T=296K)
Figure 13. Pure CO₂. (3800 cm⁻¹, T=296K)
Figure 14. Сorrection factor of the Lorentz line shape. CO₂+Ar. (2400 cm⁻¹, T=296K)
Figure 14. Сorrection factor of the Lorentz line shape. CO₂+N₂. (2400 cm⁻¹, T=296K)
Figure 14. Сorrection factor of the Lorentz line shape. CO₂. (2400 cm⁻¹, T=296K)
Figure 15. b. Calculated results
Figure 15a. 1
Figure 15a. 2
Figure 15b. Experimental results
Figure 15b. Values calculated on the basis of the same correction factor (a0=0.092 cm⁻¹)
Figure 16a. Curve A
Figure 16a. Curve B
Figure 16a. Curve C
Figure 16a. Curve D
Figure 16a. Curve E
Figure 16b. A. Experiment
Figure 16b. Calculation with contour A
Figure 16b. Calculation with contour B
Figure 16b. Calculation with contour C
Figure 16b. Calculation with contour D
Figure 16b. Calculation with contour E
Figure 2. Spectral curve in the 3800 cm⁻¹. Sample A. Estimated contribution
Figure 2. Spectral curve in the 3800 cm⁻¹. Sample A
Figure 2. Spectral curve in the 3800 cm⁻¹. Sample B
Figure 2. Spectral curve in the 3800 cm⁻¹. Sample C. Estimated contribution
Figure 2. Spectral curve in the 3800 cm⁻¹. Sample C
Figure 3. Spectral curve in the 2400 cm⁻¹. Sample A
Figure 3. Spectral curve in the 2400 cm⁻¹. Sample B
Figure 4. P branch
Figure 4. R branch
Figure 5. Spectral curve. Sample A
Figure 5. Spectral curve. Sample B
Figure 5. Spectral curve. Sample C
Figure 5. Spectral curve. Sample D
Figure 6. Approximation of experimental results
Figure 6. Band head
Figure 6. Sample having the following total pressures =< 2 atm
Figure 6. Sample having the following total pressures ~ 8 - 10 atm
Figure 6. The Lorentz curve
Figure 6. The WSB curve represents calculated results based on the WSB line shape
Figure 6. The sample having the following total pressure 15 atm
Figure 7. Mixture CO₂+He. Exp. (6990-7010 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Mixture CO₂+He. Theor. (6990-7010 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Mixture CO₂+N₂. Exp. (6990-7010 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Mixture CO₂+N₂. Theor. (6990-7010 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Mixture CO₂. Exp. (6990-7010 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Mixture CO₂. Theor. (6990-7010 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. CO₂+CO₂ (3770 - 4100 cm⁻¹). Approximation
Figure 8. CO₂+CO₂ (3770 - 4100 cm⁻¹). Experiment
Figure 8. CO₂+N₂ (3770 - 4100 cm⁻¹). Approximation
Figure 8. CO₂+N₂ (3770 - 4100 cm⁻¹). Experiment
Figure 9. CO₂+Ar (3770 - 3860 cm⁻¹). Approximation
Figure 9. CO₂+Ar (3770 - 3860 cm⁻¹). Experiment
Figure 9. CO₂+CO₂ (3770 - 3860 cm⁻¹). Approximation
Figure 9. CO₂+H₂ (3770 - 3860 cm⁻¹). Approximation
Figure 9. CO₂+H₂ (3770 - 3860 cm⁻¹). Experiment
Figure 9. CO₂+He (3770 - 3860 cm⁻¹). Approximation
Figure 9. CO₂+He (3770 - 3860 cm⁻¹). Experiment
Figure 9. CO₂+N₂ (3770 - 3860 cm⁻¹). Approximation
Figure 9. CO₂+O₂ (3770 - 3860 cm⁻¹). Approximation
Figure 9. CO₂+O₂ (3770 - 3860 cm⁻¹). Experiment
Figure 6. Experiment
Figure 6. Present calculation
Figure 6. Stull V.R., et al. (1965). Calculation
Figure 1a
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1. Transmittance (243K, 6600-7500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Transmittance (303K, 6600-7500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Transmittance (393K, 6600-7500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1a. (243K)
Figure 1a. (303K)
Figure 1a. (393K)
Figure 3. (353.15K, w=10 oc.cm)
Figure 3. (353.15K, w=2.5 oc.cm)
Figure 3. (393.15K, w=10 oc.cm)
Figure 3. (393.15K, w=2.5 oc.cm)
Figure 1b. (o=0.55 oc.cm)
Figure 1b. (o=10 oc.cm)
Figure 1b. (o=2.5 oc.cm)
Figure 4. (Calculation. o=10 oc.cm)
Figure 4. (Calculation. o=2.5 oc.cm)
Figure 4. (Experiment. o=2.5 oc.cm)
Figure 4. Experiment. o=10 oc.cm. Moskalenko N.I. (1969)
Figure 1a
Figure 1a
Figure 1. Water absorption spectra. N.Wainfan, et al. (1966)
Figure 1. Water absorption spectra. P.H. Metzger et al. (1964)
Figure 1. Water absorption spectra
Figure 2a
Figure 10. Approximation (296K, 600-1300 mkm)
Figure 10. Approximation (358K, 600-1300 mkm)
Figure 10. Approximation (388K, 600-1300 mkm)
Figure 10. Present experiment (296K, 600-1300 mkm)
Figure 10. Present experiment (358K, 600-1300 mkm)
Figure 10. Present experiment (388K, 600-1300 mkm)
Figure 4. Bolle, H. J. (1964) (Beer Sheva)
Figure 4. Bolle, H. J. (1964) (Munich)
Figure 4. Bolle, H. J. (1964) (S.Agata)
Figure 4. Bolle, H. J. (1964) (Yungfraujoch)
Figure 4. Present work (extrapolated)
Figure 4. Present work
Figure 8. H. Bolle, et al. (1963)
Figure 8. K. Bignell, et al. (1963). k₁.
Figure 8. k₁. Anthony, R. (1952)
Figure 8. k₁. Bolle, (1964)
Figure 8. k₁. Palmer, C. H. Jr. (1957)
Figure 8. k₁. Roach, W.T., et al. ( 1958)
Figure 8. k₁. Roach, W.T., et al. (1958)
Figure 8. k₁. Taylor and Yates (1957)
Figure 8. k₁. Vigroux, F. (1959)
Figure 8. k₁. Yates et al. (1960)
Figure 8. k₂. Palmer, C. H. Jr. (1957)
Figure 8. k₂. Present work
Figure 1. Ar+H₂O (248K)
Figure 1. Ar+H₂O (298K)
Figure 1. a
Figure 1. (b) CO₂+CO¹⁸O (192K)
Figure 1. (c) Free-free collisions
Figure 1. (d)=(b)-(c)
Figure 1. Observed spectrum CO₂ (192K)
Figure 1a. v₁
d
band
Table 2a. Absorption coefficient of the CO₂ continuum
Table 2b. Cross section of the CO₂ continuum
Figure 5. Absorption coefficients of CO₂. (1960-2170 A)
Figure 5.Absorption coefficients of CO₂ in the region 1880-2160 A
Figure 6. Absorption coefficients of CO₂. (1800-1850 A)
Figure 6. Absorption coefficients of CO₂. (1840-1885 A)
Figure 7. Absorption coefficients of CO₂. (1720-1780 A)
Figure 7. Absorption coefficients of CO₂. (1760-1820 A)
Figure 8. Absorption cross sections of CO₂ continuum. Computation
Figure 8. Absorption cross sections of CO₂ continuum. Experiment
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1c
Figure 1a
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 2. Spectral transmittance. p= 14.6 atm, L=32.9 m
Figure 2. Spectral transmittance. p=3.70 atm, L=32.9 m
Figure 1. 2400 cm⁻¹. Approximated data
Figure 1. 2400 cm⁻¹. Interpolated data
Figure 1. 2400 cm⁻¹. Original data
Figure 1. 2450 cm⁻¹. Approximated data
Figure 1. 2450 cm⁻¹. Interpolated data
Figure 1. 2450 cm⁻¹. Original data
Figure 1. 2500 cm⁻¹. Approximated data
Figure 1. 2500 cm⁻¹. Interpolated data
Figure 1. 2500 cm⁻¹. Original data
Figure 1. 2550 cm⁻¹. Approximated data
Figure 1. 2550 cm⁻¹. Interpolated data
Figure 1. 2550 cm⁻¹. Original data
Figure 1. 2600 cm⁻¹. Approximated data
Figure 1. 2600 cm⁻¹. Interpolated data
Figure 1. 2600 cm⁻¹. Original data
Figure 2. Approximated curve (338K, 2400-2829cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Approximated curve (384K, 2400-2829cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Approximated curve (428K, 2400-2829cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Experimental points (338K, 2400-2829cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Experimental points (384K, 2400-2829cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Experimental points (428K, 2400-2829cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Extrapolated curve (296K, 2400-2829cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Extrapolated curve (296K, 2400-2829cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Experiment (233K, 0-250 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Experiment (296K, 0-250 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Far-infrared spectrum (233K, 0-250 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Fitting (296K, 0-250 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. The profile of the bar spectrum
Figure 2
Figure 3. Experiment (333K, 0-220 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Fitting (333K, 0-220 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Experimental (87.4K, 1400-1750 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Theoretical result with the doublet. (87.4K, 1400-1750 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Theoretical. (87.4K, 1400-1750 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Absorption profiles of the v₁ band at 296K
Figure 1. Absorption profiles of the v₁ band at 474K
Figure 4. Calculated absorption (1200-1600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Observed absorption (1200-1600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. M.M.Shapiro, et al. (1966)
Figure 1. Present work
Figure 1. Shapiro, M. M. (1960)
Figure 3. Absorption coefficient of O₂. (1.06 mkm; 2.91 amagat; 90K)
Figure 3. Absorption coefficient of O₂. (1.06 mkm; 4.98 amagat; 112K)
Figure 3a. O₂ (1.26 mkm; 2.91 amagat; 90K)
Figure 3a. O₂ (1.26 mkm; 4.98 amagat; 112K)
Figure 4. Absorption coefficient of O₂. (5770 A; 2.66 amagat; 90K)
Figure 4. Absorption coefficient of O₂. (5770 A; 4.42 amagat; 295K)
Figure 4. Absorption coefficient of O₂. (5770 A; 5.61 amagat; 113K)
Figure 4a. O₂ (6290 A; 2.66 amagat; 90K)
Figure 4a. O₂ (6290 A; 4.42 amagat; 295K)
Figure 4a. O₂ (6290 A; 5.61 amagat; 113K)
Figure 5. Absorption coefficient (113K, 20760-20300 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Absorption coefficient (295K, 20760-20300 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Absorption coefficient (90K, 20760-20300 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1a
Figure 1. A.A.Viktorova et al. (1970) (6-9 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Calculation of total AC for water monomer and dimer (6-9 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Experimental data (6-9 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. H₂O monomer (293K, 6-9 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Bastin, J.A. (1966) (293K, 6-9 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Cohn, M., et al. (1963) (293K, 7.5 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Dryageen, et al. (1966) (293K, 6-7.5 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Frenkel, L. et al. (1966) (293K, 9 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Gaitskell, J.N., et al. (1969) (293K, 7.4 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Malyshenko Yu.I. (1969) (293K, 7.4 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Our calculation
Figure 2. Our experiment
Figure 2. Ryadov, V. Y., et al. (1966) (293K, 8.6-8.9 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Experimental data
Figure 3. Theoretical values
Figure 4. Experitmental values
Figure 4. Theoretical values
Figure 5. Calculated values of the resultant absorption coefficient
Figure 5. Calculation for H₂O monomers
Figure 5. Experimental values
Figure 5. Fitting
Figure 2. (He + C₂H₆) Calculated spectrum
Figure 2. (He + C₂H₆) Experimental result
Figure 2. (He + CH₄) Calculated spectrum
Figure 2. (He + CH₄) Experimental result
Figure 2. (He + CO₂) Calculated spectrum
Figure 2. (He + CO₂) Experimental result
Figure 2. (He + N₂) Calculated spectrum
Figure 2. (He + N₂) Experimental result
Figure 1. Yurganov L.P., et al. (1972)
Figure 1. Water vapour transmittance. (P=158 Bar)
Figure 1. Water vapour transmittance. (P=2.8 Bar)
Figure 1. Water vapour transmittance. (P=27.5 Bar)
Figure 1. Water vapour transmittance. (P=76 Bar)
Figure 1. Water vapour transmittance. (P=8.7 Bar)
Figure 2. Optical density (350C, 158 Bar, 3100-4100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Optical density (350C, 28 Bar, 3100-4100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. WD dimers. Optical density (350C, 158 Bar, 3100-4100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Water monomers. Optical density (350C, 158 Bar, 3100-4100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 11. Kinetic line shape equation
Figure 11. Van Vleck line shape
Figure 11. Kinetic line shape equation
Figure 11. Kinetic line shape equation
Figure 11. Measurement
Figure 11. Modification takes into account Benedict parameter
Figure 11. Van Vleck line shape
Figure 11. Van Vleck line shape
Figure 1. M.M.Shapiro et al. (1966)
Figure 1b
Figure 1c
Figure 2. R.P. Blickensderfer, et al. (1969) (300K, 17000-17800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. The visible spectra of oxygen gas (87.3K, 17000-17800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. The visible spectra of oxygen gas at 87.3K
Figure 1a
Figure 2. The total absorption (σ
T
)
Figure 2b
Figure 3a
Figure 3b
Figure 1. Calculation on dispersion contour
Figure 1. Calculation on modified dispersion contour
Figure 1. Calculation on statistical contour
Figure 1. The results of this work (p=0.25 atm)
Figure 1. The results of this work (p=0.5 atm)
Figure 1. The results of this work (p=1.25 atm)
Figure 1. Winters B.H., et al. (1964). Experimental data (p=0.25 atm)
Figure 1. Winters B.H., et al. (1964). Experimental data (p=0.5 atm)
Figure 1. Winters B.H., et al. (1964). Experimental data (p=1.25 atm)
Figure 1. Calculation based on the dispersion contour
Figure 1. Calculation based on the modified dispersion contour [1]
Figure 1. Calculation based on the statistical contour
Figure 1. Results of this work, Delta = 10-5 cm7
Figure 1. Results of this work, Delta = 10-7 cm7
Figure 1. Results of this work, Delta = 10-9 cm7
Figure 1. Winters B.H., et al. (1964). Experiment p=0.25 atm
Figure 1. Winters B.H., et al. (1964). Experiment p=0.5 CO₂ + N₂
Figure 1. Winters B.H., et al. (1964). Experiment p=1.25 atm CO₂ + N₂
Figure 1a. Absorption coefficient in the band edge of 1.4 mkm. CO₂+CO₂. Original calculation
Figure 1a. Absorption coefficient in the band edge of 1.4 mkm. CO₂+N₂. Original calculation
Figure 1a. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). Absorption coefficient in the band edge of 1.4 mkm. CO₂+CO₂
Figure 1a. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). Absorption coefficient in the band edge of 1.4 mkm. CO₂+N₂
Figure 1b. Absorption coefficient in the band edge of 2.7 mkm. CO₂+CO₂. Original calculation
Figure 1b. Absorption coefficient in the band edge of 2.7 mkm. CO₂+N₂. Original calculation
Figure 1b. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). Absorption coefficient in the band edge of 2.7 mkm. CO₂+CO₂
Figure 1b. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). Absorption coefficient in the band edge of 2.7 mkm. CO₂+N₂
Figure 1c. Absorption coefficient in the band edge of 4.3 mkm. CO₂+CO₂. Calculation
Figure 1c. Absorption coefficient in the band edge of 4.3 mkm. CO₂+N₂. Calculation
Figure 1c. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). Absorption coefficient in the band edge of 4.3 mkm. CO₂+CO₂
Figure 1c. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). Absorption coefficient in the band edge of 4.3 mkm. CO₂+N₂
Figure 2. Calculation on data [5]
Figure 2. Calculation on data [9]
Figure 3. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). Experimental data
Figure 3. Calculation according to the data [9]
Figure 1a
Figure 1. (P=20 mBar, 700-1200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. (P=6 mBar, 700-1200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Bignell K.J., et al. (1963) (700-1200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Kondratiev K.Ya., et al. (1965) (700-1200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Observed spectrum (360K, 3200-4100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. WD spectrum (360K, 3400-3900 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Water monomer spectrum (360K, 3200-4100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1a. Observed spectrum (360K, 3200-4100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1a. WD spectrum (360K, 3200-4100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1a. Water monomer spectrum (360K, 3200-4100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1b. Observed spectrum (360K, 3200-4100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1b. WD spectrum (360K, 3200-4100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1b. Water monomer spectrum (360K, 3200-4100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1c. Observed spectrum (360K, 3200-4100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1c. WD spectrum (360K, 3200-4100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1c. Water monomer spectrum (360K, 3200-4100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Confidence interval
Figure 2. Confidence interval
Figure 2. Experimental data
Figure 2. BNS potential
Figure 2. Calculated for PKC potential (0.5 kcal/mole)
Figure 2. Calculated for PKC potential (1.0 kcal/mole)
Figure 2. DBP potential with dispersion forces
Figure 2. DBP potential without dispersion forces
Figure 2. Fitting of experimental data
Figure 8. DBP potential with dispersion forces
Figure 8. DBP potentials calculated with dispersion forces
Figure 8. Fitting of experimental data
Figure 8. J.E. Harries, et al. (1969)
Figure 8. J.E. Harries, et al. (1970)
Figure 8. R.A. Bohlander, et al. (1970)
Figure 1a
Figure 6. Experimental results
Figure 6. Frenkel, L. et al (1966)
Figure 6. Ho, W., et al. (1971)
Figure 6. Present results
Figure 6a. Present work.Experiment
Figure 6a. Present work
Figure 6a. W. Ho, et al. (1971)
Figure 1. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). Experiment
Figure 1. This work (Т=295K, 6800-7100 cm⁻¹). Calculation
Figure 1. This work (Т=430K, 6800-7100 cm⁻¹). Calculation
Figure 1. Absorption Coefficient (8-12 mkm, 300K)
Figure 2. Bignell K.J., et al. (1963)
Figure 2. Kondratyev, K.Ya., (1965)
Figure 2. Original data. (e₀=15 mb, t₀=22C)
Figure 2. Original data. (e₀=5 mb, t₀=5C)
Figure 1. Tabular original continuum coefficient
e
C⁰
N
₂ (296 K, 338-822 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Tabular original continuum coefficient
e
C⁰
N
₂ (430K, 338-822 cm⁻¹)
Table 1. Tabular original continuum coefficient
e
C⁰
s
(296K, 300-850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Tabular original continuum coefficient
e
C⁰
s
(430K, 338-822 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. A. Thompson, et al. (1963)
Figure 8. A.H. Laufer et al (1965)
Figure 8. K. Watanabe et al (1953)
Figure 8. M. Schurgers, et al. (1968)
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1a
Figure 1a
Figure 1a
Figure 5. N₂ gas
Figure 5. N₂(ls)
Figure 1. (CH₄) Calculated spectrum
Figure 1. (CH₄) Measured spectrum
Figure 2. (CH₄) Calculated spectrum
Figure 2. (CH₄) Measured spectrum
Figure 1. Absorpton coefficient. (2400-2480 cm⁻¹, T=300K). Experiment
Figure 1. Absorpton coefficient. (2400-2480 cm⁻¹, T=300K). Fitting
Figure 1. Absorpton coefficient. (2400-2480 cm⁻¹, T=473K). Experiment
Figure 1. Absorpton coefficient. (2400-2480 cm⁻¹, T=473K). Fitting
Figure 1. Absorpton coefficient. (2400-2480 cm⁻¹, T=673K). Experiment
Figure 1. Absorpton coefficient. (2400-2480 cm⁻¹, T=673K). Fitting
Figure 2. Absorpton coefficient. (2400-2480 cm⁻¹, T=300K). Experiment
Figure 2. Absorpton coefficient. (2400-2480 cm⁻¹, T=300K). Fitting
Figure 2. Absorpton coefficient. (2400-2480 cm⁻¹, T=473K). Experiment
Figure 2. Absorpton coefficient. (2400-2480 cm⁻¹, T=473K). fitting
Figure 2. Absorpton coefficient. (2400-2480 cm⁻¹, T=673K). Experiment
Figure 2. Absorpton coefficient. (2400-2480 cm⁻¹, T=673K). Fitting
Figure 3. Absorpton coefficient. (2400-2480 cm⁻¹, T=300K). Calculation
Figure 3. Absorpton coefficient. (2400-2480 cm⁻¹, T=473K). Calculation
Figure 3. Absorpton coefficient. (2400-2480 cm⁻¹, T=673K). Calculation
Figure 2. (d=0.0032 g/cm³)
Figure 2. (d=0.01 g/cm³)
Figure 2. (d=0.032 g/cm³)
Figure 2. (p=0.1; d=0.1 g/cm³)
Figure 1a
Figure 3. 1
Figure 3. 2
Figure 3. Approximation (296K, 600-1300 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Approximation (392K, 600-1300 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Approximation (430K, 600-1300 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Experiment (296K, 600-1300 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Experiment (392K, 600-1300 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Experiment (430K, 600-1300 cm⁻¹)
Table 1. H. Kildal, et al. (1974). P
w
=12 Torr
Table 1. Table 1. P
w
=10 torr, present experiment
Table 1. Table 1. P
w
=12 torr, present experiment
Table 1. Table 1. P
w
=6 torr, present experiment
Figure 4. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). Experiment
Figure 4. Calculation with a dispersion contour
Figure 4. Calculation with an empirical contour [20]
Figure 4. Calculation with the wing contour line taking into account F
Figure 4. Calculation with the wing contour of the line at F = 1
Figure 1a. Calculation (р=0.00989 atm)
Figure 1a. Calculation (р=0.475 atm)
Figure 1a. Experiment (p=0.00989 atm)
Figure 1a. Experiment (р=0.475 atm)
Figure 1b. Calculation (р=0.475 atm)
Figure 1b. Experiment (р=0.475 atm)
Figure 2. CO₂ (T=273K) Calculated data
Figure 2. CO₂ (T=273K) Experimental data
Figure 2. CO₂ (T=310K) Calculated data
Figure 2. CO₂ (T=310K). Experimental data
Table 1. Spectral absorption coefficients in the 4.3 mkm CO₂ band. T=1000K
Table 1. Spectral absorption coefficients in the 4.3 mkm CO₂ band. T=1200K
Table 1. Spectral absorption coefficients in the 4.3 mkm CO₂ band. T=300K
Table 1. Spectral absorption coefficients in the 4.3 mkm CO₂ band. T=400K
Table 1. Spectral absorption coefficients in the 4.3 mkm CO₂ band. T=500K
Table 1. Spectral absorption coefficients in the 4.3 mkm CO₂ band. T=600K
Table 1. Spectral absorption coefficients in the 4.3 mkm CO₂ band. T=800K
Figure 1b. Pure CO₂. 2.7 mkm band. (T=1000K, P=0.85 atm)
Figure 1b. Pure CO₂. 2.7 mkm band. (T=300K, P=0.23 atm)
Figure 1c. Pure CO₂. 2.0 mkm band. (T=300K, P=1 atm)
Figure 1c. Pure CO₂. 2.0 mkm band. (T=980K, P=17.3 atm)
Figure 1a. on Burch data [10], 500-840 cm⁻¹
Figure 1a. present data, 500-840 cm⁻¹
Figure 1a. u=500 атм см, Рэф=0.0158 атм
Figure 1b. on Burch data [10]
Figure 1b. present data
Figure 1b. расхождение
Figure 2. Kondrat'ev K.Ya., et al. (1969) (580-770 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Present data (580-770 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. CO₂ + CO₂. Formula (3)
Figure 1. CO₂ + N₂. Formula (3)
Figure 1. CO₂ + N₂. S.D. Tvorogov, et al. (1971). Lennard-Jones potential
Figure 1. Girshfelder J., et al. (1961). CO₂. Lennard-Jones potential
Figure 1. H₂O+N₂. Formula (3)
Figure 1. H₂O+N₂. Lennard-Jones potential
Figure 1. D. E. Burch (1971) (296K, 1070-1240 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. F.S. Mills et al. (1975)
Figure 1. Linear regression to all Burch's recent data
Figure 1. Mills et al. (1975) and Arefev et al. (1975)
Figure 1. Unpublished D. E. Burch (1975)
Figure 2. Linear regression to all Burch's recent data
Figure 2. Linear regression to the best Burch data
Figure 2. Recent data of Burch D.E. (1974, 1975) (296K, 300-1200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Burch D.E. et al. (1971) (294K, 14.26Torr, 800-1100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Burch D.E., et al. (1971) (300K; 19.73 Torr, 800-1100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Original data
Figure 3. R.K. Long, et al. (unpubl.) (T=294K; P=14.26Torr)
Figure 1. Calculation of k₁(1)
Figure 1. Calculation of k₁(2)
Figure 1. Calculation of k₁(3)
Figure 1. Calculation of k₁(w) (320K)
Figure 1. Calculation of k₁(w)
Figure 1. McCoy J.H., et al. (1969)
Figure 1. Moskalenko N.I. (1974). Experimental data k₁(w) (300K)
Figure 1. Moskalenko N.I. (1974). Experimental data k₁(w) (360K)
Figure 1. Recalculated data
Figure 2. Lee A.C.L. (1973)
Figure 2. Arefiev V.N., et al. (1975)
Figure 2. Calculation k₂ (dependence of alpha)
Figure 2. Calculation k₂ (F=/=1, F1=1)
Figure 2. Calculation k₂ (F=1, F1=1)
Figure 2. Calculation k₂ (dependence of alpha)
Figure 2. K. J. Bignell (1970)
Figure 3. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). Experiment
Figure 3. Burch D.E., et al. (1969)., Experiment
Figure 3. Burch D.E., et al. (1969).. Experiment
Figure 3. Calculation according to (1) taking into account F
Figure 3. Calculation according to (1) with F = 1
Figure 3. Calculation with a dispersion contour
Figure 3. Winters B.H., et al. (1964). Valculation with an empirical contour
Figure 4. Calculation of k₂
Figure 4. Calculation using F₁=1
Figure 4. Calculation using formula (1)
Figure 4. Varanasi P., et al. (1968) (500K, 600-1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Calculation using formula (6)
Figure 5. Fitting of experimental data of Varanasi P., et al. (1968)
Figure 5. Ludwig C.B., et al. (1965)
Figure 3. Spectrum 11
Figure 3. Spectrum 12
Figure 3. Spectrum 13
Figure 3. Spectrum 14
Figure 3. Spectrum 15
Figure 3. Spectrum 1
Figure 3. Spectrum 2
Figure 3. Spectrum 4
Figure 3. Spectrum 5
Figure 3. Spectrum 8
Figure 1. H₂O+N₂. (120 atm)
Figure 1. WD spectrum
Figure 1a. H₂O. (4.954 atm)
Figure 1b. H₂O. (41.44 atm)
Figure 1c. H₂O. (41.44 atm)
Figure 1d. (4.355 atm)
Figure 1e. H₂O+N₂. (120 atm)
Figure 2. H₂O+N₂. (120 atm)
Figure 2. H₂O. (4.355 atm)
Figure 2. H₂O. (41.44 atm)
Figure 2. WD spectrum
Figure 1. LOWTRAN 1,2,3
Figure 1. LOWTRAN 3B
Figure 1a
Figure 1. Absolute absorption cross section of molecular H2O
Figure 1. D.H. Katayama et al. (1973), N. Wainfan, et al. (1955)
Figure 1. D.H.Katayama et al. (1973), N. Wainfan, et al. (1955)
Figure 1. L. De Reilhac et al. (1970)
Figure 1a
Figure 2a
Figure 1. Beer's measurements
Figure 1. Calculated monochromatic transmittance
Figure 1. Temperature dependence of the N₂ continuum. T=230K
Figure 1. Temperature dependence of the N₂ continuum. T=273K
Figure 1. Temperature dependence of the N₂ continuum. T=296K
Figure 1. Temperature dependence of the N₂ continuum. T=310K
Figure 2. Approximate form
Figure 2. Empirical function (2400 cm⁻¹). Burch, D.E., et al. (1969)
Figure 4. Burch D.E. (1970)
Figure 4. Calculation using formula (1) (P=0)
Figure 4. Calculation using formula (1)
Figure 4. J.H. McCoy, et al. (1969)
Figure 4. J.H. McCoy, et al. (1969)
Figure 4. K.J. Bignell (1970)
Figure 4. K.J. Bignell (1970)
Figure 4. Moskalenko N.I. et al. (1972)
Figure 1. Anthony, R. (1952)
Figure 1. Bignell, K. J. (1970)
Figure 1. Bignell, K., et al. (1963)
Figure 1. Bolle H.J., et al. (1963)
Figure 1. Bolle, H. J. (1964)
Figure 1. Burch, D.E. (1970)
Figure 1. Roach W.T. et al. (1958)
Figure 1. Roach, W.T. et al. (1958)
Figure 5. Full Lorentz 6.3 mkm (250K)
Figure 5. Full Lorentz 6.3 mkm (300K)
Figure 5. Full Lorentz Rotation (250K)
Figure 5. Full Lorentz Rotation (300K)
Figure 5. Simple Lorentz Rotation (300K)
Figure 5. VVW 6.3 mkm (250K)
Figure 5. VVW 6.3 mkm (300K)
Figure 5. VVW Rotational band (250K)
Figure 5. VVW Rotational band (300K)
Figure 5. Zhevakin-Naumov 6.3 mkm band (250K)
Figure 5. Zhevakin-Naumov 6.3 mkm band (300K)
Figure 5. Zhevakin-Naumov Rotation (300K)
Figure 1. The observed spectrum
Figure 1. The prediction for a model atmosphere
Figure 1. Transmission spectrum derived from observations of emission
Figure 1a
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 9. N. Wainfan, et al. (1955)
Figure 9a
Figure 1a
Figure 1a
Figure 10. *C
s
⁰ =C
s
⁰ -
c
C
s
⁰, empirical continuum (296K, 300-800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10. C
s
⁰ experiment (296K, 300-800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10. Calculation line-by-line with Lorentzian line shape
Figure 10. Calculation line-by-line with modified line shape,
c
C
s
⁰
Figure 11. Experiment (296K, 600-1350 cm⁻¹)
Figure 11. Experiment (392K, 600-1350 cm⁻¹)
Figure 11. Experiment (430K, 600-1350 cm⁻¹)
Figure 11. Fitting (296K, 600-1350 cm⁻¹)
Figure 11. Fitting (392K, 600-1350 cm⁻¹)
Figure 11. Fitting (430K, 600-1350 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. P
t
=360 Torr, this work
Figure 2. P
t
=760 Torr, this work
Figure 2. R. T. Menzies, et al. (1976). P
t
=760 Torr
Figure 3. Burch D.E. (1970) (280-400K, 1203 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. D.E. Burch, et al. (1974) (296K, 1203 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. R.E. Roberts, et al. (1976) (300-500K, 1200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. This work (320-470K, 1200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Calculation using formula (4) (I)
Figure 1. Calculation using formula (4) (II)
Figure 1. Optical depth of vertical pillar of the atmosphere (I)
Figure 1. Optical depth of vertical pillar of the atmosphere (II)
Figure 5. Adel A., et al. (1958)
Figure 5. Adiks T.G. et al. (1975)
Figure 5. Anthony R. (1952)
Figure 5. Bignell K.J., et al. (1963)
Figure 5. Calculation using formula (4) and (6) (I)
Figure 5. Calculation using formula (4) and (6) (II)
Figure 5. Calculation using formula (6)
Figure 5. Kondratiev K.Ya., et al. (1965)
Figure 5. Roach W.T., et al. (1958)
Figure 5. Roach W.T., et al. (1958)
Figure 5. Shukurov A. Kh. et al. (1972)
Figure 5. Yurganov L.N., et al. (1972)
Figure 3. Measurement this work (338K, 2400-2900 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Prediction (338K, 2400-2900 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Burch results. Extrapolation of higher temperature data
Figure 4. Burch results. Solid curve based on 65C self-broadened data
Figure 4. This work
Figure 5. Burch extrapolation
Figure 5. OSU. Measurement
Figure 5. Our measurement
Figure 5. Our model
Figure 6. Burch fit
Figure 6. Burch uncertainty (141K)
Figure 6. Burch uncertainty (172K)
Figure 6. Burch uncertainty (208K)
Figure 6. Burch uncertainty (338K)
Figure 6. Burch uncertainty (374K)
Figure 6. Burch uncertainty (428K)
Figure 6. Experiment. This work
Figure 1a
Figure 2. 1
Figure 2. 2
Figure 6. 5.48 km to Space. N₂ continuum
Figure 6. AFGL data. CO₂ continuum
Figure 6. Burch Form Factor. CO₂ continuum
Figure 6. Lorentz lineshape. CO₂ continuum
Figure 7. D. E. Burch, et al. (1969). CO₂+N₂
Figure 7. J. Susskind et al. (1977). CO₂+N₂
Figure 1a
Figure 1a
Figure 1. This work (Computed)
Figure 1. Winters B.H., et al. (1964)
Figure 2. Transmittance. (3100-4800 см-1, L=128 m)
Figure 2. Transmittance. (3100-4800 см-1, L=32 m)
Figure 2. Transmittance. (3100-4800 см-1, L=64 m)
Figure 1a. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). Pure CO₂. 4.3 mkm band. Experiment
Figure 1a. Pure CO₂. 4.3 mkm band. Calculation in approximation of a strong line
Figure 1a. Pure CO₂. 4.3 mkm band. Line by line calculation
Figure 1b. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). Pure CO₂. 2.7 mkm band. Experiment
Figure 1b. Pure CO₂. 2.7 mkm band. Calculation in approximation of a strong line
Figure 1b. Pure CO₂. 2.7 mkm band. Line by line calculation
Figure 1c. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). Pure CO₂. 1.4 mkm band. Experiment
Figure 1c. Pure CO₂. 1.4 mkm band. Calculation in approximation of a strong line
Figure 1c. Pure CO₂. 1.4 mkm band. Line by line calculation
Figure 2a. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). CO₂+NO₂. 4.3 mkm band. Experiment
Figure 2a. CO₂+N₂. 4.3 mkm band. Calculation in approximation of a strong line
Figure 2a. CO₂+N₂. 4.3 mkm band. Line by line calculation
Figure 2b. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). CO₂+NO₂. 2.7 mkm band. Experiment
Figure 2b. CO₂+N₂. 2.7 mkm band. Calculation in approximation of a strong line
Figure 2b. CO₂+N₂. 2.7 mkm band. Line by line calculation
Figure 2c. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). CO₂+NO₂. 4.3 mkm band. Experiment
Figure 2c. CO₂+N₂. 4.3 mkm band. Line by line calculation
Figure 5. Bulanin M.O., et al. (1978). Experiment
Figure 5. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). Experiment
Figure 5. Results of the authors' calculations
Table 1. Calculation with Lorentzian contour
Table 1. Experiment
Table 1. Telegin G.V., et al. (1979). Calculation with contour
Table 2. Calculation with Lorentzian contour
Table 2. Calculation with contour [1]
Table 2. Experiment
Figure 3. D. E. Burch, et al. (1975)
Figure 3. Present data
Figure 3. Quadratic fit to present data
Table 1A. Cs0 (cm2molec-1atm-1) self-broadening. Spectrophone
Table 1A. Cs0 (cm2molec-1atm-1) self-broadening. White Cell
Table 1B. Cs0 γ Spectrophone (cm2molec-1atm-1) foreign-broadening
Table 1B. Cs0 γ White Cell (cm2molec-1atm-1) foreign-broadening
Table 1C. γ Spectrophone
Table 1C. γ White Cell
Figure 1. Curve a-a. (281K)
Figure 1. Curve b-b. (290K)
Figure 1. Curve l-l. Scaled Burch data (290K)
Figure 1. Curve m-m. Monomer model spectrum (290K)
Figure 1a. Coffey, M.T. (1977) Curve L-L. (8-14 mkm)
Figure 1a. Curve A-A
Figure 1a. Curve B-B
Figure 3. Fowle, F.E. (1913)
Figure 3. Fowle, F.E. (1914)
Figure 3. Fraser, R.S. (1975)
Figure 3. Present data. Set A
Figure 3. Present data. Set B
Figure 3. Present data. Set C
Figure 3. Present data. Set D
Figure 3. Present data. Set E
Figure 3. Tomasi, C. and Guzzi, R. (1974)
Figure 4. Present data. Set A
Figure 4. Present data. Set B
Figure 4. Present data. Set C
Figure 4. Present data. Set D
Figure 4. Present data. Set E
Figure 4. The regression line
Figure 4. Tomasi, C. and Guzzi, R. (1974)
Figure 1. Table 1. H₂O (296K, 338-882 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Table 1. H₂O (430K, 430-882 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Table 1. H₂O+N₂ (296K, 338-629 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Table 1. H₂O+N₂ (430K, 430-629 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Approximated continuum data (296K, 300-850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Continuum data (296K, 300-850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Line contribution data (296K, 300-850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Original experimental data H₂O-H₂O (296 K, 300-900 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Approximated continuum data (338K, 300-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Continuum data (338K, 300-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Line contribution data (338K, 300-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Original experimental data H₂O (338 K, 300-480 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Approximated continuum data (430K, 400-850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Continuum data (430K, 400-850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Line contribution data (430K, 400-850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Original experimental data H₂O-H₂O (430 K, 400-900 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Empirical continuum. Approximated data. (296K, 300-900 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Empirical continuum. Approximated data. (338K, 300-450 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Empirical continuum. Approximated data. (430K, 400-900 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Empirical continuum. Extrapolated data. (338K,450-900 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Empirical continuum. Extrapolated data. (430K, 300-450 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. H₂O + N₂ continuum coefficient (296K, 300-700 cm⁻¹). Approximated continuum data
Figure 6. H₂O + N₂ continuum coefficient (296K, 300-700 cm⁻¹). Continuum data
Figure 6. H₂O + N₂ continuum coefficient (296K, 300-700 cm⁻¹). Line contribution data
Figure 6. Original experimental data H₂O + N₂. (296K, 300-700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. H₂O + N₂ continuum coefficient (338K, 300-700 cm⁻¹). Approximated continuum data
Figure 7. H₂O + N₂ continuum coefficient (338K, 300-700 cm⁻¹). Continuum data
Figure 7. H₂O + N₂ continuum coefficient (338K, 300-700 cm⁻¹). Line contribution data
Figure 7. H₂O + N₂ continuum coefficient (338K, 300-700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. H₂O + N₂ continuum coefficient (430K, 400-700 cm⁻¹). Approximated continuum data
Figure 8. H₂O + N₂ continuum coefficient (430K, 400-700 cm⁻¹). Continuum data
Figure 8. H₂O + N₂ continuum coefficient (430K, 400-700 cm⁻¹). Line contribution data
Figure 8.Original experimental data H₂O + N₂ continuum coefficient (430K, 400-700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Observed profile
Figure 5. The profile calculated
Figure 2. (23420-23440 MHz)
Figure 2. (23440-23560 MHz)
Figure 1a
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 3. Burch D. E., et al. (1972) (1200-2000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Burch D.E, et al. (1973) (1200-2200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Burch D.E., et al. (1972) (1200-2000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Burch D.E., et al. (1972) (1200-2000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Burch D.E., et al. (1973) (1300-2100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Burch D.E., et al. (1972) (1200-2000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Calculated spectra with Burch data (1973)
Figure 3. Calculated spectra with Burch data (1973)
Figure 3. Calculated without the continuum (1) (1300-2100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Calculated without the continuum (2). (1200-2200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient (2400-2500 cm⁻¹, T=293K). Calculation
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient (2400-2500 cm⁻¹). Calculation
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient (2400-2500 cm⁻¹, T=213K). Calculation
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient (2400-2500 cm⁻¹, T=310K). Calculation
Figure 1. Буланин М. и др. (1976). Точки c аппроксимационной кривой для экспериментальных данных. (2400-2500 cm⁻¹, T=213K)
Figure 1. Буланин М. и др. (1976). Точки c аппроксимационной кривой для экспериментальных данных. (2400-2500 cm⁻¹, T=293K)
Figure 1. Точки c аппроксимационной кривой для экспериментальных данных из работы [4]. (2400-2500 cm⁻¹, T=310K)
Figure 2. Absorption coefficient (2400-2500 cm⁻¹, T=213K). Calculation
Figure 2. Absorption coefficient (2400-2500 cm⁻¹, T=293K). Calculation
Figure 2. Absorption coefficient (2400-2500 cm⁻¹, T=310K). Calculation
Figure 2. Bulanin M.O., et al. (1976). (2400-2500 cm⁻¹, T=293K). Experiment
Figure 2. Bulanin M.O., et al. (1976). (2400-2500 cm⁻¹, T=310K). Experiment
Figure 2. Bulanin M.O., et al. (1980). (2400-2500 cm⁻¹, T=213K). Experiment
Figure 2a. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). 4.3 mkm band. Experiment
Figure 2a. Calculation in the approximation of one strong line. 4.3 mkm band
Figure 2a. Line by line calculation. 4.3 mkm band
Figure 2a. Lorentzian contour calculation. 4.3 mkm band
Figure 2b. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). 2.7 mkm band. Experiment
Figure 2b. Calculation in the approximation of one strong line. 2.7 mkm band
Figure 2b. Line by line calculation. 2.7 mkm band
Figure 2b. Lorentzian contour calculation. 2.7 mkm band
Figure 2c. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). 1.4 mkm band. Experiment
Figure 2c. Calculation in the approximation of one strong line. 1.4 mkm band
Figure 2c. Line by line calculation. 1.4 mkm band
Figure 2c. Lorentzian contour calculation. 1.4 mkm band
Figure 3a. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). 4.3 mkm band. Experiment
Figure 3a. Calculation in the approximation of one strong line. 4.3 mkm band
Figure 3a. Line by line calculation. 4.3 mkm band
Figure 3a. Lorentzian contour calculation. 4.3 mkm band
Figure 3b. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). 2.7 mkm band. Experiment
Figure 3b. Calculation in the approximation of one strong line. 2.7 mkm band
Figure 3b. Line by line calculation. 2.7 mkm band
Figure 3b. Lorentzian contour calculation. 2.7 mkm band
Figure 3c. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). 1.4 mkm band. Experiment
Figure 3c. Line by line calculation. 1.4 mkm band
Figure 3c. Lorentzian contour calculation. 1.4 mkm band
Table 2. Binary absorption coefficient. CO₂+Ar. Experiment
Table 2. Binary absorption coefficient. CO₂+He. Experiment
Table 2. Binary absorption coefficient. CO₂+N₂. Experiment
Figure 2a. Deviations of the calculated K2(vk) from the experimental ones. khi(v)=1
Figure 2a.Deviations of the calculated K2(vk) from the experimental ones. khi(v) is described by curve (8)
Figure 2b. Deviations of the calculated K2(vk) from the experimental ones. khi(v)=1
Figure 2b.Deviations of the calculated K2(vk) from the experimental ones. khi(v) is described by curve (8)
Figure 2c.Deviations of the calculated K2(vk) from the experimental ones. khi(v) is described by curve (8)
Figure 2c.culated K2(vk) from the experimental ones. khi(v) is described by curve (8)
Figure 3. Сorrection factor of the Lorentz line shape in cases of CO₂+Ar
Figure 3. Сorrection factor of the Lorentz line shape in cases of CO₂+He
Figure 3. Сorrection factor of the Lorentz line shape in cases of CO₂+N₂
Figure 1. Calculation according to the Lorentzian contour
Figure 1. Calculation according to the generalized contour
Figure 1. Dokuchaev A.B., et al. (1979). Experimental data
Figure 2. Calculation according to the Lorentzian contour
Figure 2. Calculation according to the generalized contour
Figure 2. Dokuchaev A.B., et al. (1979). Experimental data
Figure 1. Arefiev V.N., et al.(1977) (300K, 10-13 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Bignell K. J. (1970) (296K, 800-1200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Bignell K. J. (1970) (303K, 800-1200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Burch D.E. (1970) (296K, 700-1200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Burch D.E. (1970). Averaged data (296K, 700-1300 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Burch D.E. et al. (1974) (296K, 700-1250 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Calculation using formula (10)
Figure 1. McCoy J.H., et al. (1969) (296K, 800-1150 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. McCoy J.H., et al. (1969)
Figure 3. Burch D.E. (1970) (800-1200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Grassl H. (1971) (800-1200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Grassl H. (1974) (800-1200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Tvorogov S.D., et al. (1971) (800-1200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. H₂O. Calculation using formula (12)
Figure 9. H₂O. Calculation using formula (7)
Figure 9. H₂O
Figure 9. H₂O + N₂. Calculation using formula (12)
Figure 9. H₂O + N₂. Calculation using formula (7)
Figure 9. H₂O + N-2
Figure 1. Experiment (296K, 600-1350 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Experiment (392K, 600-1350 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Experiment (430K, 600-1350 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Fitting (296K, 600-1350 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Fitting (392K, 600-1350 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Fitting (430K, 600-1350 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10. Burch, D.E. (1968) (13-35 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10. Calculation, the line contribution plus continuum
Figure 10. Continuum
Figure 10. Dryagin, Yu. A., et al. (1966) (3-7 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10. Frenkel, R. L., et al. (1966) (5-10 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10. Ryadov, Ya.V., et al. (1972) (6-14 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10. Straiton, A. W., et al. (1960) (0-5 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Approximated curve (338 K, 2400-2800cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Approximated curve (384 K, 2400-2800cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Approximated curve (428 K, 2400-2800cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Experimental points (338 K, 2400-2800cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Experimental points (384K, 2400-2800cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Experimental points (428K, 2400-2800cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Extrapolated curve (296 K, 2400-2800cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Extrapolated curve (296 K, 2400-2800cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Contribution of lines
Figure 4. Empirical continuum (296K, 300-800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Experiment (296K, 300-800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Continuum (296K, 300-640 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Contribution of lines (296K, 300-640 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Empirical continuum (296K, 300-640 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Experiment. N₂ broadening (296K, 300-650 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. Continuum (308K, 1400-1900 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. Contribution of lines
Figure 8. Empirical continuum (308K, 1400-1900 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. Experiment (308K, 1400-1900 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. H₂O+N₂. (308K, 1400-1850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. H₂O+N₂. (353K, 1290-1450 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. H₂O+N₂. (353K, 1600-2000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. H₂O+N₂. (428K, 1850-2050 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. H₂O. (308K, 1400-1850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. H₂O. (322K, 1850-2250 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. H₂O. (353K, 1290-1450 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. H₂O. (353K, 1600-2200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. H₂O. (428K, 1290-1450 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. H₂O. (428K,1850-2200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Calculation (296 K, 0-1080 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Present experiment (296 K, 0-1080 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Calculation (333K, 0-1080 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Calculation (337K, 0-1080 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Present experiment (333K, 0-1080 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Present experiment (337K, 0-1080 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Calculation using Lorentz profile
Figure 1. Calculation using formula (2)
Figure 1. Calculation using full Lorentz profile
Figure 1. Fitting of Burch D.E. (1970) data
Figure 1a. Calculation using Lorentz profile
Figure 1a. Calculation using full Lorentz profile
Figure 1a. Calculation using generalized contour
Figure 1a. Fitting of experimental data
Figure 1. (Ar-CO₂)
Figure 1. Lower limit (CO₂-CO₂)
Figure 1. Lower limit (H₂O-Ar)
Figure 1. Lower limit (H₂O-H₂O)
Figure 1. Lower limit (N₂-CO₂)
Figure 1. Lower limit (N₂-H₂O)
Figure 1. Lower limit (O₂-CO₂)
Figure 1. Lower limit (O₂-H₂O)
Figure 1. Total number density
Figure 1. Upper limit (CO₂-CO₂)
Figure 1. Upper limit (H₂O-Ar)
Figure 1. Upper limit (H₂O-H₂O)
Figure 1. Upper limit (N₂-CO₂)
Figure 1. Upper limit (N₂-H₂O)
Figure 1. Upper limit (O₂-CO₂)
Figure 1. Upper limit (O₂-H₂O)
Figure 1a. Water vapour (50-100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1b. Water vapour (0-50 cm⁻¹)
Table 1. B.H.Winters, et al. (1964). Continuum Transmittance.
Table 1. Continuum Transmittance. This work N_2
Table 1. Continuum Transmittance. This work
Table 1. D. E. Burch, et al. (1969). Continuum Transmittance.
Table 1. J. Susskind, et al. (1977). Continuum Transmittance
Table 1. M.W.P.Cann, et al. (1980). Continuum Transmittance
Figure 2. Absorption coefficient computed with the Susskind and Mo (1978) line shape
Figure 2. Absorption coefficients computed with the Burch et al. (1969) line shape
Figure 2. Calculated with the B.H. Winters, et al. (1964) line shape
Figure 2. Calculated with the M.W.P. Cann et al. (1980) line shape
Figure 6. A. 10% CO₂ in He (P
s
=5.3 atm, 3700-3730 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. B. 10% CO₂ in He (P
s
=13.3 atm, 3700-3730 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. C. 40% CO₂ in He (P
s
=9.2 atm, 3700-3730 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. D. 40% CO₂ in He (P
s
=14.8 atm, 3700-3730 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. E. 40% CO₂ in He (P
s
=21.4 atm, 3700-3730 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. F. 40% CO₂ in He (P
s
=29.2 atm, 3700-3730 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Approximation of experimental data (296K, 600-1299 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Approximation of experimental data (392K)
Figure 1. Approximation of experimental data (430K, 600-1200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Experimental data (296K, 600-1200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Experimental data (392K, 600-1200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Experimental data (430K, 625-818 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10. Burch, D.E. (1968)
Figure 10. Calculation, the line contribution plus continuum
Figure 10. Continuum
Figure 10. Dryagin, Yu. A., et al. (1966)
Figure 10. Frenkel, R. L., et al. (1966)
Figure 10. Ryadov, Ya.V., et al. (1972)
Figure 10. Straiton, A. W., et al. (1960)
Figure 11. Becker, G.E. et al. (1946)
Figure 11. Bohlander, R. A.
Figure 11. Burch, D.E. (1968) (22.5-28.3 cm⁻¹)
Figure 11. Dryagin, Yu.A., et al. (1966) (4-7.5 cm⁻¹)
Figure 11. Frenkel, R.L., et al. (1966) (1.31 cm⁻¹)
Figure 11. Hogg, D.C. (1978) (2.26-2-65 cm⁻¹)
Figure 11. Liebe, H.J., et al. (1969) (1.908 cm⁻¹)
Figure 11. Llewellyn Jones, D.T., et al. (1978) (7.09 cm⁻¹)
Figure 11. Ryadov Ya.V., et al. (1974) (5-10 cm⁻¹)
Figure 11. Simpson, O.A., et al. (1979) (5-45 cm⁻¹)
Figure 11. Straiton, A.W., et al. (1960) (2cm⁻¹)
Figure 13. Absorption coefficient of liquid water (L)
Figure 13. The average intensities of the H₂O vapor lines (V)
Figure 13. The empirical continuum for self broadening (C)
Figure 13a. Absorption coefficient of liquid water (L) (50-300 cm⁻¹)
Figure 13a. The average intensities of the H₂O vapor lines (V) (50-3000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 13a. The empirical continuum for self broadening (C) (296K, 300-3000 cm⁻¹))
Figure 2. Approximated curve (384K, 2400-2800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Approximated curve (338K, 2400-2800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Approximated curve (428K, 2400-2800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Experimental points (338K, 2400-2650 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Experimental points (384K, 2400-2740 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Experimental points (428K, 2400-2700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Extrapolated curve (T=296K)
Figure 2. Extrapolated curve (T=296K)
Figure 4. Contribution of lines (296K, 300-800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Empirical continuum (296K, 300-800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Experiment (296K, 300-800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Calculatied contributions of lines according to an apodized weigthing function (300-650 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Empirical continuum (296K, 300-650 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Experimental values (H₂O+N₂) (296K, 300-650 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Fitting empirical continuum (296K, 300-650 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Continuum (308K, 1400-1900 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Contribution of lines
Figure 7. Empirical continuum (308K, 1400-1900 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Experiment (308K, 1400-1900 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. Composite of spectral curves of the empirical continuum. H₂O. (308K, 1400-1850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. H₂O+N₂. (308K, 1400-1850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. H₂O+N₂. (353K, 1290-1450 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. H₂O+N₂. (353K, 1600-1850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. H₂O+N₂. (428K, 1850-2050 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. H₂O. (322K, 1850-2250 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. H₂O. (353K, 1290-1450 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. H₂O. (353K, 1600-2200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. H₂O. (428K, 1290-1450 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. H₂O. (428K, 1850-2200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. B.Kolos perturbation theory calculation
Figure 8. Diersken G.H.F., et al. (1975). Potential Water Dimer Curve
Figure 8. Matsuoka O., et al. (1976)*. Potential Water Dimer Curve
Figure 8. Matsuoka O., et al. (1976). Potential Water Dimer Curve
Figure 1a. Baranov Yu.I., et al. (1981). CO₂+CO₂. Experiment
Figure 1a. Baranov Yu.I., et al. (1981). CO₂+He. Experiment
Figure 1a. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). CO₂+CO₂. Experiment
Figure 1a. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). CO₂+He. Experiment
Figure 1a. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). CO₂+N₂. Experiment
Figure 1a. CO₂+CO₂. Calculation
Figure 1a. CO₂+He. Calculation
Figure 1a. CO₂+N₂. Calculation
Figure 1b. Baranov Yu.I., et al. (1981). CO₂+CO₂. Experiment
Figure 1b. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). CO₂+CO₂. Experiment
Figure 1b. CO₂+CO₂. Calculation
Figure 1. 1.4 mkm band. CO₂+Ar, calculation on (1)
Figure 1. 1.4 mkm band. CO₂+Ar, calculation with dispersion contour
Figure 1. 1.4 mkm band. CO₂+Ar, experiment
Figure 1. 1.4 mkm band. CO₂+CO₂, calculation on (1)
Figure 1. 1.4 mkm band. CO₂+CO₂, calculation with dispersion contour
Figure 1. 1.4 mkm band. CO₂+CO₂, experiment
Figure 1. 1.4 mkm band. CO₂+He, calculation on (1)
Figure 1. 1.4 mkm band. CO₂+He, calculation with dispersion contour
Figure 1. CO₂+He, experiment
Table 1a. За кантом полосы 3v3 CO2
Table 1a. За кантом полосы 3v3. Ar+CO2
Table 1a. За кантом полосы 3v3. He+CO2
Table 1b. В микроокнах 3v3. CO2+He
Table 1b. В микроокнах 3v3. Чистый CO2
Figure 1. Absorption spectra (2500-3500 cm⁻¹, 220K, 15atm)
Figure 1. Absorption spectra (2500-3500 cm⁻¹, 300K, 15atm)
Figure 1. D. E. Burch et al. (1969). Nitrogen-broadening
Figure 1. Nitrogen-broadening
Figure 1. Oxygen-broadening
Figure 1. Self-broadening
Figure 5. Continuum absorption coefficient (200K)
Figure 5. Continuum absorption coefficient (300K)
Figure 5. Molecular absorption (200K)
Figure 5. Molecular absorption (300K)
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 2. Absorption coefficient of O₃ (300K, 200-320 nm)
Figure 2. Absorption coefficient of O₃ (500K, 200-320 nm)
Figure 2. Absorption coefficient of O₃ (720K, 200-320 nm)
Figure 2. Absorption coefficient of O₃ (900K, 200-320 nm)
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1c
Figure 1d
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient (661-667-cm⁻¹). With line mixing
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient (661-667-cm⁻¹). With no line mixing
Figure 2. Absorption coefficient (661-667-cm⁻¹). With line mixing
Figure 2. Absorption coefficient (661-667-cm⁻¹). With no line mixing
Figure 3. Absorption coefficient (667.366-667.469 cm⁻¹). With line mixing
Figure 3. Absorption coefficient (667.366-667.469 cm⁻¹). With no line mixing
Figure 4. Absorption coefficient (667.366-667.469 cm⁻¹). With line mixing
Figure 4. Absorption coefficient (667.366-667.469 cm⁻¹). With no line mixing
Figure 1. Calculation with dispersion contour
Figure 1. Calculation with empirical contour [6]
Figure 1. Calculation with line wing contour [1] without exponential factor
Figure 1. Calculation with line wing contour [1]
Figure 1. Winters B.H., et al. (1964). Experiment (pCO2=0.25 atm)
Figure 1. Winters B.H., et al. (1964). Experiment (pCO2=0.5 atm)
Figure 1. Winters B.H., et al. (1964). Experiment (pCO2=1.25 atm)
Figure 4. Bulanin M.O., et al. (1976). Experiment (T=213K)
Figure 4. Bulanin M.O., et al. (1976). Experiment
Figure 4. Our calculation
Figure 4. Winters B.H., et al. (1964). Experiment
Figure 2. Baranov Yu.I., et al. (1981). Experiment
Figure 2. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). Experiment
Figure 2. Calculation using Lorentz contour
Figure 2. Calculation using formula (6)
Figure 3. Calculation Lorentz contour
Figure 3. Calculation k(10)
Figure 3. Calculation k(5)
Figure 3. Calculation using formula (6)
Figure 3. Dokuchaev A.B., et al. (1980). Experiment. 4.3 mkm band+
Figure 3. Winters B.H., et al. (1964). Experiment. 4.3 mkm band
Figure 4. Calculation using Lorentz contour
Figure 4. Calculation using formula (6)
Figure 4. Dokuchaev A.B., et al. (1980). Experimemt. 4.3 mkm band
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient of pure CO₂ at the 4.3 mkm band periphery. T=213K. Calculation
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient of pure CO₂ at the 4.3 mkm band periphery. T=273K. Calculation
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient of pure CO₂ at the 4.3 mkm band periphery. T=310K. Calculation
Figure 1. Bulanin M.O., et al. (1976). T=213K. Experiment
Figure 1. Bulanin M.O., et al. (1976). T=273K. Experiment
Figure 1. Bulanin M.O., et al. (1976). T=310K. Experiment
Figure 1. Burch D.E. et al. (1970). Experiment, T=240 K
Figure 1. Burch D.E. et al. (1970). Experiment, T=296 K
Figure 1. Present calculation not using V(T), T=240K
Figure 1. Present calculation, T=240K
Figure 1. Present calculation, T=296K
Figure 2. Burch D.E. et al. (1970). Experiment (780-900 cm-1, T=240K)
Figure 2. Burch D.E. et al. (1970). Experiment, T=296K
Figure 2. Present calculation, T=240K
Figure 2. Present calculation, T=296K
Figure 2. Absorption coefficient of CO₂+Ar. Original calculation
Figure 2. Absorption coefficient of CO₂+CO₂. Lorentz contour
Figure 2. Absorption coefficient of CO₂+CO₂. Origina calculation
Figure 2. Absorption coefficient of CO₂+H₂. Original calculation
Figure 2. Absorption coefficient of CO₂+He. Originalt calculation
Figure 2. Absorption coefficient of CO₂+N₂. Original calculation
Figure 2. Absorption coefficient of CO₂+O₂. Lorentz contour
Figure 2. Absorption coefficient of CO₂+O₂. Original calculation
Figure 2. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). Absorption coefficient of CO₂+Ar. Experiment
Figure 2. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). Absorption coefficient of CO₂+CO₂. Experiment
Figure 2. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). Absorption coefficient of CO₂+H₂. Experiment
Figure 2. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). Absorption coefficient of CO₂+He. Experiment
Figure 2. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). Absorption coefficient of CO₂+N₂. Experiment
Figure 2. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). Absorption coefficient of CO₂+O₂. Experiment
Figure 3. Absorption coefficient of pure CO₂. Present calculation
Figure 3. Absorption coefficient of pure CO₂. k10
Figure 3. Absorption coefficient of pure CO₂. k12
Figure 3. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). Absorption coefficient of pure CO₂. Experiment
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient in the wing of the band is 1.4 mkm. CO₂+Ar. Experiment
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient in the wing of the band is 1.4 mkm. CO₂+Ar. This calculation
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient in the wing of the band is 1.4 mkm. CO₂+CO₂. Experiment [2,11]
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient in the wing of the band is 1.4 mkm. CO₂+CO₂. This calculation
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient in the wing of the band is 1.4 mkm. CO₂+He. Experiment
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient in the wing of the band is 1.4 mkm. CO₂+He. This calculation
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient in the wing of the band is 1.4 mkm. CO₂+N₂. This calculation
Figure 1. D.E. Burch, et al. Absorption coefficient in the wing of the band 1.4 mkm. CO₂+N₂. Experiment
Figure 2. 4
Figure 2. Baranov Yu.I., et al. (1981). Experiment
Figure 2. Calculation
Figure 2.Burch, et al. (1969). Experiment
Figure 4. Temperature dependence of the absorption coefficient (w=2390.8 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Temperature dependence of the absorption coefficient (w=2395 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Temperature dependence of the absorption coefficient (w=2396.5 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Temperature dependence of the absorption coefficient (w=2405 cm⁻¹)
Figure Burch D.E., et al. (1969). Experiment+. 2. Baranov Yu.I., et al. (1981). Experiment
Table 1. Absorption coefficient (T = 293K). CO₂+Ar
Table 1. Absorption coefficient (T = 293K). CO₂+CO₂
Table 1. Absorption coefficient (T = 293K). CO₂+N₂
Figure 1. Bulanin M.O., et al. (1976). T=293K. Experiment
Figure 1. Winters B.H., et al. (1964). Experiment
Figure 1. Сalculation by formula (10) without factor F
Figure 1. Сalculation by the formula (10)
Figure 1. Сalculation with a dispersion contour
Figure 2. Calculation by formula (10) without factor F
Figure 2. Calculation by the formula (10)
Figure 2. Calculation with a dispersion contour
Figure 2. Winters B.H., et al. (1969). Experiment II
Figure 2. Winters B.H., et al. (1969). Experiment I
Figure 3. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). Experimental data (2400.7716 - 2549.3022 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Calculation by formula (10) without factor F
Figure 3. Calculation by the formula (10)
Figure 3. Calculation with a dispersion contour
Figure 1. Calculation along the generalized contour
Figure 1. Calculation by the dispersion contour
Figure 1. Dokuchaev A.B., et al. (1980). Experiment
Figure 2. Calculation along the dispersion contour
Figure 2. Calculation along the generalized contour
Figure 2. Dokuchaev A.B., et al. (1980). Experiment
Table 3. Calculation along the dispersion contour with half-widths
Table 3. Calculation along the generalized contour
Table 3. Calculation for the dispersion contour with half-widths
Table 3. Dokuchaev A.B., et al. (1980). Calculation along the dispersion contour
Table 3. Dokuchaev A.B., et al. (1980). Experiment [4]
Figure 4. Adiks, T.G. (1982) (Fermi doublet, 20⁰0, 2547 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Calculated spectra
Figure 4. Measured spectra
Figure 4a. Calculated spectra
Figure 4a. Measured spectra
Figure 4b. Calculated spectra
Figure 4b. Measured spectra
Figure 1. Approximation of experimental data (296K, 600-1350 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Approximation of experimental data (392K, 600-1350 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Approximation of experimental data (430K, 600-1350 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Experiment (296K, 600-1350 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Experiment (392K, 600-1350 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Experiment (430K, 600-1350 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10. Burch, D.E. (1968)
Figure 10. Calculation, the line contribution plus continuum
Figure 10. Continuum
Figure 10. Dryagin, Yu. A., et al. (1966)
Figure 10. Frenkel, R. L., et al. (1966)
Figure 10. Ryadov, Ya.V., et al. (1972)
Figure 10. Straiton, A. W., et al. (1960)
Figure 13. Absorption coefficient of liquid water (L) (5-45 cm⁻¹)
Figure 13. The average intensities of the H₂O vapor lines (V) (5-45 cm⁻¹)
Figure 13. The empirical continuum for self broadening (C)
Figure 13a. Absorption coefficient of liquid water (L)
Figure 13a. The average intensities of the H₂O vapor lines (V)
Figure 13a. The empirical continuum for self broadening (C)
Figure 2. Approximated curve (338K, 2400-2829cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Approximated curve (384K, 2400-2829cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Approximated curve (428K, 2400-2829cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Experimental points (338K, 2400-2829cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Experimental points (384K, 2400-2829cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Experimental points (428K, 2400-2829cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Extrapolated curve (296K, 2400-2829cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Extrapolated curve (296K, 2400-2829cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Continuum (296K, 300-650 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Contribution of lines (296K, 300-650 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Empirical continuum (296K, 300-650 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Experiment (296K, 300-650 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Continuum (308K, 1400-1900 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Contribution of lines
Figure 7. Empirical continuum (308K, 1400-1900 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Experiment (308K, 1400-1900 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. H₂O+N₂. (T=308K, 1400-1850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. H₂O+N₂. (T=353K, 1290-1450 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. H₂O+N₂. (T=353K, 1600-2000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. H₂O+N₂. (T=428K, 1850-2050 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. H₂O. (1290-1450 cm⁻¹, T=353K)
Figure 8. H₂O. (T=308K, 1400-1850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. H₂O. (T=322K, 1850-2250 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. H₂O. (T=353K, 1600-2200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. H₂O. (T=428K, 1290-1450 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. H₂O. (T=428K, 1850-2200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Visibility 10 m
Figure 1. Visibility 150 m
Figure 1. Visibility 50 m
Figure 1a. Visibility 100 m
Figure 1a. Visibility 150 m
Figure 1a. Visibility 50 m
Figure 3. D.E.Burch (1970). (700-1300 cm-1)
Figure 3. Full Lorentz
Figure 3. Simple Lorentz
Figure 3. This work
Figure 3. Van Vleck-Weisskopf
Figure 4. Burch experimental data
Figure 4. Calculated data far wings
Figure 4. Calculated data total absorption
Figure 5. Lorentz no bound
Figure 5. OSU data (J. C. Peterson, 1978)
Figure 5. Present calculation
Figure 5. Soviet data (V. N. Aref'ev, et al., 1977)
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1c
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1c
Figure 1d
Figure 1e
Figure 1f
Figure 1g
Figure 2. Watanabe, K., et al. (1953)
Figure 2a
Figure 2b
Figure 2d
Figure 1a
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1a. Absorption coefficient. Experiment
Figure 1a. Calculated values of absorption coefficient.
Figure 1a. Fitting
Figure 1b. Absorption coefficient. Experiment
Figure 1b. Calculated values of absorption coefficient.
Figure 1b. Fitting
Figure 2. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). Experiment. Р=14.5 atm, u=47.3 cmSTP
Figure 2. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). Experiment. Р=0.077 atm, u=3.32 atm cmSTP
Figure 2. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). Experiment. Р=2.0 atm, u=87.1 atm cmSTP
Figure 2. Calculation. P=2.0 атм, u=87.1 атм смSTP
Figure 2. Calculation. Р=0.077 atm, u=3.32 atm cmSTP
Figure 2. Calculation. Р=14.5 atm, u=47.3 cmSTP
Figure 1. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). CO₂+CO₂. Experiment (6990-7020 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). CO₂+He. Experiment (6990-7020 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). CO₂+N₂. Experiment (6990-7020 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. CO₂+Ar. Calculation (6990-7020 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. CO₂+CO₂. Calculation (6990-7020 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. CO₂+He. Calculation (6990-7020 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. CO₂+N₂. Calculation (6990-7020 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Баранов Ю.И. et al. (1981). CO₂+Ar. Experiment (6990-7020 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Bulanin M.O, et al. (1976). Experiment, normalized to the integrated intensity of the band
Figure 2. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). Experiment, normalized to the integrated intensity of the band
Figure 2. Calculation with Morse potential. (T=300K)
Figure 2. Calculation with the Kihara potential. (T=300K)
Figure 3. Temperature dependence of the absorption coefficient at 2450 cm⁻¹ (potential Morse (11))
Figure 3. Temperature dependence of the absorption coefficient at 2600 cm⁻¹ (potential Morse (11))
Figure 3. Temperature dependence of the absorption coefficient at 3000 cm⁻¹ (potential Morse (11))
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient in the wing of the v₃ CO₂ band. CO₂+Ar. Experiment
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient in the wing of the v₃ CO₂ band. CO₂+Ar. Fitting
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient in the wing of the v₃ CO₂ band. CO₂+CO₂. Experiment
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient in the wing of the v₃ CO₂ band. CO₂+CO₂. Fitting
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient in the wing of the v₃ CO₂ band. CO₂+D₂. Experiment
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient in the wing of the v₃ CO₂ band. CO₂+D₂. Fitting
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient in the wing of the v₃ CO₂ band. CO₂+H₂. Experiment
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient in the wing of the v₃ CO₂ band. CO₂+H₂. Fitting
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient in the wing of the v₃ CO₂ band. CO₂+He. Experiment
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient in the wing of the v₃ CO₂ band. CO₂+He. Fitting
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient in the wing of the v₃ CO₂ band. CO₂+N₂. Experiment
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient in the wing of the v₃ CO₂ band. CO₂+N₂. Fitting
Figure 1. Lennard-Jones potential used to determine the parameters of the contour
Figure 1. Potential retrieved from absorption coefficient data. T=213K
Figure 1. Potential retrieved from absorption coefficient data. T=293K
Figure 1. Potential retrieved from absorption coefficient data. T=310K
Figure 2. Absorption coefficient. CO₂+Ar. Calculation
Figure 2. Absorption coefficient. CO₂+Ar. Experiment
Figure 2. Absorption coefficient. CO₂+CO₂. Calculation
Figure 2. Absorption coefficient. CO₂+CO₂. Experiment
Figure 2. Absorption coefficient. CO₂+D₂. Experiment
Figure 2. Absorption coefficient. CO₂+H₂. Calculation
Figure 2. Absorption coefficient. CO₂+H₂. Experiment
Figure 2. Absorption coefficient. CO₂+He. Calculation
Figure 2. Absorption coefficient. CO₂+He. Experiment
Figure 2. Absorption coefficient. CO₂+N₂. Calculation
Figure 2. Absorption coefficient. CO₂+N₂. Experiment
Figure 3. Absorption coefficient. CO₂+Ar. Experiment
Figure 3. Absorption coefficient. CO₂+CO₂. Experiment
Figure 3. Absorption coefficient. CO₂+D₂. Experiment
Figure 3. Absorption coefficient. CO₂+H₂. Experiment
Figure 3. Absorption coefficient. CO₂+He. Experiment
Figure 3. Absorption coefficient. CO₂+N₂. Experiment
Figure 3. Correcting factor. CO₂. Calculation. n=14
Figure 3. Correcting factor. CO₂. Calculation. n=24
Figure 3. Correcting factor. CO₂. Calculation. n=5
Figure 3. Correcting factor. CO₂. Calculation. n=8
Figure 3. Calculation using (1), (2)
Figure 3. Calculations using data of Arefiev V.N., et al. (1977)
Figure 3. G.P.Montgomery (1978)
Figure 1. Calculation. Continuum Absorption. P(20) (10.59 mkm)
Figure 1. Calculation. Line Absorption R(20) (10.25 mkm)
Figure 1. Experiment. Continuum Absorption. P(20) (10.59 mkm)
Figure 1. Experiment. Line Absorption R(20) (10.25 mkm)
Figure 1. Bignell K.J., et al. (Fll Lorentz Lineshape)
Figure 1. Bignell K.J., et al. (Simple Lorentz Lineshape)
Figure 1. Bignell K.J., et al. (van Vleck-Weisskopf Lineshape)
Figure 1. Coffey M.T. (Full Lorentz Lineshape)
Figure 1. Coffey M.T. (Simple Lorentz Lineshape)
Figure 1. Coffey M.T. (van Vleck-Weisskopf Lineshape)
Figure 1. Knyazev N.A., et al. (Full Lorentz Lineshape)
Figure 1. Knyazev N.A., et al. (Simple Lorentz Lineshape)
Figure 1. Our calculation (Full Lorentz Lineshape)
Figure 1. Our calculation (Simple Lorentz Lineshape)
Figure 1. Our calculation (van Vleck-Weisskopf Lineshape)
Figure 8. D.E.Burch, et al. (1970, 1974)
Figure 8. Aerospace
Figure 8. Collisional broadening model
Figure 8. D.E.Burch, et al. (1970, 1974)
Figure 8. Dimer model (-6.5 kcal/mole binding energy)
Figure 8. G.P.Montgomery, Jr. (1978)
Figure 7. The calculated absorption coefficients of H₂O (1 atm, 1300-2300K, 1901.762 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. The calculated absorption coefficients of H₂O (0.3 atm, 1300-2300K, 1901.762 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. The calculated absorption coefficients of H₂O (0.64 atm, 1300-2300K, 1901.762 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. The measured absorption coefficient (0.3 atm, 1300-2300K, 1901.762 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. The measured absorption coefficient (0.64 atm, 1300-2300K, 1901.762 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. The measured absorption coefficient (1 atm, 1300-2300K, 1901.762 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient (228.3K, 20-300 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient (253.5K, 20-300 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient (277.5K, 20-300 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient (297.5K, 20-300 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient (322.6K, 20-300 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient (343K, 20-300 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Laser results (15.1 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Laser results (84.2 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1a
Figure 1. Calculation (corner-corner approach)
Figure 1. Calculation (crossed-edge approach)
Figure 1. Calculation (staggered plane-plane approach)
Figure 1. Present model (corner-corner approach)
Figure 1. Present model (crossed-edge approach)
Figure 1. Present model (staggered plane-plane approach)
Figure 1a
Figure 1. Approximation of U(R) curve (4)
Figure 1. The boundary of the region of intermolecular distances R1 (left)
Figure 1. The boundary of the region of intermolecular distances R2 (right)
Figure 1. U(R) at TE0=273K
Figure 1. U0(R) at TE0=300K
Figure 2. Bulanin M.O., et al. (1976). Experiment T= 213 K
Figure 2. Bulanin M.O., et al. (1976). Experiment T= 273 K
Figure 2. Bulanin M.O., et al. (1976). Experiment T= 310 K
Figure 2. Calculation along the generalized contour at Т = 213 K
Figure 2. Calculation along the generalized contour at Т = 273 K
Figure 2. Calculation along the generalized contour at Т = 310 K
Table 3. Calculation with Lorentzian contour (T=300 K)
Table 3. Calculation with generalized contour (T=213K)
Table 3. Calculation with generalized contour (T=273K)
Table 3. Calculation with generalized contour (T=300K)
Table 3. Calculation with generalized contour (T=310K)
Table 3. Experiment (T=300K)
Table 5. Calculation with Lorentzian contour (T=300 K)
Table 5. Calculation with generalized contour (T=213K)
Table 5. Calculation with generalized contour (T=273K)
Table 5. Calculation with generalized contour (T=300K)
Table 5. Calculation with generalized contour (T=310K)
Table 5. Experiment (T=300K)
Table 6. Calculation with Lorentzian contour (T=300 K)
Table 6. Calculation with generalized contour (T=213K)
Table 6. Calculation with generalized contour (T=273K)
Table 6. Calculation with generalized contour (T=300K)
Table 6. Calculation with generalized contour (T=310K)
Table 6. Experiment (T=300K)
Table 3. Absorption coefficient behind the edge of the band 4.3 mkm. T= 273K
Table 3. Absorption coefficient behind the edge of the band 4.3 mkm. T=273K
Table 3. Absorption coefficient behind the edge of the band 4.3 mkm. T=296K
Table 3. Absorption coefficient behind the edge of the band 4.3 mkm. T=298K
Table 3. Absorption coefficient behind the edge of the band 4.3 mkm. T=333K
Table 3. Absorption coefficient behind the edge of the band 4.3 mkm. T=336K
Table 3. Absorption coefficient behind the edge of the band 4.3 mkm. T=359K
Table 3. Absorption coefficient behind the edge of the band 4.3 mkm. T=363K
Figure 2. Laser line P(20) Density=2.07
Figure 2. Laser line P(20) Density=2.08
Figure 2. Laser line P(20) Density=3.45
Figure 2. Laser line P(20) Density=5.25
Figure 2. S.H.Suck, et al. (1982). Dimer model
Figure 1. Theoretical values for water vapor monomers
Figure 1. Our total absorption (T=25.5C, P =730 Torr)
Figure 1. Our total absorption (T=25.5C, P=730 Torr)
Figure 1. Theoretical values for water vapor monomers
Figure 1a. A.A.Viktorova, et al. (1970). Theoretical dimer absorption
Figure 1a. A.A.Viktorova, et al. (1970). Theoretical dimer absorption.
Figure 1a. Our excess absorption
Figure 1a. Our excess absorption
Figure 1a. R.J. Emery, et al. (1975)
Figure 1a. R.J. Emery, et al. (1975)
Figure 2. Our total absorption
Figure 2. Our total absorption
Figure 2. Theoretical values for water vapor monomers.
Figure 2. Theoretical values for water vapor monomers
Figure 2a. A.A.Viktorova, et al. (1970). Theoretical dimer absorption.
Figure 2a. A.A.Viktorova, et al. (1970). Theoretical dimer absorption
Figure 2a. Our excess absorption.
Figure 2a. Our excess absorption
Figure 2a. R.J. Emery, et al. (1975), Excess absorption spectrum.
Figure 2a. R.J. Emery, et al. (1975). Excess absorption spectrum
Figure 1. D.E.Burch, (1976, 1982) (296K, 700-1100cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Our experimental results (296K, 700-1100cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Our fitting (296K, 700-1100cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. (296K, 700-1100cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Experiment (284K, 700-1100cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Self-broadening coefficient (284K, 700-1100cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Fitting (1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Fitting (700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. LOTRAN 6 (1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. LOTRAN 6 (700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. This work (1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. This work (700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. H₂O+N₂. LOWTRAN 6 data (296K, 700-1200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. H₂O+N₂. Measured values (296K, 700-1200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. H₂O+N₂. Smoothed values (296K, 700-1200 cm⁻¹) (Tab)
Figure 6. Experiment (296K, 2400-2640cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Experiment (328K, 2400-2640cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Fitting (296K) (2400-2640cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Fitting (328K) (2400-2640cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. 1971, extrapolated, (296 K)
Figure 7. D.E. Burch, et al. (1971). (338K, 2400-2800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. D.E. Burch, et al. (1971). (384K, 2400-2800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. D.E. Burch, et al. (1971). (428K, 2400-2800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Present work (296K, 2400-2800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Present work. (328K, 2400-2800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. Wavenumber 2400 cm⁻¹. Temperature dependence. Approximation
Figure 8. Wavenumber 2400 cm⁻¹. Temperature dependence. Experiment
Figure 8. Wavenumber 2500 cm⁻¹. Temperature dependence. Approximation
Figure 8. Wavenumber 2500 cm⁻¹. Temperature dependence. Experiment
Figure 8. Wavenumber 2600 cm⁻¹. Temperature dependence. Approximation
Figure 8. Wavenumber 2600 cm⁻¹. Temperature dependence. Experiment
Figure 4. L.M. Koukin, et al. (278K)
Figure 4. Absorption coefficient (263K, 0.6-0.9 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1a
Table 7. Absorption coefficients CO₂+Ar
Table 7. Absorption coefficients CO₂+H₂
Table 7. Absorption coefficients CO₂+He
Table 7. Absorption coefficients CO₂+N₂
Table 7. Absorption coefficients CO₂+Ne
Figure 1a
Figure 4a
Figure 4b
Figure 4c
Figure 4d
Figure 4e
Figure 4f
Figure 4g
Figure 4h
Figure 4i
Figure 4j
Figure 4k
Figure 5. Experimental results for the water dimer
Figure 5. Quantum simulation results for the water dimer
Figure 4. I E.L.Knuth (1977)
Figure 4. II D.E.Stogryn et al. (1959)
Figure 4. III This work
Figure 4. IV This work (classical partition functions)
Figure 4. V This work (neglecting the anisotropy)
Figure 4. VI This work (dimer as a diatomic molecule)
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1a
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1c
Table 1. Normalized Absorption Coefficient. T=193K
Table 1. Normalized Absorption Coefficient. T=218K
Table 1. Normalized Absorption Coefficient. T=238K
Table 1. Normalized Absorption Coefficient. T=258K
Table 1. Normalized Absorption Coefficient. T=296K
Table 1. Normalized Absorption Coefficient.T=296K
Figure 5a. Normalized absorption coefficient. CO₂. T=193K
Figure 5a. Normalized absorption coefficient. CO₂. T=296K
Figure 5b. Normalized absorption coefficient. CO₂. T=193K
Figure 5b. Normalized absorption coefficient. CO₂. T=296K
Figure 5c. Normalized absorption coefficient. CO₂. T=193K
Figure 5c. Normalized absorption coefficient. CO₂. T=296K
Figure 6. Temperature dependence of the normalized absorption coefficient (l=2395 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Temperature dependence of the normalized absorption coefficient (l=2435 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Temperature dependence of the normalized absorption coefficient (l=2485 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Temperature dependence of the normalized absorption coefficient (l=2590 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Temperature dependence of the normalized absorption coefficient. Fitting (l=2395 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Temperature dependence of the normalized absorption coefficient. Fitting (l=2435 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Temperature dependence of the normalized absorption coefficient. Fitting (l=2485 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Temperature dependence of the normalized absorption coefficient. Fitting (l=2590 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Correcting factor of the line shape (WSB)
Figure 9a. Best fit obtained with the two-parameter lineshape factor of Birnbaum
Figure 9a. Calculation with the Lorentzian model
Figure 9a. Experimental data (T=296K)
Figure 9b. Best fit obtained with the two-parameter lineshape factor of Birnbaum
Figure 9b. Calculation with Lorentzian model
Figure 9b. Experimental data (T=218K)
Table 2. Normalized Absorption Coefficient. Paris. T=296K
Table 2. Normalized Absorption Coefficient. Rennes. T=193K
Table 2. Normalized Absorption Coefficient. Rennes. T=218K
Table 2. Normalized Absorption Coefficient. Rennes. T=238K
Figure 2a. Normalized absorption coefficient. CO₂+N₂. T=193K
Figure 2a. Normalized absorption coefficient. CO₂+N₂. T=296K
Figure 2b. Normalized absorption coefficient. CO₂+N₂. T=193K
Figure 2b. Normalized absorption coefficient. CO₂+N₂. T=296K
Figure 2c. Normalized absorption coefficient. CO₂+N₂. Experiment. l=2395 cm⁻¹
Figure 2c. Normalized absorption coefficient. CO₂+N₂. Experiment. l=2435 cm⁻¹2435
Figure 2c. Normalized absorption coefficient. CO₂+N₂. Experiment. l=2445 cm⁻¹
Figure 2c. Normalized absorption coefficient. CO₂+N₂. Experiment. l=2520 cm⁻¹
Figure 2c. Normalized absorption coefficient. CO₂+N₂. l=2395 cm⁻¹
Figure 2c. Normalized absorption coefficient. CO₂+N₂. l=2435 cm⁻¹
Figure 2c. Normalized absorption coefficient. CO₂+N₂. l=2445 cm⁻¹
Figure 2c. Normalized absorption coefficient. CO₂+N₂. l=2520 cm⁻¹
Table 3. Normalized Absorption Coefficient. Rennes. T=193K
Table 3. Normalized Absorption Coefficient. Rennes. T=218K
Table 3. Normalized Absorption Coefficient. Rennes. T=238K
Table 3. Normalized Absorption Coefficient. Rennes. T=296K
Figure 3a. Normalized absorption coefficient. CO₂+O₂. T=193K
Figure 3a. Normalized absorption coefficient. CO₂+O₂. T=296K
Figure 3b. Normalized absorption coefficient. CO₂+O₂. T=193K
Figure 3b. Normalized absorption coefficient. CO₂+O₂. T=296K
Figure 3c. Normalized absorption coefficient. CO₂+O₂. Experiment. l=2395 cm⁻¹
Figure 3c. Normalized absorption coefficient. CO₂+O₂. Experiment. l=2435 cm⁻¹
Figure 3c. Normalized absorption coefficient. CO₂+O₂. Experiment. l=2445 cm⁻¹
Figure 3c. Normalized absorption coefficient. CO₂+O₂. Experiment. l=2520 cm⁻¹
Figure 3c. Normalized absorption coefficient. CO₂+O₂. l=2395 cm⁻¹
Figure 3c. Normalized absorption coefficient. CO₂+O₂. l=2435 cm⁻¹
Figure 3c. Normalized absorption coefficient. CO₂+O₂. l=2445 cm⁻¹
Figure 3c. Normalized absorption coefficient. CO₂+O₂. l=2520 cm⁻¹
Figure 4. CO₂+N₂. Correcting factor of the line shape (WSB)
Figure 4. CO₂+O₂. Correcting factor of the line shape (WSB)
Figure 5. CO₂+N₂. Correcting factor of the line shape (BGPB)
Figure 5. CO₂+N₂. Correcting factor of the line shape (CNRFB)
Figure 3. FIR Interferometer
Figure 3. FIR Laser (15.1 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. FIR Laser (84.2 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Theory (Mori theory)
Figure 3a. FIR Interferometer
Figure 3a. FIR Laser (84.2 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3a. IR Laser (15.1 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3a. Theory (Mori theory)
Figure 3b. FIR Interferometer
Figure 3b. FIR Laser (15.1 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3b. FIR Laser (84.2 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3b. Theory (Mori theory)
Figure 3c. Buontempo et al. (1975). FIR Interferometer
Figure 3c. FIR Interferometer
Figure 3c. FIR Laser (15.1 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3c. FIR Laser (84.2 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3c. Theory (Mori theory)
Figure 1. Birnbaum, G. (1975) (195K, 0-600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Present results (195K, 0-600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1a. Birnbaum, G. (1975) (296K, 0-600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1a. Present results (296K, 0-600 cm⁻¹)
Table 1. Binary absorption coefficient CO₂+Ar
Table 1. Binary absorption coefficient CO₂+D₂
Table 1. Binary absorption coefficient CO₂+H₂
Table 1. Binary absorption coefficient CO₂+He
Table 1. Binary absorption coefficient CO₂+N₂
Table 1. Binary absorption coefficient CO₂+Ne
Table 1. Binary absorption coefficient CO₂+Xe
Figure 1. CO₂+Ar. Correction factor of the Lorentz shape
Figure 1. CO₂+D₂. Correction factor of the Lorentz shape
Figure 1. CO₂+H₂. Correction factor of the Lorentz shape
Figure 1. CO₂+He. Correction factor of the Lorentz shape
Figure 1. CO₂+N₂. Correction factor of the Lorentz shape
Figure 1. CO₂+Ne. Correction factor of the Lorentz shape
Figure 1. CO₂+Xe. Correction factor of the Lorentz shape
Figure 1. Расчет по модели изолированных ветвей
Figure 1. Расчет по модели сильных столкновений
Table 1. Absorption coefficient. T=213K. Calculation
Table 1. Absorption coefficient. T=293K. Calculation
Table 1. Absorption coefficient. T=310K. Calculation
Table 1. Bulanin M.O., et al. (1976). T=213K. Experiment
Table 1. Bulanin M.O., et al. (1976). T=293K. Experiment
Table 1. Bulanin M.O., et al. (1976). T=310K. Experiment
Figure 4a. Calculation with V(T₀=293 K), T=673K
Figure 4a. Calculation with V(T0=293 K), T=300K
Figure 4a. Calculation with V(T0=293°K), T=473K
Figure 4b. Calculation with V(T), T=300K
Figure 4b. Calculation with V(T), T=473K
Figure 4b. Calculation with V(T), T=673K
Figure 5a. Bulanin M.O., et al. (1976). Experiment. T=213K
Figure 5a. Original calculation. T=213K, V(T0)
Figure 5a. Original calculation. T=310K, V(T0)
Figure 5a. Original calculation. T=500K, V(T0)
Figure 5a. Winters B.H., et al. (1964) and Bulanin M.O., et al. (1976). Experiment. T=300K
Figure 5b. Original calculation. T=213K, V(T)
Figure 5b. Original calculation. T=310K, V(T)
Figure 5b. Original calculation. T=310K, V(T)
Figure 5b. Original calculation. T=590K, V(T)
Figure 5b. Winters B.H., et al. (1964) and Буланин М.О., et al. (1976). Experiment T=300K
Figure 5b. Буланин М.О., et al. (1976). Experiment T=213K
Figure 5c. Calculation with a dispersion contour. T=213K
Figure 5c. Calculation with a dispersion contour. T=310K
Figure 5c. Calculation with a dispersion contour. T=500K
Figure 5c. Winters B.H., et al. (1964) and Буланин М.О., et al. (1976). Experiment T=300K
Figure 5c. Буланин М.О., et al. (1976). Experiment T=213K
Figure 6. Calculation with a dispersion contour. (2394 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Calculation with a dispersion contour. (2396 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Calculation with a dispersion contour. (2400 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Calculation with a dispersion contour. (2410 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Calculation with a dispersion contour. (2420 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Present calculation. (2394 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Present calculation. (2396 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Present calculation. (2400 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Present calculation. (2410 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Present calculation. (2420 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1a. Calculation with a Lorentzian contour
Figure 1a. Calculation with a limited number of interacting lines
Figure 1a. Experiment
Figure 1a. Positions and relative intensities of the lines
Figure 1b. Calculation with a Lorentzian contour
Figure 1b. Calculation with a limited number of interacting lines
Figure 1b. Experiment
Figure 1b. Positions and relative intensities of the lines
Figure 1b. Сalculation with the strong collision model
Figure 1. Table 1. Calculated
e
C
s
⁰
Figure 1. Table 1. Corrected
e
C⁰
s
Figure 1. Table 1. Empirical
e
C
s
⁰
Figure 3. Calculated
e
C
s
⁰ (3000-4400 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Corrected
e
C
s
⁰ (3000-4400 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Empirical
e
C
s
⁰ (3000-4400 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Calculated
e
C⁰
N
(296K, 3000 to 4200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Corrected
e
C⁰
N
(296K, 3000-4200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Empirical
e
C⁰
N
(296K, 3000 to 4200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Continuum (308K, 1400-1900 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Contribution of lines
Figure 6. Empirical continuum (308K, 1400-1900 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Experiment (308K, 1400-1900 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. H₂O+N₂. (T=308K, 1400-1850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. H₂O+N₂. (T=353K, 1290-1450 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. H₂O+N₂. (T=353K, 1600-2000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. H₂O+N₂. (T=428K, 1850-2050 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. H₂O. (T=308K, 1400-1850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. H₂O. (T=322K, 1850-2250 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. H₂O. (T=353K, 1290-1450 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. H₂O. (T=353K, 1600-2200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. H₂O. (T=428K, 1290-1450 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. H₂O. (T=428K, 1850-2200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Experimental data
Figure 1. Regression fit
Figure 2. Experimental data
Figure 2. Regression fit
Figure 3. Experimental data
Figure 3. Regression fit
Figure 4. Difference between 9R(36) and 9R(34)
Figure 4. Regression fit
Figure 8. Fedoseev L.I. et al. (1984) (278K, 190-260 GHz)
Figure 8. Millimeter-Wave Propagation Model (MPM)
Figure 8a. Fedoseev L.I. et al. (1984) (263K, 180-260 GHz)
Figure 8a. Millimeter-Wave Propagation Model (MPM) 263K
Figure 2. D.E.Burch, et al. (1971) (338K, 2400-2850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. H₂O+N₂. D.E.Burch, et al. (1971) (296K, 2400-2800 cm⁻¹))
Figure 2. Total line shape (298K)
Figure 2. Total line shape (338K)
Figure 3. D.E.Burch, et al. (1971, 1980) (280-400K, 944.195 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Dimer
Figure 3. G.L.Loper, et al. (1983) (260-300K, 944.195 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. J.C.Peterson, et al. (1978,1979) (280-305K, 944.195 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Total line shape
Figure 3. V.N.Arefev et al. (1977) (280-360Kб 944.195 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. D.E.Burch et al. (1971, 1980) (1203 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Dimer and local lines
Figure 4. Dimer
Figure 4. G.L.Loper, et al. (1983)
Figure 4. G.P.Montgomery Jr. (1978)
Figure 4. Total line Shape
Figure 5. Experiment (296K, 850-1100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Experiment (392K, , 850-1100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Total line shape (392K)
Figure 5. Total line shape 296K
Figure 6. D.E.Burch et al. (1971, 1980) (2500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Total line shape (2500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1a
Figure 1a
Figure 1a
Figure 1a
Figure 1a
Figure 2. LLambda contributions (LLambda=32 CH₄)
Figure 2. LLambda contributions (LLambda=43 CH₄)
Figure 2. LLambda contributions (LLambda=54 CH₄)
Figure 2. Quantum calculation based on the fit of the measurement
Figure 2. Sutter et al. (1986). Experiment (195K)
Figure 3. A quantum calculation based on the fit of the measurement. (297K)
Figure 3. Birnbaum, G., et al. (1987). Absorption coefficient of H2 + CH4
Figure 3. LLambda contributions as follows: LLambda = 32 CH₄
Figure 3. LLambda contributions as follows: LLambda = 43 CH₄
Figure 3. LLambda contributions as follows: LLambda = 54 CH₄
Figure 4. Absorption coefficient of H₂-CH₄ calculated at 70K, in the region of the hydrogen S
o
(0) line
Figure 5. 2
Figure 5. LLambda contribution (LLambda=54 H₂)
Figure 5. LLambda contributions (LLambda=32 CH₄)
Figure 5. LLambda contributions (LLambda=43 CH₄)
Figure 5. Total LLambda contribution
Figure 2. Buontempo et al. (1975) (124K, 0-200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Fitting (126K)
Figure 2. Fitting (149K)
Figure 2. Fitting (179K)
Figure 2. Stone et al. (1984), Dagg et al. (1985) (126K, 0-200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Stone et al. (1984), Dagg et al. (1985) (149K, 0-200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Stone et al. (1984), Dagg et al. (1985) (179K, 0-200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2a. Dagg, I.R., et al. (1985) (300K)
Figure 2a. Fitting-228.3K
Figure 2a. Fitting-300K
Figure 2a. Stone, N. W. B., et al. (1984) (228.3K)
Figure 2a. U. Buentempo, et al. (300K)
Figure 1a. CO₂+N₂. (2374-2383 cm⁻¹, T=193K)
Figure 1a. CO₂+N₂. (2374-2383 cm⁻¹, T=238K)
Figure 1a. CO₂+N₂. (2374-2383 cm⁻¹, T=296K)
Figure 1b. CO₂+N₂. (2383-2388 cm⁻¹, T=193K)
Figure 1b. CO₂+N₂. (2383-2388 cm⁻¹, T=238K)
Figure 1b. CO₂+N₂. (2383-2388 cm⁻¹, T=296K)
Figure 1c. CO₂+N₂. (2388-2395 cm⁻¹, T=193K)
Figure 1c. CO₂+N₂. (2388-2395 cm⁻¹, T=238K)
Figure 1c. CO₂+N₂. (2388-2395 cm⁻¹, T=296K)
Figure 2a. CO₂+O₂. (2374-2383 cm⁻¹, T=193K)
Figure 2a. CO₂+O₂. (2374-2383 cm⁻¹, T=238K)
Figure 2a. CO₂+O₂. (2374-2383 cm⁻¹, T=296K)
Figure 2b. CO₂+O₂. (2383-2387 cm⁻¹, T=193K)
Figure 2b. CO₂+O₂. (2383-2387 cm⁻¹, T=238K)
Figure 2b. CO₂+O₂. (2383-2387 cm⁻¹, T=296K)
Figure 2c. CO₂+O₂. (2387-2393 cm⁻¹, T=193K)
Figure 2c. CO₂+O₂. (2387-2393 cm⁻¹, T=238K)
Figure 2c. CO₂+O₂. (2387-2393 cm⁻¹, T=296K)
Table 4. Normalized Absorption Coefficient. Paris. T=296K
Table 4. Normalized Absorption Coefficient. Rennes. T=193K
Table 4. Normalized Absorption Coefficient. Rennes. T=218K
Table 4. Normalized Absorption Coefficient. Rennes. T=238K
Table 4. Normalized Absorption Coefficient. Rennes. T=296K
Table 5. Normalized Absorption Coefficient. Rennes. T=193K
Table 5. Normalized Absorption Coefficient. Rennes. T=218K
Table 5. Normalized Absorption Coefficient. Rennes. T=238K
Table 5. Normalized Absorption Coefficient. Rennes. T=296K
Figure 4. FIR interferometer. The experimental results (212K, 0-400 cm⁻1)
Figure 4. FIR laser (212K, 15.1 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. FIR laser (212K, 84.2 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Microwave (212K, 4.85 cm⁻1)
Figure 4. Theory (212K, 0-400 cm⁻1)
Figure 4a. FIR interferometer. The experimental results (179K, 0-400 cm⁻1)
Figure 4a. FIR laser (179K, 15.1 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4a. FIR laser (179K, 84.2 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4a. Microwave (179K, 4.85 cm⁻1)
Figure 4a. Theory (179K, 0-400 cm⁻1)
Figure 4b. FIR laser (149K, 15.1 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4b. FIR laser (149K, 84.2 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4b. Microwave (149K, 4.85 cm⁻1)
Figure 4b. The experimental results (149K, 0-400 cm⁻1)
Figure 4b. Theory (149K, 0-400 cm⁻1)
Figure 4c. FIR interferometer. The experimental results (126K, 0-400 cm⁻1)
Figure 4c. FIR laser (126K, 15.1 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4c. FIR laser (126K, 84.2 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4c. Microwave (126K, 4.85 cm⁻1)
Figure 4c. Theory (126K, 0-400 cm⁻1)
Figure 4c. Theory. Hexadecapole induction (126K, 0-400 cm⁻1)
Figure 4c. Theory. Octopole induction (126K, 0-400 cm⁻1)
Figure 4c. Theory. Quadrupole induction (126K, 0-400 cm⁻1)
Figure 1. P. Codastefano, et al. (1986) (140K, 150-850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Theoretical roto-translational spectra H₂-CH₄ (140K, 150-850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1a. P. Codastefano, et al. (1986) (163K, 150-850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1a. Theoretical roto-translational spectra H₂-CH₄ (163K, 150-850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1b. P. Codastefano, et al. (1986) (175K, 150-850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1b. Theoretical roto-translational spectra H₂+CH₄ (175K, 150-850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1c. P. Codastefano, et al. (1986) (195K, 150-850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1c. Theoretical roto-translational spectra H₂-CH₄ (195K, 150-850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1d. P. Codastefano, et al. (1986) (296K, 150-850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1d. Theoretical roto-translational spectra H₂+CH₄ (296K, 150-850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Measured roto-translational spectra (91K, 100-800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Theoretical roto-translational spectra (91K, 100-800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1a. Measured roto-translational spectra (141K, 100-800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1a. Theoretical roto-translational spectra (141K, 100-800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1b. Measured roto-translational spectra (165K, 100-800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1b. Theoretical roto-translational spectra (165K, 100-800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1c. Measured roto-translational spectra (195K, 100-800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1c. Theoretical roto-translational spectra (195K, 100-800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1d. Measured roto-translational spectra (298K, 100-800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1d. Theoretical roto-translational spectra (298K, 100-800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. CH₄ absorption p²
m
A
mm
(v). (175K, 100-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. H₂ absorption p²
h
A
hh
(v). (175K, 100-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Measured absorption A
e
(v) (175K, 100-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Total absorption due to all of the CH₄+H₂ interactions A
T
HM
(v) (175K, 100-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. CH₄ absorption p²
m
A
mm
(v). (175K, 300-850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. H₂ absorption p²
h
A
hh
(v) (175K, 300-850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Measured absorption A
e
(v) (175K, 300-850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Total absorption due to all of the CH₄+H₂ interactions A
T
HM
(v)(175K, 300-850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Absorption coefficient A
HM
(v) (195K, 200-850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Previous measurements (195K, 200-850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3a. Absorption coefficient A
HM
(v) (296K, 200-850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3a. Previous measurements (296K, 200-850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Best fitting profile (140K, 0-850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Experimental F
HM
(v) (140K, 0-850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. m-h contribution (140K, 0-850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Table 1. Computation
Figure 1. Table 1. Experiment
Figure 1. Table 1. Kelley P.L., et al. (1976)
Figure 1. Table 1. Rice D.K., et al. (1973), Menzies R.T., et al. (1976)
Figure 1. CO₂+Hе, 13.4 Amagat
Figure 1. CO₂+Hе, 2.2 Amagat
Figure 1. CO₂+Hе, 47.4 Amagat
Figure 1. CO₂+Хе, 14.8 Amagat
Figure 1. CO₂+Хе, 2.1 Amagat
Figure 1. CO₂+Хе, 45.0 Amagat
Figure 1. CO₂+Хе, 7.0 Amagat
Figure 2. The shape of the Q-branch of the band v=1932 cm⁻¹. CO₂+Ar. Experiment
Figure 2. The shape of the Q-branch of the band v=1932 cm⁻¹. CO₂+He. Experiment
Figure 2. The shape of the Q-branch of the band v=1932 cm⁻¹. CO₂+Ne. Experiment
Figure 2. The shape of the Q-branch of the band v=1932 cm⁻¹. CO₂+Xe. Experiment
Figure 2. The shape of the Q-branch of the band v=1932 cm⁻¹. Calculation (MILDC)
Figure 2. The shape of the Q-branch of the band v=1932 cm⁻¹. Calculation (MInB)
Figure 2. The shape of the Q-branch of the band v=1932 cm⁻¹. Calculation (MIsB)
Table 1. The absorption coefficient. CO₂+N₂. T=210K
Table 1. The absorption coefficient. CO₂+N₂. T=230K
Table 1. The absorption coefficient. CO₂+N₂. T=250K
Table 1. The absorption coefficient. CO₂+N₂. T=260K
Table 1. The absorption coefficient. CO₂+N₂. T=280K
Table 1. The absorption coefficient. CO₂+N₂. T=300K
Figure 1. Function of deviation. CO₂+Ar. Calculation of a model of a limited number of interacting lines
Figure 1. Function of deviation. CO₂+Ar. Experiment
Figure 1. Function of deviation. CO₂+He. Calculation of a model of a limited number of interacting lines
Figure 1. Function of deviation. CO₂+He. Experiment
Figure 1. Function of deviation. CO₂+N₂. Calculation of a model of a limited number of interacting lines
Figure 1. Function of deviation. CO₂+N₂. Experiment
Figure 1. Function of deviation. CO₂+Ne. Calculation of a model of a limited number of interacting lines
Figure 1. Function of deviation. CO₂+Ne. Experiment
Figure 1. Function of deviation. CO₂+Xe. Calculation of a model of a limited number of interacting lines
Figure 1. Function of deviation. CO₂+Xe. Experiment
Figure 1. Function of deviation. CO₂. Calculation of a strong collision model
Table 1. Adiks T.G., et al. (1984). Experiment. T=273K
Table 1. Adiks T.G., et al. (1984). Experiment. T=298K
Table 1. Adiks T.G., et al. (1984). Experiment. T=333K
Table 1. Adiks T.G., et al. (1984). Experiment. T=363K
Table 1. Original calculation. (2400-2450 cm-1, T=273K)
Table 1. Original calculation. (2400-2450 cm-1, T=298K)
Table 1. Original calculation. (2400-2450 cm-1, T=333K)
Table 1. Original calculation. (2400-2450 cm-1, T=363K)
Figure 1a. Absorption coefficient. Calculation with V (T0 = 293K) at T=300K
Figure 1a. Absorption coefficient. Calculation with V (T0 = 293K) at T=473K
Figure 1a. Absorption coefficient. Calculation with V (T0 = 293K) at T=673K
Figure 1b. Absorption coefficient. Calculation with V (T) at T=300K
Figure 1b. Absorption coefficient. Calculation with V (T) at T=473K
Figure 1b. Absorption coefficient. Calculation with V (T) at T=673K
Figure 4. Baranov Yu.I., et al. (1981). CO₂+He. Experiment
Figure 4. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). CO₂+He. Experiment
Figure 4. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). CO₂+N₂. Experiment
Figure 4. CO₂+He. Calculation with Γmm
Figure 4. CO₂+He. Calculation with ENT contour
Figure 4. CO₂+He. Experiment
Figure 4. CO₂+N₂. Calculation with Γmm
Figure 4. CO₂+N₂. Calculation with ENT contour
Figure 4. CO₂+N₂. Experiment
Figure 1. CO₂ + Ar. Calculation according to the formula (1)
Figure 1. CO₂ + Ar. Experiment
Figure 1. CO₂ + Ar. Lorentz curve
Figure 1. CO₂ + He. Calculation according to the formula (1)
Figure 1. CO₂ + He. Lorentz curve
Figure 1. Sattarov, K., et al. (1983). CO₂ + He. Experiment
Table 1. Normalized Absorption Coefficient. Paris. T=296K
Table 1. Normalized Absorption Coefficient. Rennes. T=193K
Table 1. Normalized Absorption Coefficient. Rennes. T=296K
Table 2. Normalized Absorption Coefficient. Paris. T=296K
Table 2. Normalized Absorption Coefficient. Rennes. T=193K
Table 2. Normalized Absorption Coefficient. Rennes. T=296K
Figure 1. Absorption coefficients of gaseous methane (150K, 0-600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Absorption coefficients of gaseous methane (175K, 0-600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Absorption coefficients of gaseous methane (195K, 0-600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Experimentally determined absorption band. (243K, 50-700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. The best-fit curve obtained by using the ab inifio computed single line profiles
Figure 3. The best-fit curve: (a) octupolar contribution
Figure 3. The best-fit curve: (b) hexadecapolar contribution
Figure 4. Experimentally determined absorption band. (163K, 50-600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. The best-fit curve obtained by using the MLEW model to describe the single line profiles (R=2.3)
Figure 4. The best-fit curve: (a) octupolar contribution (R=2.3)
Figure 4. The best-fit curve: (b) hexadecapolar contribution (R=2.3)
Figure 4a. Experimentally determined absorption band. (163K, 50-600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4a. The best-fit curve obtained by using the MLEW model to describe the line profiles (R=1.6)
Figure 4a. The best-fit curve: (a) octupolar contribution (R=1.6)
Figure 4a. The best-fit curve: (b) hexadecapolar contribution (R=1.6)
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1c
Figure 2. CO₂ laser line 10P(30)
Figure 2. S.H. Suck, et al. (1979). Dimer model
Figure 1a
Figure 3. Calculated. Perpendicular band
Figure 3. Experimental
Figure 1. Calculation of the CO₂ trimer spectrum
Figure 1a. Observed spectrum of the (CO₂)₂ (5 atm)
Figure 1a. Observed spectrum of the CO₂+(CO₂)₂+He (5 atm)
Figure 1b. Observed spectrum of the CO₂+(CO₂)₂+He (2 atm)
Figure 1c. Observed spectrum of the CO₂+(CO₂)₂+He (3 atm)
Figure 1. Absorption coefficients of CH₄+CH₄ (295K)
Figure 1. P. Codastefano, et al. (1986). Experimental data ( 295K, 0-600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1a. Fitted absorption coefficients of CH₄+CH₄ (243K, 0-600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1a. P. Codastefano, et al. (1986). Experimental data (243K, 0-600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1b. Fitted absorption coefficients of CH₄+CH₄ (195K, 0-600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1b. P. Codastefano, et al. (1986). Experimental data (195K, 0-600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1c. Fitted absorption coefficients of CH₄+CH₄ (175K, 0-600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1c. P. Codastefano, et al. (1986). Experimental data (175K, 0-600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1d. Fitted absorption coefficients of CH₄+CH₄ (163K, 0-600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1d. P. Codastefano, et al. (1986). Experimental data (163K, 0-600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1e. Fitted absorption coefficients of CH₄-CH₄ (151K, 0-600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1e. P. Codastefano, et al. (1986). Experimental data (151K, 0-600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1f. Fitted absorption coefficients of CH₄-CH₄ (140K, 0-600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1f. P. Codastefano, et al. (1986). Experimental data (151K, 0-600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1g. CH₄-CH₄. The contribution due to the hexadecapole induction (126K, 0-600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1g. CH₄-CH₄. The contributions due to the octopole induction (126K, 0-600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1g. Fitted absorption coefficients of CH₄-CH₄ (126K, 0-600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1g. I.R. Dagg, et al. (1986). Absorption coefficients of CH₄-CH₄. (126K, 0-600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Part of mixture spectrum showing the contributions due to CH₄ collisions
Figure 1. Part of mixture spectrum showing the contributions due to H₂+CH₄ collisions
Figure 1. Part of mixture spectrum showing the contributions due to H₂+H₂ collisions
Figure 1. The Far-Infrared spectrum of a mixture of 20.7% CH₄ in H₂ at 195K
Figure 2. Part of mixture spectrum showing the contributions due to CH₄+CH₄ collisions
Figure 2. Part of mixture spectrum showing the contributions due to H₂+CH₄ collisions
Figure 2. Part of mixture spectrum showing the contributions due to H₂+H₂ collisions
Figure 2. The Far-Infrared spectrum of a mixture of 20.7% CH₄ in H₂ at 297K
Figure 3. Fitting the difference between the experinmental and computed CH₄ induced spectra
Figure 3. The experinmental points CH₄+H₂ (195K, 0-1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. The quadrupole-Induced spectrum of H₂ (195K, 0-1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. The sum of the computed octopole and hexadecapole-induced spectrum of CH₄ (195K, 0-1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. The sum of the computed spectrum of CH₄ and H₂ (195K, 0-1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Fitting the difference between the experinmental and computed CH₄ induced spectra
Figure 4. The experinmental points CH₄+H₂ (297K, 0-1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. The quadrupole-Induced spectrum of H₂ (297K, 0-1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. The sum of the computed octopole and hexadecapole-induced spectrum of CH₄ (297K, 0-1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. The sum of the computed spectrum of CH₄ and H₂ (297K, 0-1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. The hexadecapole-induced contribution (300K, 0-600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. The octopole-induced contribution (300K, 0-600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. The total contribution (300K, 0-650 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1a. The hexadecapole-induced contribution (110K, 0-600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1a. The octopole-induced contribution (110K, 0-600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1a. The total contribution (110K, 0-650 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1b. The hexadecapole-induced contribution (50K, 0-600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1b. The octopole-induced contribution (50K, 0-600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1b. The total contribution (50K, 0-650 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Best fit (297K)
Figure 1. Hexadecapolar component (297K)
Figure 1. Stone, N. W. B., et al. (1984) Experimental data (297K)
Figure 1a. Best fit (149K)
Figure 1a. Hexadecapolar component (149K)
Figure 1a. Stone, N. W. B., et al. (149K)
Figure 2. Computed spectra (140K)
Figure 2. P.Codastefano, et al. (1986) (140K)
Figure 2a. Computed spectra (93K)
Figure 2a. J.L.Hunt, et al. (1983) (90K)
Figure 2a. P.Codastefano, et al. (1986) (93K)
Figure 1. Adiks T.G., et al. (1984). (2400 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Adiks T.G., et al. (1984). (2410 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Adiks T.G., et al. (1984). (2420 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Adiks T.G., et al. (1984). (2430 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Adiks T.G., et al. (1984). (2440 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Adiks T.G., et al. (1984). (2450 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Bulanin M.O., et al. (1976). (2400 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Bulanin M.O., et al. (1976). (2410 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Bulanin M.O., et al. (1976). (2420 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Bulanin M.O., et al. (1976). (2430 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Bulanin M.O., et al. (1976). (2440 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Bulanin M.O., et al. (1976). (2450 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Le Doucen R., et al. (1985). (2400 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Le Doucen R., et al. (1985). (2410 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Le Doucen R., et al. (1985). (2420 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Le Doucen R., et al. (1985). (2430 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Le Doucen R., et al. (1985). (2440 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Le Doucen R., et al. (1985). (2450 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. This work (2400 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. This work (2410 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. This work (2420 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. This work (2430 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. This work (2440 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. This work (2450 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Calculation. T=218K
Figure 2. Calculation. T=296K
Figure 2. Le Doucen R., et al. (1985). Experiment. T=218K
Figure 2. Le Doucen R., et al. (1985). Experiment. T=296K
Figure 2. Adiks T.G., et al. (1984). Experiment. T=298K
Figure 2. Le Doucen R., et al. (1985). Experiment. T=193K
Figure 2. Le Doucen R., et al. (1985). Experiment. T=296K
Figure 2. Сalculation. T = 296K
Figure 2. Сalculationю T = 193K
Figure 1. All of the lines
Figure 1. Self-broadened water vapor spectra
Figure 1. Self-broadened water vapor
Figure 2. Calculated water vapor spectra (lower)
Figure 2. Calculated water vapor spectra (upper)
Figure 2. Measured water vapor spectra
Figure 3. Experimental continua
Figure 3. Theoretical continua
Figure 4. D.E. Burch et al. (1984) (2500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. G.L. Loper, et al. (1981). Temperature dependence of the self-broadening coefficient
Figure 4. M.E. Thomas et al. (1982)
Figure 4. Our data
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1c
Figure 1d
Figure 1e
Figure 1f
Figure 1g
Figure 1h
Figure 1i
Figure 1a
Figure 19. Laser line: 10P(20). Density=2.07
Figure 19. Laser line: 10P(20). Density=2.08
Figure 19. Laser line: 10P(20). Density=3.45
Figure 19. Laser line: 10P(20). Density=5.25
Figure 19. Suck S.H., et al. (1979). Dimer model
Figure 19a. Laser line: 10P(24). Density=2.07
Figure 19a. Laser line: 10P(24). Density=2.08
Figure 19a. Laser line: 10P(24). Density=3.45
Figure 19a. Laser line: 10P(24). Density=5.25
Figure 19a. Suck S.H., et al. (1979). Dimer model
Figure 19b. Laser line: 10P(30). Density=2.07
Figure 19b. Laser line: 10P(30). Density=2.08
Figure 19b. Laser line: 10P(30). Density=3.45
Figure 19b. Laser line: 10P(30). Density=5.25
Figure 19b. Semi-empirical formula
Figure 19b. Suck S.H., et al. (1979). Dimer model
Figure 20. Laser line:10P(20)
Figure 20. Suck S.H., et al. (1979). Dimer model
Figure 20a. Suck S.H., et al. (1979). Dimer model
Figure 20a. Laser line:10P(24)
Figure 20b. Laser line:10P(38)
Figure 20b. Suck S.H., et al. (1979). Dimer model
Figure 20c. Laser line:10P(30)
Figure 20c. Suck S.H., et al. (1979). Dimer model
Figure 24. Laser line 10P(20)
Figure 24. Suck S.H., et al. (1979). Dimer model
Figure 24a. Laser line 10P(24)
Figure 24a. Suck S.H., et al. (1979). Dimer model
Figure 6. Burch, D.E., et al. (1979, 1980, 1981, 1984) (296K, 300-1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Burch, D.E., et al. (1979, 1980, 1981, 1984). Self-broadened
Figure 6. N₂ broadened
Figure 6. Self-broadened
Figure 7. Burch, D.E., et al. (1979, 1980, 1981, 1984). N₂ broadened. (338K, 300-450 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Burch, D.E., et al. (1979, 1980, 1981, 1984). Self-broadened (338K, 300-450 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. N₂ broadened
Figure 7. Self-broadened
Figure 8. Burch, D.E., et al. (1979, 1980, 1981, 1984). N₂ broadened (430K, 350-650 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. Burch, D.E., et al. (1979, 1980, 1981, 1984). Self-broadened
Figure 8. N₂ broadened.
Figure 8. Self-broadened
Figure 1a
Figure 1. A.D. Afanasev et al. (1980) (353K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Calculated spectra (353K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1a. A.D. Afanasev et al. (1980) (293K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1a. Calculated spectra (293K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1b. A.D. Afanasev et al. (1980) (150K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1b. Calculated spectra (150K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Calculated spectra (300K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Ezra Bar‐Ziv et al. (1972) (300K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. A.D. Afanasev et al. (1980) (150K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Component due to hexadecapolar (Lambda = 4) overlap (150K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Component due to isotropic (Lambda = 0) overlap (150K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Component due to octopolar (Lambda = 3) overlap (150K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Total contribution (150K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. A.D. Afanasev et al. (1980) (293K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Component due to hexadecapolar (Lambda = 4) overlap (293K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Component due to isotropic (Lambda = 0) overlap (150K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Component due to octopolar (Lambda = 3) overlap (293K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Total contribution (293K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Component due to hexadecapolar (Lambda = 4) overlap (300K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Component due to isotropic (Lambda = 0) overlap (300K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Component due to octopolar (Lambda = 3) overlap (300K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Ezra Bar‐Ziv, et al. (1972) (300K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Total contribution (300K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. A.D. Afanasev et al. (1980) (353K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Component due to hexadecapolar (Lambda = 4) overlap (353K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Component due to isotropic (Lambda = 0) overlap (353K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Component due to octopolar (Lambda = 3) overlap (353K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Total contribution (353K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. CO₂+N₂ absorption coefficient (T=301K, P=0.49 atm)
Figure 1. CO₂+N₂ absorption coefficient (T=301K, P=1.94 atm)
Figure 1. CO₂+N₂ absorption coefficient divided by the CO₂ mole fraction.Experiment. (P=0.49 atm)
Figure 1. CO₂+N₂ absorption coefficient divided by the CO₂ mole fraction.Experiment. (P=1.94 atm)
Figure 1. Lorentzian calculation (P=1.94 atm)
Figure 1. Lorentzian calculation. P=0.49 atm
Figure 1. Lorentzian calculation. P=1.94 atm
Figure 2. L. Rosenmann, et al. (1988)
Figure 2. CO₂+N₂ broadening coefficient at 296K. EGL fit
Figure 3a. Calculated with the EGL line-overlapping model, T=296 K
Figure 3a. Calculated with the Lorentzian model, T=296 K
Figure 3a. Experiment, T=296 K
Figure 3b. Calculated with the EGL line-overlapping model, T=370 K
Figure 3b. Calculated with the Lorentzian model, T=370 K
Figure 3b. Experiment, T=370 K
Figure 6. C.Cousin, et al. (1986). Experimental data
Figure 6. Calculated data: EGL model
Figure 6. Calculated data: Lorentzian model accounting for all lines
Figure 6. Calculated data: Rj lines with J >=66
Figure 6. Calculated data: lines other than Rj with J>=66
Figure 6. Experimental data: this work
Figure 3. CO₂ dimer (10⁰1-00⁰0)
Table 1. Table 1. N₂ Absorption coefficient (100K, 5-200 cm⁻¹)
Table 1. Table 1. N₂ Absorption coefficient (110K, 5-200 cm⁻¹)
Table 1. Table 1. N₂ Absorption coefficient (120K, 5-200 cm⁻¹)
Table 1. Table 1. N₂ Absorption coefficient (70K, 5-200 cm⁻¹)
Table 1. Table 1. N₂ Absorption coefficient (80K, 5-200 cm⁻¹)
Table 1. Table 1. N₂ Absorption coefficient (90K, 5-200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. The collision-induced spectrum of N₂ + Ar (126K, 0-250 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Dagg, I. R., et al. (1986). The collision-induced spectrum of N₂ + Ar (126K, 40-160 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Dagg, I.R., et al. (1986). The collision-induced spectrum of N₂ + Ar. (126K, 15 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Dagg, I.R., et al. (1986). The collision-induced spectrum of N₂ + Ar. (126K, 84.2 cm⁻¹)
Table 2. Table 2. CH₄ Absorption coefficient (100K, 5-550 cm⁻¹)
Table 2. Table 2. CH₄ Absorption coefficient (110K, 5-550 cm⁻¹)
Table 2. Table 2. CH₄ Absorption coefficient (120K, 5-550 cm⁻¹)
Table 2. Table 2. CH₄ Absorption coefficient (70K, 5-550 cm⁻¹)
Table 2. Table 2. CH₄ Absorption coefficient (80K, 5-550 cm⁻¹)
Table 2. Table 2. CH₄ Absorption coefficient (90K, 5-550 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2a. The collision-induced spectrum of N₂ + Ar (149K, 0-250 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2a. Dagg, I. R., et al. (1986). The collision-induced spectrum of N₂ + Ar (149K, 40-160 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2a. Dagg, I.R., et al. (1986). The collision-induced spectrum of N₂ + Ar (149K, 15 cm ⁻¹)
Figure 2a. Dagg, I.R., et al. (1986). The collision-induced spectrum of N₂ + Ar. (149K, 84.2 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2b. Dagg, I.R., et al. (1986) The collision-induced spectrum of N₂ + Ar. (179K, 15 cm ⁻¹)
Figure 2b. Dagg, I.R., et al. (1986). The collision-induced spectrum of N₂ + Ar (179K, 40-200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2b. Dagg, I.R., et al. (1986). The collision-induced spectrum of N₂ + Ar. (179K, 84.2 cm ⁻¹)
Figure 2b. The collision-induced spectrum of N₂ + Ar (179K, 0-250 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2c. The collision-induced spectrum of N₂ + Ar (212K, 0-250 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2c. Dagg, I. R., et al. (1986). The collision-induced spectrum of N₂ + Ar (212K, 40-200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2c. Dagg, I. R., et al. (1986). The collision-induced spectrum of N₂ + Ar. (212K, 84.2 cm ⁻¹)
Figure 2c. Dagg, I.R., et al. (1986). The collision-induced spectrum of N₂ + Ar. (212K, 15 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Codastefano, P., et al. (1985, 1986). (140K, 0-450 cm⁻¹)
Table 3. Table 3. CH₄+N₂ Absorption coefficient (100K, 5-550 cm⁻¹)
Table 3. Table 3. CH₄+N₂ Absorption coefficient (110K, 5-550 cm⁻¹)
Table 3. Table 3. CH₄+N₂ Absorption coefficient (120K, 5-550 cm⁻¹)
Table 3. Table 3. CH₄+N₂ Absorption coefficient (70K, 5-550 cm⁻¹)
Table 3. Table 3. CH₄+N₂ Absorption coefficient (80K, 5-550 cm⁻¹)
Table 3. Table 3. CH₄+N₂ Absorption coefficient (90K, 5-550 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. The collision-induced spectrum of pure CH₄. (140K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3a. Codastefano, P., et al. (1985, 1986). (163K, 0-450 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3a. The collision-induced spectrum of pure CH₄. (163K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3b. Codastefano, P., et al. (1985, 1986). (195K, 0-450 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3b. The collision-induced spectrum of pure CH₄. (195K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3c. Codastefano, P., et al. (1985, 1986). (295K, 0-450 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3c. The collision-induced spectrum of pure CH₄. (295K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Dagg et al. (1986). The collision-induced spectrum of N₂ + CH₄. (126K, 15.1 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Dagg, I. R., et al. (1986). The collision-induced spectrum of N₂ + CH₄. (126K, 0-450 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Dagg, I. R., et al. (1986). The collision-induced spectrum of N₂ + CH₄. (126K, 84.5 cm⁻¹)
Table 4. Table 4. N₂ + H₂ Absorption coefficient (100K, 5-800 cm⁻¹)
Table 4. Table 4. N₂ + H₂ Absorption coefficient (110K, 5-800 cm⁻¹)
Table 4. Table 4. N₂ + H₂ Absorption coefficient (120K, 5-800 cm⁻¹)
Table 4. Table 4. N₂ + H₂ Absorption coefficient (70K, 5-800 cm⁻¹)
Table 4. Table 4. N₂ + H₂ Absorption coefficient (80K, 5-800 cm⁻¹)
Table 4. Table 4. N₂ + H₂ Absorption coefficient (90K, 5-800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. The collision-induced spectrum of N₂ + CH₄. (126K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4a. Dagg et al. (1986). The collision-induced spectrum of N₂ + CH₄. (149K, 0-400 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4a. Dagg, I. R., et al. (1986). The collision-induced spectrum of N₂ + CH₄. (149K, 15 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4a. Dagg, I. R., et al. (1986). The collision-induced spectrum of N₂ + CH₄. (149K, 84.2 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4a. The collision-induced spectrum of N₂ + CH₄. (149K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4b. Dagg, I. R., et al. (1986). The collision-induced spectrum of N₂ + CH₄. (179K, 0-400 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4b. Dagg, I. R., et al. (1986). The collision-induced spectrum of N₂ + CH₄. (179K, 15 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4b. Dagg, I. R., et al. (1986). The collision-induced spectrum of N₂ + CH₄. (179K, 84.2 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4b. The collision-induced spectrum of N₂ + CH₄. (179K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4c. Dagg et al. (1986). The collision-induced spectrum of N₂ + CH₄. (212K, 15 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4c. Dagg, I. R., et al. (1986). The collision-induced spectrum of N₂ + CH₄. (212K, 0-400 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4c. Dagg, I. R., et al. (1986). The collision-induced spectrum of N₂ + CH₄. (212K, 84.2 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4c. The collision-induced spectrum of N₂ + CH₄. (212K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Dore, P., et al. (1986). The collision-induced spectrum of N₂ + H₂. (91K, 0-1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. The collision-induced spectrum of N₂ + H₂ mixture. (91K, 0-1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5a. Dore, P., et al. (1986). The collision-induced spectrum of N₂ + H₂. (141K, 0-1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5a. The collision-induced spectrum of N₂ + H₂ mixture. (141K, 0-1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5b. Dore, P., et al. (1986). The collision-induced spectrum of N₂ + H₂. (165K, 0-1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5b. The collision-induced spectrum of N₂ + H₂ mixture. (165K, 0-1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5c. Dore, P., et al. (1986). The collision-induced spectrum of N₂ + H₂. (195K, 0-1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5c. The collision-induced spectrum of N₂ + H₂ mixture. (195K, 0-1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5d. Dore, P., et al. (1986). The collision-induced spectrum of N₂ + H₂. (298K, 0-1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5d. The collision-induced spectrum of N₂ + H₂ mixture. (298K, 0-1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. The collision-induced absorption spectrum calculated for a gaseous mixture at temperature 110K
Figure 6. The collision-induced absorption spectrum calculated for a gaseous mixture at temperature 75K
Figure 6. The collision-induced absorption spectrum calculated for a gaseous mixture at temperature 95K
Figure 1. Nitrogen broadening, calculation
Figure 1. Nitrogen broadening, experiment
Figure 1. Self-broadening, calculation
Figure 1. Self-broadening, experiment
Figure 2a. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). Experiment
Figure 2a. Calculation using the Lorentzian contour
Figure 2a. Calculation with a refined value of v
l
Figure 2a. Calculation with an original theoretical contour
Figure 2a. Sattarov, K., et al. (1983). Experiment
Figure 2a. Winters B.H., et al. (1964). Experiment
Figure 2b. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). Experiment
Figure 2b. Calculation using the Lorentzian contour
Figure 2b. Calculation with a refined value of v
l
Figure 2b. Calculation with a theoretical contour
Figure 2b. Winters B.H., et al. (1964). Experiment
Figure 2b. Докучаев А.Б. et al. (1980). Experiment
Figure 2. Measured nitrogen-broadened water vapor spectra
Figure 2. Measured self-broadened water vapor spectra
Figure 3. Calculated self-broadened water vapor spectrum (lower)
Figure 3. Calculated self-broadened water vapor spectrum (upper))
Figure 3. Measured self-broadened water vapor spectrum
Figure 4. Calculated nitrogen-broadened water vapor spectrum (lower)
Figure 4. Calculated nitrogen-broadened water vapor spectrum (upper))
Figure 4. Measured nitrogen-broadened water vapor spectrum
Figure 6. Experimental continua
Figure 6. Theoretical continua
Figure 7. D.E. Burch et al. (1984) (1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Fitting
Figure 7. Our data
Figure 8. D.E. Burch et al. (1980)
Figure 8. Dimer model
Figure 8. G. P. Montgomery, Jr. (1978)
Figure 8. G.L. Loper et al. (1981)
Figure 8. M.E. Thomas et al. (1982). Far-wing absorption model
Figure 8. Our data
Figure 1a
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Table 1. Normalized absorption coefficient. CO₂. (P=1.62 amagat, T=291K)
Table 1. Normalized absorption coefficient. CO₂. (P=17.0 amagat, T=291K)
Table 1. Normalized absorption coefficient. CO₂. (P=29.3 amagat, T=291K)
Table 1. Normalized absorption coefficient. CO₂. (P=51.5 amagat, T=291K)
Table 1. Normalized absorption coefficient. CO₂. (P=7.27 amagat, T=291K)
Table 1. Normalized absorption coefficient. CO₂. (P=77.1 amagat, T=291K)
Table 1. Normalized absorption coefficient. CO₂. (T=296K)
Figure 3. Calculated with the model Lorentzian. d=1.62 amagat
Figure 3. Calculated with the model Lorentzian. d=17.0 amagat
Figure 3. Calculated with the model Lorentzian. d=7.27 amagat
Figure 3. Calculated with the modified Lorentzian model. d=17.0 amagat
Figure 3. Calculated with the modified Lorentzian model. d=1.62 amagat
Figure 3. Calculated with the modified Lorentzian model. d=7.27 amagat
Figure 3. Experimental transmission spectra. d=1.62 amagat
Figure 3. Experimental transmission spectra. d=17.0 amagat
Figure 3. Experimental transmission spectra. d=7.27 amagat
Figure 5. Calculated with the ECSA line-mixing model. d=29.3 amagat
Figure 5. Calculated with the ECSA line-mixing model. d=51.5 amagat
Figure 5. Calculated with the ECSA line-mixing model. d=77.1 amagat
Figure 5. Calculated with the modified Lorentzian model. d=29.3 amagat
Figure 5. Calculated with the modified Lorentzian model. d=51.5 amagat
Figure 5. Calculated with the modified Lorentzian model. d=77.1 amagat
Figure 5. Experimental Transmission spectrum. d=29.3 amagat
Figure 5. Experimental Transmission spectrum. d=51.5 amagat
Figure 5. Experimental Transmission spectrum. d=77.1 amagat
Figure 7. Asymptotic. Kexp(v)/Kth(v)=1
Figure 7. Kexp(v)/ Kth(v). Kth=ECSA line-mixing model
Figure 7. Kexp(v)/ Kth(v). Kth=Lorentzian model
Table 1. Experimental values. CO₂+N₂. T=296K
Table 1. Experimental values. CO₂+N₂. T=448K
Table 1. Experimental values. CO₂+N₂. T=550K
Table 1. Experimental values. CO₂+N₂. T=623K
Table 1. Experimental values. CO₂+N₂. T=643K
Table 1. Experimental values. CO₂+N₂. T=773K
Figure 4a. Calculation. Eq. (4) with Bi parameters for the given temperature
Figure 4a. Calculation. Eqs. (3) and (4) with the parameters of Table 3
Figure 4a. Transmission spectra for pure CO₂. Experimental data. T=291K
Figure 4b. Transmission spectra for pure CO₂. Calculation using Eq. (4) with Bi parameters
Figure 4b. Transmission spectra for pure CO₂. Experimental data
Figure 5. CO₂+CO₂ contribution. Fitting
Figure 5. CO₂+CO₂ contribution
Figure 5. CO₂+N₂ contribution. Fitting
Figure 5. CO₂+N₂ contribution
Figure 5. Calculated from Eqs.(3) and (4) with the parameters of Table 3
Figure 5. Transmission spectra CO₂-N₂. Experimental data
Figure 6. Transmission spectra. CO₂+N₂. T= 296K, p=20.6 bar. Experimental data
Figure 6. Transmission spectra. CO₂+N₂. T=296K, p=20.6 bar. Calculated with the parameters of Table 3
Figure 6. Transmission spectra. CO₂+N₂. T=296K, p=20.6 bar. Lorentzlan calculation
Figure 6. Transmission spectra. CO₂+N₂. T=296K, p=59 bar. Calculated with the parameters of Table 3
Figure 6. Transmission spectra. CO₂+N₂. T=296K, p=59 bar. Experimental data.
Figure 6. Transmission spectra. CO₂+N₂. T=296K, p=59 bar. Lorentzlan calculation
Figure 3. Measured spectra
Figure 3. Present work profile
Figure 3. Sub-Lorentzian profile
Figure 3a. Measured spectra
Figure 3a. Present work profile
Figure 6. J.A. Barnes et al. (1987)
Figure 6. The calculated spectrum
Table 1. Normalized Absorption Coefficient. T=291K
Table 1. Normalized Absorption Coefficient. T=414K
Table 1. Normalized Absorption Coefficient. T=534K
Table 1. Normalized Absorption Coefficient. T=627K
Table 1. Normalized Absorption Coefficient. T=751K
Figure 2. Absorption spectra for CO₂. P=13.5-bar
Figure 2. Absorption spectra for CO₂. P=31.9-bar
Figure 2. Absorption spectra for CO₂. P=58.3-bar
Figure 5a. Calculation with the Lorentzian model Khee (296 K) factor [4,5]
Figure 5a. Calculation with the Lorentzian model (T=291K)
Figure 5a. Normalized absorption coefficient at 291K. Experiment
Figure 5b. Calculation with the Lorentzian model (T=534K)
Figure 5b. Calculation with the Lorentzian model Khee (296 K) factor [4,5]
Figure 5b. Normalized absorption coefficient at 534°K. Experiment
Figure 5c. Calculation with the Lorentzian model (T=751K)
Figure 5c. Calculation with the Lorentzian model Khee (296K) factor [4,5]
Figure 5c. Normalized absorption coefficient at 751°K; Experiment.
Figure 1. Methane absorption coefficient at 296K. Experimental spectrum
Figure 1. Methane absorption coefficient at 296K. The computed spectrum
Figure 1. The computed spectrum is given by the l= 3 (a) component
Figure 1. The computed spectrum is given by, l = 4 (b) component
Figure 1. The computed spectrum is given double transition (c) component
Figure 1a. The component (3, 3) of the double transition spectrum
Figure 1a. The component (3, 4) of the double transition spectrum
Figure 1a. The computed spectrum is given double transition (c) component
Figure 2. Methane absorption coefficient at 296K. Experimental spectrum
Figure 2. Methane absorption coefficient at 296K. The fitted spectrum
Figure 2. The computed spectrum is given by l = 4 (b) component
Figure 2. The computed spectrum is given by the l= 3 (a) component
Figure 2. The computed spectrum is given double transition (c) component
Figure 3. Best fit as in figure 2
Figure 3. Best fit in the frequency range (296K, 50-700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Experimental results
Figure 4. Best fit in the frequency range (163K, 50-550 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Experimental results (163K, 50-550 cm⁻¹)
Table 1. Normalized absorption coefficient in the v₃-band of CO₂
Figure 1. Normalized absorption coefficient of CO₂. Experimental results
Figure 1. Normalized absorption coefficient of CO₂. Lorentzian calculation
Table 1. Normalized absorption coefficient
Figure 5. Experimental results
Figure 5. Lorentzian calculation
Figure 5. Theoretical results BRQS-EC0 obtained with the optimized anisotropic potential V2(R)
Figure 5. Theoretical results BRQS-EC0
Figure 9. The ratios of the observed absorption to the calculated ECS-P absorption. CO₂+N₂. (T=300K)
Figure 9. The ratios of the observed absorption to the calculated ECS-P absorption. CO₂. (T=300K)
Figure 7. Data derived from OH photolysis yields
Figure 7. Incident shock transmission data
Figure 7. Reflected shock-transmission data
Figure 7. Vibrational model of Eq. (6)
Figure 7. Bignell K.J. (1970). Moisty air (303K)
Figure 7. Calculation (296K)
Figure 7. Calculation (303K)
Figure 7. Roberts E.R., et al. (1976) (296K)
Figure 8. Calculation. (2)
Figure 8. Calculation. (7)
Figure 8. G.P.Montgomery (1978)
Figure 4. The chi function for water at 296K. Foreign-broadening
Figure 4. The chi function for water at 296K. Self-broadening
Figure 5. The self-broadened water vapor continuum at 260K
Figure 5. The self-broadened water vapor continuum at 296K
Figure 5. The self-broadened water vapor continuum at 338K
Figure 7. Burch D.E. (1981) (308K, 700-1500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Burch D.E. (1981) (353K, 700-1500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Burch D.E. (1981) (358K)
Figure 7. Burch and Alt (1984) (284K)
Figure 7. Burch and Alt (1984) (296K, 700-1050 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Calculated continuum (296K)
Figure 1a. Normal H₂
Figure 1b. Para-H₂
Figure 1a
Figure 1. Transmission spectra for a 23.4% CO₂-76.6% Ar mixture. d=9.18 amagat
Figure 1. Transmission spectra for a 23.4% CO₂-76.6% Ar mixture. d=13.1 amagat
Figure 1. Transmission spectra for a 23.4% CO₂-76.6% Ar mixture. d=17.2 amagat
Figure 1. Transmission spectra for a 23.4% CO₂-76.6% Ar mixture. d=23.3 amagat
Figure 1. (p²
m
/2) A
mm
(v) contribution
Figure 1. Experimental results (243K, 0-600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Resulting p
a
p
m
A
ma
(v) spectrum
Figure 2. A
(
⁰
)
(v) component (243K, 0-600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. A
(
³
)
(v) + A
(
⁴
)
(v) component (243K, 0-600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Best fit profile (243K, 0-600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Experimental results (243K, 0-600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. A few line positions
Figure 1. Calculation with the strong collision mode
Figure 1. Experiment ()
Figure 5a. Calculation with a dispersion contour
Figure 5a. Hartmann J.M., et al. (1988). Experiment
Figure 5a. J. M. Hartmann, et al. (1988) . Calculated with the EGL line-overlapping model
Figure 5a. Nesmelova L.I., et al. (1982). Calculation by the theory of line wings (TLW)
Figure 5b. Calculation with a dispersion contour
Figure 5b. Hartmann J.M., et al. (1988). Calculated with the EGL line-overlapping model
Figure 5b. Hartmann J.M., et al. (1988). Experiment
Figure 5b. Nesmelova L.I., et al. (1990). Calculation
Figure 1. Boulet C. (1988). Calculation with different potentials. I
Figure 1. Boulet C. (1988). Calculation with different potentials. II
Figure 1. Boulet C. (1988). Experiment
Figure 1. Calculation according to the line wing theory
Figure 1. Calculation with dispersive line shape
Figure 3. Calculation according to the line wing theory (ro=1.62 amagat)
Figure 3. Calculation according to the line wing theory (ro=17 amagat)
Figure 3. Calculation according to the line wing theory (ro=77 amagat)
Figure 3. Hartmann J.M. (1989). Calculation taking interference into account (ro=1.62 amagat)
Figure 3. Hartmann J.M. (1989). Calculation taking interference into account (ro=17 amagat)
Figure 3. Hartmann J.M. (1989). Calculation taking interference into account (ro=77 amagat)
Figure 3. Hartmann J.M. (1989). Experiment (ro=1.62 amagat)
Figure 3. Hartmann J.M. (1989). Experiment (ro=17 amagat)
Figure 3. Hartmann J.M. (1989). Experiment (ro=77 amagat)
Figure 1. Calculated with Lorentzian model (2150-2240 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Calculated with Lorentzian model (2360-2550 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Calculated with corrected line mixing model (2150-2240 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Calculated with corrected line mixing model (2370-2550 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Calculated with impact line mixing model (2150-2240 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Calculated with impact line mixing model (2350-2550 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Experimental data (2150-2240 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Experimental data (2370-2550 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Correction Factor of the Lorentz Shape. CO₂
Figure 3. Calculated with the Lorentzian model. CO₂ (P=24.3 Am)
Figure 3. Calculated with the Lorentzian model. CO₂ (P=51.4 Am)
Figure 3. Calculated with the corrected line mixing model. CO₂ (P=24.3 Am)
Figure 3. Calculated with the corrected line mixing model. CO₂ (P=51.4 Am)
Figure 3. Experimental data. CO₂ (P=24.3 Am)
Figure 3. Experimental data. CO₂ (P=51.4 Am)
Figure 4a. Calculated with the Lorentzian model. CO₂ (P=91.4 Am)
Figure 4a. Calculated with the corrected line mixing model. CO₂ (P=91.4 Am)
Figure 4a. Transmission coefficient. Experimental data. CO₂ (P=91.4 Am)
Figure 4b. Calculated with the Lorentzian model. CO₂ (P=32.8 Am)
Figure 4b. Calculated with the corrected line mixing model. CO₂ (P=32.8 Am)
Figure 4b. Experimental data. CO₂ (P=32.8 Am)
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1a. Absorption Measurements of Oxygen Between 330 and 1140 nm
Figure 1b. Absorption spectrum between 330 and 1140 nm for an O₂
Figure 1a
Figure 1. MPM model continuum of Liebe 296.1K
Figure 1. MPM model continuum of Liebe 315.5K
Figure 1. MPM model continuum of Liebe
Figure 1. Present theoretical results 281.8K
Figure 1. Present theoretical results 296.1K
Figure 1. Present theoretical results 315.5K
Figure 2. MPM model continuum of Liebe f=120 GHz
Figure 2. MPM model continuum of Liebe f=30 GHz
Figure 2. MPM model continuum of Liebe f=360 GHz
Figure 2. Present theoretical results f=120 GHz
Figure 2. Present theoretical results f=30 GHz
Figure 2. Present theoretical results f=360 GHz
Figure 2. Burch et al. (1981)
Figure 2. With the normalization factor
Figure 2. Without the normalization factor
Figure 3. D.E.Burch, et al. (1984) (296K, 300-1100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. With the normalization factor
Figure 3. Without the normalization factor
Figure 4. D.E.Burch et al. (1984) (430K, 400-850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. With the normalization factor
Figure 4. Without the normalization factor
Figure 11. Water vapor (24.15 atm, 685K)
Figure 11. Water vapor (47.6 atm, 685K)
Figure 11. Water vapor (7.82 atm, 685K)
Figure 4. D.E.Burch et al. (1984) (295K, 700-1100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Fitting
Figure 5. Fitting
Figure 5. H₂O+N₂. D.E. Burch et al. (1984) (295K, 700-1200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. D. E. Burch et al. (1984)
Figure 7. Fitting
Figure 7. G.L.Loper, et al. (1983)
Figure 7. G.P.Montgomery (1979)
Figure 7. JHU/APL
Figure 7. P.S.Varanasi, et al. (1968, 1987)
Figure 8. Continuum absorption
Figure 8. D.E.Burch et al. (1984)
Figure 8a. F.S.Mills (1975)
Figure 8a. K.O.White, et al. (1978)
Figure 8a. Quadratic to data
Figure 9. D.E.Burch, et al. (1984) (2400 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. D.E.Burch, et al. (1984) (2500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. D.E.Burch, et al. (1984) (2600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. Fitting (2400 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. Fitting (2500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. Fitting (2600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Burch, D.E., et al. (1984)
Figure 1. D.E. Burch (1982)
Figure 1. Fitting. D.E. Burch, et al. (1984)
Figure 2. H₂O+N₂. D.E.Burch et al. (1984) (296K, 850-1100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. L.S. Rothman, et al. (1987)
Figure 4. Hinderling et al. (1987)
Figure 4. L.S. Rothman, et al. (1986)
Figure 5. Hitran. L.S. Rothman, et al. (1987)
Figure 5. M.S. Shumate, et al. (1976)
Figure 5. Normal data. Corrected data. M.S. Shumate, et al. (1976)
Figure 6. G.L. Loper, et al. (1983)
Figure 6. L.S. Rothman, et al. (1987)
Figure 7. ¹⁴C¹⁶O₂-laser. J. S. Ryan, et al. (1984)
Figure 7. ¹²C¹⁶O₂-laser. J. S. Ryan, et al. (1984)
Figure 7. ¹³C¹⁶O₂-laser. J.S. Ryan, et al. (1983, 1984)
Figure 7. L.S. Rothman, et al. (1987)
Figure 1. Burch D.E. et al. (1984)
Figure 1. Fiiting
Figure 1. Loper G.L., et al. (1983)
Figure 1. Montgomery G.P. (1978)
Figure 1. The Johns Hopkins University measurements
Figure 1. Varanasi P., et al. (1987)
Figure 2. Mills F.S. (1975)
Figure 2. Quadratic to data
Figure 2. White K.O., et al. (1978)
Figure 1. 237K
Figure 1. 296K
Figure 2. Long, C. A, et al. (1971)
Figure 2. Shapiro (1961), as reported by McKellar et al. (1972)
Figure 2. This work (measured values)
Figure 2. This work, parameterization
Figure 2. Timofeyev, Yu.M. et al. (1978)
Figure 1. Table 1. Absorption coefficient (T=292K)
Figure 1. Table 1. Absorption coefficient (T=540K)
Figure 1. Table 1. Absorption coefficient (T=920K)
Figure 1. Table 1. J. M. Hartmann, et al., (T=291K)
Figure 1. Table 1. J. M. Hartmann, et al., (T=594K)
Figure 1. Table 1. R. Le Doucen, et al., (T=296K)
Figure 11. Experiment [3-5]. P branch. (T=296K)
Figure 11. Experiment [3-5]. R branch. (T=296K)
Figure 11. Impact line-mixing model MEGL(I). P branch. (T=296K)
Figure 11. Impact line-mixing model MEGL(I). R branch. (T=296K)
Figure 11. Impact line-mixing model MEGL(II). P branch. (T=296K)
Figure 11. Impact line-mixing model MEGL(II). R branch. (T=296K)
Figure 8. Absorption coefficient. Impact line-mixing model ECSP. P branch (T=296K)
Figure 8. Absorption coefficient. Impact line-mixing model ECSP. R branch (T=296K)
Figure 8. Absorption coefficient. Impact line-mixing model MEGL(I). P branch (T=296K)
Figure 8. Absorption coefficient. Impact line-mixing model MEGL(I). R branch (T=296K)
Figure 8. Absorption coefficient. Impact line-mixing model MEGL(II). P branch (T=296K)
Figure 8. Absorption coefficient. Impact line-mixing model MEGL(II). R branch (T=296K)
Figure 8. Absorption coefficient. Lorentzian model. P branch (T=296K)
Figure 8. Absorption coefficient. Lorentzian model. R branch (T=296K)
Figure 8. Absorption coefficient. P branch (T=296K)
Figure 8. Absorption coefficient. R branch (T=296K)
Table 1. Experimental Results (T=238)
Figure 1. Line shape factor for pure CO₂ for left part of line profile
Figure 1. Line shape factor for pure CO₂ for right part of line profile
Table 1a. Experimental Results (T=193 K)
Table 1a. Experimental Results (T=218 K)
Table 1a. Experimental Results (T=238 K)
Table 1a. Theoretical Results (T=218 K, kappa asym)
Table 1a. Theoretical Results (T=218 K, kappa sym)
Table 1b. delta calculation (T=218 K) (kappa asym)
Table 1b. delta calculation (T=218 K) (kappa sym)
Figure 2. Line shape factor for pure CO₂ for left part of line profile
Figure 2. Line shape factor for pure CO₂ for right part of line profile
Table 2a. Experimental Results (T=193 K)
Table 2a. Experimental Results (T=218 K)
Table 2a. Experimental Results (T=238 K)
Table 2a. Theoretical Results (T=193K) kappa asym
Table 2a. Theoretical Results (T=193K) kappa sym
Table 2a. Theoretical Results (T=238 K) kappa sym
Table 2b. delta calculation (T=193 K) (kappa asym)
Table 2b. delta calculation (T=193 K) (kappa sym)
Table 2b. delta calculation (T=238 K) (kappa sym)
Figure 1. Water absorption coefficient (N₂-broadening). Computation using Lorents profile
Figure 1. Water absorption coefficient (N₂-broadening)
Figure 1. Water absorption coefficient (self-broadening). Computation using Lorents profile
Figure 1. Water absorption coefficient (self-broadening)
Figure 2. Borysova N.F., et al. (1986) (1820-1870 cm-¹)
Figure 2. Menzies R.T., et al. (1976) (1880-1900 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Present experiment (1800-1900 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Schnell W., et al. (1978) (1800-1860 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2a. Contribution of AMM
Figure 2a. Contribution of CO₂ continuum
Figure 2a. Contribution of H₂O continuum
Figure 2a. Contribution of N₂ continuum
Figure 2b. Contribution of AMM
Figure 2b. Contribution of CO₂ continuum
Figure 2b. Contribution of H₂O continuum
Figure 2b. Contribution of N₂ continuum
Figure 5a. Континуальная составляющая коэффициента поглощения (k
конт
) CO₂ (Т=300К)
Figure 5a. Полный коэффициент поглощения (k
полн
) CO₂ (Т=300К)
Figure 5a. Селективная часть коэффициента поглощения (k
селек
) CO₂ (Т=300К)
Figure 5b. Континуальная составляющая коэффициента поглощения (k
конт
) CO₂ (Т=627К)
Figure 5b. Полный коэффициент поглощения (k
полн
) CO₂ (Т=627К)
Figure 5b. Селективная составляющая коэффициента поглощения (k
селек
) CO₂ (Т=627К)
Figure 6a. J. M. Hartmann (1989). Transmission spectra. ro=1.62 Амага. Experiment
Figure 6a. J. M. Hartmann (1989). Transmission spectra. ro=17 Amagat. Calculation
Figure 6a. J. M. Hartmann (1989). Transmission spectra. ro=17 Amagat. Experiment
Figure 6a. J. M. Hartmann (1989). Transmission spectra. ro=7.27 Amagat. Calculation
Figure 6a. J. M. Hartmann (1989). Transmission spectra. ro=7.27 Amagat.1 Experiment
Figure 6a. Transmission spectra. ro=1.627 Amagat. Original calculation
Figure 6a. Transmission spectra. ro=17 Amagat. Original calculation
Figure 6a. Transmission spectra. ro=7.27 Amagat. Original calculation
Figure 6b. Hartmann J. M., (1989). Transmission spectra. ro=77.1 Амага. Original calculation
Figure 6b. J. M. Hartmann (1989). Transmission spectra. ro=29.3 Амага. Calculation
Figure 6b. J. M. Hartmann (1989). Transmission spectra. ro=29.3 Амага. Experiment
Figure 6b. J. M. Hartmann (1989). Transmission spectra. ro=51.5 Амага. Calculation
Figure 6b. J. M. Hartmann (1989). Transmission spectra. ro=51.5 Амага. Experiment
Figure 6b. J. M. Hartmann (1989). Transmission spectra. ro=77.1 Амага. Calculation
Figure 6b. J. M. Hartmann (1989). Transmission spectra. ro=77.1 Амага. Experiment
Figure 6b.Transmission spectra. ro=29.3 Амага. Original calculation
Figure 6b.Transmission spectra. ro=51.5 Амага. Original calculation
Figure 8. H.J. Liebe (1984)
Figure 8. J.H. Van Vleck, et al. (1945)
Figure 8. M.E. Thomas, et al. (1982)
Figure 8. Pure water vapor absorption
Figure 8. S.A. Clough, et al. (1989)
Figure 1. Binary absorption coefficient
Figure 2a. Calculated with Burch chi-factor
Figure 2a. Original experiment
Figure 2b. Calculated with Birch chi-factor
Figure 2b. Lorentzian calculation (i.e., chi=1)
Figure 2b. Original experiment
Figure 1. Negative frequency resonance-average line shape function
Figure 1. Positive frequency resonance-average line shape function
Figure 1. The Rosenkranz band-averaged relaxation parameter
Figure 4. Rozenkrantz's results
Figure 4. The experimental values of Burch et al.(1979,1981,1984) (296K, 350-1100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Theoretical
Figure 5. D.E. Burch (1981) (338K, 300-450 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Rozenkrantz's results
Figure 5. Theoretical
Figure 6. D.E.Burch (1981) (430K, 400-800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Rozenkrantz's results
Figure 6. Theoretic
Figure 13. Bignell K.J. (1970). Experiment
Figure 13. Burch D.E. (1970) (700-1200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 13. Burch D.E., et al. (1984) (700-1200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 13. Computation used model [40]. Case 1
Figure 13. Computation used model [40]. Case 2
Figure 13. Computation used model [40]. Case 3
Figure 13. Computation used model [40]. Case 4
Figure 13. Varanasi P. (1988). (700-1200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 14. Computation used continuum model [3]
Figure 14. Computation used continuum model [40]
Figure 14. Montgomery G.P. (1978)
Figure 14. Varanasi P. (1988)
Figure 1a
Figure 3. Experimental data
Figure 3. Line-by-line model calculations using the HITRAN data set
Figure 4. Line-by-line model calculations using the HITEMP data set
Figure 4. Experimental data
Figure 3a. kappa(calc)/kappa(exp), СО2+СО2, T=193 K
Figure 3b. kappa(calc)/kappa(exp), СО2+СО2, T=291 K
Figure 3c. kappa(calc)/kappa(exp), СО2+СО2, T=414 K
Figure 3d. kappa(calc)/kappa(exp), СО2+СО2, T=534 K
Figure 3e. kappa(calc)/kappa(exp), СО2+СО2, T=627 K
Figure 3f. kappa(calc)/kappa(exp), СО2+СО2, T=751 K
Figure 3g. kappa(calc)/kappa(exp), СО2+N2, T=193 K
Figure 3h. kappa(calc)/kappa(exp), СО2+N2, T=291 K
Figure 3i. kappa(calc)/kappa(exp), СО2+N2, T=448 K
Figure 3j. kappa(calc)/kappa(exp), СО2+N2, T=550 K
Figure 3k. kappa(calc)/kappa(exp), СО2+N2, T=623 K
Figure 3l. kappa(calc)/kappa(exp), СО2+N2, T=673 K
Figure 3m. kappa(calc)/kappa(exp), СО2+N2, T=773 K
Figure 4a. kappa(calc)/kappa(exp), T=193 K
Figure 4b. kappa(calc)/kappaexp), T=296 K
Figure 4c. kappa(calc)/kappa(exp), T=193 K
Figure 4d. kappa(calc)/kappa(exp), T=296 K
Figure 7. Hartmann J.M., et al., (1989). Calculation
Figure 7. Hartmann J.M., et al., (1989). Computation
Figure 7. Кузнецова Э.С., и др. (1975). Experiment
Figure 7. Кузнецова Э.С., и др. (1975). Экспериментальные данные
Figure 7. Расчет по теории крыльев линий. T=281K
Figure 7. Расчет по теории крыльев линий. T=673K
Figure 1. C.Cousin, et al., (1986). Experiment, 2387.5 cm⁻¹
Figure 1. Calculation used line wing theory, 2387.5 cm⁻¹
Figure 1. Calculation used line wing theory, 2400 cm⁻¹
Figure 1. Calculation used line wing theory, 2480 cm⁻¹
Figure 1. Calculation used line wing theory, 2520 cm⁻¹
Figure 1. Calculation used line wing theory, 2580 cm⁻¹
Figure 1. G. Adiks, et al., (1984). Experiment, 2400 cm⁻¹
Figure 1. G. Adiks, et al., (1984). Experiment, 2480 cm⁻¹
Figure 1. G. Adiks, et al., (1984). Experiment, 2520 cm⁻¹
Figure 1. G. Adiks, et al., (1984). Experiment, 2580 cm⁻¹
Figure 1. J.M.Hartmann, et al., (1989). Experiment, 2400 cm⁻¹
Figure 1. J.M.Hartmann, et al., (1989). Experiment, 2480 cm⁻¹
Figure 1. J.M.Hartmann, et al., (1989). Experiment, 2520 cm⁻¹
Figure 1. M.O.Bulanin, et al., (1976). Experiment, 2400 cm⁻¹
Figure 1. M.O.Bulanin, et al., (1976). Experiment, 2480 cm⁻¹
Figure 1. M.O.Bulanin, et al., (1976). Experiment, 2580 cm⁻¹
Figure 1. M.O.Bulanin, et al., (1976). Experiment, 2520 cm⁻¹
Figure 1. R.LeDoucen, et al., (1985). Experiment, 2400 cm⁻¹
Figure 1. R.LeDoucen, et al., (1985). Experiment, 2480 cm⁻¹
Figure 1. R.LeDoucen, et al., (1985). Experiment, 2520 cm⁻¹
Figure 1. R.LeDoucen, et al., (1985). Experiment, 2580 cm⁻¹
Figure 3. Calculation (line wing theory), p=1.62 amagat
Figure 3. Calculation (line wing theory), p=17 amagat
Figure 3. Calculation (line wing theory), p=77 amagat
Figure 3. J. M. Hartmann (1989). Experiment, p=1.62 amagat
Figure 3. J. M. Hartmann (1989). Experiment, p=17 amagat
Figure 3. J. M. Hartmann (1989). Experiment, p=77 amagat
Figure 3. J. M. Hartmann (1989). Line mixing calculation, p=1.62 amagat
Figure 3. J. M. Hartmann (1989). Line mixing calculation, p=17 amagat
Figure 3. J. M. Hartmann (1989). Line mixing calculation, p=77 amagat
Figure 1a. The CO2 absorption coefficient. Line wing theory calculation
Figure 1a. The CO2 absorption coefficient. Lorentzian calculation
Figure 1b. The normalized deviation. Experimental results
Figure 1b. The normalized deviation. Line wing theory calculation
Figure 3. Line shape in the 4.3 mkm band
Figure 3. Lorentzian shape
Figure 3. Present calculation
Figure 4. CO₂-He absorption coefficient (P=2 atm)
Figure 4. CO₂-He absorption coefficient (P=7 atm)
Figure 4. CO₂-Xe absorption coefficient (P=2 atm)
Figure 4. CO₂-Xe absorption coefficient (P=7 atm)
Figure 4. Experimental values (after fits)
Figure 4. H.J. Liebe (1984). Calculated values
Figure 4. J.H.Van Vleck, et al. (1945). Calculated values
Figure 4. S.A.Clough, et al. (1989). Calculated values
Figure 4. S.A.Zhevakin, et al. (1963). Calculated values
Figure 8. Experimental values (after fits)
Figure 8. H.J.Liebe (1984). Calculated values
Figure 8. J.H.Van Vleck, et al. (1945). Calculated values
Figure 8. S.A.Clough, et al. (1989). Calculated values
Figure 8. S.A.Zhevakin, et al. (1963). Calculated values
Figure 9. Experimental values (after fits) (296K, 185-215 GHz)
Figure 9. H.J.Liebe (1984). Calculated values (296K, 185-215 GHz)
Figure 9. J.H.Van Vleck (1945). Calculated values (296K, 185-215 GHz)
Figure 9. S.A.Clough, et al. (1989). Calculated values (296K, 185-215 GHz)
Figure 9. S.A.Zhevakin et al. (1963). Calculated values
Figure 1a
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1c
Figure 1d
Figure 1e
Figure 1a
Figure 2. Best fit to Burch D.E. at al. (1984) (296K, 700-1200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Empirical model of Clough et al. (1980) based on Burch (1981)
Figure 2. Empirical model of Clough et al. (1989) based on Burch and Alt (1984)
Figure 2. Empirical model of Roberts et al. (1976)
Figure 3. Empirical model of Clough et al. (1989) (1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Laboratory measured values of Burch and Alt (1984) (1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Roberts et al. (1976) parametrization (T₀=1800K) (1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Roberts et al. (1976) parametrization (T₀=2900K) (1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Roberts et al. (1976) parametrization (T₀=4000K) (1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10. A.Ben-Shalom, et al. (1985), A.D.Devir, et al. (1988). Experimental values
Figure 10. Original theoretical results (2000-2225 cm⁻¹)
Figure 11. Burch et al. (1984, 1985) (296K, 3090-4220 cm⁻¹)
Figure 11. Present theory
Figure 4. Rosenkranz's results
Figure 4. The present theory
Figure 7. T=296 K
Figure 7. T=338 K
Figure 7. T=430 K
Figure 9. Burch D.E. et al. (1971) (428K, 2400-2670 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. Burch D.E. et al. (1984) (296K, 2400-2650 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. Burch D.E. et al. (1984) (328K, 2400-2650 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. Theoretical results for T=296K
Figure 9. Theoretical results for T=328K
Figure 9. Theoretical results for T=428K
Figure 10. Experiment Burch D.E. et al. (1979) (430K, 420-640 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10. Present calculation with one averaged line shape functions
Figure 10. Present calculation with two averaged line shape functions
Figure 11. Experiment Burch D.E. et al. (1985) (353K, 1200-2300 cm⁻¹)
Figure 11. Our theoretical results
Figure 12. Burch D.E. (1979,1981,1985) (308K, 1300-1900 cm⁻¹)
Figure 12. Burch D.E. experimental values for T=428K
Figure 12. Theoretical results for T = 308K
Figure 12. Theoretical results for T = 428K
Figure 13. D.E.Burch experimental values for T= 296K
Figure 13. Theoretical results for T = 296K
Figure 7. H₂O self-broadening AC (0-10000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. H₂O+CO₂ foreign-broadening AC (0-10000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. H₂O+N₂ foreign-broadening AC (0-10000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. Experiment Burch D.E. et al. (1985)
Figure 8. Present calculation with one averaged line shape functions
Figure 8. Present calculation with two averaged line shape functions
Figure 9. Burch D.E. et al. (1979,81,85). Experiment (338K, 300-1100 сm⁻¹)
Figure 9. Present calculation with one averaged line shape functions
Figure 9. Present calculation with two averaged line shape functions
Figure 3. Normalized absorption coefficient (193K)
Figure 3. Normalized absorption coefficient (213K)
Figure 3. Normalized absorption coefficient (233K)
Figure 3. Normalized absorption coefficient (253K)
Figure 3. Normalized absorption coefficient (273K
Figure 3. Normalized absorption coefficient (293K)
Figure 1a
Figure 1a
Figure 3. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). Experimental data (2460 cm-1)
Figure 3. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). Experimental data. (2440 cm-1)
Figure 3. Calculated from eqs. (3) and (6), (2440 cm-1)
Figure 3. Calculated from eqs. (3) and (6), (2460 cm-1)
Figure 3. Calculated from eqs. (4) and (6) and chi from [11], (2440 cm-1)
Figure 3. Calculated from eqs. (4) and (6) and chi from [11], (2460 cm-1)
Figure 3. Hartmann J.M. (1989). Experimental data (2460 cm-1)
Figure 3. Hartmann J.M., (1989). Experimental data (2440 cm-1)
Figure 3. Hartmann J.M., et al (1989). Experimental data (2440 cm-1)
Figure 3. Hartmann J.M., et al. (1989). Experimental data (2460 cm-1)
Figure 3. Le Doucen R., et al. (1985). Experimental data (2440 cm-1)
Figure 3. Le Doucen R., et al. (1985). Experimental data (2460 cm-1)
Figure 3. Present experiment (2440 cm-1)
Figure 3. Present experiment (2460 cm-1)
Figure 3. Winters B.H., et al. (1964). Experimental data (2440 cm-1)
Figure 3. Winters B.H., et al. (1964). Experimental data (2460 cm-1)
Figure 1. Collision-induced intensities due to N₂ pairs
Figure 1. Collision-induced intensities due to N₂+H₂
Figure 1. Haze layer
Figure 1. McKay, C.P., et al. (1991). Collision-induced intensities due to N₂+CH₄
Figure 1. McKay, C.P., et al. (1989). Collision-induced intensities due to CH₄+CH₄ pairs (0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Plank function at 94K
Figure 2. Collision-induced intensities due to N₂+CH₄ pairs. Experiment (126K)
Figure 2. Rototranslational collision-induced spectra of N₂+CH₄ pairs. Theoretical results (126K)
Figure 2a. R. Dagg, et al. (1986). Collision-induced intensities due to N₂-CH₄ pair. Experiment (149K)
Figure 2a. Rototranslational collision-induced spectra of N₂-CH₄ pairs. Theoretical results (149K)
Figure 2b. Collision-induced intensities due to N₂-CH₄ pair. Experiment (179K)
Figure 2b. Rototranslational collision-induced spectra of N₂-CH₄ pairs. Theoretical results (179K)
Figure 2c. Collision-induced intensities due to N₂-CH₄ pair. Experiment (212K)
Figure 2c. Rototranslational collision-induced spectra of N₂-CH₄ pairs. Theoretical results (212K)
Figure 3. Rototranslational collision-induced spectra of N₂-CH₄ pairs. Experiment (162K)
Figure 3. Rototranslational collision-induced spectra of N₂-CH₄ pairs. Induction by: CH₄ Fi
Figure 3. Rototranslational collision-induced spectra of N₂-CH₄ pairs. Induction by: CH₄ Omega
Figure 3. Rototranslational collision-induced spectra of N₂-CH₄ pairs. Induction by: CH₄ Q6
Figure 3. Rototranslational collision-induced spectra of N₂-CH₄ pairs. Induction by: N₂ Fi
Figure 3. Rototranslational collision-induced spectra of N₂-CH₄ pairs. Induction by: N₂ Teta
Figure 3. Rototranslational collision-induced spectra of N₂-CH₄ pairs. Induction by: double tr
Figure 3. Rototranslational collision-induced spectra of N₂-CH₄ pairs. Theoretical results (162K)
Figure 3a. Rototranslational collision-induced spectra of N₂-CH₄ pairs. Birnbaum et al. (1993) (195K)
Figure 3a. Rototranslational collision-induced spectra of N₂-CH₄ pairs. Induction - Double transitions
Figure 3a. Rototranslational collision-induced spectra of N₂-CH₄ pairs. Induction by: CH₄ Q6
Figure 3a. Rototranslational collision-induced spectra of N₂-CH₄ pairs. Theoretical results (195K)
Figure 3a. Rototranslational collision-induced spectra of N₂-CH₄ pairs. induction by: CH₄ Fi
Figure 3a. Rototranslational collision-induced spectra of N₂-CH₄ pairs. induction by: N₂ Fi
Figure 3a. Rototranslational collision-induced spectra of N₂-CH₄ pairs. induction by: dots, N₂ Teta
Figure 3a. Rototranslational collision-induced spectra of N₂-CH₄ pairs.Induction by: CH₄ Omega
Figure 3b. Birnbaum et al. (1993). Rototranslational collision-induced spectra of N₂-CH₄ pairs. (297K)
Figure 3b. Rototranslational collision-induced spectra of N₂-CH₄ pairs. Induction by: CH₄ Fi
Figure 3b. Rototranslational collision-induced spectra of N₂-CH₄ pairs. Induction by: CH₄ Omega
Figure 3b. Rototranslational collision-induced spectra of N₂-CH₄ pairs. Induction by: CH₄ Q6
Figure 3b. Rototranslational collision-induced spectra of N₂-CH₄ pairs. Induction by: N₂ Fi
Figure 3b. Rototranslational collision-induced spectra of N₂-CH₄ pairs. Induction by: N₂ Teta
Figure 3b. Rototranslational collision-induced spectra of N₂-CH₄ pairs. Induction: double transitions
Figure 3b. Rototranslational collision-induced spectra of N₂-CH₄ pairs. Theoretical results (297K)
Figure 4. The current model (70K)
Figure 4. The previous (R. Courtin (1988)) model (70K)
Figure 4a. The current model (120K)
Figure 4a. The previous (R. Courtin (1988)) model (120K)
Figure 4b. The current model (170K)
Figure 4b. The previous (R. Courtin (1988)) model (170K)
Figure 8. The absorption coefficient. CO2-He, 3ν3, Lorentzian calculation
Figure 8. I. M. Grigorev, et al. (1985). The absorption coefficient. CO2+He, 3ν3, Experiment
Figure 8. The absorption coefficient. CO2+He, 3ν3, SCA-calculation
Figure 9. The absorption coefficient. CO2+He, 3v3, Lorentzian calculation
Figure 9. The absorption coefficient. CO2+He, 3v3, SCA-calculation
Figure 9. V. M. Tarabukhin, et al. (1986). The absorption coefficient. CO2+He, 3ν3, Experiment
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient of CH₄ (297K, 0-700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient of CH₄+N₂ (297K, 0-700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient of N₂ (297K, 0-700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Absorption coefficient of CH₄ (195K, 0-700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Absorption coefficient of CH₄+N₂ (195K, 0-700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Absorption coefficient of N₂ (195K, 0-700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Absorption coefficient of CH₄ (162K, 0-700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Absorption coefficient of CH₄+N₂ (162K, 0-700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Absorption coefficient of N₂ (162K, 0-700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Absorption coefficient of CH₄+N₂. Experiment (297K, 0-700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Absorption coefficient of CH₄+N₂. Theory (297K, 0-700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Absorption coefficient of CH₄+N₂. Experiment (195K, 0-700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Absorption coefficient of CH₄+N₂. Theory (195K, 0-700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. Absorption coefficient of CH₄+N₂. Experiment (162K, 0-700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. Absorption coefficient of CH₄+N₂. Theory (162K, 0-700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Potential curves for the total intermolecular interaction in the orientation 1
Figure 3. Potential curves for the total intermolecular interaction in the orientation 2
Figure 3. Potential curves for the total intermolecular interaction in the orientation 3
Figure 3. Potential curves for the total intermolecular interaction in the orientation 5
Figure 3. Potential curves for the total intermolecular interaction in the orientation 6
Figure 2. e
HL
exch
energy for E-H configuration. Fitting
Figure 2. e
HL
exch
energy for E-H configuration
Figure 2. e
HL
exch
energy for E-O configuration. Fitting
Figure 2. e
HL
exch
energy for E-O configuration
Figure 2. e
HL
exch
energy for F-H configuration. Fitting
Figure 2. e
HL
exch
energy for F-H configuration
Figure 2. e
HL
exch
energy for F-O configuration. Fitting
Figure 2. e
HL
exch
energy for F-O configuration
Figure 2. e
HL
exch
energy for V-O configuration. Fitting
Figure 2. e
HL
exch
energy for V-O configuration
Figure 3. e
(
¹⁰
)
es
for E-H configuration. Electrostatic energy. Fitting
Figure 3. e
(
¹⁰
)
es
for E-H configuration. Electrostatic energy
Figure 3. e
(
¹⁰
)
es
for E-O configuration. Electrostatic energy. Fitting
Figure 3. e
(
¹⁰
)
es
for E-O configuration. Electrostatic energy
Figure 3. e
(
¹⁰
)
es
for F-H configuration. Electrostatic energy. Fitting
Figure 3. e
(
¹⁰
)
es
for F-H configuration. Electrostatic energy
Figure 3. e
(
¹⁰
)
es
for F-O configuration. Electrostatic energy. Fitting
Figure 3. e
(
¹⁰
)
es
for F-O configuration. Electrostatic energy
Figure 3. e
(
¹⁰
)
es
for V-O configuration. Electrostatic energy. Fitting
Figure 3. e
(
¹⁰
)
es
for V-O configuration. Electrostatic energy
Figure 4. d
SCF
def
, for E-H configuration. SCF-deformation energy. Fitting
Figure 4. d
SCF
def
, for E-H configuration. SCF-deformation energy
Figure 4. d
SCF
def
, for E-O configuration. SCF-deformation energy. Fitting
Figure 4. d
SCF
def
, for E-O configuration. SCF-deformation energy
Figure 4. d
SCF
def
, for F-H configuration. SCF-deformation energy. Fitting
Figure 4. d
SCF
def
, for F-H configuration. SCF-deformation energy
Figure 4. d
SCF
def
, for F-O configuration. SCF-deformation energy. Fitting
Figure 4. d
SCF
def
, for F-O configuration. SCF-deformation energy
Figure 4. d
SCF
def
, for V-O configuration. SCF-deformation energy. Fitting
Figure 4. d
SCF
def
, for V-O configuration. SCF-deformation energy
Figure 5. e
(
²⁰
)
disp
, for E-H configuration, dispersion energy. Fitting
Figure 5. e
(
²⁰
)
disp
, for E-H configuration, dispersion energy
Figure 5. e
(
²⁰
)
disp
, for E-O configuration, dispersion energy. Fitting
Figure 5. e
(
²⁰
)
disp
, for E-O configuration, dispersion energy
Figure 5. e
(
²⁰
)
disp
, for F-H configuration, dispersion energy. Fitting
Figure 5. e
(
²⁰
)
disp
, for F-H configuration, dispersion energy
Figure 5. e
(
²⁰
)
disp
, for F-O configuration, dispersion energy. Fitting
Figure 5. e
(
²⁰
)
disp
, for F-O configuration, dispersion energy
Figure 5. e
(
²⁰
)
disp
, for V-O configuration, dispersion energy. Fitting
Figure 5. e
(
²⁰
)
disp
, for V-O configuration, dispersion energy
Figure 6. Interaction energy for E-H configuration. Fitting
Figure 6. Interaction energy for E-H configuration
Figure 6. Interaction energy for E-O configuration. Fitting
Figure 6. Interaction energy for E-O configuration
Figure 6. Interaction energy for F-H configuration. Fitting
Figure 6. Interaction energy for F-H configuration
Figure 6. Interaction energy for F-O configuration. Fitting
Figure 6. Interaction energy for F-O configuration
Figure 6. Interaction energy for V-O configuration. Fitting
Figure 6. Interaction energy for V-O configuration
Figure 1. The wing of the v₂ band of H₂O. Calculation (475 K; 2.73 Am)
Figure 1. The wing of the v₂ band of H₂O. Calculation (575 K; 3.91 Am)
Figure 1. The wing of the v₂ band of H₂O. Calculation (675 K; 5.70 Am)
Figure 1. The wing of the v₂ band of H₂O. Experiment (475 K; 2.73 Am)
Figure 1. The wing of the v₂ band of H₂O. Experiment (575 K; 3.91 Am)
Figure 1. The wing of the v₂ band of H₂O. Experiment (675 K; 5.70 Am)
Figure 12. Pure H₂O transmissivity in the wing of the v₂ band. Calculation (575K, 10.5 Am)
Figure 12. Pure H₂O transmissivity in the wing of the v₂ band. Calculation (575K, 21.3 Am)
Figure 12. Pure H₂O transmissivity in the wing of the v₂ band. Calculation (575K, 38.2 Am)
Figure 12. Pure H₂O transmissivity in the wing of the v₂ band. Experiment (575K, 10.5 Am)
Figure 12. Pure H₂O transmissivity in the wing of the v₂ band. Experiment (575K, 21.3 Am)
Figure 12. Pure H₂O transmissivity in the wing of the v₂ band. Experiment (575K, 38.2 Am)
Figure 12a. Pure H₂O transmissivity in the wing of the v₂ band. Calculation (775K, 14.2 Am)
Figure 12a. Pure H₂O transmissivity in the wing of the v₂ band. Calculation (775K, 25.6 Am)
Figure 12a. Pure H₂O transmissivity in the wing of the v₂ band. Calculation (775K, 8.30 Am)
Figure 12a. Pure H₂O transmissivity in the wing of the v₂ band. Experiment (775K, 14.2 Am)
Figure 12a. Pure H₂O transmissivity in the wing of the v₂ band. Experiment (775K, 25.6 Am)
Figure 12a. Pure H₂O transmissivity in the wing of the v₂ band. Experiment (775K, 8.30 Am)
Figure 13. Pure H₂O transmissivities in the wing of the (v₁,2v₂,v₃) triad. Calculation (575K, 37.7 Am)
Figure 13. Pure H₂O transmissivities in the wing of the (v₁,2v₂,v₃) triad. Calculation (675K, 28.1 Am)
Figure 13. Pure H₂O transmissivities in the wing of the (v₁,2v₂,v₃) triad. Calculation (765K, 18.8 Am)
Figure 13. Pure H₂O transmissivities in the wing of the (v₁,2v₂,v₃) triad. Calculation (875K, 14.2 Am)
Figure 13. Pure H₂O transmissivities in the wing of the (v₁,2v₂,v₃) triad. Experiment (575K, 37.7 Am)
Figure 13. Pure H₂O transmissivities in the wing of the (v₁,2v₂,v₃) triad. Experiment (675K, 28.1 Am)
Figure 13. Pure H₂O transmissivities in the wing of the (v₁,2v₂,v₃) triad. Experiment (765K, 18.8 Am)
Figure 13. Pure H₂O transmissivities in the wing of the (v₁,2v₂,v₃) triad. Experiment (875K, 14.2 Am)
Figure 14. Calculation. Khee (Table 4) (2200-3500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 14. Calculation. Khee (Table 4) (4100-6000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 14. Calculation. Khee=1 (2200-3500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 14. Calculation. Khee=1 (4100-6000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 14. Thomas (1990). Experiment (2200-3300 cm⁻¹)
Figure 14. Thomas (1990). Experiment (4100-5000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 14. Thomas (1990). Experiment (5600-6000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. The wing of the v₁+2v₂+v₃ band of H₂O. Calculation (475K; 3.83 Am)
Figure 2. The wing of the v₁+2v₂+v₃ band of H₂O. Calculation (575K; 3.26 Am)
Figure 2. The wing of the v₁+2v₂+v₃ band of H₂O. Calculation (765K; 4.28 Am)
Figure 2. The wing of the v₁+2v₂+v₃ band of H₂O. Experiment (475K; 3.83 Am)
Figure 2. The wing of the v₁+2v₂+v₃ band of H₂O. Experiment (575K; 3.26 Am)
Figure 2. The wing of the v₁+2v₂+v₃ band of H₂O. Experiment (765K; 4.28 Am)
Figure 3. Burch, et al. (1984,1985). H₂O continuum absorption coefficient (2400 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Burch, et al. (1984,1985). H₂O continuum absorption coefficient (2600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. H₂O continuum absorption coefficient (2400 cm⁻¹, this work)
Figure 3. H₂O continuum absorption coefficient (2500 cm⁻¹, Burch, et al. (1984,1985))
Figure 3. H₂O continuum absorption coefficient (2500 cm⁻¹, this work)
Figure 3. H₂O continuum absorption coefficient (2600 cm⁻¹, this work)
Figure 4. Pure H₂O transmission spectra (1900-2250 cm⁻¹, P=10.5 Am)
Figure 4. Pure H₂O transmission spectra (1900-2250 cm⁻¹, P=21.3 Am)
Figure 4. Pure H₂O transmission spectra (1900-2250 cm⁻¹, P=38.2 Am)
Figure 4a. Pure H₂O transmission spectra (3900-4550 cm⁻¹, P=19.9 Am)
Figure 4a. Pure H₂O transmission spectra (3900-4550 cm⁻¹, P=27.7 Am)
Figure 4a. Pure H₂O transmission spectra (3900-4550 cm⁻¹, P=37.7 Am)
Figure 7. D.E. Burch, et al. (1975, 1979, 1987) (296K)
Figure 7. Q. Ma et al. (1990) (296K)
Figure 7. S.A. Clough, et al. (1989) (296K)
Figure 7. D.E. Burch, et al. (430K)
Figure 7. D.E. Burch, et al. (575K)
Figure 7. D.E. Burch, et al. (765K)
Figure 7. Q. Ma et al. (1990) (430K)
Figure 7. Q. Ma et al. (1990) (575K)
Figure 7. Q. Ma et al. (1990) (765K)
Figure 14. CKD continuum, determined in this work
Figure 14. D. E. Burch (1968) (0-2 cm⁻¹)
Figure 14. D.E. Burch et al. (1980)
Figure 14. Experiment, this work
Figure 14. S.A.Clough et al. (1989)
Figure 16. D.E.Burch (1968) (0.1-10 cm⁻¹)
Figure 16. D.E.Burch et al. (1980) (300-700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 16. Experiment, this work
Figure 16. S.A.Clough, et al. CKD continuum
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1c
Figure 1a
Figure 2a. 2.3 mkm window, opacity of CO2, high-T database
Figure 2a. 2.3 mkm window, opacity of CO2, room temperature
Figure 2b. 1.7 mkm window, opacity of CO2, high-T database
Figure 2b. 1.7 mkm window, opacity of CO2, room temperature
Figure 2c. 1.2 mkm window, opacity of CO2, high-T database
Figure 2c. 1.2 mkm window, opacity of CO2, room temperature
Figure 7. Absorption coefficient of CO2
Figure 7. Absorption coefficient of H2O
Figure 7. Near infrared window (4000 cm-1)
Figure 7. Near infrared window (5000 cm-1)
Figure 7. Near infrared window (7000 cm-1)
Figure 7. Near infrared window (8000 cm-1)
Figure 7. Near infrared window (9000 cm-1)
Figure 4. Burch, et al. (1979, 1981, 1984, 1985) (296K, 300-1100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. With the near-wing correction
Figure 4. Without the near-wing correction
Figure 5. Results with the correction
Figure 5. Results without correction
Figure 5. Shalom, et al.
Figure 6. E. Burch et al. (1984, 1985) ()296K, 3000-4200 cm⁻¹
Figure 6. Theoretical results with the correction
Figure 6. Theoretical results without the correction
Figure 7. With the near-wing correction
Figure 7. Without the near-wing correction
Figure 8. With the near-wing correction
Figure 8. Without the near-wing correction
Figure 1. The band-averaged line shape function kappa(omega)
Figure 1. The correction to the band-averaged line shape function
Figure 2. Contribution from the band-averaged line shape function. CO₂+Ar
Figure 2. Experimental data. CO₂+Ar
Figure 2. Results calculated using a Lorentzian line shape. CO₂+Ar
Figure 2. Total contribution
Figure 3. Absorption coefficient. Calculation using the modified potential parameters. CO₂+Ar
Figure 3. J. Boissoles, et al., (1989). Absorption coefficient. Experimental data. CO₂+Ar
Figure 11. Line shape function Eq.(66)
Figure 11. Line shape function Eq.(69)
Figure 12. J. Boissoles, et al., (1989). The experimental data. CO₂+Ar
Figure 12. The result of calculation. CO₂+Ar
Figure 12. The results obtained using Eq. (66). CO₂+Ar
Figure 12. The results obtained using Eq. (69). CO₂+Ar
Figure 3. CO2+Ar line shape function
Figure 4. J. Boissoles, et al., (1989). The experimental results. CO₂+Ar
Figure 4. The results obtained assuming Lorentzian line shapes. CO₂+Ar
Figure 4. The theoretical values. CO₂+Ar
Figure 4. Experiment (T=11.5C, 400-650 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Experiment (T=14.3C, 400-600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Experiment (T=7.7C, 400-650 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Experiment (T=9.4C, 400-650 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Calculation (T=11.5C, 400-640 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Calculation (T=14.3C, 450-630 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Calculation (T=7.7C, 380-650 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1c
Figure 1d
Figure 1e
Figure 2a. Experimental results
Figure 2a. Lorentzian calculation
Figure 2a. Y. I. Baranov, et al. (1981). Experiment
Figure 2b. B0(exp)/B0(Lor)
Figure 5a. Experiment. P(CO2)=200 Torr, P(He)=7.9 atm
Figure 5a. Lorentzian calculation
Figure 5b. B0(exp)/B0(Lor)
Figure 5c. Experiment. P(CO2)=200 Torr, P(He)=9.4 atm
Figure 5c. Lorentzian calculation
Figure 5d. B0(exp)/B0(Lor)
Figure 6a. Experiment. CO₂+He. P(CO₂)=2.5 atm, P(He)=63.6 atm
Figure 6a. Lorentzian calculation. CO₂+He. P(CO₂)=2.5 atm, P(He)=63.6 atm
Figure 6b. Experiment. CO₂+He. P(CO₂)=5.05 atm, P(He)=143.1 atm
Figure 6b. Lorentzian calculation. CO₂+He. P(CO₂)=5.05 atm, P(He)=143.1 atm
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient. CO₂+He. ECS calculation
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient. CO₂+He. Experiment
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient. CO₂+He. Lorentzian calculation
Figure 1. Positions and relative intensities of the lines. CO₂+He
Figure 2. E.C.S. predictions in the wing above 6990 cm-1. B0(calc)/B0(Lor)
Figure 2. Experimental absorption in the wing above 6990 cm-1. B0(exp)/B0(Lor)
Figure 3. Absorption coefficient. CO₂+He. ECS calculation
Figure 3. Absorption coefficient. CO₂+He. Experiment
Figure 3. Absorption coefficient. CO₂+He. Lorentzian calculation
Figure 5. Absorption coefficient. CO₂+Ar. Experiment
Figure 5. Absorption coefficient. CO₂+Ar. Lorentzian calculation
Figure 6. Absorption coefficient. CO₂+N₂. Experiment
Figure 6. Absorption coefficient. CO₂+N₂. Lorentzian calculation
Figure 4. Water internal-rotation potential energy (phi=0)
Figure 4. Water internal-rotation potential energy (phi=90)
Figure 6. Absorption coefficient. ECS calculation
Figure 6. Absorption coefficient. Experiment
Figure 6. Absorption coefficient. Lorentzian calculation
Figure 7. Absorption coefficient. ECS calculation
Figure 7. Absorption coefficient. Experiment
Figure 7. Absorption coefficient. Lorentzian calculation
Figure 10a. Absorption coefficient. ECS calculation
Figure 10a. Absorption coefficient. Experiment
Figure 10a. Absorption coefficient. Lorentzian calculation
Figure 10b. B0(calc)/B0(Lor)
Figure 10b. B0(exp)/B0(Lor)
Figure 2a. B0(IOS)/B0(Lor)
Figure 2a. B0(exp)/B0(Lor)
Figure 2b. R branch region. B0(IOS)/B0(Lor)
Figure 2b. R branch region. B0(exp)/B0(Lor)
Figure 3a. B0(IOS-DBC)/B0(Lor)
Figure 3a. B0(exp)/B0(Lor)
Figure 3b. B0(calc)/B0(Lor), Wkk = -Sigmal=k dl/dk Wlk IOS/DBC=S’k
Figure 3b. B0(calc)/B0(Lor), Wkk=1.01S’k
Figure 3b. B0(calc)/B0(Lor), Wkk=1.02S’k
Figure 3b. B0(calc)/B0(Lor), Wkk=1.05S’k
Figure 3b. B0(calc)/B0(Lor), Wkk=1.1S’k
Figure 3b. B0(exp)/B0(Lor)
Figure 8. B0(calc)/B0(Lor)
Figure 8. B0(exp)/B0(Lor)
Figure 10. Burch D.E. (1981, 1985), Burch et al. (1984) Experimental values for T= 296 K (3000-4100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10. Theoretical results for T = 296 K (3000-4100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 11. Hinderling et al. (1987) (253-278K) 10P(20)
Figure 11. Hinderling et al. (1987) (275-305K). 10P(20)
Figure 11. Hinderling et al. (1987) (305-345K). 10P(20) CO₂ laser line frequency of 944.195 cm⁻¹
Figure 11. Present theory
Figure 12. Burch et al. (1971) (1203 cm⁻¹)
Figure 12. Loper, G.L., et al. (1983)
Figure 12. Montgomery, G.P. (1978) (1200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 12. Present theory
Figure 12. Roberts, R.E., et al. (1976)
Figure 12. Varanasi, P. (1988)
Figure 3. Rosenkranz's results
Figure 3. The present theory (296K)
Figure 5. Calculation with one line shape functions (296K)
Figure 5. Calculation with two line shape functions (296K)
Figure 5. D.E.Burch, et al. (1984) Experiment (296K, 300-1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Burch (1981, 1985), Burch et al. (1984) (296K, 300-1100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Calculation of AC with one line shape functions
Figure 6. Calculation of AC with two line shape functions
Figure 7. Burch et al. (1971) (428K, 2400-2700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Burch et al. (1984) (296K, 2400-2700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Burch et al. (1984) (328K, 2400-2700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Theoretical results for T=296 K (2400-2700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Theoretical results for T=328 K (2400-2700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Theoretical results for T=428 K (2400-2700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. Burch et al. (1984), Burch D.E. (1985) Experimental values (3000-4300 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. Theoretical results (3000-4300 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. Burch et al. (1984), Burch D.E. (1985) (353K, 1200-2300 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. Theoretical results (1200-2300 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10. Eq. (8) and the fitted parameters of Table 4. P=1.97 atm
Figure 10. Eq. (8) and the fitted parameters of Table 4. P=19.8 atm
Figure 10. Eq. (8) and the fitted parameters of Table 4. P=3.95 atm
Figure 10. Eq. (8) and the fitted parameters of Table 4. P=9.87 atm
Figure 10. F. Thibault, et al., (199?). Experiment. P=1.97 atm
Figure 10. F. Thibault, et al., (199?). Experiment. P=19.8 atm
Figure 10. F. Thibault, et al., (199?). Experiment. P=3.95 atm
Figure 10. F. Thibault, et al., (199?). Experiment. P=9.87 atm
Figure 10. The difference between the two previous. P=1.97 atm
Figure 10. The difference between the two previous. P=19.8 atm
Figure 10. The difference between the two previous. P=3.95 atm
Figure 10. The difference between the two previous. P=9.87 atm
Figure 4. Eq. (I) and the ECS model
Figure 4. Eq. (I) and the Strong Collision Model
Figure 6. Eq. (8) and the fitted parameters of Table 2, P=0.2 atm
Figure 6. Eq. (8) and the fitted parameters of Table 2, P=2 atm
Figure 6. Eq. (8) and the fitted parameters of Table 2, P=5 atm
Figure 6. Eq. (I) and the ECS Model, P=0.2 atm
Figure 6. Eq. (I) and the ECS Model, P=2 atm
Figure 6. Eq. (I) and the ECS Model, P=5 atm
Figure 6. The difference between the two previous, P=0.2 atm
Figure 6. The difference between the two previous, P=2 atm
Figure 6. The difference between the two previous, P=5 atm
Figure 8. Eq. (8) and the fitted parameters; T=100 K
Figure 8. Eq. (8) and the fitted parameters; T=300 K
Figure 8. Eq. (8) and the fitted parameters; T=900 K
Figure 8. Eq. (I) and the ECS Model; T=100 K
Figure 8. Eq. (I) and the ECS Model; T=300 K
Figure 8. Eq. (I) and the ECS Model; T=900 K
Figure 8. The difference between the two previous; T=100 K
Figure 8. The difference between the two previous; T=300 K
Figure 8. The difference between the two previous; T=900 K
Figure 10a. (CO₂)₂ + (CO₂)₃ model spectrum
Figure 10b. Unidentified Q-branch in the observed (CO₂)₂ + (CO₂)₃ spectrum
Figure 3a. (CO₂)₂+(CO₂)₃ model
Figure 3b. (CO₂)₃ model
Figure 3c. (CO₂)₂ model
Figure 3d. Observed
Figure 4a. (CO₂)₂ + (CO₂)₃ model
Figure 4b. (CO₂)₃ model
Figure 4c. (CO₂)₂ model
Figure 4d. Observed
Figure 8. Spectra of CH₄ + Ar at 61K in the region of the R(0) transition of the v₃ of CH₄
Figure 8. Spectra of CH₄ at 61°K in the region of the R(0) transition of the v₃ of CH₄
Figure 9. Spectrum due to the CH₄-H₂ complex
Figure 5a. Calculated with the ECS model, nCO2= 4.62 Am and nHe=121.2 Am (n˜He=126.2 Am)
Figure 5a. Calculated with the Lorentzian model, nCO2= 4.62 Am and nHe=121.2 Am (n˜He=126.2 Am)
Figure 5a. Experimental, nCO2= 4.62 Am and nHe=121.2 Am (n˜He=126.2 Am)
Figure 5b. Calculated with the ECS model, nCO2= 4.66 Am and nHe=598.7 Am (n˜ He=720.6 Am)
Figure 5b. Calculated with the Lorentzian model, nCO2= 4.66 Am and nHe=598.7 Am (n˜ He=720.6 Am)
Figure 5b. Experimental, nCO2= 4.66 Am and nHe=598.7 Am (n˜ He=720.6 Am)
Figure 7a. Calculated with the ECS model corrected for the effective shift Deff; nCO2= 4.61 Am and nHe=364.3 Am (n˜ He=409.4 A
Figure 7a. Experimental; nCO2= 4.61 Am and nHe=364.3 Am (n˜He=409.4 Am)
Figure 7b. Calculated with the ECS model corrected for the effective shift Deff. nCO2=5 4.66 Am and nHe=598.7 Am (n˜ He=720.6
Figure 7b. Experimental. nCO2=5 4.66 Am and nHe=598.7 Am (n˜ He=720.6 Am)
Figure 9a. ECS model, bR-P=0.0, nCO2= 2.73*10-5 Am and nHe=603.4 Am (n˜ He=727.2 Am)
Figure 9a. ECS model, bR-P=0.25, nCO2= 2.73*10-5 Am and nHe=603.4 Am (n˜ He=727.2 Am)
Figure 9a. ECS model, bR-P=0.4, nCO2= 2.73*10-5 Am and nHe=603.4 Am (n˜ He=727.2 Am)
Figure 9a. Experiment, nCO2= 2.73*10-5 Am and nHe=603.4 Am (n˜ He=727.2 Am)
Figure 9b. ECS model, bR-P=0.0, nCO2= 1.63*10-5 Am and nHe=124.3 Am (n-He=129.5 Am)
Figure 9b. ECS model, bR-P=0.25, nCO2= 1.63*10-5 Am and nHe=124.3 Am (n˜ He=129.5 Am)
Figure 9b. Experiment, nCO2= 1.63*10-5 Am and nHe=124.3 Am (n˜ He=129.5 Am)
Figure 9c. ECS model, bR-P=0.0, nCO2= 4.25 *10-5 Am and nHe=241.5 Am (n˜ He=261.3 Am)
Figure 9c. ECS model, bR-P=0.25, nCO2= 4.25 *10-5 Am and nHe=241.5 Am (n˜ He=261.3 Am)
Figure 9c. Experiment, nCO2= 4.25 *10-5 Am and nHe=241.5 Am (n˜ He=261.3 Am)
Figure 1. H. Schindler, et al. (1993). Fitting. Methane dimer interaction energies for orientation A
Figure 1. H. Schindler, et al. (1993). Theory. Methane dimer interaction energies for orientation A
Figure 1. H.J. Bohm, et al. (1984). Fitting. Methane dimer interaction energies for orientation A
Figure 1. H.J. Bohm, et al. (1984). Theory. Methane dimer interaction energies for orientation A
Figure 1. Kolos, W., et al. (1980). Fitting. Methane dimer interaction energies for orientation A
Figure 1. Kolos, W., et al. (1980). Theory. Methane dimer interaction energies for orientation A
Figure 1. MM3corren. Fitting
Figure 1. MM3corren. Theory
Figure 1. MM3for. Fitting
Figure 1. MM3for. Theory
Figure 1. MP2
corr
Figure 1a. Calculated values. CO₂+He. nCO₂=4.62. Am, nHe=126 Am
Figure 1a. L. Ozanne, et al., (1995). Experiment. CO₂+He. nCO₂=4.62 Am, nHe=126 Am
Figure 1a. Lorentzian calculation. CO₂+He. nCO₂=4.62. Am, nHe=126 Am
Figure 1b. Calculated values. CO₂+He. nCO₂=4.61 Am, nHe=409 Am
Figure 1b. L.Ozanne, et al., (1995). Experiment. CO₂+He. nCO₂=4.61 Am, nHe=409 Am
Figure 1b. Lorentzian calculation. CO₂+He. nCO₂=4.61 Am, nHe=409 Am
Figure 1c. Calculated values. CO₂+He. nCO₂=4.66 Am, nHe=721 Am
Figure 1c. L.Ozanne, et al., (1995). Exp. nCO₂=4.66 Am, nHe=721 Am
Figure 1c. Lorentzian calculation. CO₂+He. nCO₂=4.66 Am, nHe=721 Am
Figure 2a. Calculated values. nCO₂=1.63 10-5 Am, nHe=130 Am
Figure 2a. L.Ozanne, et al., (1995). Experiment. nCO₂=1.63 10-5 Am, nHe=130 Am
Figure 2a. Lorentzian calculation. CO₂+He. nCO₂=1.63 10-5 Am, nHe=130 Am
Figure 2b. Calculated values. CO₂+He. 4.25 10-5 Am, nHe=261 Am
Figure 2b. L.Ozanne, et al., (1995). Experiment. CO₂+He. 4.25 10-5 Am, nHe=261 Am
Figure 2b. Lorentzian calculation. CO₂+He. 4.25 10-5 Am, nHe=261 Am
Figure 2c. Calculated values. CO₂+He. nCO₂=2.73 10-5 Am, nHe=727 Am
Figure 2c. L.Ozanne, et al., (1995). Experiment. CO₂+He. nCO₂=2.73 10-5 Am, nHe=727 Am
Figure 2c. Lorentzian calculation. CO₂+He. nCO₂=2.73 10-5 Am, nHe=727 Am
Table 2. Calculated absorption coefficient of CO₂. (2410-2480 cm⁻¹)
Table 2. Hartmann J.M., et al., (1991). Experiment. CO₂. (2410-2480 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10. Calculation. CKD continuum. S.A.Clough, et al. (1989)
Figure 10. Calculation. Van Vleck-Weisskopf line shape. J.H.Van Vleck et al. (1945)
Figure 10. Calculation. Zhevakin-Naumov line shape. S.A.Zhevakin et al. (1963)
Figure 10. Experiment, this work (140-260 GHz)
Figure 10. H.J.Liebe (1984, 1989). Calculation
Figure 9. Experiment, this work (150-240 GHz)
Figure 9. H.J. Liebe (1989)
Figure 9. J.H.Van Vleck et al. (1945). Calculation
Figure 9. Q.Ma et al. (1990)
Figure 9. S.A.Clough, et al. (1989). Calculation
Figure 9. S.A.Zhevakin et al. (1963). Calculation, Zhevakin-Naumov line shape.
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1c
Figure 1d
Figure 1. Calculation CO2+Ar, 296 K, Jmax=108
Figure 1. Calculation CO2+Ar, 296 K, Jmax=40
Figure 1. Calculation CO2+Ar, 296 K, Jmax=60
Figure 1. Calculation CO2+Ar, 296 K, Jmax=80
Figure 1. J. Boissoles et al. (1989). Experiment CO2+Ar, 296 K
Figure 3. The line shape function calculation CO2+Ar, 296 K, Rosenkranz’ method
Figure 3. The line shape function calculation CO2+Ar, 296 K, with the frequency shift correction
Figure 2. Total continuum (experiment minus Clough continuum with plintus)
Figure 7a. S. A. Clough. (1995). N₂-broadened continuum coefficient. 296 K. CKD v2.1.
Figure 7a. . Burch D. E., et al. (1981). N₂-broadened continuum coefficient. 308 K
Figure 7a. Burch D.E., et al., (1981). N₂-broadened continuum coefficient. 353 K
Figure 7a. N₂-broadened continuum coefficient. 300 K. Ma & Tipping. (1995)
Figure 7a. N₂-broadened continuum. Impact calculation (local contribution, Van Vleck-Huber line shape)
Figure 7a. S.A. Clough S.A. (1995). N₂-broadened continuum coefficient. 296K. CKD v0
Figure 7a. This work. 296K. N₂-broadened continuum coefficient
Figure 7b. . Burch D. E., et al. (1981). N₂-broadened continuum coefficient. 308 K
Figure 7b. Burch D. E., et al. (1981). N₂-broadened continuum coefficient. 353K
Figure 7b. Clough S.A. (1995). N₂-broadened continuum coefficient. 296K. CKD v.0
Figure 7b. N₂-broadened continuum coefficient. 296K. CKD v.2.4, S. A. Clough S.A. (1995)
Figure 7b. N₂-broadened continuum coefficient. 296K. This work
Figure 7b. N₂-broadened continuum. Impact calculation (local contribution, Van Vleck-Huber line shape)
Figure 1a
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1c
Figure 1d
Figure 1a
Figure 1. Normalized absorption coefficient (228K)
Figure 1. Normalized absorption coefficient (243K)
Figure 1. Normalized absorption coefficient (253K)
Figure 1. Normalized absorption coefficient (272K)
Figure 1. Normalized absorption coefficient (296K)
Figure 2. Normalized absorption coefficient (228K)
Figure 2. Normalized absorption coefficient (243K)
Figure 2. Normalized absorption coefficient (253K)
Figure 2. Normalized absorption coefficient (272K)
Figure 2. Normalized absorption coefficient (296K)
Figure 2. Basement component (plintus)
Figure 2. Far-wing component (beyond 25 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Near-wing component (within 25 cm⁻¹ – non-Lorentzian)
Figure 2. Total continuum (experiment minus Clough continuum with plintus)
Figure 5. D. E. Burch (1982) (308K, 1400-1900 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. D. E. Burch (1982) (322K, 1850-2000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Impact calculation (local contribution, Van vleck-Huber line shape)
Figure 5. R.H. Tipping, et al. (1995) (300K)
Figure 5. S.A. Clough, et al. (1995). CKD v0 (296 K)
Figure 5. S.A. Clough, et al. (1995). CKD v2.1 (296 K)
Figure 5. This work (296 K)
Figure 5a. D.E. Burch (1982, 308 K)
Figure 5a. Impact calculation (local contribution, Van Vleck-Huber line shape)
Figure 5a. S.A. Clough, CKD v0 (1995, 296K)
Figure 5a. S.A. Clough, CKD v2.1 (1995, 296K)
Figure 5a. This work (296 K)
Figure 6. D.E.Burch (322K, 1900-2020 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. S.A. Clough, CKD 2.1. (296K)
Figure 6. This work (296 K)
Figure 8. S.A. Clough, CKD v0 (296K)
Figure 8. S.A. Clough, CKD v2.1 (296K)
Figure 8. This work (296 K)
Figure 8. Wide microwindows
Figure 1. ECS model applied with Eq. (13). CO₂+Ar. (6990-7015 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. ECS model applied with Eq. (15). CO₂+Ar. (6990-7015 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Experiment, St Petersburg. CO₂+Ar. (6990-7015 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Experiment. Rennes spectrum. CO₂+Ar. (6990-7015 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Lorentzian model. CO₂+Ar. (6990-7015 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. SCA model. CO₂+Ar. (6990-7015 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10a. Absorption coefficient of CO₂+Ar. ECS model, corrected individual lineshifts (6900-7000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10a. Absorption coefficient of CO₂+Ar. Experiment. (6900-7000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10b. Absorption coefficient of CO₂+Ar. ECS model, corrected individual lineshifts (6900-7000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10b. Absorption coefficient of CO₂+Ar. Experiment. (6900-7000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Calculated from the ESC model (6900-7000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Calculated from the SCA model (6900-7000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7a. Absorption coefficient of CO₂+Ar. ECS model. n1=4.78Am and n2=112.3Am (6900-7000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7a. Absorption coefficient of CO₂+Ar. Experiment. n1 =4.78 Am and n2 = 112.3 Am (6900-7000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7a. Absorption coefficient of CO₂+Ar. Lorentzian model. n1=4.78Am and n2=112.3Am (6900-7000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7b. Absorption coefficient of CO₂+Ar. ECS model. 4.68Am, n2=169.4Am (6900-7000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7b. Absorption coefficient of CO₂+Ar. Experiment. 4.68Am, n2=169.4Am (6900-7000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7b. Absorption coefficient of CO₂+Ar. Lorentzian model. 4.68Am, n2=169.4Am (6900-7000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9a. Absorption coefficient of CO₂+Ar. CSA model. n1 =4.78 Am, n2 = 112.3 Am (6900-7000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9a. Absorption coefficient of CO₂+Ar. Experiment. n1 =4.78 Am, n2 = 112.3 Am (6900-7000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9b. Absorption coefficient of CO₂+Ar. CSA model. n1 = 4.68 Am, n2 = 169.4 Am (6900-7000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9b. Absorption coefficient of CO₂+Ar. Experiment. n1 = 4.68 Am, n2 = 169.4 Am (6900-7000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10a. Absorption coefficient of CO₂+He. Experiment. P(2) line
Figure 10a. Absorption coefficient of CO₂+He. Experiment. P(4) line
Figure 10a. Absorption coefficient of CO₂+He. Lorentzian profile. P(2) line
Figure 10a. Absorption coefficient of CO₂+He. Lorentzian profile. P(4) line
Figure 10b. The ratio of experimental absorption coefficient to Lorentzian line. P(2)
Figure 10b. The ratio of experimental absorption coefficient to Lorentzian line. P(4)
Figure 11. The difference between alphaExp - alphaLor. alpha - absorption coefficient
Figure 11. The spectrum of CO₂ in He around 597.3 cm⁻¹. Experiment
Figure 11. The spectrum of CO₂ in He around 597.3 cm⁻¹. Lorentzian (without Q branch)
Figure 5a. Experiment. CO₂+Ar. The Q-branch at 720 cm⁻¹
Figure 5a. Lorentzian profile. CO₂+Ar. The Q-branch at 720 cm⁻¹
Figure 5b. The ratio of alphaExp/alphaLor
Figure 6a. Experiment. CO₂+He. The Q-branch at 720 cm⁻¹
Figure 6a. Lorentzian profile. CO₂+He. The Q-branch at 720 cm⁻¹
Figure 6b. The ratio of alphaExp/alphaLor
Figure 7a. Experiment. CO₂+He. The Q-branch at 618 cm⁻¹
Figure 7a. Lorentzian profile. CO₂+He. The Q-branch at 618 cm⁻¹
Figure 7b. The ratio of alphaExp/alphaLor
Figure 8. Experiment. CO₂+He. The Q-branch of v2 band. 663-673 cm⁻¹
Figure 8. Lorentzian fit. CO₂+He. The Q-branch of v2 band. 663-673 cm⁻¹
Figure 8. alphaExp-alphaLor. CO₂+He. The Q-branch of v2 band. 663-673 cm⁻¹
Figure 2a. Absorption coefficient. ECS model. P[CO₂]= 46 Torr., P[He] = 2.5 atm
Figure 2a. Absorption coefficient. Experiment. P[CO₂]= 46 Torr., P[He] = 2.5 atm
Figure 2a. Absorption coefficient. Lorentzian model. P[CO₂]= 46 Torr., P[He] = 2.5 atm
Figure 2b. Absorption coefficient. ECS model. P[CO₂] = 159 Torr, P[He] = 5 atm
Figure 2b. Absorption coefficient. ECS model. P[CO₂]= 159 Torr, P[He] = 5 atm
Figure 2b. Absorption coefficient. Experiment. P[CO₂] = 159 Torr, P[He] = 5 atm
Figure 2b. Absorption coefficient. Experiment. P[CO₂]= 159 Torr, P[He] = 5 atm
Figure 2b. Absorption coefficient. Lorentzian model. P[CO₂] = 159 Torr, P[He] = 5 atm
Figure 2b. Absorption coefficient. Lorentzian model. P[CO₂]= 159 Torr, P[He] = 5 atm
Figure 2. Absorption coefficient. ABC-shape
Figure 2. Absorption coefficient. Lorentz shape
Figure 2. V.M.Tarabukhin, et al. (1987). Absorption coefficient. Experiment
Figure 5. A. Margottin-Maclou, et al. (1992). Experiment
Figure 5. ABC-shape
Figure 5. Lorentz shape
Figure 4a. The observed spectrum
Figure 4b. Model spectrum
Figure 6a. The noncyclic (CO₂)₃ isomer - (CO₂)₂ + both (CO₂)₃ isomers model
Figure 6b. The noncyclic (CO₂)₃ isomer - noncyclic (CO₂)₃ model
Figure 6c. The noncyclic (CO₂)₃ isomer - (CO₂)₃ + cyclic (CO₂)₃ model
Figure 6d. Observed noncyclic (CO₂)₃ isomer
Figure 1. Experiment. Rennes spectrum
Figure 1. Experiment. St. Petersburg spectrum
Figure 2. Normalized absorption coefficient. Orsay-1 values
Figure 2. Normalized absorption coefficient. Orsay-2 values
Figure 2. Normalized absorption coefficient. St. Petersburg values
Figure 2. Normalized absorption coefficient.Experimental values from Burch, et al. (1969)
Figure 4. D. E. Burch, et al. (1989). Absorption coefficient. Calculation
Figure 4. Experimental values
Figure 4. M. Y. Perrin, et al. (1989). Absorption coefficient. Calculation
Figure 5. Absorption coefficient. CO₂. Calculation with the chi factor of Table 2
Figure 5. Absorption coefficient. CO₂. Calculation of the far wings of the v₁+v₃ band
Figure 5. Absorption coefficient. CO₂. Calculation with the chi factor of Table 2
Figure 5. Absorption coefficient. CO₂. Experimental values
Figure 6. Absorption coefficient. CO₂. Calculation with HITRAN-92
Figure 6. Absorption coefficient. CO₂. Calculation with HITRAN-95
Figure 6. Absorption coefficient. CO₂. Experimental values (Rennes data) corrected for far wings
Figure 7a. Absorption coefficient. CO₂. Calculation contribution of the wings
Figure 7a. Absorption coefficient. CO₂. Calculation with HITEMP
Figure 7a. Absorption coefficient. CO₂. Experimental values
Figure 7b. CO₂. Relative difference between observed and computed spectra
Figure 9. Absorption coefficien. CO₂. Contribution of local collision-induced transitions
Figure 9. Absorption coefficien. CO₂. Corrected experimental values
Figure 9. Absorption coefficien. CO₂. Experimental values
Figure 6. N₂+Ar (78K)
Figure 6. N₂+Ar (89K)
Figure 6. N₂+N₂ (78K)
Figure 6. N₂+N₂ (89K)
Figure 6. Ne+N₂ (78K)
Figure 2a. Lorentzian model. 10 bar
Figure 2a. Meadows and Crisp model. 10 bar
Figure 2a. Perrin, M.Y. , et al. (1989). Extrapolation of Fukabori, M., et al. (1986) model. 10 bar
Figure 2a. Pollack, J. B., et al., (1993). Pollack, J. B., et al., model. 10 bar
Figure 2b. Lorentzian model. 90 bar
Figure 2b. Meadows and Crisp model. 90 bar
Figure 2b. Perrin M.Y.. et al., (1989)., extrapolation of Fukabori et al., (1986) model. 90 bar
Figure 2b. Pollack, J. B., et al., (1993). Pollack, J. B., et al., model. 90 bar
Figure 1a
Figure 1a
Figure 1a
Figure 2a
Figure 2b
Figure 3. A.M. Laufer et al. (1965)
Figure 3. Experimental data
Figure 3. K. Watanabe et al. (1953)
Figure 3. W.F. Chan, et al. (1986)
Figure 3. W.F.Chan, et al. (1993)
Figure 2a-1.03atm
Figure 2b-0.85atm
Figure 2c-0.68atm
Figure 4. BCBC model (233K)
Figure 4. BCBC model (300K)
Figure 4. BCBC model (400K)
Figure 4. Dagg, I. (233K)
Figure 4. Dagg, I. (300K)
Figure 4. Dagg, I. (400K)
Figure 4. Ho, W., et al. (1971) (233K)
Figure 4. Ho, W., et al. (1971) (300K)
Figure 10a. Normalized coefficient of absorption. Computed with the ECS model (n’Ar=109.3 Am)
Figure 10a. Normalized coefficient of absorption. Computed with the ECS model (n’Ar=375.1Am)
Figure 10a. Normalized coefficient of absorption. Computed with the ECS model (n’Ar=732.5 Am)
Figure 10a. Normalized coefficient of absorption. Experiment (n’Ar=109.3 Am)
Figure 10a. Normalized coefficient of absorption. Experiment (n’Ar=375.1 Am)
Figure 10a. Normalized coefficient of absorption. Experiment (n’Ar=732.5Am)
Figure 10b. Normalized coefficient of absorption. Computed with the ECS model (n’Ar=112.9 Am)
Figure 10b. Normalized coefficient of absorption. Computed with the ECS model (n’Ar=342.4 Am)
Figure 10b. Normalized coefficient of absorption. Computed with the ECS model (n’Ar=765.6 Am)
Figure 10b. Normalized coefficient of absorption. Experiment (n’Ar=112.9 Am)
Figure 10b. Normalized coefficient of absorption. Experiment (n’Ar=342.4 Am)
Figure 10b. Normalized coefficient of absorption. Experiment (n’Ar=765.6 Am)
Table 2a. Binary absorption coefficient. Experiment (this work) (2475-2579 cm-1))
Table 2a. Boissoles J., et al., (1989). Binary absorption coefficient. Experiment (2475-2579 cm-1))
Table 2b. Density effect parameter c CO₂-Ar. This work (2475-2579 cm⁻¹))
Figure 3a. Calculated absorption coefficient with the ECS model. nCO₂=3.26 Am and nAr=283.1 Am
Figure 3a. Measured absorption coefficient. nCO₂=3.26 Am and nAr=283.1 Am
Figure 3b. Calculated absorption coefficient with the ECS model. nCO₂=3.26 Am and nAr=545.5 Am
Figure 3b. Measured absorption coefficient. nCO₂=3.26 Am and nAr=545.5 Am
Figure 6. Band wing parameters. Calculation the Lorentzian model
Figure 6. Band wing parameters. Calculation the ECS model
Figure 6. Band wing parameters. Calculation the impact/quasi-static interpolation model
Figure 6. Band wing parameters. Experiment Rennes
Figure 6. Filippov N. N., et al., (1996). Band wing parameters. Experiment
Figure 7a. Band wing parameters. Calculation, the ECS impact model (2350-2550 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7a. Band wing parameters. Calculation, the Lorentzian model (2350-2550 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7a. Band wing parameters. Calculation, the impact/quasi-static interpolation model (2350-2550 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7a. Band wing parameters. Experiment this work (2350-2550 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7a. Boissoles J., et al., (1989). Band wing parameters. Experiment. (2350-2550 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7a. Bulanin M.O., et al., (1984). Band wing parameters. Experiment. (2350-2550 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7b. Band wing parameters. Calculation, the ECS impact model (2390-2460 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7b. Band wing parameters. Calculation, the impact/quasi-static interpolation model (2390-2460 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7b. Boissoles J., et al., (1989). Band wing parameters. Experiment (2390-2460 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7b. Bulanin M.O., et al., (1984). Band wing parameters. Experiment (2390-2460 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Infrared collision-induced absorption by O₂ (193K)
Figure 1. Infrared collision-induced absorption by O₂ (213K)
Figure 1. Infrared collision-induced absorption by O₂ (233K)
Figure 1. Infrared collision-induced absorption by O₂ (253K)
Figure 1. Infrared collision-induced absorption by O₂ (273K)
Figure 1. Infrared collision-induced absorption by O₂ (293K)
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient of CO₂. Calculation with Lorentz profile (6980-7060 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient of CO₂. Calculation with a line mixing (6980-7060 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient of CO₂. Present experiment (6980-7060 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Yu. I. Baranov, et al., (1981). Absorption coefficient of CO₂.Present experiment (6980-7060 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Difference between the experimental coefficients and the ones calculated from Eq. (10)
Figure 2. Frequency of v₃+2v₃ double transition of CO₂, 7022.47 cm⁻¹
Figure 2. M.V.Tonkov, et al., (1996). Profile of a S-S collision-induced band of CO₂
Figure 5a. Calculated transmission. Calculation LM-R model. Spectra 1 (Table 1)
Figure 5a. Calculated transmission. Calculation LM-S model. Spectra 1 (Table 1)
Figure 5a. Measured transmission. Experiment. Spectra 1 (Table 1)
Figure 5b. Calculated transmission. Calculation LM-R model, spectra 84 (Table 1)
Figure 5b. Calculated transmission. Calculation LM-S model, spectra 84 (Table 1)
Figure 5b. Measured transmission. Experiment. Spectra 84 (Table 1)
Figure 6a. Deviations between measured and computed (LM-R model) transmissions. Spectra 1 (Table 1)
Figure 6a. Deviations between measured and computed (LM-S-model) transmissions. Spectra 1 (Table 1)
Figure 6a. Deviations between measured and computed (Vgt model) transmissions. Spectra 1 (Table 1)
Figure 6b. Deviations between measured and computed (LM-R model) transmissions. Spectra 84 (Table 1)
Figure 6b. Deviations between measured and computed (LM-S model) transmissions. Spectra 84 (Table 1)
Figure 6b. Deviations between measured and computed (Vgt model) transmissions. Spectra 84 (Table 1)
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1c
Figure 1a
Figure 10. Absorption coefficient. CO₂. Lorentzian calculation (2400–2580 cm⁻¹, T=296K)
Figure 10. Absorption coefficient. CO₂. Present calculation (2400–2580 cm⁻¹, T=296K)
Figure 10. R. Le Doucen, et al., (1985). Absorption coefficient. CO₂. Experiment (2400–2580 cm⁻¹, T=296K)
Figure 11. Absorption coefficient. CO₂. Lorentzian calculation (2400–2580 cm⁻¹, T=218K)
Figure 11. Absorption coefficient. CO₂. Present calculation (2400–2580 cm⁻¹, T=218K)
Figure 11. R. Le Doucen, et al., (1985). Absorption coefficient. CO₂. Experiment (2400–2580 cm⁻¹, T=218K)
Figure 12. Absorption coefficient. CO₂+N₂. Lorentzian calculation (2400–2580 cm⁻¹, T=296K)
Figure 12. Absorption coefficient. CO₂+N₂. Present calculation (2400–2580 cm⁻¹, T=296K)
Figure 12. R. Le Doucen, et al., (1985). Absorption coefficient. CO₂+N₂.Experiment (2400–2580 cm⁻¹, T=296K)
Figure 13. Absorption. CO₂+Ar. The present formalism
Figure 13. Q. Ma, et al., (1996). Absorption. CO₂+Ar. Cut-off value jmax=108
Figure 13. Q. Ma, et al., (1996). Absorption. CO₂+Ar. Cut-off value jmax=40
Figure 13. Q. Ma, et al., (1996). Absorption. CO₂+Ar. Cut-off value jmax=50
Figure 13. Q. Ma, et al., (1996). Absorption. CO₂+Ar. cut-off value jmax=60
Figure 10a
Figure 10b. O₄ visible bands (1000 hPa)
Figure 10c
Figure 10d
Figure 5a. D₂O cluster spectra (0.68 atm)
Figure 5a. D₂O cluster spectra (1.02 atm)
Figure 5a. D₂O cluster spectra (1.7 atm)
Figure 5a. D₂O cluster spectra (2.38 atm)
Figure 5a. D₂O cluster spectra (3.06 atm)
Figure 5b. D_2O cluster spectra. Pressure=35 psi. n1
Figure 5b. D_2O cluster spectra. Pressure=35 psi. n2
Figure 5b. D_2O cluster spectra. Pressure=35 psi. n3
Figure 5b. D_2O cluster spectra. Pressure=35 psi. n4
Figure 5a. Absorption in the wing computed with changed values of tau_J^-1. CO2+He
Figure 5a. Absorption in the wing computed with our value tay_J^-1. CO2+He
Figure 5a. Experiment. CO2+He
Figure 5b. Absorption in the wing computed with changed values of tau_J^-1
Figure 5b. Absorption in the wing computed with our values of tau_J^-1
Figure 5b. Absorption in the wing. Experiment CO2+Ar
Figure 1. Bauer A., et al. (1993) (153GHz)
Figure 1. Bauer, A., et al (1995) (239GHz)
Figure 1. Godon M., et al. [1992) (214GHz)
Figure 1. Liebe H.J. (1984) (138 GHz)
Figure 1. Liebe H.J., et al (1987) (138GHz)
Figure 1. Model calculations from Clough et al. (1989) (CKD₂.1)
Figure 1. Model calculations from Liebe and Layton (1987) (MPM87)
Figure 1. Model calculations from Liebe et al. (1993) (MPM93)
Figure 2. Experiment
Figure 2. Метод ВВВ
Figure 2. Сумма вкладов отдельных линий
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 4D
Figure 4M
Figure 4T
Figure 5. D.E.Burch (1981) (296K, 600-1200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Present calculation (300-1100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. D.E.Burch (1981), D.E.Burch et al. (1979), D.E.Burch et al. (1984), D.E.Burch (1985)
Figure 6. Present calculation (T=430K, 300-1100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. D.E.Burch (1981), D.E.Burch et al. (1979), D.E.Burch et al. (1984), D.E.Burch (1985)
Figure 8. Present calculation (T=296K, 300–1100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. D.E.Burch (1981), D.E.Burch et al. (1979), D.E.Burch et al. (1984), D.E.Burch (1985)
Figure 9. Present calculation (T=430K, 300-1100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1c
Figure 1d
Figure 6. B
O
₂
+N
₂. (296K, 7400-7850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. B
O
₂
+air
. (296K, 7400-7850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. B
O
₂. (296K, 7400-7850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Theoretical far-wing line shape. T=218 K
Figure 2. Theoretical far-wing line shape. T=291 K
Figure 2. Theoretical far-wing line shape. T=414 K
Figure 2. Theoretical far-wing line shape. T=534 K
Figure 2. Theoretical far-wing line shape. T=627 K
Figure 2. Theoretical far-wing line shape. T=751 K
Figure 3a. Calculation CO₂+CO₂ absorption coefficient. (2400–2580 cm⁻¹, T=296 K)
Figure 3a. Lorentzian calculation CO₂+CO₂ absorption coefficient. (2400–2580 cm⁻¹, T=296 K)
Figure 3a. R. Le Doucen, et al., (1985). CO₂+CO₂. Absorption coefficient. (2400–2580 cm⁻¹, T=296 K)
Figure 3b. Calculation CO₂+CO₂ absorption coefficient. (2400–2580 cm⁻¹, T=296 K)
Figure 3b. Lorentzian calculation CO₂+CO₂ absorption coefficient. (2400–2580 cm⁻¹, T=218 K)
Figure 3b. R. Le Doucen, (1985). CO₂+CO₂ absorption coefficient. (2400–2580 cm⁻¹, T=296 K)
Figure 4a. Calculation CO₂+CO₂ absorption coefficient. (2400–2580 cm⁻¹, T=291 K)
Figure 4a. J.-M. Hartmann, et al., (1989). Experiment [16] (2400–2580 cm⁻¹, T=291 K)
Figure 4a. Lorentzian calculation (2400–2580 cm⁻¹, T=291 K)
Figure 4b. Calculation CO₂+CO₂ absorption coefficient. (2400–2580 cm⁻¹, T=414 K)
Figure 4b. J.-M. Hartmann, et al., (1989). Experiment [16] (2400–2580 cm⁻¹, T=414 K)
Figure 4b. Lorentzian calculation. (2400–2580 cm⁻¹, T=414 K)
Figure 4c. Calculation CO₂+CO₂ absorption coefficient. (2400–2580 cm⁻¹, T=534 K)
Figure 4c. J.-M. Hartmann, et al., (1989). Experiment (2400–2580 cm⁻¹, T=534 K)
Figure 4c. Lorentzian calculation (2400–2580 cm⁻¹, T=534 K)
Figure 4d. Calculation CO₂+CO₂ absorption coefficient, (2400–2580 cm⁻¹, T=627 K)
Figure 4d. J.-M. Hartmann, et al., (1989). Experiment (2400–2580 cm⁻¹, T=627 K)
Figure 4d. Lorentzian calculation (2400–2580 cm⁻¹, T=627 K)
Figure 4e. Calculation CO₂+CO₂ absorption coefficient, (2400–2580 cm⁻¹, T=751 K)
Figure 4e. J.-M. Hartmann, et al., (1989). Experiment (2400–2580 cm⁻¹, T=751 K)
Figure 4e. Lorentzian calculation (2400–2580 cm⁻¹, T=751 K)
Figure 5. (O₂)₂ collision-induced absorption cross section
Figure 5. The skewed Voigt profiles fitted to the data
Figure 1. Observed spectrum of the CH₄-H₂ accompanying the S₀(0) pure rotational transition of H₂
Figure 2. FTIS spectrum (97K, 1311.0-1311.5 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. R(0) transition in the v₄ fundamental band of CH₄
Figure 2. Spectra of the CH₄-H₂ observed by diode laser techniques (97K, 1311.0-1311.5 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Observed diode laser spectra of the CH₄-H₂ complex
Figure 3. Simulated spectra of the CH₄-H₂ complex
Figure 4. Observed FTIR spectra of the CH₄-H₂ complex
Figure 4. Simulated spectra of the CH₄-H₂ complex
Figure 1. CIA contribution
Figure 1. Infrared absorption spectrum in the v₁, 2v₂ region
Figure 2. Peaks (1281.0, 1284.75, 1289.0 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Peaks (1383.75, 1387.75, 1391.75 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1c
Figure 1d
Figure 1e
Figure 1f
Figure 1g
Figure 1h
Figure 1i
Figure 1j
Figure 1k
Figure 8. D.E.Burch (1981), D.E.Burch et al. (1979), D.E.Burch et al. (1984), D.E.Burch (1985)
Figure 8. Present calculation (300-1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. D.E.Burch (1981), D.E.Burch et al. (1979), D.E.Burch et al. (1984), D.E.Burch (1985)
Figure 9. H₂O + N₂. Present calculation (430K, 400-700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Bauer A., et al. (1991) (190GHz)
Figure 1. Bauer A., et al. (1993) (153GHz)
Figure 1. Bauer A., et al. (1995) (239 GHz)
Figure 1. Fitting of these points (153 GHz)
Figure 1. Fitting of these points (190 GHz)
Figure 1. Fitting of these points (239 GHz)
Figure 1. Simultaneous fitting of all points (153 GHz)
Figure 1. Simultaneous fitting of all points (190 GHz)
Figure 1. Simultaneous fitting of all points (239 GHz)
Figure 3. Bauer A., et al. (1991) (190 GHz)
Figure 3. Bauer A., et al. (1995) (239 GHz)
Figure 3. This work. Calculation (190 GHz)
Figure 3. This work. Calculation (239 GHz)
Figure 3a. 4
Figure 3a. Aref'ev V.N. (1989). 10P(20)
Figure 3a. Hinderling J., et al. (1987). 10P(20)
Figure 3a. Hinderling J., et al. (1987). 10P(24)
Figure 1a
Figure 8. v₃. CO₂/Ar = 1/10 000
Figure 4. (v₁+v₃) and (2v₂+v₃) Fermi resonance. CO₂/Ar=1/2000
Figure 4. (v₁+v₃) and (2v₂+v₃) Fermi resonance. CO₂/N₂=1/2000
Figure 5. v₃ of CO₂. Time lapse: t = 0
Figure 5. v₃ of CO₂. Time lapse: t = 10 min
Figure 5. v₃ of CO₂. Time lapse: t = 20 min
Figure 5. v₃ of CO₂. Time lapse:t=30 min
Figure 5. v₃ of CO₂. Time lapse:t=45 min
Figure 5a. v₃. ¹³CO₂/Ar=0.0001 (deposition 20K)
Figure 5a. v₃. ¹³CO₂/Ar=0.0001 (deposition 30K)
Figure 2. B. Mate, et al. (2000)
Figure 2. The simulated spectrum
Figure 2. The stick spectrum of O₂
Figure 6a
Figure 6b
Figure 1. Lorentz profiles
Figure 1. Spectrum (CO₂)₂
Figure 1. Yu.I.Baranov et al. (1999)
Figure 3. The experimental values
Figure 3. The calculated (CO₂)₂ spectrum
Figure 3. The spectral profile
Figure 3a. The calculated (CO₂)₂ spectrum
Figure 3a. The experimental spectrum
Figure 1. Вода. СА
Figure 2. Вода. BAX
Figure 7. O₂ (243K)
Figure 7. O₂+Ar (267K)
Figure 7. O₂+N₂ (243K)
Figure 7. The calculated stick spectrum of pure O₂
Figure 1a
Figure 3. A. A. Vigasin, et al. (1996, 1997). Typical CARS
Figure 3. a1-40
Figure 3. a1
Figure 3a. A. A. Vigasin, et al. (1996, 1997)
Figure 3a. b-1
Figure 3a. b
Figure 4. The present anharmonic calculations
Figure 4. Y.I. Baranov, et al. (1999), A. A. Vigasin (2000). The dimer spectrum retrieved from the CIA recording
Figure 5. The calculated absorption spectrum for (CO2)2
Figure 3. Spectral width (15 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Spectral width (200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Spectral width (40 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1a
Figure 2. v₃. Ar/H₂¹⁶O = 800 (10K)
Figure 2. v₃. Ar/H₂¹⁶O = 800 (25K)
Figure 3. 2v₂. Ar/H₂¹⁶O = 80 (10K)
Figure 3. 2v₂. Ar/H₂¹⁶O = 80 (20K)
Figure 3. 2v₂. Ar/H₂¹⁶O = 800 (25K)
Figure 4. v₂+v₃. Ar/H₂¹⁶O = 100 (10K)
Figure 4. v₂+v₃. Ar/H₂¹⁶O = 100 (20K)
Figure 4. v₂+v₃. Ar/H₂¹⁶O = 1500 (10K)
Figure 5. v₁+v₂. Ar/H₂¹⁶O = 100 (10K)
Figure 5. v₁+v₂. Ar/H₂¹⁶O = 20 (10K)
Figure 1. H₂O/N₂ molar ratio = 1.2/100
Figure 1. H₂O/N₂ molar ratio = 7/100
Figure 2. H₂O/N₂ = 1/100
Figure 2. H₂O/N₂ = 1/300
Figure 2. H₂O/N₂ =7/100
Figure 3. CRDS spectra of (O₂)₂ (2 amagat) (14500-17000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. CRDS spectra of (O₂)₂ (4 amagat) (14500-17000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. CRDS spectra of (O₂)₂ (8 amagat) (14500-17000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3a. CRDS spectra of (O₂)₂ (2 Amagat)
Figure 3a. CRDS spectra of (O₂)₂ (4 Amagat)
Figure 3a. CRDS spectra of (O₂)₂ (8 Amagat)
Figure 10. Corrected to cc-pVQZ basic set. Fitting
Figure 10. Corrected to cc-pVQZ basic set
Figure 10. Fitting. MP2/6-31++G(2d,2p)
Figure 10. MP2/6-31++G(2d,2p). Ab initio
Figure 2a. CO2+CO2, T=200 K
Figure 2a. CO2+CO2, T=273 K
Figure 2a. CO2+CO2, T=700 K
Figure 2b. Absorption spectrum. CO2+He, T=200 K
Figure 2b. Absorption spectrum. CO2+He, T=273 K
Figure 2b. Absorption spectrum. CO2+He, T=700 K
Figure 4. CO2+Ar. Calculation
Figure 4. CO2+He. Calculation
Figure 4. CO2+Ne. Calculation
Figure 4. CO2+Xe. Calculation
Figure 4. Dokuchaev A.B., et al. (1985). CO2+Ar. Experiment
Figure 4. Dokuchaev A.B., et al. (1985). CO2+H2. Experiment
Figure 4. Dokuchaev A.B., et al. (1985). CO2+He. Experiment
Figure 4. Dokuchaev A.B., et al. (1985). CO2+N2. Experiment
Figure 4. Dokuchaev A.B., et al. (1985). CO2+Ne. Experiment
Figure 4. Dokuchaev A.B., et al. (1985). CO2+Xe. Experiment
Figure 6. Calculation. P=14.6 atm
Figure 6. Calculation. P=2 atm
Figure 6. Calculation. Лорентциан (300)
Figure 6. D.E. Burch, et al. (1969). Experiment
Table 1. z, x((N2)2) %
Table 1. z, x((O2)2) %
Table 1. z, x(N2+O2) %
Figure 4. Mean of previos measurements
Figure 4. Present experiment
Figure 4. Q. Ma, et al (1999)
Figure 4. R. E. Roberts, et al. (1976). RSB model
Figure 4. S.A. Clough, et al. (1989). CKD 2.4 calculation
Figure 5. Experiment, present and [18-20]
Figure 5. HITRAN00
Figure 5. MMHIT00-A
Figure 5. MMHIT00-B
Figure 5. MPM93
Figure 5. R98
Figure 6. Experiment, this work and [18-21]
Figure 6. HITRAN00
Figure 6. MMHIT00-A
Figure 6. MMHIT00-B
Figure 6. MPM93
Figure 6. R98
Figure 4. Burch et al. (1979, 1981, 1984) (296K, 300–1100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. J. G. Cormier, et al. (2002) (296K, 300–1100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. The calculated self-broadened absorption coefficient (296K, 300–1100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. The self-broadened absorption coefficient calculated for T=220K
Figure 8. The self-broadened absorption coefficient calculated for T=230K
Figure 8. The self-broadened absorption coefficient calculated for T=240K
Figure 8. The self-broadened absorption coefficient calculated for T=250K
Figure 8. The self-broadened absorption coefficient calculated for T=260K
Figure 8. The self-broadened absorption coefficient calculated for T=270K
Figure 8. The self-broadened absorption coefficient calculated for T=280K
Figure 8. The self-broadened absorption coefficient calculated for T=290K
Figure 8. The self-broadened absorption coefficient calculated for T=300K
Figure 8. The self-broadened absorption coefficient calculated for T=310K
Figure 8. The self-broadened absorption coefficient calculated for T=320K
Figure 8. The self-broadened absorption coefficient calculated for T=330K
Figure 6. A. Bauer, et al. (1992, 1993, 1995, 1996, 2002)
Figure 6. MPM89 model
Figure 6. MPM93 model
Figure 7. A. Bauer, et al. (1992, 1993, 1995, 1996, 2002)
Figure 7. MPM89 model
Figure 7. MPM93 model
Figure 7. The calculated H₂O+N₂ millimeter wave continuum (330K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. MPM89 model
Figure 8. MPM93 model
Figure 8. The calculated H₂O+N₂ millimeter wave continuum (270K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Model base CIA pedestals
Figure 1. The numerical purification from the FTIR spectrum
Figure 1. True dimers
Figure 2. Experiment. The width of high-frequency component
Figure 2. Experiment. The width of low-frequency component
Figure 2. Fitting. The width of high-frequency component
Figure 2. Fitting. The width of low-frequency component
Figure 2a. Experiment The high-frequency component
Figure 2a. Experiment. The low-frequency component
Figure 2a. Fitting. The high-frequency component
Figure 2a. Fitting. The low-frequency component
Figure 3. This work
Figure 3. L.Mannik et al. (1972)
Figure 3. T.G.Adiks (1984)
Figure 4. Fiitting (Unbound pairs)
Figure 4. Fitting (Bound dimer)
Figure 4. The true dimer spectrum
Figure 4. Unbound pairs CIA spectrum
Figure 6. Calculations using PES#1
Figure 6. Calculations using PES#2
Figure 6. Spectral decomposition of our taken CIA profiles
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1c
Figure 1d
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1c
Figure 1d
Figure 1e
Figure 1f
Figure 2
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1c
Figure 1d
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1. Calculation, CB=0.80
Figure 1. Calculation, CB=0.85
Figure 1. Calculation, CB=0.90
Figure 1. Calculation, without line mixing
Figure 1. Experimental data
Figure 2. ABC-calculation
Figure 2. Calculation, Voigt lines
Figure 2. Experimental data
Figure 3. Calculation, ABC
Figure 3. Calculation, LOR
Figure 3. Calculation, ROZ
Figure 3. Experimental data
Figure 98. Experiment
Figure 2. Density (0.009 g.cm⁻³)
Figure 2. Density (0.018 g cm⁻³)
Figure 2. Density (0.03 g.cm⁻³)
Figure 2. Density (0.04 g.cm⁻³)
Figure 2. Density (0.054 g.cm⁻³)
Figure 2. Density (0.063 g.cm⁻³)
Figure 2. Density (0.076 g cm⁻³)
Figure 2. Density (0.096 g.cm⁻³)
Figure 2a. Dimer
Figure 2a. Monomer
Figure 2a. Tetramer
Figure 2a. Trimer
Figure 2a.
Figure 3. Density (0.12 g cm⁻³)
Figure 3. Density (0.2 g.cm⁻³)
Figure 3. Density (0.27 g.cm⁻³)
Figure 3. Density (0.32 g.cm⁻³)
Figure 3. Density (0.43 g.cm⁻³)
Figure 3a-asymp
Figure 3a-dimer
Figure 3a-monomer
Figure 3a-tetramer
Figure 3a-trimer
Figure 3. Naus, H. et al. (1999)
Figure 3. Spectrum O₂ (132K)
Figure 3. Spectrum O₂ (192.5K)
Figure 3. Spectrum O₂ (296K)
Figure 3.Asymptotic (132K)
Figure 3.Asymptotic (192.5K)
Figure 3.Asymptotic (296K)
Figure 2a
Figure 3. A. Bauer, et al. (1991, 1992, 1993, 1995, 2002)
Figure 3. MPM89 model
Figure 3. MPM93 model
Figure 3. The calculated H₂O+N₂ millimeter wave continuum (296K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. A. Bauer, et al. (1991, 1992, 1993, 1995, 2002)
Figure 4. MPM89 model
Figure 4. MPM93 model
Figure 4. The calculated H₂O+N₂ millimeter wave continuum (330K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. MPM89 model
Figure 5. MPM93 model
Figure 5. The calculated H₂O+N₂ millimeter wave continuum (270K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. CKD 0 model (1989). (296K, 700-1400 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. CKD 2.2 model (1996). (296K, 700-1400 cm⁻¹))
Figure 4. Clough S.A., et al. (1989). (296K, 600-1800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. D.A.Gryvnak, et al. (1976)
Figure 4. Ma, Q., et al. (1991). (296K, 700-1400 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Roberts R.E., et al. (1976). (1100-1350 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. This work computation
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1c
Figure 1d
Figure 2. The absolute cross-sections of H₂O
Figure 2. The cross-sections of H₂O
Figure 3. K.Yoshino et al. (1995, 1996)
Figure 3. W.F. Chan, et al. (1993)
Figure 3c
Figure 4
Figure 1a
Figure 2. Fitting
Figure 2. Measured points
Figure 10. CDSD-1000 a high-temperature version
Figure 10. HITEMP the high-resolution databank
Figure 10. M.F. Modest, et al. (2002). Experiment
Figure 13. CDSD-1000 a high-temperature versio
Figure 13. HITEMP the high-resolution databank
Figure 13. M.F. Modest, et al. (2002). Experiment
Figure 4. CDSD-1000 a high-temperature version
Figure 4. HITEMP the high-resolution databank
Figure 4. Scutaru D, et al. (1993). Experiment
Figure 6. CDSD-1000 a high-temperature version
Figure 6. HITEMP the high-resolution databank
Figure 6. Parker R.A., et al. (1992). Experiment
Figure 8. CDSD-x_CO2=100%
Figure 8. CDSD-x_CO2=99%, x_CO=1%
Figure 8. HITEMP x_CO2=100%
Figure 8. Modest M.F., et al. (2002). Experiment
Figure 1. (1.1 atm)
Figure 1. (2.0 atm)
Figure 1. (3.0 atm)
Figure 1. (4.1 atm)
Figure 1. (5.0 atm)
Figure 1. (6.1 atm)
Figure 1. (7.1 atm)
Figure 1. (8.1 atm)
Figure 2. IEM (211K)
Figure 2. NIST (297K)
Figure 4. (Fermi doublet, 10⁰0) Theory
Figure 4. (Fermi doublet, 20⁰0, 2547 cm⁻¹) Theory
Figure 4. (Fermi doublet, 20⁰0, 2671 cm⁻¹) Theory
Figure 4. (Fermi doublet, 20⁰0, 2797 cm⁻¹) Theory
Figure 4. Adiks, T.G. (1982). (Fermi doublet, 10⁰0)
Figure 4. Adiks, T.G. (1982). (Fermi doublet, 20⁰0, 2671 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Baranov Yu.I., et al. (1999) (Fermi doublet, 20⁰0, 2547 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Baranov Yu.I., et al. (1999). (Fermi doublet, 20⁰0, 2671 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Baranov Yu.I., et al. (1999). (Fermi doublet, 10⁰0)
Figure 4. Baranov Yu.I., et al. (1999). (Fermi doublet, 20⁰0, 2797 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Mannik, L. et al. (1972). (Fermi doublet, 10⁰0)
Figure 1. Density 2.272 times that of an ideal gas
Figure 1. Density 3.317 times that of an ideal gas
Figure 1. Density 4.419 times that of an ideal gas
Figure 1. Density 5.531 times that of an ideal gas
Figure 1. Density 6.644 times that of an ideal gas
Figure 1. Density 7.767 times that of an ideal gas
Figure 2. Density 1.00 times that of an ideal gas
Figure 2. Density 1.89 times that of an ideal gas
Figure 2. Density 3.74 times that of an ideal gas
Figure 2. Density 5.67 times that of an ideal gas
Figure 2. Density 7.52 times that of an ideal gas
Figure 5. CIAC for Ar + O₂
Figure 5. CIAC for O₂ + N₂
Figure 5. CIAC for O₂
Figure 5. The O₂ stick spectrum
Figure 2a
Figure 2b
Figure 3. Arefiev, V.N. (1990). (800-1100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Line mixing calculation using ABC model
Figure 3. Line mixing calculation using strong collision model
Figure 3a. Arefiev, V.N. (1990). (800-1100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3a. Line mixing calculation using strong collision model
Figure 1. Observed profile of a CO₂ dimer band
Figure 1. Simulated profile of a CO₂ dimer band
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1c
Figure 1d
Figure 1e
Figure 1a
Figure 1. H₂O (9.75 hPa) + Air (167.5 hPa)
Figure 1. H₂O (9.75 hPa) + Air (332.2 hPa)
Figure 1. H₂O (9.75 hPa) + Air (498.75 hPa)
Figure 1. Pure H₂O
Figure 1a
Figure 1. CKD-2.4 only
Figure 1. HITRAN V.11 with CKD-2.4
Figure 1. Water Dimer. Low, G.R., et al. (1999)
Figure 1. Water Dimer. Schofield, D.P., et al. (2003)
Figure 4. CKD-2.4 continuum
Figure 4. Dimer: K
eq
=0.018 atm⁻¹; HWHM=20 cm⁻¹; Shift=12 cm⁻¹
Figure 4. Residual: measurement - HITRAN(m) with CKD-2.4
Figure 4a. CKD-2.4 continuum
Figure 4a. Dimer: K
eq
=0.011 atm⁻¹; HWHM=16 cm⁻¹; Shift=5 cm⁻¹
Figure 4a. Residual: measurement - HITRAN(m) with CKD-2.4
Figure 5. CKD-2.4 continuum
Figure 5. Dimer: K
eq
=0.043 atm⁻¹; HWHM=30 cm⁻¹; Shift=9 cm⁻¹
Figure 5. Ma&Tipping continuum
Figure 5. Residual: measurement - HITRAN(m) with MT
Figure 5a. CKD-2.4 continuum
Figure 5a. Dimer: K
eq
=0.02 atm⁻¹; HWHM=26 cm⁻¹; Shift=5 cm⁻¹
Figure 5a. Ma&Tipping continuum
Figure 5a. Residual: measurement - HITRAN(m) with MT
Figure
Figure 12. 4nu + delta water vapor band
Figure 12. An O₄ continuum
Figure 12. O₂ γ band
Figure 12. Total
Figure 13. Modeled continuum. Differential O₄ absorption. SZA=80 degree
Figure 13. Modeled continuum. Differential O₄ absorption. SZA=85 degree
Figure 13. Retrival continuum. Differential O₄ absorption. SZA=80 degree
Figure 13. Retrival continuum. Differential O₄ absorption. SZA=85 degree
Figure 15. CKD 2.4.1. (SZA=89). Optical path for water
Figure 15. MT-CKD 1.0. (SZA=89). Optical path for water
Figure 15. Optical path for water dimer (multiplied by 10) (SZA=89)
Figure 15. Retrieval. (SZA=89). Optical path for water
Figure 15a. CKD 2.4.1. (SZA=87). Optical path for water
Figure 15a. MT-CKD 1.0. (SZA=87). Optical path for water
Figure 15a. Optical path for water dimer (multiplied by 10) (SZA=87)
Figure 15a. Retrieval. (SZA=87). Optical path for water
Figure 15b. CKD 2.4.1. (SZA=85). Optical path for water
Figure 15b. MT-CKD 1.0. (SZA=85). Optical path for water
Figure 15b. Optical path for water dimer (multiplied by 10) (SZA=85)
Figure 15b. Retrieval. (SZA=85). Optical path for water
Figure 15c. CKD 2.4.1. (SZA=83). Optical path for water
Figure 15c. MT-CKD 1.0. (SZA=83). Optical path for water
Figure 15c. Optical path for water dimer (multiplied by 10) (SZA=83)
Figure 15c. Retrieval. (SZA=83). Optical path for water
Figure 17. CKD 2.4.1. (SZA=89). Optical path for water
Figure 17. MT-CKD 1.0. (SZA=89). Optical path for water
Figure 17. Optical path for water dimer (multiplied by 10) (SZA=89)
Figure 17. Retrieval. (SZA=89). Optical path for water
Figure 17a. CKD 2.4.1. (SZA=87). Optical path for water
Figure 17a. MT-CKD 1.0. (SZA=87). Optical path for water
Figure 17a. Optical path for water dimer (multiplied by 10) (SZA=87)
Figure 17a. Retrieval. (SZA=87). Optical path for water
Figure 17b. CKD 2.4.1. (SZA=85). Optical path for water
Figure 17b. MT-CKD 1.0. (SZA=85). Optical path for water
Figure 17b. Optical path for water dimer (multiplied by 10) (SZA=85)
Figure 17b. Retrieval. (SZA=85). Optical path for water
Figure 17c. CKD 2.4.1. (SZA=83). Optical path for water
Figure 17c. MT-CKD 1.0. (SZA=83). Optical path for water
Figure 17c. Optical path for water dimer (multiplied by 10) (SZA=83)
Figure 17c. Retrieval. (SZA=83). Optical path for water
Figure 5. CKD 2.4.1 model
Figure 5. Measured transmission
Figure 5. Transmission for water dimer (multiplied by 10)
Figure 5. Transmission for water monomer
Figure 6. CKD 2.4.1 model
Figure 6. Total transmission
Figure 6. Transmission for the H₂O monomer
Figure 6. Transmission for the O₂ B band
Figure 6. Transmission for water dimer (multiplied by 10)
Figure 9. Total transmission
Figure 9. Transmission of 5ν water vapor polyad centered at 590 nm
Figure 9. Transmission of O₄ band at 575 nm
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1c
Figure 1d
Figure 1e
Figure 1f
Figure 1g
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1c
Figure 1d
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1c
Figure 1d
Figure 1e.
Figure 2. Derived from the spectrum of K.Yoshino, et al. (1996)
Figure 2. Present experimental spectrum
Figure 1a
Figure 1b.
Figure 2
Figure 1. (H₂¹⁸O)₂ trapped in Ne (Ne/H₂¹⁸O=800) (4K)
Figure 1. (H₂¹⁸O)₂ trapped in Ne (Ne/H₂¹⁸O=800) (8K)
Figure 1b. (H₂¹⁸O)₂ trapped in Ne (Ne/H₂¹⁸O=800) (4K)
Figure 1b. (H₂¹⁸O)₂ trapped in Ne (Ne/H₂¹⁸O=800) (8K)
Figure 1c. (H₂¹⁸O)₂ trapped in Ne (Ne/H₂¹⁸O=800) (4K)
Figure 1c. (H₂¹⁸O)₂ trapped in Ne (Ne/H₂¹⁸O=800) (8K)
Figure 1d. (H₂¹⁸O)₂ trapped in Ne (Ne/H₂¹⁸O=800) (4K)
Figure 1d. (H₂¹⁸O)₂ trapped in Ne (Ne/H₂¹⁸O=800) (8K)
Figure 1e. (H₂¹⁸O)₂ trapped in Ne (Ne/H₂¹⁸O=800) (4K)
Figure 1e. (H₂¹⁸O)₂ trapped in Ne (Ne/H₂¹⁸O=800) (8K)
Figure 1f. (H₂¹⁸O)₂ trapped in Ne (Ne/H₂¹⁸O=800) (4K)
Figure 1f. (H₂¹⁸O)₂ trapped in Ne (Ne/H₂¹⁸O=800) (8K)
Figure 1g. (H₂¹⁸O)₂ trapped in Ne (Ne/H₂¹⁸O=800) (8K)
Figure 3a
Figure 3b
Figure 4. v₁/2v₂ Fermi dyad (193K)
Figure 4. v₁/2v₂ Fermi dyad (218K)
Figure 4. v₁/2v₂ Fermi dyad (239K)
Figure 4. v₁/2v₂ Fermi dyad (270K)
Figure 4. v₁/2v₂ Fermi dyad (346K)
Figure 5. D.E.Burch et al. (1971)
Figure 5. L.Mannik, et al. (1971)
Figure 5. T.G.Adiks (1984)
Figure 5. This work
Figure 5. Yu.I. Baranov et al. (1999)
Figure 1. G. Birnbaum, et al. (1993). Measurement (CH₄+N₂, 162K, 0-650 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Our calculation (CH₄+N₂, 162K, 0-650 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. An existing measurement. G. Birnbaum, et al. (1993)
Figure 2. Our calculation
Figure 2. The induced dipole surface. B₀₀₀₁
Figure 2. The induced dipole surface. B₀₃₃₄
Figure 2. The induced dipole surface. B₀₄₄₅
Figure 2. The induced dipole surface. B₂₀₂₃
Figure 2. The induced dipole surface. B₂₃₃₄
Figure 2. The induced dipole surface. B₂₃₅₄
Figure 2. The induced dipole surface. B₂₄₀₅
Figure 2. The induced dipole surface. B₄₀₄₅
Figure 3. G. Birnbaum, et al. (1993). Measurement (CH₄+N₂, 195K, 0-650 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Our calculation (CH₄+N₂, 195K, 0-650 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. I. R. Dagg, et al. (1986). Measurements (CH₄+N₂, 126K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Our calculations (CH₄+N₂, 126K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4a. I. R. Dagg, et al. (1986). Measurements (CH₄+N₂, 149K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4a. Our calculations (CH₄+N₂, 149K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4b. I. R. Dagg, et al. (1986). Measurements (CH₄+N₂, 179K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4b. Our calculations (CH₄+N₂, 179K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4c. I. R. Dagg, et al. (1986). Measurements (CH₄+N₂, 212K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4c. Our calculations (CH₄+N₂, 212K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. A/(sigma-667)^2
Figure 5. Experiment
Figure 5. Model with renormalization of the relaxation operator
Figure 5. Model without renormalization of the relaxation operator
Figure 6A. Calculated with the Lorentzian approach
Figure 6A. Calculated with the present ECS model
Figure 6A. Experiment
Figure 6B. Normalized relative deviations
Figure 8A. Calculated with the present ECS model
Figure 8A. Experiment
Figure 8A. Lorentzian approach
Figure 8B. Normalized relative deviations
Figure 17. Asymptotical computation (296K, 2350-2800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 17. Asymptotical computation (338K, 2350-2800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 17. Asymptotical computation (384K, 2350-2800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 17. Asymptotical computation (428K, 2350-2800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 17. Burch D.E. (1982) (338K, 2300-2800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 17. Burch D.E. (1982) (384K, 2300-2800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 17. Burch D.E. (1982) (428K, 2300-2800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 17. Burch D.E., et al. (1984) (296K, 2350-2800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 17a. Burch D.E. (1982) (338K, 2300-2800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 17a. Burch D.E. (1982) (428K, 2300-2800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 17a. Burch D.E., et al. (1984) (296K, 2300-2800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 17a. Ma Q. et al. (1992) (296K, 2300-2800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 17a. Ma Q. et al. (1992) (338K, 2300-2800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 17a. Ma Q. et al. (1992) (428K, 2300-2800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 18. Burch D.E. (1984) (296K, 700-1200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 18. Line wing theory (296K, 700-1200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 18. Roberts R.E., et al. (1976) (284K, 700-1200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 18. Roberts R.E., et al. (1976). Recomputed. (284K, 700-1200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 20. Hinderling J., et al. (1987) (244.19 cm⁻¹, 230-340K)
Figure 20. Hinderling J., et al. (1987) a (244.19 cm⁻¹, 230-340K)
Figure 20. Line wing theory (244.19 cm⁻¹, 230-340K)
Figure 20. Ma Q., et al. (2002) (244.19 cm⁻¹, 230-340K)
Figure 21. Burch D.E., et al. (1980) (1000 cm⁻¹, 240-500K)
Figure 21. Burch D.E., et al. (1980). (1000 cm⁻¹, 240-500K)
Figure 21. Line wing theory (1000 cm⁻¹, 240-500K)
Figure 21. Loper G.L., et al. (1983) (1000 cm⁻¹, 240-500K)
Figure 21. Montgomery G.P. (1978) (1000 cm⁻¹, 240-500K)
Figure 21. Thomas M.E., et al. (1985) (1000 cm⁻¹, 240-500K)
Figure 21. Varanasi P. (1988). Dimer model. (1000 cm⁻¹, 240-500K)
Figure 21. Varanasi P., et al. (1987-8) (1000 cm⁻¹, 240-500K)
Figure 6B. Calculation using the ECS-EP model
Figure 6B. Experiment
Figure 6B. The measured–calculated deviations multiplied by 5
Figure 7A. Experiment, 700 Torr
Figure 7A. Measured–calculated deviations of the ECS-EP model, accounting for line mixing
Figure 7A. Measured–calculated deviations of the ECS-EP model, neglecting line mixing
Figure 7B. Experiment, 250 Torr
Figure 7B. Measured–calculated deviations of the ECS-EP model, accounting for line mixing
Figure 7B. Measured–calculated deviations of the ECS-EP model, neglecting line mixing
Figure 7C. Experiment, 100 Torr
Figure 7C. Measured–calculated deviations of the ECS-EP model, accounting for line mixing
Figure 7C. Measured–calculated deviations of the ECS-EP model, neglecting line mixing
Figure 2. Calculated using the model of isolated branches
Figure 2. Calculated using the model of strong collisions
Figure 2. Calculated using the model of weak collisions
Figure 2. Experiment
Figure 3. Experiment
Figure 3. Model of adjusted branch coupling (ABC)
Figure 3. Model of the Lorentzian line shape
Figure 3. Model of the varied collision efficiency (VCE)
Figure 5. (2v2+v3) CO2+He. Calculation using the model of adjusted branch coupling (ABC)
Figure 5. (2v2+v3) CO2+He. Calculation using the model of of Lorentzian line shape
Figure 5. (2v2+v3) CO2+He. Calculation using the model of the varied collision efficiency (VCE)
Figure 5. (2v2+v3) CO2+He. Experimental data for a density of 100 atm
Figure 10. Best fit of experimental data
Figure 10. Experimental data
Figure 10. Far wing model
Figure 10. H₂O-N₂ complex model
Figure 6. Best fit of present experiment
Figure 6. G. L. Loper, et al. (1983). Photoacoustic measurements
Figure 6. J. Hinderling, et al. (1987). Photoacoustic measurements
Figure 6. M. T. Coffey, et al. (1977). Radiometer measurements
Figure 6. Present experiment
Figure 7. Present experiment
Figure 7. best fit of present experiment
Figure 9. Best fit of experimental data
Figure 9. Experimental data
Figure 9. Far wing model
Figure 9. Water dimer model
Figure 4. Experimental spectra for N₂ pressure of 0 kPa
Figure 4. Experimental spectra for N₂ pressure of 81.0 kPa
Figure 4.Continuum absorbance for N₂ pressure of 0 kPa
Figure 4.Continuum absorbance for N₂ pressure of 81.0 kPa
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1c
Figure 1. a
Figure 1. б
Figure 1a
Figure 1. Ar/H₂O=1000/5
Figure 1. Kr/H₂O=1000/5
Figure 1. Xe/H₂O=1000/5
Figure 2. Ar/H₂O=1000/5
Figure 2. Kr/H₂O=1000/5
Figure 2. Xe/H₂O=1000/2
Figure 2. H₂O in solid Kr
Figure 2. H₂O in solid argon
Figure 2. H₂O in solid neon
Figure 3. H₂ ¹⁸O in solid neon
Figure 3. H₂O in solid neon
Figure 1. The induced dipole components (0334) of CH₄-H₂
Figure 1. The induced dipole components (0445) of CH₄-H₂
Figure 1. The induced dipole components (2023) of CH₄-H₂
Figure 1. The induced dipole components (2344) of CH₄-H₂
Figure 1. The induced dipole components (2354) of CH₄-H₂
Figure 1. The induced dipole components (2405) of CH₄-H₂
Figure 1. The induced dipole components (4045) of CH₄-H₂
Figure 1. The rototranslational enhancement spectrum in the far infrared
Figure 2. Calculations of the binary rototranslational spectra (140K, 150-850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. P. Codastefano, et al. (1986). Measurements of absorption spectra (140K, 150-850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2a. Calculations of the binary rototranslational spectra (163K, 150-850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2a. Measurements of the rototranslational enhancement absorption spectra (163K, 150-850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2b. Calculations of the binary rototranslational spectra (175K, 150-850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2b. P. Codastefano, et al. (1986). Measurements of absorption spectra (175K, 150-850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2c. Calculations of the binary rototranslational spectra (195K, 150-850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2c. P. Codastefano, et al. (1986). Measurements of absorption spectra (195K, 150-850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2d. Calculations of the binary rototranslational spectra (195K, 150-850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2d. P. Codastefano, et al. (1986). Measurements of absorption spectra (195K, 150-850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2e. Calculations of the binary rototranslational spectra (269K, 150-850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2e. Measurements of the rototranslational enhancement absorption spectra (269K, 150-850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2f. Calculations of the binary rototranslational spectra (297K, 150-850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2f. G. Birnbaum, et al. (1987). Measurements of absorption spectra (297K, 150-850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. A.D. Afanasev, et al. (1980). Measurement spectrum of gaseous CH₄-He (293K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Calculated total absorption of CH₄-He (293K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. The hexadecapole-induced component of CH₄-He (293K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. The sum of the octopole-induced component of CH₄-He (293K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. The excess absorption spectra of CH₄ - H₂ pairs (140K, 0-900 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. The excess absorption spectra of CH₄ - H₂ pairs (195K, 0-900 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. The excess absorption spectra of CH₄ - H₂ pairs (297K, 0-900 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. The excess absorption spectra of CH₄ - N₂ pairs (162K, 0-700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. The excess absorption spectra of CH₄ - N₂ pairs (195K, 0-700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. The excess absorption spectra of CH₄ - N₂ pairs (297K, 0-700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. The excess absorption spectra of CH₄ - He pairs (293K, 100-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. The excess absorption spectra of CH₄ - He pairs (353K, 100-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6.3 The excess absorption spectra of CH₄ - He pairs (150K, 0-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Calculated absorption spectra in methane (163K, 0-800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. P. Codastefano, et al. (1986) (163K, 0-650 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1a. Calculated absorption spectra in methane (195K, 0-750 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1a. P. Codastefano, et al. (1986) (195K, 0-650 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1b. Calculated absorption spectra in methane (243K, 0-750 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1b. P. Codastefano, et al. (1986) (243K, 0-650 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1c. Calculated absorption spectra in methane (297K, 0-750 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1c. P. Codastefano, et al. (1986) (297K, 0-650 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. A.A. Vetrov (1976). Experimental data
Figure 2. Resulting spectral profile
Figure 2. Water dimer
Figure 2. Water monomer
Figure 2a. A.A. Vetrov (1976). Experimental data
Figure 2a. Resulting spectral profile
Figure 2a. Water dimer
Figure 2a. Water monomer
Figure 2b. A.A. Vetrov (1976). Experimental data
Figure 2b. Resulting spectral profile
Figure 2b. Water dimer
Figure 2b. Water monomer
Figure 3a. REMPI spectra recorded in the m/z=16 mass channel. CH₄⁺ and O⁺
Figure 3b. REMPI spectra recorded in the m/z=16 mass channel. O⁺ only
Figure 3c. REMPI spectra recorded in the m/z=46 mass channel. NO-CH₄⁺
Figure 4a. REMPI spectra of isotopomer of CH₂D₂-NO
Figure 4b. REMPI spectra of the isotopomer of CH₃D-NO
Figure 4c. REMPI spectra of the isotopomers of CD₄-NO
Figure 4d. REMPI spectra of the isotopomers of CH₄-NO
Figure 4e. REMPI spectra of the isotopomer of CH₃D-NO
Figure 5a. REMPI spectra of isotopomer of CH₂D₂-NO
Figure 5b. REMPI spectra of the CH₄-NO
Figure 5c. REMPI spectra of the isotopomer of CH₃D-NO
Figure 5d. REMPI spectra of the isotopomer of CHD₃-NO
Figure 5e. REMPI spectra of the isotopomers of CD₄-NO
Figure 1. Component 1
Figure 1. Component 2
Figure 1. Component 3
Figure 1. Lorentz profile
Figure 1. Sum theoretical profile
Figure 4A. CO2 spectra calculated using the far-wing theory, 0-6000 cm-1
Figure 4A. CO2 spectra obtained with the empirical line profile model, 0-6000 cm-1
Figure 4A. The absorption of 30 ppm of water vapor 0-6000 cm-1
Figure 4B. CO2 spectra calculated using the far-wing theory, 1000-1500 cm-1
Figure 4B. CO2 spectra obtained with the empirical line profile model, 1000-1500 cm-1
Figure 4B. The absorption of 30 ppm of water vapor, 1000-1500 cm-1
Figure 2a
Figure 2. N₂
Figure 2. O₂
Figure 7a. CO2. Computation accounting for line-mixing. 963-963.6 cm-1
Figure 7a. CO2. Computation neglecting line-mixing. 963-963.6 cm-1
Figure 7a. CO2. Measured values. 963-963.6 cm-1
Figure 7b. CO2. Computation accounting for line-mixing. 841.6-842.2 cm-1
Figure 7b. CO2. Computation neglecting line-mixing. 841.6-842.2 cm-1
Figure 7b. CO2. Measured values. 841.6-842.2 cm-1
Figure 7c. CO2. Computation accounting for line-mixing. 748.8-749.4 cm-1
Figure 7c. CO2. Computation neglecting line-mixing. 748.8-749.4 cm-1
Figure 7c. CO2. Measured values. 748.8-749.4 cm-1
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1c
Figure 1d
Figure 1e
Figure 1f
Figure 1g
Figure 1h
Figure 1i
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1a
Figure 6. Calculated equilibrium constant + resonances
Figure 6. Calculated equilibrium constant
Figure 6. Curtiss, L. A., et al. (1979). Equilibrium constant
Figure 6. Evans, G. T., et al. (2000). Equilibrium constant
Figure 6. Goldman, N., et al. (2004). Rigid VRT-ASP III potential
Figure 6. Harvey, A. H., et al. (2004). Equilibrium constant (38.5 cm³/mol)
Figure 6. Harvey, A. H., et al. (2004). Equilibrium constant
Figure 6. Pfeilsticker, K., et al. (2003). Equilibrium constant
Figure 6. Ptashnik, I. V., et al. (2004). Equilibrium constant. Ma-Tipping continuum model
Figure 6. Ptashnik, I., et al. (2004). Equilibrium constant. CKD-2.4
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1c
Figure 3a
Figure 3b
Figure 3c
Figure 4. Least-square best-fit results
Figure 4. Experimental data
Figure 4. The confidence interval for the fit-result
Figure 4. The confidence interval for the fit-result
Figure 4. The confidence interval for the prediction
Figure 4. The confidence interval for the prediction
Figure 4a. The confidence interval for the fit-result
Figure 4a. The confidence interval for the fit-result
Figure 4a. The confidence interval for the prediction
Figure 4a. The confidence interval for the prediction
Figure 4a. The least-square best-fit results
Figure 4a.Experimental data
Figure 4b. The confidence interval for the fit-result
Figure 4b. The confidence interval for the fit-result
Figure 4b. The confidence interval for the prediction
Figure 4b. The confidence interval for the prediction
Figure 4b. The least-square best-fit results
Figure 4b.Experimental data
Figure 5. The least-square best-fit results
Figure 5. Naus, H. et al. (1999)
Figure 5. The confidence interval for the prediction
Figure 5. The confidence interval for the prediction
Figure 5a. Experimental results
Figure 5a. The confidence interval for the fit-result
Figure 5a. The confidence interval for the fit-result
Figure 5a. The confidence interval for the prediction
Figure 5a. The confidence interval for the prediction
Figure 5a. The least-square best-fit results
Figure 5b. The confidence interval for the fit-result
Figure 5b. The confidence interval for the fit-result
Figure 5b. The confidence interval for the prediction
Figure 5b. The confidence interval for the prediction
Figure 5b. The least-square best-fit results
Figure 5b.Experimental data
Figure 7. O₂ perturbed by N₂
Figure 7. Pure O₂
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 5a
Figure 5b
Figure 5c
Figure 5d
Figure 5e
Figure 7. Lines + Continuum * 10
Figure 7. Lines + Continuum * 8
Figure 7. Lines + Continuum * 9
Figure 7. Lines + Continuum
Figure 7. Measurement
Figure 8. Continuum 14.7 torr
Figure 8. Continuum 9 torr
Figure 8. Hitran 14.7 torr
Figure 8. Hitran 9 torr
Figure 8. Measured 14.7 torr
Figure 8. Measured 9 torr
Figure 3-17. The rototranslational spectrum of H₂+CH₄. All components
Figure 3-17. The rototranslational spectrum of H₂+CH₄. CH₄ hexadecapole-induced component
Figure 3-17. The rototranslational spectrum of H₂-CH₄. CH₄ octopole-induced component
Figure 3-17. The rototranslational spectrum of H₂-CH₄. Experimental points
Figure 3-17. The rototranslational spectrum of H₂-CH₄. H₂ quadrupole-induced component
Figure 3c-22. P. Dore, et al. (1989). The rototranslational spectrum of CH₄-CH₄. Experiment
Figure 3c-22. The rototranslational spectrum of CH₄-CH₄. An octopole-induced component
Figure 3c-22. The rototranslational spectrum of CH₄-CH₄. A hexadecapole-induced component
Figure 3c-22. The rototranslational spectrum of CH₄-CH₄. All components
Figure 3c-22. The rototranslational spectrum of CH₄-CH₄. Double transitions
Figure 13. V. B. Podobedov, et al. (2005)
Figure 13. Water Dimer absorption
Figure 4. Infrared absorption spectrum. Ar/H₂O=25
Figure 4. Infrared absorption spectrum. Ne/H₂O = 50
Figure 1. Conformation H
Figure 1. Conformation L
Figure 1. Conformation Ta
Figure 1. Conformation Tb
Figure 1. Conformation X
Figure 1a. Conformation H
Figure 1a. Conformation L
Figure 1a. Conformation S45
Figure 1a. Conformation T
Figure 1a. Conformation X
Figure 10a. Bharadwaj S.P., et al. (2006). Measured values (old)
Figure 10a. Calculation based on CDSD
Figure 10a. Calculation based on HITEMP
Figure 10a. Measured values
Figure 10b. Bharadwaj S.P., et al. (2006). Measured values (old)
Figure 10b. Calculation based on CDSD
Figure 10b. Calculation based on HITEMP
Figure 10b. Measured values
Figure 13a. Calculation based on CDSD
Figure 13a. Calculation based on HITEMP
Figure 13a. Measured values
Figure 13b. Calculation based on CDSD
Figure 13b. Calculation based on HITEMP
Figure 13b. Measured values
Figure 4a. Bharadwaj S.P., et al. (2006). Measured values
Figure 4a. Calculation based on CDSD
Figure 4a. Calculation based on HITEMP
Figure 4a. Measured values
Figure 4b. Bharadwaj S.P., et al. (2006). Measured values
Figure 4b. Calculation based on CDSD
Figure 4b. Calculation based on HITEMP
Figure 4b. Measured values
Figure 10. D.E. Burch, et al. (1979, 1981, 1984) (296K, 800-1150 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10. J.G. Cormier, et al. (2005) (296K, 800-1150 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10. J.G. Cormier, et al. (2005) (310K, 800-1150 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10. MT-CKD calculation (296K, 800-1150 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10. MT-CKD calculation (310K, 800-1150 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10. MT-CKD calculation (325K, 800-1150 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10. MT-CKD calculation (363K, 800-1150 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10. Present calculation (296K, 800-1150 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10. Present calculation (310K, 800-1150 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10. Present calculation (325K, 800-1150 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10. Present calculation (363K, 800-1150 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10. Yu. I. Baranov, et al. (2008) (310.8K, 800-1150 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10. Yu. I. Baranov, et al. (2008) (325.8K, 800-1150 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10. Yu. I. Baranov, et al. (2008) (363.6K, 800-1150 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. D.E. Burch, et al. (296K, 300-1100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. Present calculation
Figure 9. G. L. Loper, et al. (1983). (944.195 cm⁻¹, 250-345K)
Figure 9. J. G. Cormier, et al. (2005). (944.195 cm⁻¹, 250-345K)
Figure 9. J. Hinderling, et al. (1987). (944.195 cm⁻¹, 250-345K)
Figure 9. Present calculation (944.195 cm⁻¹, 250-345K)
Figure 2. Fitting (293K, 10-90 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Fitting (313K, 10-90 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Fitting (333K, 10-90 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Present experiment (293K, 10-90 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Present experiment (313K, 10-90 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Present experiment (333K, 10-90 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2a. Fitting (293K, 10-90 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2a. Fitting (313K, 10-90 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2a. Fitting (333K, 10-90 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2a. Present experiment (293K, 10-90 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2a. Present experiment (313K, 10-90 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2a. Present experiment (333K, 10-90 cm⁻¹).
Figure 4. Fitting 0.67/70 kPa (293K, 10-90 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Fitting 0.67/70 kPa (333K, 10-90 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Fitting 1.43/78.5 kPa (293K, 10-90 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Fitting 1.43/78.5 kPa (323K, 10-90 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Present experiment 0.67/70 kPa (293K, 10-90 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Present experiment 0.67/70 kPa (333K, 10-90 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Present experiment 1.43/78.5 kPa (293K, 10-90 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Present experiment 1.43/78.5 kPa (323K, 10-90 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4a. Fitting 0.67/70 kPa (293K, 10-88 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4a. Fitting 0.67/70 kPa (333K, 10-90 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4a. Fitting 1.43/78.5 kPa (293K, 10-54 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4a. Fitting 1.43/78.5 kPa (323K, 10-72 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4a. Present experiment 0.67/70 kPa (293K, 15-85 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4a. Present experiment 0.67/70 kPa (333K, 10-84 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4a. Present experiment 1.43/78.5 kPa (293K, 18-50 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4a. Present experiment 1.43/78.5 kPa (323K, 20-65 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Calculated far-IR absorption spectra per molecule for the dimer. (80K))
Figure 3a. Calculated far-IR absorption spectra per molecule for the dimer. (220K))
Figure 3a. Y. Scribano, et al. (2007). Calculated far-IR absorption spectra per molecule for the dimer
Figure 4. Far-IR absorption spectra per molecule for the tetramer (T=270K)
Figure 4. Far-IR absorption spectra per molecule for the tetramer (T=80K)
Figure 4a. Far-IR absorption spectra per molecule for the hexamer (T=220K)
Figure 4a. Far-IR absorption spectra per molecule for the hexamer (T=80K)
Figure 5. Calculated contribution of water dimers to the water vapor
Figure 5. D.E.Burch (1981) (300-1100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10. CKD-2.4 continuum
Figure 10. HITRAN + MT-CKD
Figure 10. D.E.Burch, et al. (1985) Empirical continuum
Figure 10. HITRAN + MT
C
KD (smooth)
Figure 10. MT-CKD continuum
Figure 10. Monochrom. (AFGL)
Figure 10. Monochrom. (HITRAN-2004)
Figure 10. WD model (K
eq
=0.043 atm⁻¹)
Figure 7. (1) Poberovsky A.V. (1976). (4.2 atm H₂O+115 atm N₂, 5000-5600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. (2) Poberovsky A.V. (1976). (41 atm H₂O, 5000-5600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Modified difference spectrum of Poberovsky (1976)
Figure 7. Poberovsky A.V. (1976). Water clusters: The difference spectrum (2)-(1)
Figure 7. Schofield D.P., et al. (2003). Water Dimer model (shift: -10 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7a. (1) Poberovsky A.V. (1976). (2.8 atm H₂O+80 atm N₂, 3400-4000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7a. (2) Poberovsky A.V. (1976). (25.8 atm H₂O, 3400-4000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7a. Ptashnik I.V., (2004). The modified difference spectrum of Poberovsky
Figure 7a. Schofield D.P., (2003). Water Dimer model
Figure 7a. Water clusters: (2)-(1)
Figure 5. Burch D.E., et al. (1974) (250-600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Fit I-BEST (dtgs)
Figure 5. Fit I-BEST (mct)
Figure 5. Fit REFIR
Figure 5. MT-CKD 1.0 model
Figure 5. MT-CKD 2.1 model
Figure 3. Spectrum of D₂O-DOD in solid neon
Figure 3. Spectrum of H₂O-DOD in solid neon
Figure 3. Spectrum of H₂O-H₂O in solid neon
Figure 4. Spectrum of D₂O-D₂O dimers in solid neon
Figure 4. Spectrum of H₂O-D₂O dimers in solid neon
Figure 4. Spectrum of water dimers in solid neon
Figure 2. Absorbance. Experimental data
Figure 2. Absorbance. Calculation
Figure 2. Absorbance. Water Dimer
Figure 2. Absorbance. Water Monomer
Figure 2a. Absorbance. Calculation
Figure 2a. Absorbance. Experimental data
Figure 2a. Absorbance. Water Monomer
Figure 2a. Water Dimer
Figure 2c. Absorbance. Calculation
Figure 2c. Absorbance. Experimental data
Figure 2c. Absorbance. Water Dimer
Figure 2c. Absorbance. Water Monomer
Figure 2. Neon matrix [Ne]/[H₂O] = 2030
Figure 2. Parahydrogen matrix [p-H₂]/ [H₂O] = 388
Figure 2. Parahydrogen without added water
Figure 3. Neon matrix [Ne]/[H₂O] = 1740
Figure 3. Parahydrogen matrix [p-H₂]/ [H₂O] = 340
Figure 10(0.48)
Figure 10. (1.55)
Figure 10. (1.87)
Figure 3. Resulting profile of slipped dimer
Figure 3. Vibrational transitions in slipped dimer
Figure 5a. Resulting profile of noncyclic trimer
Figure 5a. Resulting profile of slipped dimer
Figure 5a. Vibrational transitions in dimer and trimer
Figure 5b. Resulting profile of cyclic trimer
Figure 5b. Resulting profile of slipped dimer
Figure 5b. Vibrational transitions in cyclic trimer
Figure 2. FTIR spectra. CO2 isolated in an Ar matrix in the proportion 1:10000
Figure 2. FTIR spectra. CO2 isolated in an Ar matrix in the proportion 1:1000
Figure 2. FTIR spectra. CO2 isolated in an Ar matrix in the proportion 1:100
Figure 2. FTIR spectra. CO2 isolated in an Ar matrix in the proportion 1:200
Figure 2. FTIR spectra. CO2 isolated in an Ar matrix in the proportion 1:50
Figure 1. Singlet. Lower limit. H geometry
Figure 1. Singlet. Upper limit. H geometry
Figure 1a. Singlet. Lower limit. H geometry
Figure 1a. Triplet. Upper limit. H geometry
Figure 1b. Singlet. Lower limit. X geometry
Figure 1b. Singlet. Upper limit. X geometry
Figure 1c. Triplet. Lower limit. X geometry
Figure 1c. Triplet. Upper limit. X geometry
Figure 1d. Singlet. Lower limit. T geometry
Figure 1d. Singlet. Upper limit. T geometry
Figure 1e. Triplet. Lower limit. T geometry
Figure 1e. Triplet. Upper limit. T geometry
Figure 1f. Singlet. Lowper limit. L geometry
Figure 1f. Singlet. Upper limit. L geometry
Figure 1g. Triplet. Lower limit. L geometry
Figure 1g. Triplet. Upper limit. L geometry
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient for the isotopologue of 16O12C16O
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient for the isotopologue of 16O12C17O
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient for the isotopologue of 16O12C18O
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient for the isotopologue of 16O13C16O
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient for the isotopologue of 16O13C17O
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient for the isotopologue of 16O13C18O
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient for the isotopologue of 17O12C18O
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient for the isotopologue of 18O12C18O
Figure 1. Absorption coefficient for the isotopologue of 18O13C18O
Figure 2. Present experiment (310.8K, 800-1150 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Present experiment (318K, 800-1150 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Present experiment (325K, 800-1150 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Present experiment (339K, 800-1150 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Present experiment (351K, 800-1150 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Present experiment (363K, 800-1150 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. MT-CKD model (310.8K, 800-1150 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. MT-CKD model (325.8K, 800-1150 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. MT-CKD model (363.6K, 800-1150 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Present calculations (310.8K, 800-1150 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Present calculations (325.8K, 800-1150 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Present calculations (363.6K, 800-1150 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Present experiment (310.8K, 800-1150 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Present experiment (325.8K, 800-1150 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Present experiment (363.6K, 800-1150 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. NIST (2007-2009)
Figure 8. Burch D.E. (1982) (295-395K, 944.19 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. Cormier J.G., et al. (2005) (270-310 K, 944.19 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. Dianov-Klokov V.I., et al. (1981) (270-390 K)
Figure 8. Eng R.S., et al. (1980)
Figure 8. Hinderling J., et al. (1987) (944.19 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. Loper G.L., et al. (1983) (944.19 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. MT
C
KD model (944.19 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. NIST 2006, (spectrometer, White cell)
Figure 8. Nordstrom R.J., et al. (1978) (944.19 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. Our fitting (944.19 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. Peterson J.C., et al. (1979) (944.19 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. Burch, D.E., (1982) (1203 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. MT-CKD model (1203 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. Montgomery Jr G.P. (1978)
Figure 9. NIST, (2006)
Figure 9. Our fitting
Figure 2. B.H. Winters, et al. (1964).
Figure 2. C.Cousin, et al. (1985, 1986)
Figure 2. Experiment
Figure 2. Fitting results
Figure 2. J. Susskind, et al. (1978)
Figure 2. Lorentz profile
Figure 2. V.G.Kunde et al. (1974). 15 mm band
Figure 3a. CO2+N2. The chi-factor. T=230 K
Figure 3a. CO2+N2. The chi-factor. T=250 K
Figure 3a. CO2+N2. The chi-factor. T=273 K
Figure 3a. CO2+N2. The chi-factor. T=296 K
Figure 3a. CO2+N2. The chi-factor. T=318 K
Figure 3b. CO2+N2. The chi-factor. T=230 K
Figure 3b. CO2+N2. The chi-factor. T=250 K
Figure 3b. CO2+N2. The chi-factor. T=273 K
Figure 3b. CO2+N2. The chi-factor. T=296 K
Figure 3b. CO2+N2. The chi-factor. T=318 K
Figure 5a. Calculated spectra (line-mixing). T=318K
Figure 5a. Measured spectra. T=318K
Figure 5b. Calculated spectra (line-mixing). T=296 K
Figure 5b. Measured spectra. T=296 K
Figure 5c. Calculated spectra (line-mixing) . T=273K
Figure 5c. Measured spectra. T=273K
Figure 5d. Calculated spectra (line-mixing). T=250 K
Figure 5d. Measured spectra. T=250 K
Figure 5e. Calculated spectra (line-mixing). T=230 K
Figure 5e. Measured spectra. T=230 K
Figure 6. Experiment (T=296 K)
Figure 6. Line-mixing profile (T=296 K)
Figure 6. Line-mixing profile with chi-factor (T=296 K)
Figure 2. Angular orientation 17
Figure 2. Angular orientation 1
Figure 2. Angular orientation 2
Figure 2. Angular orientation 3
Figure 2. Angular orientation 4
Figure 2. Angular orientation 7
Figure 2. Angular orientation 8
Figure 2. Angular orientation 9
Figure 5. Base line, original
Figure 5. Burch, D. E. (1982) (308K, 1400-1850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. MT
C
KD 1.10 (295K, 1400-1850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. The CKD model (296K, 1400-1850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. This work (295 K, 1200-2000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Tobin, D. C., et al. (1996), (296K, 1300-1950 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Base line, original
Figure 6. Paynter, D. J., et al. (2007) (296K, 3400-4000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. This work (293K, 3400-4000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Burch, D.E., (1985), corrected. (296K, 3400-4000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Model CKD 2.4. (293K, 3400-4000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Model MT
C
KD 1.10. (293K, 3400-4000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Base line, original
Figure 7. Model CKD 2.4. (293 K, 5000-5600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Model MT-CKD 1.10. (293 K, 5000-5600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Ptashnik, I. V., et al. (2004) (299K, 5000-5600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. This work (LPAC) (293 K, 5000-5600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. Base term, original
Figure 8. CKD 2.4, 293 K
Figure 8. MT-CKD 1.10 (293K, 6900-7500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. This work (LPAC) (293K, 6900-7500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Fit to P.M. Rowe, et al. (2006) (1300-1500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Fit to present experiment (1300-1500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. MT-CKD model (1300-1500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. P. M. Rowe, et al. (2006) (1300-1500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Present results (1300-1500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6a. Fit to P.M. Rowe, et al. (2006) (1580-1620 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6a. Fit to present experiment (1580-1620 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6a. MT-CKD model (1580-1620 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6a. P. M. Rowe, et al. (2006) (1580-1620 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6a. Present results (1580-1620 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6b. Fit to P.M. Rowe, et al. (2006) (1850-1990 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6b. Fit to present experiment (1850-1990 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6b. MT-CKD model (1850-1990 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6b. P. M. Rowe, et al. (2006) (1850-1990 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6b. Present results (1850-1990 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1a
Figure 4a
Figure 4b
Figure 4c
Figure 4d
Figure 4e
Figure 5a. F. Huisken, et al. (1996). The variation in vibrational frequencies
Figure 5a. The variation in vibrational frequencies as a function of n in small-sized water cluster
Figure 5b. An absolute infrared absorption intensities as a function of the number of n in small-sized water
Figure 5b. Ice
Figure 5b. M. N.Slipchenko, et al. (2006), S.Kuma, et al.(2006). Measured values
Figure 5b. S.S. Xantheas, et al. (1993), M. Losada, et al. (2002). Ab initio calculated intensities
Figure 3. Ab initio calculation at theory with BSSE correction (Geometry: 1)
Figure 3. Ab initio calculation at theory with BSSE correction (Geometry: 2)
Figure 3. Ab initio calculation at theory with BSSE correction (Geometry: 3)
Figure 3. Ab initio calculation at theory with BSSE correction (Geometry: 4)
Figure 3. Ab initio calculation at theory with BSSE correction (Geometry: 5)
Figure 3. Ab initio calculation at theory with BSSE correction (Geometry: 6)
Figure 3. Ab initio calculation at theory with BSSE correction (Geometry: 7)
Figure 3. Ab initio calculation at theory with BSSE correction (Geometry: 8)
Figure 3. Ab initio calculation at theory with BSSE correction (Geometry: 9)
Figure 3. H. Schindler, et al. (1993) 1
Figure 3. H. Schindler, et al. (1993) (Geometry 1)
Figure 3. H. Schindler, et al. (1993) (Geometry 4)
Figure 3. H. Schindler, et al. (1993) (Geometry 6)
Figure 3. H. Schindler, et al. (1993) (Geometry 7)
Figure 3. H. Schindler, et al. (1993) 2
Figure 8. Interaction energy of the CH₄-N₂ complex for the geometry 4. Ab initio calculation
Figure 8. Interaction energy of the CH₄-N₂ complex for the geometry 4. Esposti–Werner potential
Figure 8. Interaction energy of the CH₄-N₂ complex for the geometry 4. Lennard-Jonnes potential
Figure 4. A smoothed representation of the classical spectrum
Figure 4. The structured classical spectrum
Figure 4a. The structured classical spectrum
Figure 4a. The vertical lines represent the nearly exact quantum energies
Figure 1a. Le Doucen, et al. (1985)
Figure 1a. Meadows, V. S., et al. (1996)
Figure 1a. Perrin, M. Y., et al. (1989)
Figure 1a. The unmodified Lorentz line-shape
Figure 1a. Tonkov, M. V., et al. (1996)
Figure 1b. Le Doucen, at al. (1985). Effect of the chi factor on absorption by a single line
Figure 1b. Lorentz line-shape
Figure 1b. Meadows, V. S., at al. (1996). The effect of the chi factor on absorption by a single line
Figure 1b. Perrin, M.Y., at al. (1989). The effect of the chi factor on absorption by a single line
Figure 1b. Tonkov, M. V., et al. (1996). The effect of the chi factor on absorption by a single line
Figure 3a. CA parameterization of Earth
Figure 3a. GBKM parameterization Earth
Figure 3a. MT_CKD parameterization of Earth
Figure 3b. CA parameterization of Mars
Figure 3b. GBKM parameterization of Mars
Figure 3b. MTCKD parameterization of Mars
Figure 3c. Difference in OLR between the CA and GBKM parameterizations of Earth
Figure 3c. Difference in OLR between the CA and GBKM parameterizations of Mars
Figure 2a. One water molecule on average per droplet
Figure 2b. One water molecule on average per droplet (fragment)
Figure 2c. Three water molecules on average per droplet
Figure 7. D.E. Burch, et al (1979, 1982, 1984). Experiment (T=296K, 0-1150 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. MT-CKD model, T=240 K
Figure 7. MT-CKD model, T=270 K
Figure 7. MT-CKD model, T=300 K
Figure 7. MT-CKD model, T=330 K
Figure 7. Present calculation (T=240K, 0-1150 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Present calculation (T=270K, 0-1150 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Present calculation (T=300K, 0-1150 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Present calculation (T=330K, 0-1150 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1a
Figure 2. Spectra recorded after annealing
Figure 2. Spectra recorded before annealing
Figure 3. Infrared spectra of H₂O/Ne = 1/140 matrix recorded at 3K. After annealing
Figure 3. Infrared spectra of H₂O/Ne = 1/140 matrix recorded at 3K. Before annealing
Figure 3a. After annealing
Figure 3a. Before annealing
Figure 3b. Infrared spectra of H₂O/Ne = 1/140 matrix. After annealing
Figure 3b. Infrared spectra of H₂O/Ne = 1/140 matrix. Before annealing
Figure 3c. After annealing. H₂O/Ne = 1/140 matrix
Figure 3c. Before annealing. H₂O/Ne = 1/140 matrix
Figure 5. Spectra of a H₂O/Ne = 1/140 matrix recorded at 3K after annealing
Figure 5. Spectra of a H₂O/Ne = 1/140 matrix recorded at 3K before annealing
Figure 1. Calculation
Figure 1. Observed
Figure 1a. Calculation
Figure 1a. Observed
Figure 1b. Calculation
Figure 1b. Observed
Figure 2. Observed
Figure 2. Simulation
Figure 2b. Observed
Figure 2b. Simulation
Figure 3. Observed
Figure 3. Simulation
Figure 3a. Observed
Figure 3a. Simulation
Figure 3b. Observed
Figure 3b. Simulation
Figure 3. Configuration 1. CCSD(T) calculations
Figure 3. Configuration 1. MP2 calculations
Figure 3. Configuration 2. CCSD(T) calculations
Figure 3. Configuration 2. MP2 calculations
Figure 3. Configuration 3. CCSD(T) calculations
Figure 3. Configuration 3. MP2 calculations
Figure 3. Configuration 4. CCSD(T) calculations
Figure 3. Configuration 4. MP2 calculations
Figure 3. Configuration 5. CCSD(T) calculations
Figure 3. Configuration 5. MP2 calculations
Figure 3. Configuration 6. CCSD(T) calculations
Figure 3. Configuration 6. MP2 calculations
Figure 3a. Configuration 4. CCSD(T) calculations
Figure 3a. Configuration 4. MP2 calculations
Figure 3a. Configuration 5. CCSD(T) calculations
Figure 3a. Configuration 5. MP2 calculations
Figure 4. Dipole model (mu
x
). Configuration 3. Analytical calculations with the exchange contribution
Figure 4. Dipole model (mu
x
). Configuration 3. Analytical calculations without the exchange contribution
Figure 4. Dipole model (mu
x
). Configuration 3. CCSD(T) calculations
Figure 4. Dipole model (mu
x
). Configuration 4. Analytical calculations with the exchange contribution
Figure 4. Dipole model (mu
x
). Configuration 4. Analytical calculations without the exchange contribution
Figure 4. Dipole model (mu
x
). Configuration 4. CCSD(T) calculations
Figure 4. Dipole model (mu
x
). Configuration 5. Analytical calculations with the exchange contribution
Figure 4. Dipole model (mu
x
). Configuration 5. Analytical calculations without the exchange contribution
Figure 4. Dipole model (mu
x
). Configuration 5. CCSD(T) calculations
Figure 4a. Dipole model (mu
y
). Configuration 4. Analytical calculations with the exchange contribution
Figure 4a. Dipole model (mu
y
). Configuration 4. Analytical calculations without the exchange contribution
Figure 4a. Dipole model (mu
y
). Configuration 4. CCSD(T) calculations
Figure 4a. Dipole model (mu
y
). Configuration 5. Analytical calculations with the exchange contribution
Figure 4a. Dipole model (mu
y
). Configuration 5. Analytical calculations without the exchange contribution
Figure 4a. Dipole model (mu
y
). Configuration 5. CCSD(T) calculations
Figure 1a. Baranov, Y.I., et al. (2004). Water dimer absorption. T=273K
Figure 1a. Gruszka et al. (1998). Induced dipole absorption. T=273K
Figure 1a. Infrared collision induced and far line absorption in dense CO2 atmospheres. T=273K
Figure 1b. Gruszka, M., et al, (1998) and Baranov Yu.I. et al. (2004). CIA absorption. T=200K
Figure 1b. Kasting et al. (1984). Comparison of the CIA absorption. Parameterisation
Figure 1c. Gruszka, M., et al, (1998) and Baranov Yu.I. et al. (2004). CIA absorption. T=250K
Figure 1c. Kasting et al. (1984). Comparison of the CIA absorption. Parameterisation
Figure 1d. Gruszka, M., et al, (1998) and Baranov Yu.I. et al. (2004). CIA absorption. T=300K
Figure 1d. Kasting et al. (1984) Comparison of the CIA absorption. Parameterisation
Figure 3. (15 atm)
Figure 3. (19 atm)
Figure 3. (24 atm)
Figure 3. (29 atm)
Figure 3. (34 atm)
Figure 3. (39 atm)
Figure 3. (44 atm)
Figure 3a. (15 atm)
Figure 3a. (19 atm)
Figure 3a. (24 atm)
Figure 3a. (29 atm)
Figure 3a. (34 atm)
Figure 3a. (39 atm)
Figure 3a. (44 atm)
Figure 5a. Calculated with the new version taking into account line-mixing P=76.0 atm
Figure 5a. Calculated with the old version neglecting line-mixing P=76.0 atm
Figure 5a. Measured values P=76.0 atm
Figure 5b. Calculated with the new version taking into account line-mixing P=47.6 atm
Figure 5b. Calculated with the old version neglecting line-mixing P=47.6 atm
Figure 5b. Measured values P=47.6 atm
Figure 5c. Calculated with the new version taking into account line-mixing P=28.1 atm
Figure 5c. Calculated with the old version neglecting line-mixing P=28.1 atm
Figure 5c. Measured values P=28.1 atm
Figure 8a. Calculated with the new version taking into account line-mixing. T=72.3 atm
Figure 8a. Calculated with the old version neglecting line-mixing T=72.3 atm
Figure 8a. Measured values 72.3 atm
Figure 8b. Calculated with the new version taking into account line-mixing. T=29.9 atm
Figure 8b. Calculated with the old version neglecting line-mixing. T=29.9 atm
Figure 8b. Measured values. T=29.9 atm
Figure 9a. Calculated with the new version taking into account line-mixing. T=54.0 atm
Figure 9a. Calculated with the old version neglecting line-mixing. T=54.0 atm
Figure 9a. Measured values. T=54.0 atm
Figure 9b. Calculated with the new version neglecting line-mixing. T=35.6 atm
Figure 9b. Calculated with the new version taking into account line-mixing. T=35.6 atm
Figure 9b. Measured values. T=35.6 atm
Figure 9c. Calculated with the new version taking into account line-mixing. T=20.1 atm
Figure 9c. Calculated with the old version neglecting line-mixing. T=20.1 atm
Figure 9c. Measured values. T=20.1 atm
Figure 6. Classical model [Eq. (8)]
Figure 6. Classically treated free rotating molecules [Eq. (6)]
Figure 6. J.M.Hartmann et al. (1989), R.Le Doucen, et al. (1985). Measured values
Figure 6. MDS calculations [Eqs. (2) and (4)]
Figure 6. Using Lorentzian line shapes
Figure 7. Lorentzian line shapes [Eq. (8)]
Figure 7. MDS calculations [Eqs. (2) and (4)]
Figure 7. Present measured values
Figure 7. R. Le Doucen, et al, (1985). Measured values
Figure 6. H.Tran, et al. (2006)
Figure 6. a-1
Figure 6a-3
Figure 6a-4
Figure 6a-5
Figure 10. Lee M.-S., et al (2008). Water Dimer
Figure 10. MTCKD-1.3 (296K)
Figure 10. Scribano Y., et al. (2007). Water Dimer
Figure 10. Viktorova A.A., et al. (1970). Water Dimer
Figure 10a. Burch D. (1982) (296K, 300-1100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10a. Lee M.-S., et al. (2008). Water Dimer
Figure 10a. MTCKD-1.3 (296K)
Figure 10a. Scribano Y., et al. (2007). Water Dimer
Figure 10b. Lee M.-S., et al. (2008)/Burch D. (1982)
Figure 10b. Lee M.-S., et al. (2008)/MTCKD-1.3
Figure 10b. Scribano Y., et al. (2007)/Burch D. (1981)
Figure 10b. Scribano Y., et al. (2007)/MTCKD-1.3
Figure 5A. Bound water dimers
Figure 5A. Paynter D.J., et al. (2009). Experimental continuum
Figure 5A. Quasi-bound dimers
Figure 5A. Total simulated spectrum of water dimers
Figure 5a. Kjaergaard H., et al. (2008). Bound water dimers
Figure 5aB. The experimental water vapour self-continuum
Figure 5aB. The quasi- bound water dimers
Figure 5aB. Total simulated spectrum of water dimers
Figure 5b. Averaged spectra of the retrieved self-continuum C
s
(296K)
Figure 5b. Averaged spectra of the retrieved self-continuum C
s
(330K)
Figure 5b. Averaged spectra of the retrieved self-continuum C
s
(351K)
Figure 5c. Averaged spectra of the retrieved self-continuum C
s
(296K)
Figure 5c. Averaged spectra of the retrieved self-continuum C
s
(351K)
Figure 5c. Averaged spectra of the retrieved self-continuum C
s
(317K)
Figure 5d. Cs(296K)/Cs(351K)
Figure 5e. Cs (296 K)/Cs(351 K)
Figure 6. Bicknell et al. (2006) (298K)
Figure 6. Burch et al. (1984) (296K, 2400-2800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. MTCKD-1-3 (2006) (296K)
Figure 6. MTCKD-2-5 (2010) (296K)
Figure 6. Ptashnik et al. (2011) (293K, 1500-5500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Tipping et al. (1995) (296K, 1000-7000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Water dimers (2008)
Figure 6. Watkins et al. (1979) (298K)
Figure 7. Baranov et al. (2008) (296K) (extrapol)
Figure 7. Baranov et al. (2008) (311K)
Figure 7. Baranov et al. (2008) (326K)
Figure 7. Baranov et al. (2008) (363K)
Figure 7. Burch et al. (1984) (296K)
Figure 7. MTCKD-2.5 (2010) (296K)
Figure 7. MTCKD-2.5 (2010) (311K)
Figure 7. MTCKD-2.5 (2010) (326K)
Figure 7. MTCKD-2.5 (2010) (363K)
Figure 7. Ma et al. (2008) (296K)
Figure 7. Ma et al. (2008) (311K)
Figure 7. Ma et al. (2008) (326K)
Figure 7. Ma et al. (2008) (363K)
Figure 7. Taylor et al. (2003) (296K)
Figure 8. 190 GHz. Bauer A., et al. (1991)
Figure 8. 239 GHz. Bauer A., et al. (1995)
Figure 8. Bauer A., et al. (1995). Fitting. 239 GHz
Figure 8. Fitting. 190 GHz. Bauer A., et al. (1991)
Figure 8a. 10P(20). Arefev V.N. (1989)
Figure 8a. 10P(20). Hinderling J., et al. (1987)
Figure 8a. 10P(24). Hinderling J., et al. (1987)
Figure 8a. Fitting
Figure 3. Experiment (271K, 105-145 GHz)
Figure 3. Experiment (286K, 105-145 GHz)
Figure 3. Experiment (299K, 105-145 GHz)
Figure 3. Experiment (311K, 105-145 GHz)
Figure 3. Fitting (271K, 60-150 GHz)
Figure 3. Fitting (286K, 60-150 GHz)
Figure 3. Fitting (299K, 60-150 GHz)
Figure 3. Fitting (311K, 60-150 GHz)
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1c
Figure 1d
Figure 1e
Figure 1f
Figure 1g
Figure 1a
Figure 1a
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1c
Figure 4a. Bag-A
Figure 4a. Bag
Figure 4b. Boat-I
Figure 4b. Boat
Figure 4c. Book-I
Figure 4c. Book
Figure 4d. Cage-I
Figure 4d. Cage
Figure 4e. Prism-I
Figure 4e. Prism
Figure 4f. Ring-I
Figure 4f. Ring
Figure 6a. n=7-I
Figure 6a. n=7
Figure 6b. n=8-I
Figure 6b. n=8
Figure 6c. n=9-I
Figure 6c. n=9
Figure 1. The background signal from the dimer
Figure 1. The enhancement signal from the dimer
Figure 6. The curve H/D close to 1
Figure 6. The curve a trace of HDO in a H₂O experiment
Figure 1a. Infrared spectrum of a H₂O/Ne = 1/150 matrix. After annealing
Figure 1a. Infrared spectrum of a H₂O/Ne = 1/150 matrix. Before annealing
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1c
Figure 2a
Figure 3a. Spectrum of H₂O trapped in Ne (H₂O/Ne = 1/150). After annealing
Figure 3a. Spectrum of H₂O trapped in Ne (H₂O/Ne = 1/150). Before annealing
Figure 3a
Figure 4. Water trapped in Ne (H₂O/Ne = 1/1500). Recorded at 3K after annealing at 11K
Figure 4. Water trapped in Ne (H₂O/Ne = 1/1500). Recorded at 3K after deposition
Figure 4. Water trapped in Ne (H₂O/Ne = 1/1500). Recorded at 3K
Figure 4. Water trapped in Ne (H₂O/Ne = 1/1500). Recorded at 9.8K
Figure 5. Intermolecular mode at 92.6 cm⁻¹ measured after annealing at 11K
Figure 5. Component 0
s
--> 1
a
of (1 0 0) PA recorded after annealing at 12K
Figure 1. ¹⁸O/¹⁶O=0
Figure 1. ¹⁸O/¹⁶O=1
Figure 1. ¹⁸O/¹⁶O=3
Figure 1b. Ratio of isotopes 18O/16O=0
Figure 1b. Ratio of isotopes 18O/16O=1
Figure 1b. Ratio of isotopes 18O/16O=3
Figure 2. Monomer H₂O
Figure 2c. Ratio of isotopes 18O/16O=0.2
Figure 2c. Ratio of isotopes 18O/16O=0
Figure 2c. Ratio of isotopes 18O/16O=5
Figure 3a. (CO₂)₆. Observed spectra
Figure 3b. Simulated spectra
Figure 3c. (CO₂)₆. Simulated spectrum
Figure 3d. Band of (CO₂)₂
Figure 3e. Observed spectrum
Figure 3f. The cyclic isomers of (CO₂)₃
Figure 3g. The noncyclic isomers of (CO₂)₃
Figure 1. Baranov, Yu. I. et al. (2008) (311K, 1800-3500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Bicknell, W. E. et al. (2006) (298K, 6110-6190 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Burch, D. E., et al. (1984) (296K, 2380-2900 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. CAVIAR (293K, 1600-5800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Fulghum, S. F., et al. (1991) (303K, 9490 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. MT-CKD 2.4 model
Figure 1. MT-CKD 2.5 model
Figure 1. Tipping, R. H., et al. (1995)
Figure 1. Water dimers
Figure 1. Watkins, W. R. et al. (1979) (296K, 2450-2850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. MTCKD-2.5 (350K)
Figure 7. MTCKD-2.5 (374K)
Figure 7. MTCKD-2.5 (402K)
Figure 7. MTCKD-2.5 (431K)
Figure 7. MTCKD-2.5 (472K)
Figure 7. CAVIAR (350K)
Figure 7. CAVIAR (375K)
Figure 7. CAVIAR (402K)
Figure 7. CAVIAR (431K)
Figure 7. CAVIAR (472K)
Figure 7.Baranov, Yu.I., et al. (2011) (352K)
Figure 7.Burch D.E. et al. (1984) (338K, 2400–2800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7.Burch D.E. et al. (1984) (384K, 2400–2800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7.Burch D.E. et al.t (1984) (428K, 2400-2800cm⁻¹)
Figure 7.Hartmann et al. (1993) (575K)
Figure 7.Paynter et al. (2009) (351K)
Figure 9. Baranov et al. (2011) (2400 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. Baranov et al. (2011) (2500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. Baranov et al. (2011) (2600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. Bicknell et al. (2006) (6100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. Bicknell, W.E., et al. (2006) (6200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. Burch et al. (1984) (2600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. Burch, D.E., et al. (1984) (2400 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. Burch, D.E., et al. (1984) (2500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. Hartmann, J.M., et al. (1993) (2400 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. Hartmann, J.M., et al. (1993) (2500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. Hartmann, J.M., et al. (1993) (2600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. Hartmann, J.M., et al. (1993) (4190 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. Hartmann, J.M., et al. (1993) (4310 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. Hartmann, J.M., et al. (1993) (4400 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. Hartmann, J.M., et al. (1993) (4490 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. RAL 2400 cm⁻¹
Figure 9. RAL 2500 cm⁻¹
Figure 9. RAL 2600 cm⁻¹
Figure 9. RAL 4200 cm⁻¹
Figure 9. RAL 4300 cm⁻¹
Figure 9. RAL 4400 cm⁻¹
Figure 9. RAL 4500 cm⁻¹
Figure 9. RAL 4600 cm⁻¹
Figure 9. RAL 5800 cm⁻¹
Figure 9. RAL 5900 cm⁻¹
Figure 9. RAL 6000 cm⁻¹
Figure 9. RAL 6100 cm⁻¹
Figure 9. RAL 6200 cm⁻¹
Figure 9. RAL 6300 cm⁻¹
Figure 13. Burch et al., (1969). The kappa factor for modeling CO2 lineshape
Figure 13. Meadows, V.S., et al., (1996). The kappa factor for modeling CO2 lineshape
Figure 13. The Lorentz case corresponds to kappa = 1
Figure 13. The kappa factor we used for modeling CO2 lineshape
Figure 13. Tonkov M.V., et al., (1996). The kappa factor for modeling CO2 lineshape
Figure 2. Average IR spectrum, 1060-1220 nm
Figure 2. CO2 wings of v1+3v3,1175-1213 nm
Figure 2. CO2 5v1+v3 series, 1106-1172 nm
Figure 2. CO2 hot bands, 2v1+3v3, 1065-1104 nm
Figure 2. H2O v1+v2+v3 , 1098-1188 nm
Figure 10a. Calculation with line-mixing, present work T=295K
Figure 10a. Experiment present work. T=295K
Figure 10a. Le Doucen R., et al. (1985). Experiment
Figure 10a. Menoux V., et al. (1987). Experiment
Figure 10a. Perrin M.Y., et al. (1989). Experiment
Figure 10b. Calculation with line-mixing, present work. T=473K
Figure 10b. Experiment present work. T=473K
Figure 11a. Calculation with line-mixing, present work. T=218 K
Figure 11a. Le Doucen R., et al. (1985). Experiment. T=218 K
Figure 11b. Calculation with line-mixing, present work. T=751K
Figure 11b. Perrin M.Y., et al. (1989).Experiment. T=751 K
Figure 12a. Present calculation with line-mixing, the v1+v3 band. T=230K
Figure 12a. Present experiment, the v1+v3 band. T=230K
Figure 12b. Present calculation with line-mixing, the v1+v3 band. T=260K
Figure 12b. Present experiment, the v1+v3 band. T=260K
Figure 12c. Present calculation with line-mixing, the v1+v3 band. T=295K
Figure 12c. Present experiment, the v1+v3 band. T=295K
Figure 12c. Tonkov M.V., et al. (1996). Experiment, the v1+v3 band. T=295K
Figure 12d. Present calculation with line-mixing, the v1+v3 band. T=373K
Figure 12d. Present experiment, the v1+v3 band. T=373K
Figure 3a. Experiment present work T=294K, 2400-2600 cm-1
Figure 3a. Le Doucen R, Cousin C, et al. (1985). Experiment. T=294K, 2400-2600 cm-1
Figure 3a. Perrin M.Y., Hartmann J.M. (1989). Experiment. T=294K, 2400-2600 cm-1
Figure 3b. Burch D.E., Gryvnak D.A., et al. (1969). Experiment. T=294K, 3750-4000 cm-1
Figure 3b. Experiment present work T=294K, 3750-4000 cm-1
Figure 3b. Tonkov M.V., Filippov N.N., et al. (1996). Experiment. T=294K, 3750-4000 cm-1
Figure 6a. Calculation with line-mixing, present work T=294K, 51.28 amagat, 6850-7050 cm-1
Figure 6a. Calculation without line-mixing, present work T=294K, 51.28 amagat, 6850-7050 cm-1
Figure 6a. Experiment present work T=294K, 51.28 amagat, 6850-7050 cm-1
Figure 6b. Calculation with line-mixing, present work T=294K, 51.28 amagat, 8100-8400 cm-1
Figure 6b. Calculation without line-mixing, present work T=294K, 51.28 amagat, 8100-8400 cm-1
Figure 6b. Experiment present work T=294K, 51.28 amagat, 8100-8400 cm-1
Figure 7a. Calculation with line-mixing, present work T=294K, NCO2 = 35:51 amagat,
Figure 7a. Calculation without line-mixing, present work T=294K, NCO2 = 35:51 amagat,
Figure 7a. Experiment present work T=294K, NCO2 = 35:51 amagat
Figure 7b. Calculation with line-mixing, present work T=373K, NCO2 = 31:93 amagat
Figure 7b. Calculation without line-mixing, present work T=373K, NCO2 = 31:93 amagat
Figure 7b. Experiment present work T=373K, NCO2 = 31:93 amagat
Figure 7c. Calculation with line-mixing, present work T=473K, NCO2 = 23:63 amagat
Figure 7c. Calculation without line-mixing, present work T=473K, NCO2 = 23:63 amagat
Figure 7c. Experiment present work T=473K, NCO2 = 23:63 amagat
Figure 8a. Calculated with taking into account line-mixing T=294K, NCO2 =51.28 amagat
Figure 8a. Calculated without taking into account line-mixing T=294K, NCO2 =51.28 amagat
Figure 8a. Experiment T=294K, NCO2 =51.28 amagat
Figure 8b. Calculated with taking into account line-mixing T=373K, NCO2 = 31:93 amagat
Figure 8b. Calculated without taking into account line-mixing T=373K, NCO2 = 31:93 amagat
Figure 8b. Experiment T=373K, NCO2 = 31:93 amagat
Figure 8c. Calculated with taking into account line-mixing. T=473K, NCO2 = 23.63amagat
Figure 8c. Calculated without taking into account line-mixing. T=473K, NCO2 = 23.63amagat
Figure 8c. Experiment. T=473K, NCO2 = 23.63amagat
Figure 9a. Calculation with line-mixing, present work T=260K
Figure 9a. Calculation without line-mixing, present work T=260K
Figure 9a. Experiment present work T=260K
Figure 9a. LeDoucen R,, et al. (1985). Experiment. T=260K
Figure 9b. Calculation with line-mixing, present work. T=296
Figure 9b. Calculation without line-mixing, present work. T=296
Figure 9b. Experiment present work T=296
Figure 9c. Calculation with line-mixing, present work T=373K
Figure 9c. Calculation without line-mixing, present work T=373K
Figure 9c. Experiment present work T=373K
Figure 9d. Calculation with line-mixing, present work T=473K
Figure 9d. Calculation without line-mixing, present work T=473K
Figure 9d. Experiment present work T=473K
Figure 3. Data on CIA in the B-band are from the present work (part 1)
Figure 3. Data on CIA in the B-band are from the present work (part 2)
Figure 3. Data on CIA in the B-band are from the present work
Figure 3. H. Tran, et al. (2006)
Figure 3. Spiering F.R., et al. (2010)
Figure 5. Burch D. E., et al. (1979)
Figure 5. Cutten D.R. (1979)
Figure 5. Devir A.D., et al. (1992)
Figure 5. MTCKD 2.5 (310.9K)
Figure 5. MTCKD 2.5 (325.5K)
Figure 5. MTCKD 2.5 (351.6K)
Figure 5. NIST (310.9K)
Figure 5. NIST (325.5K)
Figure 5. NIST (351.6K)
Figure 5. This work (T=311K)
Figure 5. This work (T=325K)
Figure 5. This work (T=357K)
Figure 5. Watkins W.R., et al. (1979)
Figure 6. Barton I.J. (estimate from NIMBUS-5, 1981)
Figure 6. Bignell K.J. (1970)
Figure 6. Burch D.E., et al. (1971) (2460 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Burch D.E., etal. (1984)
Figure 6. MT-CKD 2.4 model
Figure 6. MTCKD 2.4 model
Figure 6. MTCKD 2.4 model
Figure 6. MTCKD 2.5 model
Figure 6. MTCKD 2.5 model
Figure 6. Ma Q. Theory (2008)
Figure 6. Watkins W.R., et al. (1979) (296K, 2460 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Continuum absorption coefficient (2475 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Mean value
Figure 4. Brown A., et al. (2003) (2000-2800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Burch D.E., et al. (1984) (296K, 2560-2630 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. CIA [8] + MT-CKD (2000-2700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. MT-CKD 2.5 model (2000-3250 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Present experiment (2000-3250 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Present experiment at selected frequencies (339 K, 2000-3250 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Watkins W.R., et al. (1979) (2420-2900 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Water–nitrogen continuum absorption coefficient (326K, 2004-2350.5 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Water–nitrogen continuum absorption coefficient (339K, 2004-2350.5 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Water–nitrogen continuum absorption coefficient (352K, 2004-2350.5 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Water–nitrogen continuum absorption coefficient (363K, 2004-2350.5 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. G.Birnbaum, et al. (1971)
Figure 2. The present measurements
Figure 2. J.E.Harries, et al. (1970)
Figure 2. Arefev, V. N. (1989) (800-1200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Burch, D.E., et al. (1984) (296K, 800-1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Cormier et al. (2005) (326K, 950 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Hinderling et al. (1987) (298K, 940-950 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Loper, G.L., et al. (1983) (296K, 940-950 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. MT-CKD model calculation (800-1200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Nordstrom, R.J., et al. (1978) (cell, 296K)
Figure 2. Our experimental data (326K, 800-1300 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Our experimental data (circles)
Figure 2. Peterson, J.C., et al. (1979) (298K, 930-1100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Peterson, J.C., et al. (1979) (298K, 930-950 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Baranov, Yu.I., et al. (2008) (310.8K)
Figure 3. Baranov, Yu.I., et al. (2008) (325.8K)
Figure 3. Baranov, Yu.I., et al. (2008) (351.9K)
Figure 3. Baranov, Yu.I., et al. (2011) (310.8K)
Figure 3. Baranov, Yu.I., et al. (2011) (325.8K)
Figure 3. Baranov, Yu.I., et al. (2011) (351.9K)
Figure 3. Burch, D.E., et al. (1984) (296K, 2200-2700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Burch, D.E., et al. (1984) (328K)
Figure 3. MT CKD (310.8K)
Figure 3. MT CKD (325.8K)
Figure 3. MT CKD (351.9K)
Figure 3. Ptashnik et al. (2011) (293K)
Figure 3. Ptashnik et al. (2011) (350K)
Figure 3. Watkins et al. (1979) (298K)
Figure 4. Baranov, Yu. I. (2011)
Figure 4. Brown, A., et al. (2004) (326K, 1200-270 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Burch, D.E., et al. (1984) (296K, 700-2700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. MT CKD continuum model (296K)
Figure 4. Present work data
Figure 4. Ptashnik, I. V., et al. (2012)
Figure 4. Watkins, W.R., et al. (1979) (298K)
Table 3. Spectrally smoothed absorption cross section
Figure 4. Mlawer, E. J., et al., (2012). MTCKD-2.5
Figure 4. This work: H2O+air, 350 K
Figure 4. This work: H2O+air, 372 K
Figure 4. This work: H2O+air, 402 K
Figure 4. This work: H2O+air, 431 K
Figure 4. Tipping, R. H., et al., (2012). Far wings
Figure 5. Baranov Yu. (2011) (339 K)
Figure 5. Brown, A. et al. (2003), N₂ + H₂O CIA
Figure 5. MTCKD-2.5
Figure 5. This work: H₂O+air (402K)
Figure 5. Tipping, R.H. et al. (1995), far wings
Figure 6. MTCKD-2.5 (Cs modified)
Figure 6. MTCKD-2.5
Figure 6. This work
Figure 7. Downwelling flux at surface/5
Figure 7. MTCKD-MTCKD (Cf modified)
Figure 7. MTCKD-MTCKD (Cs modified)
Figure 7a. Extra absorption MTCKD-MTCKD (Cf modified)
Figure 7a. Extra absorption MTCKD-MTCKD (Cs modified)
Figure 7b. (extra Cf)*5
Figure 7b. (extra Cs)*5
Figure 7b. UCL08+MTCKD(Cs and Cf modified)
Figure 7b. UCL08+MTCKD-2.5
Figure 5. Burch D.E., et al. (1984). (2550-2630 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Extrapolated absorption owing to neighbouring H₂O + N₂ continuum bands
Figure 5. MT-CKD model
Figure 5. Present experiment. (352 K, 2000-3000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Watkins, W. R., et al. (298K, 2400-2900 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Allowed term (0-2000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Total continuum (0-2000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Weak interaction term (0-2000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Conformation A (CP)
Figure 2. Conformation A (NCP)
Figure 2. Conformation B (CP)
Figure 2. Conformation B (NCP)
Figure 3a
Figure 3b
Figure 3c
Figure 2. J. H. Dymond, et al., (1980). Second virial coefficients for the CO2–CO2 system: experimental data
Figure 2. J.C. Holste, et al., (1987). Second virial coefficients for the CO2–CO2 system: experimental data
Figure 2. Second virial coefficients calculated from the MP2 PES
Figure 2. Second virial coefficients calculated from the bond–bond PES with optimized potentials
Figure 2. Second virial coefficients calculated from the bond–bond PES with predicted potentials
Figure 2. W. Duscheck, et al. (1990). Second virial coefficients for the CO2–CO2 system: experimental data
Figure 4. One stretched monomer. H-configuration
Figure 4. One stretched monomer. L- configuration
Figure 4. One stretched monomer. S₄₅- configuration
Figure 4. One stretched monomer. S₆₀- configuration
Figure 4. One stretched monomer. T
a
-configuration
Figure 4. One stretched monomer. T
b
-configuration
Figure 4. One stretched monomer. X-configuration
Figure 4. Rigid monomers. H configuration
Figure 4. Rigid monomers. L configuration
Figure 4. Rigid monomers. S₄₅ configuration
Figure 4. Rigid monomers. S₆₀-configuration
Figure 4. Rigid monomers. T
a
-configuration
Figure 4. Rigid monomers. X-configuration
Figure 4a. One stretched monomer. H-configuration
Figure 4a. One stretched monomer. L-configuration
Figure 4a. One stretched monomer. S₄₅-configuration
Figure 4a. One stretched monomer. S₆₀-configuration
Figure 4a. One stretched monomer. T
a
-configuration
Figure 4a. One stretched monomer. T
b
-configuration
Figure 4a. One stretched monomer. X-configuration
Figure 4a. Rigid monomers. H-configuration
Figure 4a. Rigid monomers. L-configuration
Figure 4a. Rigid monomers. S₆₀-configuration
Figure 4a. Rigid monomers. T
a
-configuration
Figure 4a. Rigid monomers. T
b
-configuration
Figure 4a. Rigid monomers. X-configuration
Figure 5. One stretched monomer. L-configuration
Figure 5. One stretched monomer. S₄₅-configuration
Figure 5. One stretched monomer. S₆₀-configuration
Figure 5. One stretched monomer. T
a
-configuration
Figure 5. One stretched monomer. T
b
-configuration
Figure 5. One stretched monomer. X-configuration
Figure 5. Rigid monomers. 1-configuration
Figure 5. Rigid monomers. 5-configuration
Figure 5. Rigid monomers. H-configuration
Figure 5. Rigid monomers. L-configuration
Figure 5. Rigid monomers. T
a
-configuration
Figure 5. Rigid monomers. X-configuration
Figure 5a. One stretched monomer. H-configuration
Figure 5a. One stretched monomer. L-configuration
Figure 5a. One stretched monomer. S₆₀-configuration
Figure 5a. One stretched monomer. T
a
-configuration
Figure 5a. One stretched monomer. T
b
-configuration
Figure 5a. One stretched monomer. X-configuration
Figure 5a. Rigid monomers. 4-configuration
Figure 5a. Rigid monomers. H-configuration
Figure 5a. Rigid monomers. L-configuration
Figure 5a. Rigid monomers. S₄₅-configuration
Figure 5a. Rigid monomers. T
a
-configuration
Figure 5a. Rigid monomers. X-configuration
Figure 6b. Intensities in Ames-296, 0-3000 cm-1
Figure 6b. Intensities in HITRAN2008, 0-3000 cm-1
Figure 6c. Intensities in Ames-296, 0-13000 cm-1
Figure 6c. Intensities in HITRAN2008, 8000-13000 cm-1
Figure 6а. Intensities in Ames-296, 0-13000 cm-1
Figure 6а. Intensities in HITRAN2008, 0-13000 cm-1
Figure 1. Tassaing et al. (2002)
Figure 1. This work
Figure 1. Vigasin et al. (2008)
Figure 1a. Tassaing et al. (2002)
Figure 1a. This work
Figure 1a. Vigasin et al. (2008)
Figure 10. Calculations from the second virial coefficient
Figure 2. Absorption coefficient (2400–2700 cm–1, 296K)
Figure 2. Absorption coefficient (2400–2700 cm–1, 328K)
Figure 2. Absorption coefficient (2400–2700 cm–1, 338K)
Figure 2. Absorption coefficient (2400–2700 cm–1, 384K)
Figure 2. Absorption coefficient (2400–2700 cm–1, 428K)
Figure 2. D.E. Burch (1982). Absorption coefficient (2400–2700 cm–1, 338K)
Figure 2. D.E. Burch (1982). Absorption coefficient (2400–2700 cm–1, 384K)
Figure 2. D.E. Burch (1982). Absorption coefficient (2400–2700 cm–1, 428K)
Figure 2. D.E. Burch, et al. (1984). Absorption coefficient (2400–2700 cm–1, 296K)
Figure 2. D.E. Burch, et al. (1984). Absorption coefficient (2400–2700 cm–1, 328K)
Figure 4. Bound dimer
Figure 4. Bound trimmer
Figure 4. Metastable dimer
Figure 4. Metastable trimer
Figure 4. Monomer
Figure 4. Vigasin A.A., et al. (2008). Experiment
Figure 1. Model dimer absorption
Figure 1.Calculated water monomer spectrum
Figure 1.Observed spectrum without monomer contribution
Figure 2. Observed dimer spectrum
Figure 2a. C. Leforestier, et al. (2010). Collision induced absorption
Figure 2a. Y. Scribano et al. (2007). Calculated dimer spectrum
Figure 2b. M.A.Koshelev, et al. (2011). Measured water vapor continuum
Table 1. Absorption cross-section of the self-continuum. H₂O. (T=298K)
Table 1. The total error of the retrieval Cs + DCs
Table 1. The total error of the retrieval Cs - DCs
Table 2. Absorption cross-section of the self-continuum. H₂O. (T=318K)
Figure 2. The total error of the retrieval Cs + DCs
Figure 2. The total error of the retrieval Cs - DCs
Figure 3. Air-broadened spectrum with continuum absorption (0-200 GHz)
Figure 3. Calculatedair-broadened spectrum (0-200 GHz)
Figure 3. Continuum absorption (2-200 GHz)
Figure 4
Figure 3. Calculations for the true bound dimer fraction
Figure 3. Free pair partial intensities
Figure 3. Metastable pair partial intensities
Figure 3. True bound pair partial intensities
Figure 5. Equilibrium constant for (CH₄)₂ dimer. True bound dimers calculated using ab initio PES
Figure 5. Equilibrium constant for (CH₄)₂ dimer. Calculations assuming isotropic Lennard–Jones potential
Figure 5. Equilibrium constant for (CH₄)₂. K
bound
PT
(T) by multiplying it by ratio Z₂
bm
/Z₂
b
Figure 3a. Experiment. (2v1+v2)II. T=297K, 3 amagat
Figure 3a. Sum of Lorentzians. 2v1+v2)II. T=297K, 3 amagat
Figure 3b. Experiment. (v2+2v3). T=297K, 3 amagat
Figure 3b. Sum of Lorentzians. (v2+2v3). T=297K, 3 amagat
Figure 4a. Experiment. (v1+v2)I. T=300K, 22 amagat
Figure 4a. Experiment. (v1+v2)I. T=300K, 31 amagat
Figure 4a. Experiment. (v1+v2)I. T=300K, 46 amagat
Figure 4a. Experiment. (v1+v2)I. T=300K, 67 amagat
Figure 4a. Experiment. (v1+v2)I. T=300K, 96 amagat
Figure 4a. Sum of Lorentzians. (v1+v2)I. T=300K, 96 amagat
Figure 4b. Experiment. (3v1+v3). T=300K, 20 amagat
Figure 4b. Experiment. (3v1+v3). T=300K, 49 amagat
Figure 4b. Experiment. (3v1+v3). T=300K, 92 amagat
Figure 4b. Sum of Lorentians. (3v1+v3). T=300K, 92 amagat
Figure 5. Experiment (2v1+v2)II. 3 amagat
Figure 5. Experiment (2v1+v2)II. 46 amagat
Figure 7a. Calculation ECS 3ν3 band. 20 amagat
Figure 7a. Calculation ECS-cc 3ν3 band. 20 amagat
Figure 7a. Experiment 3ν3 band. 20 amagat
Figure 7b. Calculation ECS 3ν3 band. 92 amagat
Figure 7b. Calculation ECS-cc 3ν3 band. 92 amagat
Figure 7b. Experiment 3ν3 band. 92 amagat
Figure 8. Calculation ECS 2ν1 + ν3. 20 amagat
Figure 8. Experiment 2ν1 + ν3. 20 amagat
Figure 9a. Calculation ECS (v1 + v2)I band. 20 amagat
Figure 9a. Calculation ECS-ec (v1 + v2)I band. 20 amagat
Figure 9a. Experiment (v1 + v2)I band. 20 amagat
Figure 9b. Calculation ECS (v1 + v2)I band. 46 amagat
Figure 9b. Calculation ECS-ec (v1 + v2)I band. 46 amagat
Figure 9b. Experiment (v1 + v2)I band. 46 amagat
Figure 9c. Calculation ECS (v1 + v2)I band. 92 amagat
Figure 9c. Calculation ECS-ec ( v1 + v2)I band. 92 amagat
Figure 9c. Experiment (v1 + v2)I band. 92 amagat
Figure 4. Burch D.E., et al. (1969). Коэффициент поглощения в крыле полосы 1.4 мкм СО2. Эксперимент
Figure 4. Кант полосы 6988.655 см-1
Figure 4. Коэффициент поглощения в крыле полосы 1.4 мкм СО2. наст расчет
Figure 5. Коэффициент поглощения, наст расчёт, РСО2=396 мбар, Т=290 К
Figure 5. Коэффициент поглощения, наст расчет, РСО2=1004 мбар, Т=290 К
Figure 5. Коэффициент поглощения, наст эксперимент, РСО2=1004 мбар, Т=290 К
Figure 5. Коэффициент поглощения, наст эксперимент, РСО2=396 мбар, Т=290 К
Figure 7. Коэффициент поглощения, наст расчет, РСО2=396 мбар, Т=290 К, разрешение 0.1 см-1
Figure 7. Коэффициент поглощения, наст расчет, РСО2=396 мбар, Т=290 К, разрешение 0.5 см-1
Figure 7. Коэффициент поглощения, наст эксперимент, РСО2=396 мбар, Т=290 К, разрешение 0.1 см-1
Figure 7. Коэффициент поглощения, наст эксперимент, РСО2=396 мбар, Т=290 К, разрешение 0.5 см-1
Figure 8a. Коэффициент поглощения, наст расчет с HITRAN-2004, РСО2=612 мбар, Т=290 К, 8300 cm-1
Figure 8a. Коэффициент поглощения, наст эксперимент, РСО2=612 мбар, Т=290 К, 8300 cm-1
Figure 8b. Коэффициент поглощения, наст расчет с HITRAN-2012, РСО2=612 мбар, Т=290 К, 8200 cm-1
Figure 8b. Коэффициент поглощения, наст эксперимент, РСО2=612 мбар, Т=290 К, 8200 cm-1
Figure 8b. Коэффициент поглощения, расчет с HITRAN-2004, РСО2=612 мбар, Т=290 К, 8200 cm-1
Figure 1. Burch D.E., et al. (1969) CO2, 1.4 mkm band. T=296 K
Figure 1. CO2, 2.7 mkm band. T=296 K
Figure 1. CO2, 4.3 mkm band. T=296 K
Figure 2. Burch D.E., et al. (1974, 1984). H2O 8-12 mkm band. T=296 K
Figure 2. Ptashnik I.V., et al. (2011). H2O 2-2.5 mkm band. T=296 K
Figure 2. Ptashnik I.V., et al. (2011). H2O 3-5 mkm band. T=296 K
Figure 3. Burch D.E., et al. (1974, 1984) (300-1200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Computation using function khi (2000-3500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Computation using function khi (400-1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Computation using function khi (4000-4500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Ptashnik I.V., et al. (1000-6000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Ptashnik I.V., et al. (2011). (2000-6000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10. Bicknell et al. (2006)
Figure 10. MT CKD v.2.5 model
Figure 10. Ptashnik et al. (2013, 289K, 5800-6600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10. This work
Figure 10. A.R.W.McKellar, et al. (1972)
Figure 10. D.A.Newnham, et al. (1998)
Figure 10. G.D.Greenblatt, et al. (1990)
Figure 10. Hermans (1998)
Figure 10. T.Wagner, et al. (2002)
Figure 10. This work
Figure 11. A.R.W.McKellar, et al. (1972)
Figure 11. D.A.Newnham, at al. (1998)
Figure 11. G.D.Greenblatt, et al. (1990)
Figure 11. Herman (1998)
Figure 11. This work
Figure 4. G.D.Greenblatt, et al. (1990)
Figure 4. Hermans (1998)
Figure 4. T.Wagner, et al. (2002)
Figure 4. This work
Figure 5. G.D.Greenblatt, et al. (1990)
Figure 5. Hermans (1998)
Figure 5. This work
Figure 6. A.R.W.McKellar, et al. (1972)
Figure 6. D.A.Newnham, et al. (1998)
Figure 6. G.D.Greenblatt, et al. (1990)
Figure 6. Hermans (1998)
Figure 6. K.Pfeilsticker, et al. (2001)
Figure 6. M.Sneep, et al. (2006)
Figure 6. T.Wagner, et al. (2002)
Figure 6. This work
Figure 7. D.A.Newnham, et al. (1998)
Figure 7. G.D.Greenblatt,et al. (1990)
Figure 7. Hermans (1998)
Figure 7. M.Sneep, et al. (2006)
Figure 7. R.P.Blickensderfer, et al. (1969)
Figure 7. This work
Figure 8. A.R.W.McKellar, et al. (1972)
Figure 8. D.A.Newnham, et al (1998)
Figure 8. G.D.Greenblatt, et al. (1990)
Figure 8. Hermans (1998)
Figure 8. K.Pfeilsticker, et al. (2001)
Figure 8. M.Sneep, et al. (2006)
Figure 8. T.Wagner, et al. (2002)
Figure 8. This work
Figure 9. A.R.W.McKellar, et al. (1972)
Figure 9. D.A.Newnham, et al. (1998)
Figure 9. G.D.Greenblatt, et al. (1990)
Figure 9. Herman (1998)
Figure 9. M.Sneep, et al. (2006)
Figure 9. R.P.Blickensderfer, et al. (1969)
Figure 9. This work
Figure 2. Burch D.E., (1982). (338K, 2400-2650 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Burch D.E., (1982). (428K, 2400-2700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Burch D.E., (1984). (384K, 2400-2700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Burch D.E., et al. (1984). (296K, 2400-2650 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Burch D.E., et al. (1984). (328K, 2400-2650 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Klimeshina T.E., et al. (2011). (296K, 2400-2700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Klimeshina T.E., et al. (2011). (328K, 2400-2700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Klimeshina T.E., et al. (2011). (338K, 2400-2700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Klimeshina T.E., et al. (2011). (384K, 2400-2700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Klimeshina T.E., et al. (2011). (428K, 2400-2700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Lower error bound (293K, 2000-3500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Lower error bound (350K, 2000-3500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Lower error bound (472K, 2000-3500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Present calculation (293K, 2000-3500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Present calculation (350K, 2000-3500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Present calculation (472K, 2000-3500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Ptashnik I.V., et al. (2011) (293K, 2000-3500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Ptashnik I.V., et al. (2011) (350K, 2000-3500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Ptashnik I.V., et al. (2011) (472K, 2000-3500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Ptashnik I.V., et al. (2011). Upper error bound (472K, 2000-3500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Upper error bound (293K, 2000-3500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Upper error bound (350K, 2000-3500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Baranov I., et al. (2011). (310.9K, 2000-3500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Baranov I., et al. (2011). (325.5K, 2000-3500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Baranov I., et al. (2011). (363.3K, 2000-3500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Baranov I., et al. (2011). Lower error bound (310.9K, 2000-3500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Baranov I., et al. (2011). Lower error bound (325.5K, 2000-3500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Baranov I., et al. (2011). Lower error bound (363.3K, 2000-3500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Present calculation (310.9K, 2000-3500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Present calculation (325.5K, 2000-3500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Present calculation (363.3K, 2000-3500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Upper error bound (310.9K, 2000-3500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Upper error bound (325.5K, 2000-3500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Upper error bound (363.3K, 2000-3500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. Baranov Yu.I., et al. (2008). (1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. Baranov Yu.I., et al. (2008). (1100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. Baranov Yu.I., et al. (2008). (900 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. Bogdanova Yu.V, et al. (2010). (1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. Bogdanova Yu.V, et al. (2010). (1100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. Bogdanova Yu.V, et al. (2010). (900 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. Burch D.E., et al. (1982, 1984). (1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. Burch D.E., et al. (1982, 1984). (1100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. Burch D.E., et al. (1982, 1984). (2400 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. Burch D.E., et al. (1982, 1984). (2500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. Burch D.E., et al. (1982, 1984). (2600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. Burch D.E., et al. (1982, 1984). (900 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. Present calculation (2400 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. Present calculation (2500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. Present calculation. (2600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. Ptashnik I.V., et al. (2011). (2400 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. Ptashnik I.V., et al. (2011). (2500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. Ptashnik I.V., et al. (2011). (2600 cm⁻¹
Figure 1a. Absorption coefficient of pure CO2 at 296 calculated with ECS approach, 22.65 Am
Figure 1a. Absorption coefficient of pure CO2 at 296K calculated with the present rCMDS model, 22.65 Am
Figure 1b. Absorption coefficient of pure CO2 at 296 calculated with ECS approach, 51.28 Am
Figure 1b. Absorption coefficient of pure CO2 at 296 calculated with the present rCMDS model, 51.28 Am
Figure 2a. Absorption coefficients obtained neglecting line-mixing l,294 K. 22.7 Am
Figure 2a. Absorption coefficients obtained with the rCMDS model, 294 K. 22.7 Am
Figure 2a. Measured absorption coefficients of pure CO2. 294 K. 22.7 Am
Figure 2b. Absorption coefficients obtained neglecting line-mixing, 294 K. 35.5 Am
Figure 2b. Absorption coefficientsobtained with the rCMDS model, 294 K. 35.5 Am
Figure 2b. Measured absorption coefficients [16] of pure CO2 294 K. 35.5 Am
Figure 2c. Absorption coefficient obtained neglecting line-mixing, 294 K. 51.3 Am
Figure 2c. Absorption coefficient obtained with the rCMDS model with special shifts, 294 K. 51.3 Am
Figure 2c. Absorption coefficient obtained with the rCMDS model, 294 K. 51.3 Am
Figure 2c. Measured absorption coefficients [16] of pure CO2. 294 K. 51.3 Am
Figure 3a. Absorption coefficients obtained neglecting line-mixing, 294 K. 20.6 Am
Figure 3a. Absorption coefficientsobtained with the rCMDS model, 294 K. 20.6 Am
Figure 3a. Measured absorption coefficients [16] of pure CO2. 294 K 20.6 Am
Figure 3b. Absorption coefficients obtained neglecting line-mixing, 294 K. 33.0 Am
Figure 3b. Absorption coefficients obtained with the rCMDS model, 294 K. 33.0 Am
Figure 3b. Measured absorption coefficients [16] of pure CO2. 294 K. 33.0 Am
Figure 3c. Absorption coefficients obtained neglecting line-mixing, 294 K. 56.7 Am
Figure 3c. Absorption coefficients obtained with the rCMDS model with special shifts, 294 K. 56.7 Am
Figure 3c. Absorption coefficients obtained with the rCMDS model, 294 K. 56.7 Am
Figure 3c. Measured absorption coefficients [16] of pure CO2, 294 K 56.7 Am
Figure 5. Absorption coefficients obtained neglecting line-mixing l, 473 K. 23.63 Am
Figure 5. Absorption coefficients obtained with the rCMDS model, 473 K. 23.63 Am
Figure 5. Measured absorption coefficients [16] of pure CO2 . 473 K. 23.63 Am
Figure 8a. Коэффициент поглощения, наст эксперимент, РСО2=612 мбар, Т=290 К, 8300 cm-1
Figure 8a. Коэффициент поглощения. Расчет с HITRAN-2004, Т=290K, РСО2=612мбар
Figure 8b. Коэффициент поглощения. Расчет с HITRAN-2004, Т=290 ,РСО2=612мбар
Figure 8b. Коэффициент поглощения. Расчет с HITRAN-2012; Т=290K, РСО2= 612 мбар
Figure 8b. Коэффициент поглощения. Экспериментальные данные, Т=290 ,РСО2=612мбар
Figure 5. MT-CKD 2.5 model (302K, 5800-6700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. MT-CKD 2.5 model (310K, 5800-6700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. MT-CKD 2.5 model (320K, 5800-6700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. MT-CKD 2.5 model (328K, 5800-6700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. MT-CKD 2.5 model (340K, 5800-6700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Present experiment (302K, 5800-6700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Present experiment (310K, 5800-6700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Present experiment (320K, 5800-6700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Present experiment (328K, 5800-6700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Present experiment (340K, 5800-6700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Bicknell, W.E., et al. (2006). (298K, 6100-6250 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. MT-CKD V2.5 model (296, 5500-7500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Mondeline, D., et al. (2013). (296K, 5500-7500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Ptashnik, I. V., et al. (2011). (293, 5500-5600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Ptashnik, I. V., et al. (2013). (289K, 5500-7500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Table 2. (302K, 5800-6700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Ptashnik et al. (2011, 350 K)
Figure 7. Ptashnik et al. (2011, 374 K)
Figure 7. Ptashnik et al. (2011, 402 K)
Figure 7. Ptashnik et al. (2011, 431 K)
Figure 7. Ptashnik et al. (2011, 472 K)
Figure 7. This work (302 K)
Figure 7. This work (310 K)
Figure 7. This work (320 K)
Figure 7. This work (328 K)
Figure 7. This work (340 K)
Figure 9. MTCKD V2.5 (302 K)
Figure 9. MTCKD V2.5 (340 K)
Figure 9. Ma, Q., et al. (2008). Spectral dependence of the Cs (340 K)
Figure 9. Ma, Q., et al. (2008). Spectral dependence of the Cs, (T=302 K)
Figure 9. Ptashnik et al. (2011, 296K). Water dimer simulation
Figure 9. This work (302 K)
Figure 9. This work (340 K)
Figure 4. Bicknell, W.E., et al. (2006). (298K, 6100-6200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. MT-CKD-2.5 model. (287K, 2000-8000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Mondeline, B., et al. (2013). (296K, 5800-6600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Ptashnik, I.V., et al. (2013). (289.5K, 2000-8000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. This work (287K, 2000-8000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Continuum absorption
Figure 1. Experimental recording (296K)
Figure 1. G.T.Fraser, et al. (1989). Water dimer transitions [9]
Figure 1. Water monomer
Figure 10. L.A. Curtiss, et al. (1979). Thermal conductivity measurement
Figure 10. Y. Scribano, et al. (2006). Calculation ab initio
Figure 10. Y. Scribano, et al. (2006). Modified calculation
Figure 10.Experiment for bound dimers
Figure 11. A.A. Vigasin (1991). Free pairs
Figure 11. A.A. Vigasin (1991). Metastable dimers
Figure 11. A.A. Vigasin (1991). True bound dimers
Figure 11. Free pairs (HT)
Figure 11. Free pairs (LT)
Figure 11. Free pairs (absolute value)
Figure 11. Metastable dimers (HT)
Figure 11. Metastable dimers (LT)
Figure 11. Metastable dimers (absolute value)
Figure 11. True bound dimers (HT)
Figure 11. True bound dimers (LH)
Figure 11. True bound dimers (absolute value)
Figure 11. True bound dimers
Figure 2. Y. Scribano, et al. (2007), A.F. Krupnov, et al. (2009). Calculated dimer spectrum
Figure 2. Model function (5)
Figure 3. Empirical continuum model. M.A. Koshelev, et al. (2011)
Figure 3. Experimental recording
Figure 3. Optimized model (11)
Figure 3. Water dimer transitions
Figure 6. Gaussian model
Figure 6. Lorentzian model
Figure 6. Water vapour continuum absorption
Figure 7. Convolution model obtained from 298 K, 12.1 Torr
Figure 7. Positions of water dimer transitions
Figure 7. Water vapour continuum absorption
Figure 10. Scribano Y., et al. (2007). Calculated dimer spectrum
Figure 10. Viktorova A.A., et al. (1971). Calculated dimer spectrum in the atmosphere
Figure 16. (25 C)
Figure 16. (38.0 C)
Figure 16. (48.8°C)
Figure 16. (6.7°C)
Figure 16. Fitting (25.0 C)
Figure 16. Fitting (38.0 C)
Figure 16. Fitting (48.8 C)
Figure 16. Fitting (6.7 C)
Figure 2. Leforestier C. (2014). Calculation (bounded and metastable dimers)
Figure 2. Calculation from assiciation theory (bounded dimers)
Figure 2. Curtiss L.A., et al. (1979). Experiment (bounded and metastable dimers)
Figure 2. From present experiment
Figure 2. Tretyakov M.Yu., et al. (2012). From virial coefficient (bounded and metastable dimers)
Figure 2. Y. Scribano, et al. (2006). Calculation (bounded dimers)
Figure 2a-Ar
Figure 2b-Kr
Figure 2c-Ne
Figure 2d
Figure 6-exp
Figure 6b
Figure 6c
Figure 3. A.Halkier, et al. (1999). CCSD(T)/CBS(T,Q)
Figure 3. CCSD(T)-F12a/aug-cc-PVTZ
Figure 3. CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVDZ
Figure 3. CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVQZ
Figure 3. CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVTZ
Figure 3. K.A. Peterson, et al. (1994). CCSD(T)/CBS(D,T,Q)
Figure 3. MP2/aug-cc-pVTZ
Figure 3. S.R. Bukowski, et al. (1999). SAPT
Figure 3a. A. Halkier, et al. (1999). CCSD(T)/CBS(T,Q)
Figure 3a. CCSD(T)-F12a-aug-cc-pVTZ
Figure 3a. CCSD(T)-F12b-aug-cc-pVTZ
Figure 3a. CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVDZ
Figure 3a. CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVQZ
Figure 3a. CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVTZ
Figure 3a. K. A. Peterson, et al. (1994). CCSD(T)/CBS(D,T,Q)
Figure 3a. MP2-aug-cc-pVQZ
Figure 3a. S.R. Bukowski, et al. (1999). SAPT
Figure 4. CCSD(T)-F12b/aug-cc-pVTZ
Figure 4. E=E
elec
+E
ind
+E
disp
Figure 4. TF/R⁷
Figure 4. TT/R⁶
Figure 4. aC/R⁸
Figure 4. aE/R⁸
Figure 4. aTT/R⁸
Figure 4. aa/R⁶
Figure 4a. CCDS(T)-F12b
Figure 4a. E
elec
+E
ind
+E
disp
Figure 4a. TT/R⁵
Figure 4a. aC/R⁸
Figure 4a. aE/R⁸
Figure 4a. aTT/R⁸
Figure 4a. aa/R⁶
Figure 2. CMDS calculations
Figure 2. W.B.Stone, et al. (1984) and I.R.Dagg, et al. (1985). Measurements
Figure 2a. CMDS calculations
Figure 2a. W.B.Stone, et al. (1984) and I.R.Dagg, et al. (1985). Measurements
Figure 2b. L. Gomez, et al. (2007).CMDS calculations
Figure 2b. W.B.Stone, et al. (1984) and I.R.Dagg, et al. (1985). Measurements
Figure 2. Yukhnevich G.V., et al. (1988). Absorption cross-section of water dimer.(300K, 15-1250 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Burch D.E. (1981) (296K, 300-1100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Lee M.-S., et al. (2008). Absorption cross-section of water dimer. (296K, 0-1100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. MTCKD-2.5 continuum model
Figure 2. Scribano Y., et al. (2007). Absorption cross-section of water dimer. (297K, 0-600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Vigasin A.A., et al. (1984). Absorption cross-section of water dimer. (300K, 200-1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. MTCKD-2.5 continuum model (296K, 1800-9000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Self-continuum cross-section. Ptashnik, I.V. et al. (2011, 2012) (293K, 1800-5600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. The far-wing model of Tipping, R.H., et al. (1995) (296K, 1800-8200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3a. MTCKD-2.5 continuum model (296K, 1800-9000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3a. Ptashnik I.V., et al (2011. 2012) (350-400K, 1800-5600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3a. Tipping R.H., etal. (199). The far-wing model (296K, 1800-9000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. CH₄ - N₂ pair potential. Ab initio. Angular configuration 1
Figure 1. CH₄ - N₂ pair potential. Ab initio. Angular configuration 2
Figure 1. CH₄ - N₂ pair potential. Ab initio. Angular configuration 3
Figure 1. CH₄ - N₂ pair potential. Ab initio. Angular configuration 4
Figure 1. CH₄ - N₂ pair potential. Ab initio. Angular configuration 5
Figure 1. CH₄ - N₂ pair potential. Ab initio. Angular configuration 6
Figure 1. CH₄ - N₂ pair potential. Ab initio. Angular configuration 7
Figure 1. CH₄ - N₂ pair potential. Ab initio. Angular configuration 8
Figure 1. CH₄ - N₂ pair potential. Ab initio. Angular configuration 9
Figure 1. CH₄ - N₂ pair potential. Ab initio.Angular configuration 10
Figure 1. CH₄ - N₂ pair potential. Fitting. Angular configuration 1
Figure 1. CH₄ - N₂ pair potential. Fitting. Angular configuration 2
Figure 1. CH₄ - N₂ pair potential. Fitting. Angular configuration 3
Figure 1. CH₄ - N₂ pair potential. Fitting. Angular configuration 4
Figure 1. CH₄ - N₂ pair potential. Fitting. Angular configuration 5
Figure 1. CH₄ - N₂ pair potential. Fitting. Angular configuration 6
Figure 1. CH₄ - N₂ pair potential. Fitting. Angular configuration 7
Figure 1. CH₄ - N₂ pair potential. Fitting. Angular configuration 8
Figure 1. CH₄ - N₂ pair potential. Fitting. Angular configuration 9
Figure 1. CH₄ - N₂ pair potential. Fitting. Angular configuration 10
Figure 1. Y.N. Kalugina,et al. (2009). CH₄ - N₂ pair potential. Angular configuration 1
Figure 1. Y.N. Kalugina,et al. (2009). CH₄ - N₂ pair potential. Angular configuration 4
Figure 2. Potential energy at MP2/aug-cc-pVDZ level (CH₄-CH₄)
Figure 2. Potential energy at MP2/aug-cc-pVDZ level (CH₄-CHF₃)
Figure 2. Potential energy at MP2/aug-cc-pVDZ level (CH₄-H₂O)
Figure 2. Potential energy at MP2/aug-cc-pVDZ level (H₂O-CHF₃)
Figure 3. Potential energy at MP2/aug-cc-pVTZ level (CH₄-CH₄)
Figure 3. Potential energy at MP2/aug-cc-pVTZ level (CH₄-CHF₃)
Figure 3. Potential energy at MP2/aug-cc-pVTZ level (CH₄-H₂O)
Figure 3. Potential energy at MP2/aug-cc-pVTZ level (H₂O-CHF₃)
Figure 2. Absorption coefficient PH2O=10 ppm PCO2=10 bar T=293 K
Figure 2. Absorption coefficient PH2O=10 ppm PCO2=20 bar T=293 K
Figure 2. Absorption coefficient PH2O=10 ppm PCO2=30 bar T=293 K
Figure 2. Absorption coefficient PH2O=10 ppm PCO2=40 bar T=293 K
Figure 6. Absorption coefficient PCO2=1 bar T=293 K
Figure 6. Absorption coefficient PCO2=10 bar T=293 K
Figure 6. Absorption coefficient PCO2=2 bar T=293 K
Figure 6. Absorption coefficient PCO2=20 bar T=293 K
Figure 6. Absorption coefficient PCO2=40 bar T=293 K
Figure 6. Absorption coefficient PCO2=5 bar T=293 K
Figure 8. Absorption coefficient PCO2=23.7 bar T=293 K
Figure 8. Absorption coefficient PCO2=24.3 bar T=293 K
Figure 8. Absorption coefficient PCO2=31.4 bar T=293 K
Figure 8. Absorption coefficient PCO2=35.0 bar T=293 K
Figure 8. Absorption coefficient PCO2=37.8 bar T=293 K
Figure 8. Average absorption coefficient T=293 K
Figure 8. Continuum absorption coefficient + far wing absorption [9]
Figure 8. Continuum absorption coefficient+ far wing absorption [9]
Figure 8. Upper bound of continuum absorption coefficient + far wing absorption [9]
Figure 1a. Transmittance. PCO2=14.9 Am, T=300 K
Figure 1a. Transmittance. PCO2=21.6 Am, T=300 K
Figure 1a. Transmittance. PCO2=31.3 Am, T=300 K
Figure 1a. Transmittance. PCO2=46.0 Am, T=300 K
Figure 1a. Transmittance. PCO2=64.5 Am, T=300 K
Figure 1b. Transmittance. PCO2=14.9 Am, PAr=0.0 Am, T=300 K
Figure 1b. Transmittance. PCO2=14.9 Am, PAr=29.7 Am, T=300 K
Figure 1b. Transmittance. PCO2=14.9 Am, PAr=80.6 Am, T=300 K
Figure 10. Baranov Yu.I. et al. (2011) (311K)
Figure 10. Bicknell et al. (2006) (298K)
Figure 10. MTCKD-1.3 (2006) (296K)
Figure 10. MTCKD-2.5 (2010) (296K)
Figure 10. Mondeline, D., et al. (2013) (296K)
Figure 10. Ptashnik I.V., et al. (2013) (289.5K)
Figure 10. Tipping, R.H., et al. (1995) (296K)
Figure 2. MTCKD-2.5 (296K)
Figure 2. Podobedov V.B. et al. (2008). Continuum (293K)
Figure 2. WD Lee M.-S., et al. (2008) (296K)
Figure 2. WD Scribano Y. et al. (2007) (297K)
Figure 2. WD Vigasin A,A, et al. (1966) (293K)
Figure 2a. Burch D.E. (1981) (296K, 300-1100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2a. Lee M.-S., et al., (2008) (296K). Water Dimer
Figure 2a. MTCKD-2.5
Figure 2a. Scribano Y. et al. (2007) (297K). Water Dimer
Figure 2a. Vigasin A.A et al. (1984) (300K). Water Dimer
Figure 2a. Yukhnevich G.V., et al. (1988) (300K). Water Dimer
Figure 3. Baranov Yu.I. et al. (2008) (310.8 K)
Figure 3. Baranov, Yu.I. et al. (2008) (325.8K)
Figure 3. Baranov, Yu.I. et al. (2008) (T=363.6K)
Figure 3. MTCKD-2.5 (311K)
Figure 3. MTCKD-2.5 (326K)
Figure 3. MTCKD-2.5 (363K)
Figure 3. MTL-2008 (311K)
Figure 3. MTL-2008 (326K)
Figure 3. MTL-2008 (363K)
Figure 8. Continuum. Burch D.E. (1985) (296K, 3000-4100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. Dimers (2008)
Figure 8. HITRAN – 2012
Figure 8. Local line contribution
Figure 8. MTCKD-2.5 continuum
Figure 9. Bound + Quasibound
Figure 9. Bound DW
Figure 9. Paynter D.J., et al. (2009) (1400-1900 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. Quasibound WD
Figure 9a. Bound + Quasibound
Figure 9a. Bound DW
Figure 9a. Paynter D.J., et al. (2009). Experimental continuum
Figure 9a. Quasibound WD
Figure 1. Bicknell W.E., et al. (2006)
Figure 1. Burch, D.E. (1982)
Figure 1. MT CKD calculation
Figure 1. Mondelain, D., et al. (2013)
Figure 1.Ptashnik, et al. (2011), Paynter, et al. (2009), Ptasnik, et al. (2013)
Figure 4. Ptashnik, I.V., et al. (2013)
Figure 4. Water vapor self-continuum absorption in the 50-9000 cm-1 range
Figure 4b
Figure 4c
Figure 4d
Figure 5. Calculation with the 2000-3500 cm⁻¹ line shape
Figure 5. Ptashnik, I.V., et al. (2011) (4900-8000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Ptashnik, I.V., et al. (2013) (289.5K, 4900-7600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5.Calculation with the 5600-6500 cm⁻¹ line shape
Figure 6. Original calculated results
Figure 6. Ptashnik, I.V., et al. (2011)
Figure 6. Quasi-bound dimer absorption coefficients
Figure 6. Stable dimer absorption coefficients
Figure 6a. Original calculated results
Figure 6a. Ptashnik, et al. (2011)
Figure 6a. Quasi-bound dimer absorption coefficients
Figure 6a. Stable dimer absorption coefficients
Figure 6b. Original calculated result
Figure 6b. Ptashnik, I.V., et al. (2011)
Figure 6b. Stable dimer absorption coefficients
Figure 1. Burch D.E., et al. (1984) (296K)
Figure 1. Ma Q., et al. (2000) (296K)
Figure 1. Rodimova O.B. (2003) (296K)
Figure 11. Baranov Yu.I. (2011). Experiment in the 3-5 mkm region
Figure 11. Baranov Yu.I., (2008). Experiment in the 8-12 mkm region
Figure 11. Burch D.E., et al. (1984) (296K, 300-1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 11. Calculation with 8-12 mkm line shape (296K, 400–6000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 11. Calculation with the 3-5 mkm line shape (296K, 400–6000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 11. Ptashnik I.V., (2012). Experimental curve in the 3-5 mkm region (296K, 2000-4000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 11. Ptashnik I.V., et al. (2011). Experiment in the 1.9-2.4 mkm region (431K, 4000-5000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 11. Ptashnik I.V., et al. (2012). Experiment in the 1.9-2.4 mkm region at 372 K
Figure 11.Calculation according to the MT-CKD 2.5 model
Figure 1a. H₂O + N₂. Burch D.E., et al. (1984) (430K, 700–1200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1a. H₂O + N₂. Ma Q., et al. (430K, 700–1200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1a. H₂O + N₂. Rodimova O.B. (2003) (430K, 700–1200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. H₂O+N₂. Baranov Yu.I., et al. (2012). Experimental continuum (326K, 800-1200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Baranov Yu. I., et al. (2012). Lower error bound of measurements
Figure 2. Baranov Yu. I., et al. (2012). Upper error bound of measurements
Figure 2. Baranov Yu.I., et al. (2012). Experimental H₂O+N₂ continuum
Figure 2. Burch D.E., et al. (1984). Experimental H₂O+N₂ continuum (700-1000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Klimeshina T.E., et al. (2013). H₂O+N₂ continuum. The ALWT calculation
Figure 2. MT-CKD model calculation
Figure 2. Peterson J.C., et al. (1979). H₂O+N₂ continuum
Figure 2. Peterson J.C., et al. (1979). H₂O+N₂ continuum
Figure 8. MT CKD 2.5 calculation
Figure 8. Present calculation
Figure 8. Ptashnik I.V,. (2012). Measured data
Figure 9. Baranov Yu.I. (2011)
Figure 9. MT CKD 2.5 calculation
Figure 9. Present calculation
Figure 4. Absorption coefficient, P=1600 Torr, T=296 K
Figure 4. Absorption coefficient, P=3200 Torr, T=296 K
Figure 4. Absorption coefficient, P=6400 Torr, T=296 K
Figure 4. Absorption coefficient, P=800 Torr, T=296 K
Figure 5a. Absorption coefficient, experiment, P=800 Torr, T=296 K
Figure 5a. Absorption coefficient, simulation, P=800 Torr, T=296 K
Figure 5b. Absorption coefficient, experiment, P=1600 Torr, T=296 K
Figure 5b. Absorption coefficient, simulation, P=1600 Torr, T=296 K
Figure 5c. Absorption coefficient, experiment, P=3200 Torr, T=296 K
Figure 5c. Absorption coefficient, simulation, P=3200 Torr, T=296 K
Figure 5d. Absorption coefficient, experiment, P=6400 Torr, T=296 K
Figure 5d. Absorption coefficient, simulation, P=6400 Torr, T=296 K
Figure 6a. The absorption coefficient measured by CRDS
Figure 6a. The simulations of the absortions of the local rovibrational lines
Figure 6b. Difference between AC(meas) and AC(simul)
Figure 8a. Simulations of the absortions of the local rovibrational lines with taking into account line mixing effects
Figure 8a. Simulations of the absortions of the local rovibrational lines without taking into account line mixing effects
Figure 8a. The absorption coefficient measured by CRDS, P=6400 Torr, T=296 K
Figure 8b. Resulting continuum absorption of CO2 obtained without taking into account line mixing effects
Figure 8b. Resulting continuum absorption of CO2 obtained with taking into account line mixing effects
Figure 3. Lorentz line form (10)
Figure 3. Truncated VVW and Lorentz line forms
Figure 3. Van Vleck—Weisskopf line form (9)
Figure 4. M.A. Koshelev, et al. (2011) (330K)
Figure 4. M.A.Koshelev, et al. (2011) (300K)
Figure 4. Van Vleck—Weisskopf line form 300K
Figure 4. Van Vleck—Weisskopf line form 330K
Figure 5. Leforestier, C., et al. (2010)
Figure 5. Present work
Figure 5a. C. Leforestier et al.
Figure 5a. Line form (12)
Figure 5a. Line form (14)
Figure 7. D. Mondelain, et al. (2014) (302K)
Figure 7. E.J. Mlawer, et al. (2012) (296K)
Figure 7. I. V. Ptashnik, et al. (2013) (289K)
Figure 7. I.V. Ptashnik, et al. (2011) (293K)
Figure 7. This work (298K)
Figure 7. W. E. Bicknell, et al. (2006) (298K) self+foreign
Figure 7. W.E.Bicknell, et al. (2006) (298K) self
Figure 8. E. J. Mlawer, et al. (2012)
Figure 8. I.V. Ptashnik, et al. (2011)
Figure 8. Linear extrapolation
Figure 8. This work (297 K)
Figure 9. E.J. Mlawer, et al. (2012) (296K)
Figure 9. I. V. Ptashnik, et al. (2012) (402K)
Figure 9. This work
Figure 1. Calculated CIA spectrum (126K)
Figure 1. Calculated CIA spectrum (228.3K)
Figure 1. Calculated CIA spectrum (300K)
Figure 1. Calculated CIA spectrum (78K)
Figure 1. Calculated CIA spectrum (98K)
Figure 1. E. H. Wishnow, et al. (1996) alpha (T=78K)
Figure 1. I. R. Dagg, et al. (1985). 10² alpha (T=126K)
Figure 1. N. W. B. Stone, et al. (1984) 10³ alpha (T=228.3K)
Figure 1. N. W. B. Stone, et al. (1985). 10⁴ alpha (T=300K)
Figure 1. P. Dore, et al. (1996). 10¹ alpha (T=93K)
Figure 3. Calculation, T=290 K, P=1004 mbar
Figure 3. Calculation, T=290 K, P=3011 mbar
Figure 3. Calculation, T=290 K, P=396 mbar
Figure 3. Calculation, T=290 K, P=612 mbar
Figure 3. Calculation, T=290 K, P=801 mbar
Figure 3. Experiment, T=290 K, P=1004 mbar
Figure 3. Experiment, T=290 K, P=3011 mbar
Figure 3. Experiment, T=290 K, P=612 mbar
Figure 3. Experiment, T=290 K, P=801 mbar
Figure 4. Calculation, T=290 K, P=1004 mbar
Figure 4. Calculation, T=290 K, P=3011 mbar
Figure 4. Calculation, T=290 K, P=396 mbar
Figure 4. Calculation, T=290 K, P=612 mbar
Figure 4. Calculation, T=290 K, P=801 mbar
Figure 4. Experiment, T=290 K, P=1004 mbar
Figure 4. Experiment, T=290 K, P=3011 mbar
Figure 4. Experiment, T=290 K, P=396 mbar
Figure 4. Experiment, T=290 K, P=612 mbar
Figure 4. Experiment, T=290 K, P=801 mbar
Figure 4. M. Y. Perrin and J. M. Hartmann, (1989). Experiment, T=290 K, P=1004 mbar
Figure 6a. M. Y. Perrin, et al. (1989). Deviations from a Lorentzian profile for the 1.4 mkm CO2 bands
Figure 6a. M. Y. Perrin, et al. (1989). Deviations from a Lorentzian profile for the 2.7 mkm CO2 bands
Figure 6a. M. Y. Perrin, et al. (1989). Deviations from a Lorentzian profile for the 4.3 mkm CO2 bands
Figure 6b. Deviations from a Lorentzian profile for the 1.2 mkm CO2 bands
Figure 6b. Deviations from a Lorentzian profile for the 1.4 mkm CO2 bands
Figure 6b. Deviations from a Lorentzian profile for the 2.7 mkm CO2 bands
Figure 6b. Deviations from a Lorentzian profile for the 4.3 mkm CO2 bands
Figure 7a. Absorption coefficient, T=193 K, present calculation
Figure 7a. R. Le Doucen, et al. (1985). Absorption coefficient, T=193 K, experimentulation
Figure 7b. Absorption coefficient, T=920 K, present calculation
Figure 7b. J.M. Hartmann, et al. (1991). Absorption coefficient, T=920 K, experiment
Figure 2. Method CCSD(T)-F12a/aVTZ gm=1.3
Figure 2. Method CCSD(T)-F12b/aVTZ gm=1.3
Figure 2. Method CCSD(T)/CBS(D,T,Q)
Figure 2. Method CCSD(T)/aVQZ+bf
Figure 2. Method CCSD(T)/aVQZ
Figure 2. Method CCSD(T)/aVTZ+bf
Figure 2. Method CCSD(T)/aVTZ
Figure 2. Method SAPT/aVQZ
Figure 2. Method SAPT/aVTZ
Figure 2a. Method CCSD(T)-F12a/aVTZ gm=1.3
Figure 2a. Method CCSD(T)-F12b/aVTZ gm=1.3
Figure 2a. Method CCSD(T)/CBS(D,T,Q)
Figure 2a. Method CCSD(T)/aVQZ
Figure 2a. Method CCSD(T)/aVTZ+bf
Figure 2a. Method CCSD(T)/aVTZ
Figure 2a. Method SAPT/aVQZ
Figure 2a. Method SAPT/aVTZ
Figure 2b. Method CCSD(T)-F12a/aVTZ gm=1.3
Figure 2b. Method CCSD(T)-F12b/aVTZ gm=1.3
Figure 2b. Method CCSD(T)/CBS(D,T,Q)
Figure 2b. Method CCSD(T)/aVQZ+bf
Figure 2b. Method CCSD(T)/aVQZ
Figure 2b. Method CCSD(T)/aVTZ+bf
Figure 2b. Method CCSD(T)/aVTZ
Figure 2b. Method SAPT/aVQZ
Figure 2b. Method SAPT/aVTZ
Figure 2c. Method CCSD(T)-F12a/aVTZ gm=1.3
Figure 2c. Method CCSD(T)-F12b/aVTZ gm=1.3
Figure 2c. Method CCSD(T)/CBS(D,T,Q)
Figure 2c. Method CCSD(T)/aVQZ+bf
Figure 2c. Method CCSD(T)/aVQZ
Figure 2c. Method CCSD(T)/aVTZ+bf
Figure 2c. Method CCSD(T)/aVTZ
Figure 2c. Method SAPT/aVQZ
Figure 2c. Method SAPT/aVTZ
Figure 2d. Method CCSD(T)-F12a/aVTZ gm=1.3
Figure 2d. Method CCSD(T)-F12b/aVTZ gm=1.3
Figure 2d. Method CCSD(T)/CBS(D,T,Q)
Figure 2d. Method CCSD(T)/aVQZ+bf
Figure 2d. Method CCSD(T)/aVQZ
Figure 2d. Method CCSD(T)/aVTZ+bf
Figure 2d. Method CCSD(T)/aVTZ
Figure 2d. Method SAPT/aVQZ
Figure 2d. Method SAPT/aVTZ
Figure 2e. Method CCSD(T)-F12a/aVTZ gm=1.3
Figure 2e. Method CCSD(T)-F12b/aVTZ gm=1.3
Figure 2e. Method CCSD(T)/CBS(D,T,Q)
Figure 2e. Method CCSD(T)/aVQZ+bf
Figure 2e. Method CCSD(T)/aVQZ
Figure 2e. Method CCSD(T)/aVTZ+bf
Figure 2e. Method CCSD(T)/aVTZ
Figure 2e. Method SAPT/aVQZ
Figure 2e. Method SAPT/aVTZ
Figure 2. Burch (1984)
Figure 2. Burch D.E., et al. (1974) (296K, 300-850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Present calculation
Figure 3. Curve 4
Figure 3. Curve 5
Figure 3. E. A. Serov, et al. (2014). Curve 2. Resolved water dimer spectra
Figure 3. Tretyakov, M Yu., (2014). Curve 1.
Figure 3. Tretyakov, M Yu., (2014). Curve 3.
Figure 4. Calculated bound dimer absorption
Figure 4. Tretyakov, M Yu., et al. (2014). Experimental absorption minus local contribution
Figure 5. I.V. Ptashnik (2011). Experimental H₂O self-continuum
Figure 5. Schenter, G. K., (2002). Bound dimer absorption
Figure 5. Schenter, G. K., et al. (2002). Quasi-bound dimer absorption
Figure 5. kLor*x line shape
Figure 2. Experimental spectrum of H₂O
Figure 2. MT-CKD-2.5 spectrum
Figure 2. Retrieved continuum spectrum
Figure 2. m-dimers spectrum. K
s
eq
=0.028 atm⁻¹
Figure 2. s-dimers + m-dimers spectrum
Figure 2. s-dimers spectrum. K
s
eq
=0.004 atm⁻¹
Figure 234. reteuiueie
Figure 2a. Experimental spectrum of H₂O
Figure 2a. MTCKD-2.5 spectrum
Figure 2a. Retrieved continuum
Figure 2a. m-dimers spectrum. K
s
eq
=0.028 atm⁻¹
Figure 2a. s-dimers + m-dimers spectrum
Figure 2a. s-dimers spectrum. K
s
eq
=0.004 atm⁻¹
Figure 3. Burch, D.E., et al. (1984) (296K, 2400 - 2800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. CI W.E.Bicknell et al. (2006), self, (298K)
Figure 3. CI W.E.Bicknell et al. (2006), total (298K)
Figure 3. CRDS D. Mondelain, et al. (2015) (298K)
Figure 3. D. Mondelain, et al. (2013) (296K)
Figure 3. D. Mondelain, et al. (2014) (302K)
Figure 3. FTS I.V. Ptashnik, et al. (2011) (293K)
Figure 3. FTS I.V. Ptashnik, et al. (2015) (287K)
Figure 3. FTS Yu.I.Baranov et al. (2011) (311K)
Figure 3. I.V. Ptashnik, et al. (2013) (289.5K)
Figure 3. MTCKD-2.5 (2010) (296K)
Figure 3. OF-CEAS (Grenoble, 2015) (297K)
Figure 3. R.H.Tipping et al. (1995) (296K)
Figure 5. Asymptotic (4250 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. D. Mondelain, et al. (2015) (4250 cm⁻¹, CRDS)
Figure 5. D. Mondelain, et al. (2015) (4250 cm⁻¹, OF-CEAS)
Figure 5. I.V. Ptashnik, et al. (2011) (4250 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. I.V. Ptashnik, et al. (2013) (4250 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. MT
C
KD 2.5 model (4250 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5a. D. Mondelain, et al. (2015) (4301 cm⁻¹, CRDS)
Figure 5a. D. Mondelain, et al. (2015) (4301 cm⁻¹, OF-CEAS)
Figure 5a. I.V. Ptashnik, et al. (2011) (4301 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5a. I.V. Ptashnik, et al. (2013) (4301 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5a. MT-CKD 2.5 model (4301 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5a. Temperature dependence of the form exp (D/kT) (4301 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5b. D. Mondelain, et al. (2015) (4723 cm⁻¹, OF-CEAS)
Figure 5b. I.V. Ptashnik, et al. (2011) (4723 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5b. I.V. Ptashnik, et al. (2013) (4723 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5b. MT-CKD 2.5 model (4723 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5b. Temperature dependence of the form exp (D/kT) (4723 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. I.V. Ptashnik, et al. (2013) (2400 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Burch, D.E., et al. (1984) (2400 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Burch, D.E., et al. (1984) (2500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Burch, D.E., et al. (1984) (2600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. FTS Baranov, Yu.I., et al. (2011) (2400 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. FTS Baranov, Yu.I., et al. (2011) (2600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. FTS Baranov, et al. (2011) (2500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. FTS I.V. Ptashnik, et al. (2011) (2400 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. FTS I.V. Ptashnik, et al. (2011) (2500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. FTS I.V. Ptashnik, et al. (2011) (2600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. D. Mondelain, et al. (2015), (5875 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. I.V. Ptashnik, et al. (2011), (5875 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. I.V. Ptashnik, et al. (2013), (5875 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. MT-CKD 2.5 model (5875 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7a. D. Mondelain, et al. (2015), (6121 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7a. I.V. Ptashnik, et al. (2011), (6121 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7a. I.V. Ptashnik, et al. (2013), (6121 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7a. MT-CKD 2.5 model (6121 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7a. W.E. Bicknell, et al. (2006), (6121 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7b. D. Mondelain, et al. (2015), (6665 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7b. I.V. Ptashnik, et al. (2011), (6665 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7b. I.V. Ptashnik, et al. (2013), (6665 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7b. MT-CKD 2.5 model (6665 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. CRDS D. Mondelain, et al. (2015) (298K)
Figure 8. FTS Baranov, Yu.I. (2011) (339K)
Figure 8. FTS I.V. Ptashnik, et al. (2012) (350K)
Figure 8. FTS I.V. Ptashnik, et al. (2012) (372K)
Figure 8. FTS I.V. Ptashnik, et al. (2012) (402K)
Figure 8. FTS I.V. Ptashnik, et al. (2012) (431K)
Figure 8. MTCKD-2.5
Figure 8. R.H.Tipping, et al. (1995). Far wings model
Figure 9. FTS I.V. Ptashnik, et al. (1046 hPa H₂O)
Figure 9. FTS with SCLS (665 hPa H₂O)
Figure 9. FTS with SCLS (900 hPa H₂O)
Figure 9. MTCKD-2.5
Figure 12a. Bicknell W., et al. (2006)
Figure 12a. MT CKD 2.5.2 model
Figure 12a. Mondelain et al. (2015)
Figure 12a. Ptashnik et al. (2012, 2013)
Figure 12a. This work
Figure 10. Height profiles of CH₄-Ar. (0< H <45 km)
Figure 10. Height profiles of CH₄-Ar. (75< H <100 km)
Figure 10. Height profiles of CH₄-CH₄. (0< H <45 km)
Figure 10. Height profiles of CH₄-CH₄. (75< H <100 km)
Figure 10. Height profiles of CH₄-N₂. (0< H <45 km)
Figure 10. Height profiles of CH₄-N₂. (75< H <100 km)
Figure 10. Height profiles of N₂-H₂. (0< H <45 km)
Figure 10. Height profiles of N₂-H₂. (75< H <100 km)
Figure 10. Height profiles of N₂-N₂. (0< H <45 km)
Figure 10. Height profiles of N₂-N₂. (75< H <100 km)
Figure 2. Configuration CBS(D,T,Q)
Figure 2. Configuration aug-cc-PVDZ
Figure 2. Configuration aug-cc-pVQZ+bf
Figure 2. Configuration aug-cc-pVQZ
Figure 2. Configuration aug-cc-pVTZ+bf
Figure 2. Configuration aug-cc-pVTZ
Figure 3. CBS(D,T,Q)
Figure 3. aug-cc-pVDZ+bf
Figure 3. aug-cc-pVDZ
Figure 3. aug-cc-pVQZ+bf
Figure 3. aug-cc-pVQZ
Figure 3. aug-cc-pVTDZ+bf
Figure 3. aug-cc-pVTZ
Figure 7. Calculated equilibrium constant for true bound CH₄-Ar dimer
Figure 8. Experimental zeroth spectral moment. P. Dore, et al. (1990)
Figure 8. Integration of the spectral profiles
Figure 8. The current work
Figure 9. The true dimer contribution to the total intensity of CH₄–Ar
Figure 1. Bicknell W.E. et al. [2006]
Figure 1. Bicknell et al. (2006)
Figure 1. Burch D.E., et al. (1984) Experiment (296K, 400-2640cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Fulghum S.F. et al. (1991)
Figure 1. MT-CKD₂.8 model
Figure 1. Ptashnik, I.V., et al. (2013) (289K, 1200-7500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Yu.I. Baranov, et al. (2011) (T=311K)
Figure 13. Bicknell, W. E. et al.(2006)
Figure 13. Bicknell, W. E., et al. (2006)
Figure 13. Burch D.E., et al. (1984) (296K, 2400-2640cm⁻¹)
Figure 13. Fulghum, S. F., et al. (1991)
Figure 13. MT-CKD₂.8 model
Figure 13. Mondelain, D., et al. (2014)
Figure 13. Mondelain, D., et al. (2015)
Figure 13. This work (CRDS)
Figure 13. This work (OF-CEAS)
Figure 13. Ventrillard, I., et al. (2015)
Figure 1b. Table 2. Self-Continuum Absorption Cross Sections of Water Vapor
Table 1c. Self-Continuum Absorption Cross Sections of Water Vapor
Figure 1d. Table 4. Self-Continuum Absorption Cross Sections of Water Vapor
Figure 21a. CRDS-DFB
Figure 21a. CRDS-ECDL
Figure 21a. MT-CKD₂.8 model
Figure 21a. The recom mended value
Figure 22a. CRDS-DFB
Figure 22a. CRDS-ECDL
Figure 22a. MT-CKD₂.8 model
Figure 22a. The curve corresponds to the recom mended values
Figure 4. Baranov, Y. I., et al. (2011) (2000-3100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Burch, D. E., et al. (1984) (T=296K, 2400-2630 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. MT-CKD₂.5 model
Figure 4. MT-CKD₂.8 * 0.55
Figure 4. MT-CKD₂.8 model
Figure 4. Ptashnik, I. V., et al. (2011) (T=293K, 2100-2350 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Ptashnik, I.V., et al., (2013) (289K, 2100-2700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. This work (T=296K)
Figure 5. Baranov, Yu.I., et al. Temperature dependence of the water vapor. (2011). (2288 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Burch, D.E., et al. (1984) (2400 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. D₀ slope (1100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. MT-CKD 2.8 model
Figure 5. Ptashnik, I.V., et al. (CAVIAR) (2290 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Ptashnik, I.V., et al. [2013]
Figure 5. This work OF-CEAS (2283 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. Bicknell, W. E., et al. (2006) CI
Figure 9. Bicknell, W. E., et al. (2006) CI
Figure 9. CRDS this work
Figure 9. MT-CKD₂.8 model
Figure 9. Mondelain et al. (2015) CRDS
Figure 9. Ptashnik, I. V., et al. (2011) FTS
Figure 9. Ptashnik, I. V., et al., (2013) FTS
Figure 9. Ventrillard, I.D., et al. (2015) OF-CEAS
Figure 4a. MT-CKD model
Figure 4a. Present experiment (1090-1340 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4a. Pure CO2 spectrum in arbitrary units
Figure 4b. The binary absorption coefficient at 1158 cm⁻¹
Figure 4b. The binary absorption coefficient at 1250.5 cm⁻¹
Figure 4b. The binary absorption coefficient at 1282.8 cm⁻¹
Figure 4b. The binary absorption coefficient at 1310 cm⁻¹
Figure 5a. Baranov Yu.I., (2011), Pure CO2 spectrum in arbitrary units
Figure 5a. Water–carbon dioxide continuum, experiment
Figure 5b. Temperature dependence of the binary absorption coefficients, (2806 cm-1)
Figure 5b. Temperature dependence of the binary absorption coefficients, (2825 cm-1)
Figure 5b. Temperature dependence of the binary absorption coefficients, (3138 cm-1)
Figure 6. Baranov Yu.I., et al. (1984). CO2+He
Figure 6. CO2+H2O present study
Figure 6. Cousin C., et al. (1985). CO2+N2(O2)
Figure 6. Le Doucen R., et al. (1985). Pure CO2
Figure 6. Sattarov H., et al. (1983). CO2+Ar
Figure 6. Sattarov H., et al. (1983). CO2+H2
Figure 6. The v3 CO2 band edge
Figure 2. Burch D.E. (1981)
Figure 2. Continuum in the 20-90 cm⁻¹ region
Figure 2. Extrapolation of the 20-90 cm⁻¹ continuum
Figure 2. Extrapolation of the millimeter wave continuum
Figure 2. MT CKD 2.5
Figure 2. Millimeter wave continuum.
Figure 2. The experimental continuum approximation
Figure 2. The experimental continuum
Figure 4. Approximation (2.73 mbar)
Figure 4. Approximation (5.3 mbar)
Figure 4. Continuum retrieved from spectra (2.73 mbar)
Figure 4. Continuum retrieved from spectra (5.3 mbar)
Figure 5. Podobedov V.B., et al. (2008). Experiment
Figure 5. Approximation of Burch's data
Figure 5. Approximation. Experiment. (14-35 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Approximation. Experiment. (40-200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Burch D.E. (1981) (15-50 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Burch D.E. (1981) (360-800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. MT-CKD model
Figure 5. Our data - continuum in the microwindows
Figure 5. Podobedov V.B., et al. (2008) (Calculation)
Figure 5. Slocum D.M., et al. (2015)
Figure 6. Continuum determined with the 100 cm⁻¹ cut-off
Figure 6. Continuum determined with the 25 cm⁻¹ cut-off
Figure 6. Leforestier C., et el. (2010)
Figure 6. Scribano Y., et al. (2007)
Figure 6. Total dimer absorption (bbd)
Figure 6. Total dimer absorption (dma)
Figure 5. Normalized absorption coefficient retrieved at 300 Torr
Figure 5. Normalized absorption coefficient retrieved at 500 Torr
Figure 5. Tonkov M.V., et al. (1996). Normalized absorption coefficient mesured at 20 amagat
Figure 5a. Collisions responsible for the formation of ordinary collisions
Figure 5a. Collisions responsible for the formation of metastable dimers
Figure 5a. Collisions responsible for the formation of stable dimers
Figure 5b. Collisions responsible for the formation of metastable dimers
Figure 5b. Collisions responsible for the formation of ordinary collisions
Figure 5b. Collisions responsible for the formation of stable dimers
Figure 6. Metastable dimers CO2-Ar
Figure 6. Stable dimers CO2 - Ar
Figure 6. Stable state of CO2+Ar
Figure 7a. Andreeva G.V, et al. (1990) (T=241K)
Figure 7a. Andreeva G.V., et al. (1990) (T=351K)
Figure 7a. Spectral function (T=241K)
Figure 7a. Spectral function (T=351K)
Figure 7b. Mariott, et al. (1984), ..., Dagg, et al (1986). Experimental results.
Figure 7b. Spectral function in the microwave region
Figure 7c. Andreeva G.V, et al. (1990) (T=295K)
Figure 7c. Calculated data. (T=295K)
Figure 1. LP with the added wings
Figure 1. LP with the wings cut off
Figure 1. Lorentz profile (LP)
Figure 1a. khi-function
Figure 2. Bound dimers
Figure 2. Experiment
Figure 2. Line wings
Figure 2. Metastable dimers
Figure 2. Model
Figure 2a. Bound dimers
Figure 2a. Experimental
Figure 2a. Line wing
Figure 2a. Metastable dimer
Figure 2a. Model
Figure 3. Bound dimers
Figure 3. Line wings
Figure 3. Metastable dimers
Figure 3. Model
Figure 3. Odintsova, T.A., et al. (2017). Experiment
Figure 3a. Bound dimers
Figure 3a. Experiment
Figure 3a. Line wings
Figure 3a. Metastable dimers
Figure 3a. Model
Figure 10. Approximate function recommended for the CO2 binary coefficient in the region
Figure 10. Binary coefficient from CRDS spectra recorded in this work
Figure 10. De Bergh C., et al. (1995). Constant value o obtain the best fit of the Venus spectra for the 1.74 mkm window
Figure 10. Snels M., et al. (2014). Binary coefficient
Figure 2. Extinction coefficient, 0.49 amagat
Figure 2. Extinction coefficient, 0.98 amagat
Figure 2. Extinction coefficient, 1.47 amagat
Figure 2. Extinction coefficient, 2.45 amagat
Figure 2. Extinction coefficient, 3.45 amagat
Figure 2. Extinction coefficient, 3.96 amagat
Figure 2. Extinction coefficient, 5.49 amagat
Figure 2. Extinction coefficient, 6.52 amagat
Figure 2. Extinction coefficient, 7.58 amagat
Figure 2. Extinction coefficient, 8.61 amagat
Figure 6a. CRDS spectrum, recorded for a density of 8.61 amagat
Figure 6a. The spectra simulations of the CO2 lines with the line mixing effects
Figure 6a. The spectra simulations of the CO2 lines without the line mixing effects
Figure 6b. (Obs.–Sim.) residuals , with the line mixing effects
Figure 6b. (Obs.–Sim.) residuals, without the line mixing effects
Figure 14. B. Mate, et al. (1999)
Figure 14. Theory exchange
Figure 14. Theory spin-orbit
Figure 5. Collinear
Figure 5. Collinear.
Figure 5. H-shaped
Figure 5. H-shaped.
Figure 5. Isotropic
Figure 5. Isotropic .
Figure 5. Isotropic..
Figure 5. T-shaped
Figure 5. T-shaped.
Figure 5. X-shaped
Figure 5. X-shaped.
Figure 1. Absorption spectra at Т = 300 K and РСО2 = 47 atm, L=8 m
Figure 1. Absorption spectra at Т = 300 K and РСО2 = 70 atm, L=16 m
Figure 1. Absorption spectra at Т = 300 K and РСО2 = 70 atm, L=8 m
Figure 2. Absorption spectra, calculated at omega_СО2=12*10^4 atm cm, Р_СО2=30 atm
Figure 2. Absorption spectra, calculated at omega_СО2=23*10^4 atm cm, Р_СО2=35 atm
Figure 2. Absorption spectra, calculated at omega_СО2=4*10^4 atm cm, Р_СО2=10 atm
Figure 2. Absorption spectra, measured at omega_СО2=12*10^4 atm cm, Р_СО2=30 atm
Figure 2. Absorption spectra, measured at omega_СО2=23*10^4 atm cm, Р_СО2=35 atm
Figure 2. Absorption spectra, measured at omega_СО2=4*10^4 atm cm, Р_СО2=10 atm
Figure 5. Absorption coefficient. T = 1200 K
Figure 5. Absorption coefficient. T = 1500 K
Figure 5. Absorption coefficient. T = 1800 K
Figure 5. Absorption coefficient. T = 2100 K
Figure 5. Absorption coefficient. T = 2500 K
Figure 4. Baranov Yu.I., et al. (2011), (311K, 2000-3000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Burch D.E., et al. (1984), (311K, 2400-2700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Campargue A., et al. (2016)
Figure 4. MT-CKD 3.0 model
Figure 4. Ptashnik I.V., et al. (2011), (287K, 2100-2850 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Ptashnik I.V., et al. (2013), (287K, 2100-2800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Ptashnik I.V., et al. (2015), (287K, 2100-2800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. This work
Figure 5. Burch D.E., et al. (1984) (2400-2650 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Campargue A., et al. (2016) (~2300 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. MT-CKD 2.4 model
Figure 5. MT-CKD 2.5 model
Figure 5. MT-CKD 3.0 model
Figure 5. This work (~2500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Baranov Y.I., et al. (2011, 2490 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Burch D.E., et al. (1971, 2490 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Burch D.E., et al. (1984, 2490 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Data MT CKD 3.0
Figure 6. Ptashnik I.V., et al. (2011) (2490 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Ptashnik I.V., et al. (2013) (2490 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Ptashnik I.V., et al. (2015, 2490 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Rocher-Casterline B.E., et al. (2011)
Figure 6. This work (2490 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. Ptashnik I.V., et al. (2011), (293K, 4200-5000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. Ptashnik I.V., et al. (2015), (287K, 4200-5500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. Ptashnik I.V., et al. (2013), (289.5K, 4200-5300 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. Bicknell W.E., et al. (2006)
Figure 9. Campargue A., et al. (2016) (4300-4400 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. Campargue A., et al. (2016) (4480-4550 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. MT-CKD 3.0 model
Figure 9. Mondelain D., et al. (2015) (~4720 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. This work (4425-4440 zm⁰¹)
Figure 9. Ventrillard I., et al. (2015) (2280 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. Ventrillard I., et al. (2015) (4200-4300 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9a. This work (4425-4440 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9a. This work (4425-4440 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9a. MT
C
KD 3.0 model
Figure 1. H. Tran, C., et al.(2018 ). Binary absorption coefficient, pure CO2+H2O, T=296 K
Figure 1. Binary absorption coefficients, CO2+H2O, T=323 K
Figure 1. H. Tran, C., et al. (2011 ). Binary absorption coefficient, pure CO2, T=296 K
Figure 1. J.-M. Hartmann, et al. (2011). Binary absorption coefficient, pure CO2, T=296 K
Figure 1. Y. I. Baranov, (2016). Binary absorption coefficient, CO2+H2O, T=323 K
Figure 1. Self-continuum absorption of water vapour (3007 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Self-continuum absorption of water vapour (4995.63 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Self-continuum absorption of water vapour (4998.98 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Self-continuum absorption of water vapour (5002.05 cm⁻¹)
Figure 1. Self-continuum absorption of water vapour (5006.67 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Ptashnik, I. V., et al. (2011), (293K, 2000-3200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Ptashnik, I. V., et al. (2015), (287K, 2000-3100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Ptashnik, I. V., et al. (2013), (289.5K, 2100-2700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Baranov, Y. I., et al. (2011), (311K, 2050-3100 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Burch, D. E., et al. (1984), (296K, 2400-2640 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Campargue, A., et al. (2016), (296.15K, 2490 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. MT-CKD 2.4 model (296K, 2000-3200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. MT-CKD 2.8 model (296K, 2000-3200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. MT-CKD 3.0 model (296K, 2000-3200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. MT-CKD 3.2 model (296K, 2000-3200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Richard, L., et al. (2017), (297.3K, 2490 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. This work (298.5K, 3000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. CRDS measurements (2015-18) (4200-5200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. MTCKD 3.0
Figure 6. MTCKD 3.2
Figure 6. Ptashnik et al., (2011) (293K, 4200-5200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Ptashnik et al., (2013) (289.5K, 4200-5200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Ptashnik et al., (2015) (287K, 4200-5200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6a. CRDS measurement. This work
Figure 6a. MTCKD 3.0
Figure 6a. MTCKD 3.2
Figure 7. Ptashnik, I. V., et al. (2011), (3000 cm⁻¹, CAVIAR)
Figure 7. Ptashnik, I. V., et al. (2011), (3000 cm⁻¹, CAVIAR high T)
Figure 7. Baranov, Yu. I., et al. (2011) (3000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. MT
C
KD 3.2 model
Figure 7. This work (3000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. exp(D₀/kT)
Figure 7a. Ptashnik, I. V., et al. (2011), (4301 cm⁻¹, CAVIAR)
Figure 7a. Ptashnik, I. V., et al. (2011), (4301 cm⁻¹, CAVIAR high T)
Figure 7a. Ptashnik, I. V., et al. (2013), (4301 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7a. MT-CKD 3.2 model
Figure 7a. This work (4301 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7a. exp(D₀/kT)
Figure 7b. Ptashnik, I. V., et al. (2011), (5006 cm⁻¹, CAVIAR high T)
Figure 7b. Ptashnik, I. V., et al. (2011), (5006 cm⁻¹, CAVIAR)
Figure 7b. Ptashnik, I. V., et al. (2013) (5006 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7b. MT-CKD 3.2 model
Figure 7b. This work (5006 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7b. exp(D₀/kT)
Figure 8. Baranov Yu.I., et al. (2015) (2000-3500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. Bicknell W.E., et al. (2006) (4500-6200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. Burch D.E., et al. (1984) (2100-2700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. MT-CKD 3.0 model
Figure 8. MT-CKD 3.2 model
Figure 8. Ptashnik, I. V., et al. (2011) (1600-5800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. Ptashnik, I. V., et al. (2013) (1500-7800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. Ptashnik, I. V., et al. (2015) (1900-7700 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. This work (2000-8500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Baranov Yu.I. (2016). Experiment (1100-1400 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Calculation with empirical khi factor (0-1600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Calculation with khi factor from Ma Q., et al. (2016) (0-1600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Present experiment (0-1600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. H₂O+CO₂. khee+-function, empirical
Figure 3. H₂O+CO₂. khee- - function, empirical
Figure 3. Ma Q., et al. (1992). H₂O+CO₂. khee+ function
Figure 3. Ma Q., et al. (1992). H₂O+CO₂. khee- - function
Figure 2. MTCKD-3.2 self-continuum model
Figure 2. Paynter D.J., et al. (2009) (296K, 1300-2900 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Paynter D.J., et al. (2009) (330K, 1300-2900 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Paynter D.J., et al. (2009) (351K, 1300-2900 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Ptashnik I.V., et al. (2016) (268.5, 1300-2000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Ptashnik I.V., et al. (2016) (278.8, 1300-2000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2. Ptashnik I.V., et al. (2016) (288.5, 1300-2000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2a. Mlawer E., et al. (2012) MT-CKD 3.2 self-continuum model
Figure 2a. Paynter D.J., et al. (2009) (296K, 3480-3960 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2a. Paynter D.J., et al. (2009) (317K, 3480-3960 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2a. Paynter D.J., et al. (2009) (336K, 3480-3960 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2a. Paynter D.J., et al. (2009) (351K, 3480-3960 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2a. Ptashnik I.V., et al. (2016) (268.5, 3480-3960 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2a. Ptashnik I.V., et al. (2016) (278.8, 3480-3960 cm⁻¹)
Figure 2a. Ptashnik I.V., et al. (2016) (288.4, 3480-3960 cm⁻¹)
Figure 3. Continuum (using MTCKD3.2)
Figure 3. Continuum (using Hitran2012+UCL + MTCKD3.2)
Figure 3. Continuum (using Hitran2012+UCL)
Figure 3. Continuum (using Hitran2016)
Figure 3a. Continuum (using MTCKD3.2)
Figure 3a. Continuum (using Hitran2012+UCL + MTCKD3.2)
Figure 3a. Continuum (using Hitran2012+UCL)
Figure 3a. Continuum (using Hitran2016)
Figure 4. (1548 cm⁻¹) Experiment
Figure 4. (1548 cm⁻¹) Fitting
Figure 4. (1548 cm⁻¹) MTCKD
Figure 4. (1614 cm⁻¹) Experiment
Figure 4. (1614 cm⁻¹) Fitting
Figure 4. (1614 cm⁻¹) MTCKD
Figure 4. (1691 cm⁻¹) Experiment
Figure 4. (1691 cm⁻¹) Fitting
Figure 4. (1691 cm⁻¹) MTCKD
Figure 4. (3618 cm⁻¹) Experiment
Figure 4. (3618 cm⁻¹) Fitting
Figure 4. (3618 cm⁻¹) MTCKD
Figure 4. (3666 cm⁻¹) Experiment
Figure 4. (3666 cm⁻¹) Fitting
Figure 4. (3666 cm⁻¹) MTCKD
Figure 4. (3720 cm⁻¹) Experiment
Figure 4. (3720 cm⁻¹) Fitting
Figure 4. (3720 cm⁻¹) MTCKD
Figure 4. (3848 cm⁻¹) Experiment
Figure 4. (3848 cm⁻¹) Fitting
Figure 4. (3848 cm⁻¹) MTCKD
Figure 5. Fitting of b-dimer model spectrum (272.8K, 1300-1960 cm⁻¹, K
eq
=0.036)
Figure 5. Fitting of q-dimer model spectrum (272.8K, 1300-1960 cm⁻¹, K
eq
=0.07)
Figure 5. The experimental continuum (272.8K, 1300-1960 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. The resulting total model (sum of b- and q-dimer) absorption
Figure 5a. Fitting of b-dimer model spectrum (277.8K, 3480-3960 cm⁻¹, K
eq
=0.027)
Figure 5a. Fitting of q-dimer model spectrum (272.8K, 3480-3960 cm⁻¹, K
eq
=0.075)
Figure 5a. The experimental continuum (272.8K, 3480-3960 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5a. The resulting total model (sum of b- and q-dimer) absorption
Figure 5b. Fitting of b-dimer model spectrum (288.4K, 1300-1960 cm⁻¹, K
eq
=0.031)
Figure 5b. Fitting of q-dimer model spectrum (288.4K, 1300-1960 cm⁻¹, K
eq
=0.076)
Figure 5b. The experimental continuum (288.4K, 1300-1960 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5b. The resulting total model (sum of b- and q-dimer) absorption
Figure 5c. Fitting of b-dimer model spectrum (288.4K, 3480-3960 cm⁻¹, K
eq
=0.022)
Figure 5c. Fitting of q-dimer model spectrum 288.4K, 3480-3960 cm⁻¹, K
eq
=0.076)
Figure 5c. The experimental continuum (288.4K, 3480-3960 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5c. The resulting total model (sum of b- and q-dimer) absorption
Figure 5d. Fitting of b-dimer model spectrum (296K, 1300-1960 cm⁻¹, K
eq
=0.024)
Figure 5d. Fitting of q-dimer model spectrum (296K, 1300-1960 cm⁻¹, K
eq
=0.070)
Figure 5d. The experimental continuum (296K, 1300-1960 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5d. The resulting total model (sum of b- and q-dimer) absorption
Figure 5e. Fitting of b-dimer model spectrum (296K, 3480-3960 cm⁻¹, K
eq
=0.020)
Figure 5e. Fitting of q-dimer model spectrum (296K, 3480-3960 cm⁻¹, K
eq
=0.071)
Figure 5e. The experimental continuum (296K, 3480-3960 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5e. The resulting total model (sum of b- and q-dimer) absorption
Figure 5f. Fitting of q-dimer model spectrum (351K, 1300-1960 cm⁻¹, K
eq
=0.01)
Figure 5f. Fitting of q-dimer model spectrum (351K, 1300-1960 cm⁻¹, K
eq
=0.04)
Figure 5f. The experimental continuum (351K, 1300-1960 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5f. The resulting total model (sum of b- and q-dimer) absorption
Figure 5g. Fitting of b-dimer model spectrum (351K, 3480-3960 cm⁻¹, K
eq
=0.007)
Figure 5g. Fitting of q-dimer model spectrum (351K, 3480-3960 cm⁻¹, K
eq
=0.03)
Figure 5g. The experimental continuum (351K, 3480-3960 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5g. The resulting total model (sum of b- and q-dimer) absorption
Figure 6. Buryak I., et al. (2015). Equilibrium constants of the bound water dimer
Figure 6. Equilibrium constants of the bound water dimer (1600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Equilibrium constants of the bound water dimer (3600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6. Scribano et al. (2006). Equilibrium constants of the bound water dimer
Figure 6. Serov et al. (2014) (Microwaves). Equilibrium constants of the bound water dimer
Figure 6a. Equilibrium constants of the quasibound water dimer (1600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 6a. Equilibrium constants of the quasibound water dimer (3600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Leforestier C. (2014). Total equilibrium constant (K
b+q
)
Figure 7. Ruscic B. (2013). Total equilibrium constant (K
b+q
)
Figure 7. Total equilibrium constant (K
b+q
), derived in this work (1600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Total equilibrium constant (K
b+q
), derived in this work. (3600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 7. Tretyakov, M.Yu, et al. (2012). Total equilibrium constant (K
b+q
)
Figure 7a. The ratio of the total equilibrium constant
Figure 8. Relative contribution of b-dimers among all dimer pairs in band (1600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. Relative contribution of b-dimers among all dimer pairs in band (3600 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. The average values of relative contribution of b-dimers in both bands
Figure 8a. Epifanov S., et al. (1997)
Figure 8a. RRHO (s=4.0; D
e
=1105)
Figure 8a. RRHO (s=6.5; D
e
=1105)
Figure 8a. Schenter G., et al. (2002). Classic partition function
Figure 8a. Schenter G., et al. (2002). Quantum partition function
Figure 8a. This work (average)
Figure 3. Mondelain D., et al. (2014)
Figure 3. Polynomial fit
Figure 3. This work
Figure 8. MT-CKD 2.5 model
Figure 8. MT-CKD 3.2 model
Figure 8. Mondelain D., et al. (2015) (297K, 4250 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. Ptashnik I.V., (2012). (400K, 4000-5200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 8. This work. Foreign-continuum cross-section, C
F
. (297K, 4400-5000 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10. A smoothing of the experimental values (50-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10. Experimental values (50-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10. Lower uncertainty of HITRAN parameters (50-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 10. Upper uncertainty of HITRAN parameters (50-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 11. Delta nu
wing
=11 cm⁻¹ (50-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 11. Delta nu
wing
=5.5 cm⁻¹ (50-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 11. Delta nu
wing
=88 cm⁻¹ (50-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 11. Experimental continuum (50-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Burch D.E. (1982) (10-50 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Furashov N.I., et al. (1996) (49-51 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Koshelev M.A., et al. (2011) (4-5 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Koshelev M.A., et al. (2018) (3-8 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. MT-CKD 3.2 model
Figure 4. Odintsova T.A., et al. (2017) (50-52 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Podobedov V.B., et al. (2008) (21-50 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Present data (15-36 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Scribano Y., et al. (2007) (2-60 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. Slocum D.M., et al. (2015) (50 cm⁻¹)
Figure 4. T. Kuhn, et al. (2002) (5-12 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. Burch D.E. (1982) (0-50 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. Burch D.E. (1982) (350-800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. Furashov N.I., et al. (1995) (0-800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. MT-CKD 3.2 model (0-800 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. Odintsova T.A., et al. (2017) (50-200 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. Podobedov V.B., et al. (2008) (20-80 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. Present data (50-500 cm⁻¹)
Figure 9. Slocum D.M., et al. (2015) (50 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Absorption cross section for the methanol-in-air (298K, 101575Pa, 4990-5009 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Absorption cross section for the methanol-in-air (298K, 26859Pa, 4990-5009 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Absorption cross section for the methanol-in-air (298K, 5490Pa, 4990-5009 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5. Absorption cross section for the methanol-in-air (298K, 833Pa, 4990-5009 cm⁻¹)
Figure 5.
Figure 12. Foreign continua Gauss-smoothed at 296K
Figure 12. Foreign continua smoothed 353K
Figure 12. Foreign continua smoothed at 296K
Figure 12. Foreign continua unsmoothed at 353K
Figure 12. Uncertainty of 296K continuum from baseline errors
Figure 15a. Bound water dimer
Figure 15a. Calculation
Figure 15a. Difference between observed and calculated data at 296°K
Figure 15a. Experimental
Figure 15a. Quasi-bound water dimer
Figure 15a. nu₁
,para
Figure 15a. nu₁
,perp
Figure 15a. nu₂
,para
Figure 15a. nu₂
,perp
Figure 15a. nu₃
,para
Figure 15a. nu₃
,perp
Figure 15a. nu₉
,perp
Figure 16. CAVIAR (T=293K)
Figure 16. CAVIAR (T=351K)
Figure 16. MT-CKD 3.2 (T=296K)
Figure 16. MT-CKD 3.2 (T=353K)
Figure 16. This work (T=296K)
Figure 16. This work (T=353K)
Figure 18. Difference between foreign continuum and Lorentz wings more than 100 cm⁻¹
Figure 18. Foreign continuum + base term + wing correction
Figure 18. MT-CKD 3.2
Figure 18. Paynter D.J. et al. (2009)
Figure 19. MT-CKD 3.2 calculation
Figure 19. Scaled foreign continuum from present work
Figure 19. Scaled smoothed Lorentz sum (smoothinglow-resolution band shape)
Figure 51a. Bound water dimer
Figure 51a. Calculation
Figure 51a. Difference between observed and calculated data at 296K
Figure 51a. Experimental
Figure 51a. Quasi-bound water dimer
Figure 51a. nu₁
,para
Figure 51a. nu₁
,perp
Figure 51a. nu₂
,para
Figure 51a. nu₂
,perp
Figure 51a. nu₃
,para
Figure 51a. nu₃
,perp
Figure 51a. nu₉
,perp
Figure 9. 10 x uncertainty
Figure 9. SC from air-broadened spectra
Figure 9. SC from self-broadened spectra
Figure 4. Fitting of our data (296K)
Figure 4. MT
C
KD₂.5 (296K)
Figure 4. MT
C
KD₃.2 (296K)
Figure 4. Ptashnik I.V. et al (2012)
Figure 4. This work (296K)
Figure 4. Binary absorption coefficient. Experimental data
Figure 4. Binary absorption coefficient. Method 1
Figure 4. Binary absorption coefficient. Method 2
Figure 4. Binary absorption coefficient. Method 3
Figure 4. Binary absorption coefficient. Method 4
Figure 4. Binary absorption coefficient. Sum of Lorentz curves
Figure 5. Binary absorption coefficient. Method 1
Figure 5. Binary absorption coefficient. Method 2
Figure 5. Binary absorption coefficient. Method 3
Figure 5. Binary absorption coefficient. Method 4
Figure 5. Binary absorption coefficient. Sum of Lorentz curves
Figure 5. Boissoles J.,et al. (1989). Binary absorption coefficient. Experimental data
Figure 5. Sattarov K,, et al.(1983). Binary absorption coefficient. Experimental data
Figure 11. Absorbance. Calculation with line-mixing, T=2360 K, P=16.5 atm
Figure 11. Absorbance. Calculation with line-mixing, T=2571 K, P=58.3 atm
Figure 11. Absorbance. Calculation with line-mixing, T=2665 K, P=45.2 atm
Figure 11. Absorbance. Calculation without line-mixing, T=2360 K, P=16.5 atm
Figure 11. Absorbance. Calculation without line-mixing, T=2571 K, P=58.3 atm
Figure 11. Absorbance. Calculation without line-mixing, T=2665 K, P=45.2 atm
Figure 11. Absorbance. T=2360 K, P=16.5 atm
Figure 11. Absorbance. T=2571 K, P=58.3 atm
Figure 11. Absorbance. T=2665 K, P=45.2 atm
Table 10. Dimer-based model coefficient. T=260K
Table 10. Dimer-based model coefficient. T=296K
Table 10. MT_CKD-3.2 ccoefficient. T=296K
Table 10. MT_CKD-3.2 coefficients. T=260K
Table 6. Water vapour self-continuum absorption. Empiric. T=398K
Table 6. Water vapour self-continuum absorption. Empiric. T=431K
Table 6. Water vapour self-continuum absorption. Experiment. T=398K
Table 6. Water vapour self-continuum absorption. Experiment. T=431K
Figure 9e. Experimental continuum - dimer
Figure 9f. Experimental continuum - dimer
Figure 9k. Experimental continuum - dimer
Figure 9l. Experimental continuum - dimer
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1c
Figure 1d
Figure 1a
Figure 1a
Figure 6. Burch et al.(1984,1985). Absorption coefficien (300-1000 cm-1, T=296K)
Figure 6. Values calculated with one line shape function
Figure 6. Values calculated with two line shape functions
Select composite plot
-------------------
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 4
Figure 1
Figure 3
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 4a
Figure 4b
Figure 4c
Figure 4d
Figure 3
Figure 1
Figure 4
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 5
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 2a
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 1
Figure 4
Figure 1
Figure 8
Figure 11
Figure 15
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 12
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18
Figure 2
Figure 1
Figure 6
Figure 4
Figure 1
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 1
Figure 5
Figure 2
Figure 1
Figure 4
Figure 4
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6a
Figure 6b
Figure 6c
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 6
Figure 6a
Figure 7a
Figure 7
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15a
Figure 15b
Figure 16a
Figure 16b
Figure 6
Figure 1
Figure 1a
Figure 1
Figure 3
Figure 1b
Figure 4
Figure 1
Figure 10
Figure 4
Figure 8
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 1
Figure 3
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 4
Figure 1
Figure 3a
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 4a
Figure 5
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 2
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 11
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1c
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1c
Figure 2
Figure 2
Figure 8
Figure 6a
Figure 6
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 1
Figure 8
Figure 1
Figure 5
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 3
Table 1
Figure 4
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 2
Figure 1b
Table 1
Figure 1c
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 2
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 3
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 4
Figure 1
Figure 5
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 1
Figure 5
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 2
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1c
Figure 2a
Figure 2b
Figure 2c
Figure 5
Table 1
Table 2
Figure 3
Table 1A
Table 1B
Table 1C
Figure 1
Figure 1a
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 5
Figure 2
Figure 1
Figure 3
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 2a
Figure 2b
Figure 2c
Figure 3a
Figure 3b
Figure 3c
Figure 2a
Figure 2b
Table 2
Figure 2c
Figure 3
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 1
Figure 3
Figure 9
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 1a
Figure 1
Figure 1
Table 1
Figure 2
Figure 6
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 13
Figure 13a
Figure 8
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1
Table 1a
Table 1b
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 5
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 1
Figure 4
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 4
Table 1
Figure 3
Figure 1
Figure 2
Table 3
Figure 4a
Figure 4b
Figure 4
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 5
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 10
Figure 13a
Figure 13
Figure 1a
Figure 1
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 1
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 2
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 3
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 8
Figure 7
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 2
Table 3
Table 5
Table 6
Table 3
Figure 2
Figure 1
Figure 1a
Figure 2a
Figure 2
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 4
Table 7
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 4
Figure 1
Figure 1
Table 1
Figure 5a
Figure 5b
Figure 5c
Figure 6
Figure 9a
Figure 9b
Table 2
Figure 2a
Figure 2b
Figure 2c
Table 3
Figure 3a
Figure 3b
Figure 3c
Figure 5
Figure 3
Figure 3a
Figure 3b
Figure 3c
Figure 1a
Figure 1
Table 1
Table 1
Figure 4a
Figure 4b
Figure 5a
Figure 5b
Figure 5c
Figure 6
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1
Figure 3
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 8a
Figure 8
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 5
Figure 2a
Figure 2
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1c
Figure 2a
Figure 2b
Figure 2c
Table 4
Table 5
Figure 4
Figure 4a
Figure 4b
Figure 4c
Figure 1a
Figure 1
Figure 1b
Figure 1c
Figure 1d
Figure 1a
Figure 1
Figure 1b
Figure 1c
Figure 1d
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3a
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 2
Table 1
Figure 1
Figure 1a
Table 1
Figure 1b
Figure 4
Figure 1
Table 1
Table 2
Figure 1
Figure 3
Figure 4a
Figure 4
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 1a
Figure 1
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1c
Figure 1d
Figure 1e
Figure 1f
Figure 1g
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 1
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1
Figure 1a
Figure 2a
Figure 2
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 2
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 1
Figure 19
Figure 19a
Figure 19b
Figure 20a
Figure 20
Figure 20b
Figure 20c
Figure 24a
Figure 24
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 1
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3a
Figure 3b
Figure 6
Table 1
Figure 2a
Figure 2b
Figure 2c
Figure 2
Figure 3a
Figure 3b
Figure 3
Figure 3c
Figure 4a
Figure 4b
Figure 4c
Figure 4
Figure 5a
Figure 5b
Figure 5c
Figure 5d
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 1
Figure 2a
Figure 2b
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 1
Figure 1
Table 1
Figure 3
Figure 5
Figure 7
Table 1
Figure 4a
Figure 4b
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 3a
Figure 3
Figure 6
Table 1
Figure 5a
Figure 5b
Figure 5c
Figure 1a
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 1
Figure 5
Figure 9
Figure 7
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 7
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 1
Figure 5a
Figure 5b
Figure 1
Figure 3
Figure 1
Figure 3
Figure 4a
Figure 4b
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 7
Figure 8a
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 11
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 1
Figure 8
Figure 11
Figure 1
Table 1a
Table 1b
Table 2a
Table 2b
Figure 2
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 2a
Figure 2b
Figure 5a
Figure 5b
Figure 6a
Figure 6b
Figure 8
Figure 2a
Figure 2b
Figure 1
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 7
Figure 1
Figure 3
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 4
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 7
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 3
Figure 3
Figure 1
Figure 2a
Figure 2
Figure 2b
Figure 2c
Figure 3b
Figure 3
Figure 3a
Figure 4b
Figure 4
Figure 4a
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 3
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4a
Figure 4
Figure 7
Figure 12a
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 14
Figure 16
Figure 1
Figure 2a
Figure 2b
Figure 2c
Figure 7
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 1
Figure 2a
Figure 5a
Figure 5c
Figure 6a
Figure 6b
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 4
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 10a
Figure 10b
Figure 2a
Figure 2b
Figure 3a
Figure 3b
Figure 3
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 4
Figure 6
Figure 8
Figure 10
Figure 8
Figure 5a
Figure 5b
Figure 7a
Figure 7b
Figure 9a
Figure 9b
Figure 9c
Figure 1
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1c
Figure 2a
Figure 2b
Figure 2c
Table 2
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 3
Figure 7a
Figure 7b
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 2
Figure 5a
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 8
Figure 1
Figure 5
Figure 10a
Figure 10b
Figure 7a
Figure 7b
Figure 9a
Figure 9b
Figure 5a
Figure 6a
Figure 7a
Figure 8
Figure 10a
Figure 10b
Figure 11
Figure 2a
Figure 2b
Figure 2
Figure 5
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7a
Figure 9
Figure 6
Figure 2a
Figure 2b
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 2
Figure 4
Figure 10a
Figure 10b
Table 2a
Figure 3a
Figure 3b
Figure 6
Figure 7a
Figure 7b
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 5a
Figure 5b
Figure 6a
Figure 6b
Figure 1
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 5a
Figure 5b
Figure 5a
Figure 5b
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 1
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 1
Figure 6
Figure 2
Figure 3a
Figure 3b
Figure 4a
Figure 4b
Figure 4c
Figure 4d
Figure 4e
Figure 5
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 1
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 1
Figure 3a
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 5a
Figure 2
Figure 6
Figure 1
Figure 3a
Figure 3
Figure 7
Figure 3a
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 3
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3a
Figure 3
Figure 10
Figure 2a
Figure 2b
Figure 4
Figure 6
Table 1
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 4
Figure 8
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 2a
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 6
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 2
Figure 2a
Figure 3a
Figure 3
Figure 3
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 4
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 2
Figure 4
Figure 6
Figure 8
Figure 10
Figure 13
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 4
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 5
Figure 3a
Figure 3
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 4a
Figure 4
Figure 5a
Figure 5
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 9
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 15a
Figure 15b
Figure 15
Figure 15c
Figure 17
Figure 17a
Figure 17b
Figure 17c
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 1
Figure 1b
Figure 1c
Figure 1d
Figure 1e
Figure 1f
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4a
Figure 4b
Figure 4
Figure 4c
Figure 5
Figure 6A
Figure 8A
Figure 17a
Figure 17
Figure 18
Figure 20
Figure 21
Figure 6B
Figure 7A
Figure 7B
Figure 7C
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 4
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 1
Figure 2a
Figure 2b
Figure 2c
Figure 2d
Figure 2
Figure 2e
Figure 2f
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 1
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1c
Figure 2
Figure 2a
Figure 2b
Figure 1
Figure 4A
Figure 4B
Figure 2
Figure 7a
Figure 7b
Figure 7c
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 6
Figure 4a
Figure 4
Figure 4b
Figure 5
Figure 5a
Figure 5b
Figure 7
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 3-17
Figure 3c-22
Figure 13
Figure 4
Figure 1a
Figure 1
Figure 10a
Figure 10b
Figure 13a
Figure 13b
Figure 4a
Figure 4b
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 2
Figure 2a
Figure 4a
Figure 4
Figure 3a
Figure 4a
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 7
Figure 7a
Figure 10
Figure 5
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 2a
Figure 2
Figure 2c
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 3
Figure 5a
Figure 5b
Figure 10
Figure 2
Figure 1
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1c
Figure 1d
Figure 1e
Figure 1f
Figure 1g
Figure 2
Figure 4
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 2
Figure 3a
Figure 3b
Figure 5a
Figure 5b
Figure 5c
Figure 5d
Figure 5e
Figure 6
Figure 2
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 6
Figure 6a
Figure 6b
Figure 4
Figure 5a
Figure 5b
Figure 3
Figure 8
Figure 4a
Figure 4
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 3a
Figure 3b
Figure 3c
Figure 7
Figure 2
Figure 3b
Figure 3c
Figure 3
Figure 3a
Figure 5
Figure 1
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 2b
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 3a
Figure 3b
Figure 3
Figure 3a
Figure 4a
Figure 4
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1c
Figure 1d
Figure 3a
Figure 3
Figure 5a
Figure 5b
Figure 5c
Figure 8a
Figure 8b
Figure 9a
Figure 9b
Figure 9c
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 6
Figure 10a
Figure 10b
Figure 5A
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8a
Figure 8
Figure 10
Figure 3
Figure 4a
Figure 4b
Figure 4c
Figure 4d
Figure 4e
Figure 4f
Figure 6a
Figure 6b
Figure 6c
Figure 1
Figure 6
Figure 1a
Figure 3a
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 1
Figure 1b
Figure 2c
Figure 1
Figure 7
Figure 9
Figure 2
Figure 13
Figure 10a
Figure 10b
Figure 11a
Figure 11b
Figure 12a
Figure 12b
Figure 12c
Figure 12d
Figure 3a
Figure 3b
Figure 6a
Figure 6b
Figure 7a
Figure 7b
Figure 7c
Figure 8a
Figure 8b
Figure 8c
Figure 9a
Figure 9b
Figure 9c
Figure 9d
Figure 3
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 2
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7b
Figure 7
Figure 7a
Figure 5
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 2
Figure 4
Figure 4a
Figure 5
Figure 5a
Figure 6b
Figure 6c
Figure 6а
Figure 1a
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 4
Figure 1
Figure 2a
Table 1
Figure 3
Figure 3
Figure 5
Figure 3a
Figure 3b
Figure 4a
Figure 4b
Figure 5
Figure 7a
Figure 7b
Figure 8
Figure 9a
Figure 9b
Figure 9c
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 7
Figure 8a
Figure 8b
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 10
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 2
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 2a
Figure 2b
Figure 2c
Figure 3a
Figure 3b
Figure 3c
Figure 5
Figure 8a
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 9
Figure 4
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 2
Figure 10
Figure 16
Figure 6
Figure 3
Figure 3a
Figure 4a
Figure 4
Figure 2
Figure 2a
Figure 2b
Figure 2
Figure 3a
Figure 3
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 2
Figure 6
Figure 8
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 2a
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 9a
Figure 10
Figure 1
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 6a
Figure 6b
Figure 1a
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 11
Figure 4
Figure 5a
Figure 5b
Figure 5c
Figure 5d
Figure 6a
Figure 8a
Figure 8b
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5a
Figure 5
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 1
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 6a
Figure 6b
Figure 7a
Figure 7b
Figure 2a
Figure 2
Figure 2b
Figure 2c
Figure 2d
Figure 2e
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 2a
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 5a
Figure 5b
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7a
Figure 7
Figure 7b
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 12a
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 8
Figure 10
Figure 1
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 9
Figure 13
Figure 21a
Figure 22a
Figure 4a
Figure 4b
Figure 5a
Figure 5b
Figure 6
Figure 2
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 5
Figure 5a
Figure 5b
Figure 6
Figure 7a
Figure 7b
Figure 7c
Figure 1
Figure 2a
Figure 2
Figure 3a
Figure 3
Figure 2
Figure 6a
Figure 6b
Figure 10
Figure 14
Figure 5
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 5
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 9a
Figure 9
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 3
Figure 6a
Figure 6
Figure 7b
Figure 7
Figure 7a
Figure 8
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 2
Figure 2a
Figure 3
Figure 3a
Figure 4
Figure 5a
Figure 5b
Figure 5c
Figure 5
Figure 5d
Figure 5e
Figure 5f
Figure 5g
Figure 6a
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8a
Figure 8
Figure 3
Figure 8
Figure 4
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 9
Figure 12
Figure 15a
Figure 16
Figure 18
Figure 19
Figure 51a
Figure 4
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 11
Table 6
Table 10
Figure 1
Figure 6
List of composite figures
Figures in scientific articles on spectroscopy contain a significant number of various plots. During the development of the system for workng with scientific graphics, we introduced the following terms: A primitive plot is one curve on a plane in Cartesian coordinates. All other plots are called composite plots.
In the GrafOnto system each composite plot is decomposed into a set of primitive plots. The plots obtained after the decomposition are indexed with the number of the original figure and an additional suffix. As a rule, this suffix consists of the Latin alphabet letters.
In the GrafOnto system one can search the set of all the original primitive plots as well as the set of primitive plots extracted from the composite plots.
Fig.1. An instance of a primitive plot
The composite plots presented in the GrafOnto system are divided into two types. The single-article composite plots contain only data sets obtained by the authors of the publication, or the ones that have not previously been published. Also there are multi-article composite plots, containing data from the articles published earlier along with the original data. There are two instances of each multi-article composite plot. The first instance contains the digitized values of the original publication data. The second instance along with the original data contains the data reconstructed from the plots from the articles referred to in the original paper.
Since all composite plots are decomposed into primitive plots, the researcher working in the GrafOnto system can compile his own composite plot from any combination of primitive plots. (One Amagat equals the density of a gas at normal pressure and temperature. It corresponds to a number density of 2.68943 X 10
19
cm
-3
for O
2
; 2.68808 * l0
18
cm
-3
for N
2
; 2.68946 * 10
19
cm
-3
for Ar (N.R.S. Circular No. 564).)
Рис.2. An instance of a composite plot
Scrolling of collection of published composite spectral figures
INTAS grants 00-189, 03-51-3394, RFBR grants 02-07-90139, 05-07-90196, 08-07-00318
